- 23 1月, 2018 5 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
The helpers added are: send_sig_mceerr force_sig_mceerr force_sig_bnderr force_sig_pkuerr Filling out siginfo properly can ge tricky. Especially for these specialized cases where the temptation is to share code with other cases which use a different subset of siginfo fields. Unfortunately that code sharing frequently results in bugs with the wrong siginfo fields filled in, and makes it harder to verify that the siginfo structure was properly initialized. Provide these helpers instead that get all of the details right, and guarantee that siginfo is properly initialized. send_sig_mceerr and force_sig_mceer are a little special as two si codes BUS_MCEERR_AO and BUS_MCEER_AR both use the same extended signinfo layout. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
The vast majority of signals sent from architecture specific code are simple faults. Encapsulate this reality with two helper functions so that the nit-picky implementation of preparing a siginfo does not need to be repeated many times on each architecture. As only some architectures support the trapno field, make the trapno arguement only present on those architectures. Similary as ia64 has three fields: imm, flags, and isr that are specific to it. Have those arguments always present on ia64 and no where else. This ensures the architecture specific code always remembers which fields it needs to pass into the siginfo structure. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
The function clear_siginfo is just a nice wrapper around memset so this results in no functional change. This change makes mistakes a little more difficult and it makes it clearer what is going on. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
The siginfo structure has all manners of holes with the result that a structure initializer is not guaranteed to initialize all of the bits. As we have to copy the structure to userspace don't even try to use a structure initializer. Instead use clear_siginfo followed by initializing selected fields. This gives a guarantee that uninitialized kernel memory is not copied to userspace. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Instead of jumpping while !is_compat_task placee all of the code inside of an if (is_compat_task) block. This allows the int i variable to be properly limited to the compat block no matter how the rest of ptrace_hbptriggered changes. In a following change a non-variable declaration will preceed was made independent to ensure the code is easy to review. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Now that copy_siginfo copies all of the fields this is safe, safer (as all of the bits are guaranteed to be copied), clearer, and less error prone than using a structure copy. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
- 16 1月, 2018 11 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Among the existing architecture specific versions of copy_siginfo_to_user32 there are several different implementation problems. Some architectures fail to handle all of the cases in in the siginfo union. Some architectures perform a blind copy of the siginfo union when the si_code is negative. A blind copy suggests the data is expected to be in 32bit siginfo format, which means that receiving such a signal via signalfd won't work, or that the data is in 64bit siginfo and the code is copying nonsense to userspace. Create a single instance of copy_siginfo_to_user32 that all of the architectures can share, and teach it to handle all of the cases in the siginfo union correctly, with the assumption that siginfo is stored internally to the kernel is 64bit siginfo format. A special case is made for x86 x32 format. This is needed as presence of both x32 and ia32 on x86_64 results in two different 32bit signal formats. By allowing this small special case there winds up being exactly one code base that needs to be maintained between all of the architectures. Vastly increasing the testing base and the chances of finding bugs. As the x86 copy of copy_siginfo_to_user32 the call of the x86 signal_compat_build_tests were moved into sigaction_compat_abi, so that they will keep running. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
The new unified copy_siginfo_from_user32 takes care of this. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
The function copy_siginfo_from_user32 is used for two things, in ptrace since the dawn of siginfo for arbirarily modifying a signal that user space sees, and in sigqueueinfo to send a signal with arbirary siginfo data. Create a single copy of copy_siginfo_from_user32 that all architectures share, and teach it to handle all of the cases in the siginfo union. In the generic version of copy_siginfo_from_user32 ensure that all of the fields in siginfo are initialized so that the siginfo structure can be safely copied to userspace if necessary. When copying the embedded sigval union copy the si_int member. That ensures the 32bit values passes through the kernel unchanged. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Nothing tests this define so just remove it. I suspect the intention was to make the uid field in siginfo 16bit however I can't find any code that ever tested this defined, and even if it did it the layout has been this way for 8 years so changing it now would break the ABI with userspace. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Having si_codes in many different files simply encourages duplicate definitions that can cause problems later. To avoid that merge the blackfin specific si_codes into uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h Update copy_siginfo_to_user to copy with the absence of BUS_MCEERR_AR that blackfin defines to be something else. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Having si_codes in many different files simply encourages duplicate definitions that can cause problems later. To avoid that merge the tile specific si_codes into uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Having si_codes in many different files simply encourages duplicate definitions that can cause problems later. To avoid that merce the frv specific si_codes into uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h This allows the removal of arch/frv/uapi/include/asm/siginfo.h as the last last meaningful definition it held was FPE_MDAOVF. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Having si_codes in many different files simply encourages duplicate definitions that can cause problems later. To avoid that merge the ia64 specific si_codes into uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h Update the sanity checks in arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c to expect the now lager NSIGILL and NSIGFPE. As nothing excpe the larger count is exposed on x86 no additional code needs to be updated. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
NSIGTRAP is 4 in the generic siginfo and powerpc just undefines NSGTRAP and redefine it as 4. That accomplishes nothing so remove the duplication. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
The addr_lsb fields is only valid and available when the signal is SIGBUS and the si_code is BUS_MCEERR_AR or BUS_MCEERR_AO. Document this with a comment and place the field in the _sigfault union to make this clear. All of the fields stay in the same physical location so both the old and new definitions of struct siginfo will continue to work. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
--EWB Added #ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI to arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c Changed #ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32 to #ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI in linux/compat.h CONFIG_X86_X32 is set when the user requests X32 support. CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI is set when the user requests X32 support and the tool-chain has X32 allowing X32 support to be built. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
- 13 1月, 2018 22 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
it's always __kernel_uid32_t Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Remove HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T Remove __ARCH_SIGSYS Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... having taught the latter that si_errno and si_code might be swapped. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
... at a cost of added small ifdef __ia64__ in asm-generic siginfo.h, that is. -- EWB Corrected the comment on _flags to reflect the move Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
We have never passed either field to or from userspace so just remove them. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
In preparation for unconditionally copying the whole of siginfo to userspace clear si_sys_private. So this kernel internal value is guaranteed not to make it to userspace. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
The header uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h appears to the the repository of all of these definitions in linux so collect up glibcs additions as well. Just to prevent someone from accidentally creating a conflict in the future. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
SEGV_PKUERR is a signal specific si_code which happens to have the same numeric value as several others: BUS_MCEERR_AR, ILL_ILLTRP, FPE_FLTOVF, TRAP_HWBKPT, CLD_TRAPPED, POLL_ERR, SEGV_THREAD_ID, as such it is not safe to just test the si_code the signal number must also be tested to prevent a false positive in fill_sig_info_pkey. I found this error by inspection, and BUS_MCEERR_AR appears to be a real candidate for confusion. So pass in si_signo and fix it. Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Fixes: 019132ff ("x86/mm/pkeys: Fill in pkey field in siginfo") Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Setting si_code to 0 is the same a setting si_code to SI_USER which is definitely not correct. With si_code set to SI_USER si_pid and si_uid will be copied to userspace instead of si_addr. Which is very wrong. So fix this by using a sensible si_code (SEGV_MAPERR) for this failure. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: b920de1b ("mn10300: add the MN10300/AM33 architecture to the kernel") Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Masakazu Urade <urade.masakazu@jp.panasonic.com> Cc: Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com> Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Call clear_siginfo to ensure stack allocated siginfos are fully initialized before being passed to the signal sending functions. This ensures that if there is the kind of confusion documented by TRAP_FIXME, FPE_FIXME, or BUS_FIXME the kernel won't send unitialized data to userspace when the kernel generates a signal with SI_USER but the copy to userspace assumes it is a different kind of signal, and different fields are initialized. This also prepares the way for turning copy_siginfo_to_user into a copy_to_user, by removing the need in many cases to perform a field by field copy simply to skip the uninitialized fields. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Unfortunately struct siginfo has holes both in the common part of the structure, in the union members, and in the lack of padding of the union members. The result of those wholes is that the C standard does not guarantee those bits will be initialized. As struct siginfo is for communication between the kernel and userspace that is a problem. Add the helper function clear_siginfo that is guaranteed to clear all of the bits in struct siginfo so when the structure is copied there is no danger of copying old kernel data and causing a leak of information from kernel space to userspace. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
The savings for copying just part of struct siginfo appears to be in the noise on modern machines. So remove this ``optimization'' and simplify the code. At the same time mark the second parameter as constant so there is no confusion as to which direction the copy will go. This ensures that a fully initialized siginfo that is sent ends up as a fully initialized siginfo on the signal queue. This full initialization ensures even confused code won't copy unitialized data to userspace, and it prepares for turning copy_siginfo_to_user into a simple copy_to_user. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Setting si_code to 0 results in a userspace seeing an si_code of 0. This is the same si_code as SI_USER. Posix and common sense requires that SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code. As such this use of 0 for the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI. Further use of si_code == 0 guaranteed that copy_siginfo_to_user saw a value of __SI_KILL and now sees a value of SIL_KILL with the result that uid and pid fields are copied and which might copying the si_addr field by accident but certainly not by design. Making this a very flakey implementation. Utilizing FPE_FIXME, siginfo_layout will now return SIL_FAULT and the appropriate fields will be reliably copied. Possible ABI fixes includee: - Send the signal without siginfo - Don't generate a signal - Possibly assign and use an appropriate si_code - Don't handle cases which can't happen Cc: Russell King <rmk@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Ref: 451436b7bbb2 ("[ARM] Add support code for ARM hardware vector floating point") History Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.gitSigned-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Setting si_code to 0 results in a userspace seeing an si_code of 0. This is the same si_code as SI_USER. Posix and common sense requires that SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code. As such this use of 0 for the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI. Further use of si_code == 0 guaranteed that copy_siginfo_to_user saw a value of __SI_KILL and now sees a value of SIL_KILL with the result that uid and pid fields are copied and which might copying the si_addr field by accident but certainly not by design. Making this a very flakey implementation. Utilizing FPE_FIXME, BUS_FIXME, TRAP_FIXME siginfo_layout will now return SIL_FAULT and the appropriate fields will be reliably copied. But folks this is a new and unique kind of bad. This is massively untested code bad. This is inventing new and unique was to get siginfo wrong bad. This is don't even think about Posix or what siginfo means bad. This is lots of eyeballs all missing the fact that the code does the wrong thing bad. This is getting stuck and keep making the same mistake bad. I really hope we can find a non userspace breaking fix for this on a port as new as arm64. Possible ABI fixes include: - Send the signal without siginfo - Don't generate a signal - Possibly assign and use an appropriate si_code - Don't handle cases which can't happen Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Ref: 53631b54 ("arm64: Floating point and SIMD") Ref: 32015c23 ("arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort") Ref: 1d18c47c ("arm64: MMU fault handling and page table management") Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Setting si_code to 0 results in a userspace seeing an si_code of 0. This is the same si_code as SI_USER. Posix and common sense requires that SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code. As such this use of 0 for the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI. Further use of si_code == 0 guaranteed that copy_siginfo_to_user saw a value of __SI_KILL and now sees a value of SIL_KILL with the result that uid and pid fields are copied and which might copying the si_addr field by accident but certainly not by design. Making this a very flakey implementation. Utilizing FPE_FIXME and TRAP_FIXME, siginfo_layout() will now return SIL_FAULT and the appropriate fields will be reliably copied. Possible ABI fixes includee: - Send the signal without siginfo - Don't generate a signal - Possibly assign and use an appropriate si_code - Don't handle cases which can't happen Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Ref: 9bad068c24d7 ("[PATCH] ppc32: support for e500 and 85xx") Ref: 0ed70f6105ef ("PPC32: Provide proper siginfo information on various exceptions.") History Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.gitSigned-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Setting si_code to 0 results in a userspace seeing an si_code of 0. This is the same si_code as SI_USER. Posix and common sense requires that SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code. As such this use of 0 for the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI. Further use of si_code == 0 guaranteed that copy_siginfo_to_user saw a value of __SI_KILL and now sees a value of SIL_KILL with the result hat uid and pid fields are copied and which might copying the si_addr field by accident but certainly not by design. Making this a very flakey implementation. Utilizing FPE_FIXME siginfo_layout will now return SIL_FAULT and the appropriate fields will reliably be copied. Possible ABI fixes includee: - Send the signal without siginfo - Don't generate a signal - Possibly assign and use an appropriate si_code - Don't handle cases which can't happen Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-metag@vger.kernel.org Ref: ac919f08 ("metag: Traps") Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Setting si_code to 0 results in a userspace seeing an si_code of 0. This is the same si_code as SI_USER. Posix and common sense requires that SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code. As such this use of 0 for the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI. Further use of si_code == 0 guaranteed that copy_siginfo_to_user saw a value of __SI_KILL and now sees a value of SIL_KILL with the result that uid and pid fields are copied and which might copying the si_addr field by accident but certainly not by design. Making this a very flakey implementation. Utilizing FPE_FIXME siginfo_layout will now return SIL_FAULT and the appropriate fields will reliably be copied. This bug is 13 years old and parsic machines are no longer being built so I don't know if it possible or worth fixing it. But it is at least worth documenting this so other architectures don't make the same mistake. Possible ABI fixes includee: - Send the signal without siginfo - Don't generate a signal - Possibly assign and use an appropriate si_code - Don't handle cases which can't happen Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Ref: 313c01d3e3fd ("[PATCH] PA-RISC update for 2.6.0") Histroy Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.gitSigned-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
While reviewing the signal sending on openrisc the do_unaligned_access function stood out because it is obviously wrong. A comment about an si_code set above when actually si_code is never set. Leading to a random si_code being sent to userspace in the event of an unaligned access. Looking further SIGBUS BUS_ADRALN is the proper pair of signal and si_code to send for an unaligned access. That is what other architectures do and what is required by posix. Given that do_unaligned_access is broken in a way that no one can be relying on it on openrisc fix the code to just do the right thing. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 769a8a96 ("OpenRISC: Traps") Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org Acked-by: NStafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
- 06 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Set si_signo. Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 0983b318 ("sh: Wire up division and address error exceptions on SH-2A.") Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-