- 14 10月, 2013 18 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
If the HCI commands related to the Set Connectable command fail we will get a non-zero status in the request completion callback. In such a case we must respond with the appropriate command status message to user space. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
This patch moves the responsibility of setting/clearing the HCI_CONNECTABLE flag to the request completion callback of the Set Connectable command. This will allow us to cleanly add support for LE Advertising hooks in later patches. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
This patch moves all the decisions of which HCI commands to send (or not to send) to the code between hci_req_init() and hci_req_run() this allows us to further extend the request with further commands but still keep the same logic of handling whether to return a direct mgmt response in the case that no HCI commands were sent. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Clearing the BT_SK_SUSPEND socket flag from the L2CAP core is causing a dependency on the socket. So intead of doing that, use a channel callback into the socket handling to resume. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The L2CAP core should not look into the socket flags to figure out the setting of defer setup. So introduce a L2CAP channel flag that mirrors the socket flag. Since the defer setup option is only set in one place this becomes a really easy thing to do. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The exposed socket information do not contain source or destination addresses. So adjust the header accordingly. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
There have been a lot of changes in the core Bluetooth handling lately. So it is a good idea to increase the module version. The module version is not used anywhere, but it makes debugging a little bit simpler if versions can be distinguished. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The L2CAP connectionless channels use SOCK_DGRAM and recvmsg() and need to receive the remote BD_ADDR and PSM information via msg_name from the recvmsg() system call. So in case the L2CAP socket is for connectionless channels, provide a msg_name callback that can update the data. Also store the remote BD_ADDR and PSM in the skb so it can be extracted later on. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
This allows to add a per socket msg_name callback that can be used for updating the msg_name information for recvmsg() system calls. This feature is used by another patch to support address information on L2CAP connectionless channels. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
There are few places where it makes sense to use l2cap_pi(sk) directly instead of assigning it to temporary structure. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Every socket protocol now stores its own address information. So just remove the generic src and dst fields since they are no longer needed. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The address information of RFCOMM sockets should be stored in its own socket structure. Trying to generalize them is not helpful since different transports have different address types. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The address information of SCO sockets should be stored in its own socket structure. Trying to generalize them is not helpful since different transports have different address types. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Instead of storing a pointer to the addresses for the HCI device and HCI connection, use them directly. With the recent changes to address tracking of HCI connections, this becomes simple. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The L2CAP socket structure does not contain the address information anymore. They need to be accessed through the L2CAP channel. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The L2CAP socket structure does not contain the address information anymore. They need to be accessed through the L2CAP channel. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The L2CAP socket structure does not contain the address information anymore. They need to be accessed through the L2CAP channel. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The L2CAP socket structure does not contain the address information anymore. They need to be accessed through the L2CAP channel. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 13 10月, 2013 15 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The L2CAP sockets can use BR/EDR public, LE public and LE random addresses for various combinations of source and destination devices. So make sure that getsockname(), getpeername() and accept() return the correct address type. For this the address type of the source and destination is stored with the L2CAP channel information. The stored address type is not the one specific for the HCI protocol. It is the address type used for the L2CAP sockets and the management interface. The underlying HCI connections store the HCI address type. If needed, it gets converted to the socket address type. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
With the effort of abstracting the L2CAP socket from the underlying L2CAP channel it is important to store the source and destination address information directly in the L2CAP channel structure. Direct access to the HCI connection address information is not possible since they might not be avaiable at L2CAP channel creation time. The address information will be updated when the underlying BR/EDR or LE connection status changes. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When having LE connections, the source address is not always the public address of the controller. So update the socket address based on the actual used source address of the HCI connection. This also remove the pointless source address pointer and adds a proper lock around the socket structure. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The SMP source code has a few coding style violations. Fix them up all at once. No actual code has changed. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The smp_c1() so far always assumed public addresses as input for its operation. However it should provide actually the source address type of the actual connection. Finally the source address type is tracked in hci_conn->src_type and so use that one as input. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The source address is now stored in hci_conn->src and so use that one for L2CAP functions. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The source address is now stored in hci_conn->src and so use that one for SMP functions. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The incoming LE connections do not have a proper source address and address type set. The connection needs to be set with the same values as used for advertising parameters. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The source addressed was based on the public address of the HCI device, but with LE connections this not always the case. For example single mode LE-only controllers would use a static random address. And this address is configured by userspace. To not complicate the lookup of what kind of address is in use, store the correct source address for each HCI connection. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When establishing LE connections, it is possible to use a public address (if available) or a random address. The type of address is only known when creating connections, so make sure it is stored in hci_conn structure. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The bdaddr_to_le() function tries to convert the internal address type to one that matches the HCI address type for LE. It does not handle any address types not used by LE and in the end just make the code a lot harder to read. So instead of just hiding behind a magic function, just convert the internal address type where it needs to be converted. And it turns out that these are only two cases anyway. One when creating new LE connections and the other when loading the long term keys. In both cases this makes it more clear on what it going on. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The l2cap_conn->src and l2cap_conn->dst pointers are no longer in use and so just remove them. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The l2cap_conn->src and l2cap_conn->dst addresses are just a pointers to hci_conn structure. Use hci_conn->hdev->bdaddr and hci_conn->dst directly instead. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The l2cap_conn->src and l2cap_conn->dst addresses are just a pointer to hci_conn->hdev->bdaddr and hci_conn->dst structures. Use the data provided by hci_conn directly. This is done for hci_conn->dst_type already anyway and with this change it makes it a lot clearer were the address information comes from. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The l2cap_conn->dst address is just a pointer into the hci_conn->dst structure. Use hci_conn->dst directly instead. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 12 10月, 2013 7 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The unicast connectionless data reception feature is actually support and has been supported all along. Mark it as supported in the L2CAP features bitmask. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The implementation actually supports the L2CAP connectionless data channel. So set it as supported in the fixed channels bitmask. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The PSM 0x0021 is dedicated to the 3D profile and has permission to use security mode 4 level 0 for L2CAP connectionless unicast data transfers. When establishing a L2CAP connectionless channel on PSM 0x0021, it will no longer force Secure Simple Pairing. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The exception for certain PSM channels when it comes to security mode 4 level 0 should only be checked when actually a connection oriented channel is established. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The put_unaligned() for setting the PSM is missing the (__le16 *) cast. Without this, the PSM information transmitted over the air are bogus. In addition, print the used PSM value in the debug message so this becomes easier to debug in the future. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The 1st generation of BlueFRITZ! devices from AVM Berlin pretend to be HCI version 1.2 controllers, but they are not. They are simple Bluetooth 1.1 devices. Since this company never created any newer controllers, it is safe to use the manufacturer ID instead of an USB quirk. < HCI Command: Read Page Scan Activity (0x03|0x001b) plen 0 > HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 8 Read Page Scan Activity (0x03|0x001b) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) Interval: 1280.000 msec (0x0800) Window: 21.250 msec (0x0022) < HCI Command: Read Page Scan Type (0x03|0x0046) plen 0 > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 Read Page Scan Type (0x03|0x0046) ncmd 1 Status: Unknown HCI Command (0x01) Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When adding support for MGMT_OP_SET_SCAN_PARAMS command the addition to the supported commands list has been forgotten. This is needed for userspace to detect if the command is supported or not. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-