Try and describe what this code is about..
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

When building the overlapping groups we need to attach a consistent
sched_group_capacity structure. That is, all 'identical' sched_group's
should have the _same_ sched_group_capacity.

This can (once again) be demonstrated with a topology like:

  node   0   1   2   3
    0:  10  20  30  20
    1:  20  10  20  30
    2:  30  20  10  20
    3:  20  30  20  10

But we need at least 2 CPUs per node for this to show up, after all,
if there is only one CPU per node, our CPU @i is per definition a
unique CPU that reaches this domain (aka balance-cpu).

Given the above NUMA topo and 2 CPUs per node:

  [] CPU0 attaching sched-domain(s):
  []  domain-0: span=0,4 level=DIE
  []   groups: 0:{ span=0 }, 4:{ span=4 }
  []   domain-1: span=0-1,3-5,7 level=NUMA
  []    groups: 0:{ span=0,4 mask=0,4 cap=2048 }, 1:{ span=1,5 mask=1,5 cap=2048 }, 3:{ span=3,7 mask=3,7 cap=2048 }
  []    domain-2: span=0-7 level=NUMA
  []     groups: 0:{ span=0-1,3-5,7 mask=0,4 cap=6144 }, 2:{ span=1-3,5-7 mask=2,6 cap=6144 }
  [] CPU1 attaching sched-domain(s):
  []  domain-0: span=1,5 level=DIE
  []   groups: 1:{ span=1 }, 5:{ span=5 }
  []   domain-1: span=0-2,4-6 level=NUMA
  []    groups: 1:{ span=1,5 mask=1,5 cap=2048 }, 2:{ span=2,6 mask=2,6 cap=2048 }, 4:{ span=0,4 mask=0,4 cap=2048 }
  []    domain-2: span=0-7 level=NUMA
  []     groups: 1:{ span=0-2,4-6 mask=1,5 cap=6144 }, 3:{ span=0,2-4,6-7 mask=3,7 cap=6144 }

Observe how CPU0-domain1-group0 and CPU1-domain1-group4 are the
'same' but have a different id (0 vs 4).

To fix this, use the group balance CPU to select the SGC. This means
we have to compute the full mask for each CPU and require a second
temporary mask to store the group mask in (it otherwise lives in the
SGC).

The fixed topology looks like:

  [] CPU0 attaching sched-domain(s):
  []  domain-0: span=0,4 level=DIE
  []   groups: 0:{ span=0 }, 4:{ span=4 }
  []   domain-1: span=0-1,3-5,7 level=NUMA
  []    groups: 0:{ span=0,4 mask=0,4 cap=2048 }, 1:{ span=1,5 mask=1,5 cap=2048 }, 3:{ span=3,7 mask=3,7 cap=2048 }
  []    domain-2: span=0-7 level=NUMA
  []     groups: 0:{ span=0-1,3-5,7 mask=0,4 cap=6144 }, 2:{ span=1-3,5-7 mask=2,6 cap=6144 }
  [] CPU1 attaching sched-domain(s):
  []  domain-0: span=1,5 level=DIE
  []   groups: 1:{ span=1 }, 5:{ span=5 }
  []   domain-1: span=0-2,4-6 level=NUMA
  []    groups: 1:{ span=1,5 mask=1,5 cap=2048 }, 2:{ span=2,6 mask=2,6 cap=2048 }, 0:{ span=0,4 mask=0,4 cap=2048 }
  []    domain-2: span=0-7 level=NUMA
  []     groups: 1:{ span=0-2,4-6 mask=1,5 cap=6144 }, 3:{ span=0,2-4,6-7 mask=3,7 cap=6144 }
Debugged-by: NLauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: e3589f6c ("sched: Allow for overlapping sched_domain spans")
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Add sgc::id to easier spot domain construction issues.

Take the opportunity to slightly rework the group printing, because
adding more "(id: %d)" strings makes the entire thing very hard to
read. Also the individual groups are very hard to separate, so add
explicit visual grouping, which allows replacing all the "(%s: %d)"
format things with shorter "%s=%d" variants.

Then fix up some inconsistencies in surrounding prints for domains.

The end result looks like:

  [] CPU0 attaching sched-domain(s):
  []  domain-0: span=0,4 level=DIE
  []   groups: 0:{ span=0 }, 4:{ span=4 }
  []   domain-1: span=0-1,3-5,7 level=NUMA
  []    groups: 0:{ span=0,4 mask=0,4 cap=2048 }, 1:{ span=1,5 mask=1,5 cap=2048 }, 3:{ span=3,7 mask=3,7 cap=2048 }
  []    domain-2: span=0-7 level=NUMA
  []     groups: 0:{ span=0-1,3-5,7 mask=0,4 cap=6144 }, 2:{ span=1-3,5-7 mask=2,6 cap=6144 }
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Move the allocation of topology specific cpumasks into the topology
code.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The point of sched_group_mask is to select those CPUs from
sched_group_cpus that can actually arrive at this balance domain.

The current code gets it wrong, as can be readily demonstrated with a
topology like:

  node   0   1   2   3
    0:  10  20  30  20
    1:  20  10  20  30
    2:  30  20  10  20
    3:  20  30  20  10

Where (for example) domain 1 on CPU1 ends up with a mask that includes
CPU0:

  [] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
  []  domain 0: span 0-2 level NUMA
  []   groups: 1 (mask: 1), 2, 0
  []   domain 1: span 0-3 level NUMA
  []    groups: 0-2 (mask: 0-2) (cpu_capacity: 3072), 0,2-3 (cpu_capacity: 3072)

This causes sched_balance_cpu() to compute the wrong CPU and
consequently should_we_balance() will terminate early resulting in
missed load-balance opportunities.

The fixed topology looks like:

  [] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
  []  domain 0: span 0-2 level NUMA
  []   groups: 1 (mask: 1), 2, 0
  []   domain 1: span 0-3 level NUMA
  []    groups: 0-2 (mask: 1) (cpu_capacity: 3072), 0,2-3 (cpu_capacity: 3072)

(note: this relies on OVERLAP domains to always have children, this is
 true because the regular topology domains are still here -- this is
 before degenerate trimming)
Debugged-by: NLauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: e3589f6c ("sched: Allow for overlapping sched_domain spans")
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Its an obsolete debug mechanism and future code wants to rely on
properties this undermines.

Namely, it would be good to assume that SD_OVERLAP domains have
children, but if we build the entire hierarchy with SD_OVERLAP this is
obviously false.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Signed-off-by: NLauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: lwang@redhat.com
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1492717903-5195-4-git-send-email-lvenanci@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The group mask is always used in intersection with the group CPUs. So,
when building the group mask, we don't have to care about CPUs that are
not part of the group.
Signed-off-by: NLauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: lwang@redhat.com
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1492717903-5195-2-git-send-email-lvenanci@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

We want sched_groups to be sibling child domains (or individual CPUs
when there are no child domains). Furthermore, since the first group
of a domain should include the CPU of that domain, the first group of
each domain should match the child domain.

Verify this is indeed so.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

In order to determine the balance_cpu (for should_we_balance()) we need
the sched_group_mask() for overlapping domains.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Now that the first group will always be the previous domain of this
@cpu this can be simplified.

In fact, writing the code now removed should've been a big clue I was
doing it wrong :/
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

When building the overlapping groups, we very obviously should start
with the previous domain of _this_ @cpu, not CPU-0.

This can be readily demonstrated with a topology like:

  node   0   1   2   3
    0:  10  20  30  20
    1:  20  10  20  30
    2:  30  20  10  20
    3:  20  30  20  10

Where (for example) CPU1 ends up generating the following nonsensical groups:

  [] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
  []  domain 0: span 0-2 level NUMA
  []   groups: 1 2 0
  []   domain 1: span 0-3 level NUMA
  []    groups: 1-3 (cpu_capacity = 3072) 0-1,3 (cpu_capacity = 3072)

Where the fact that domain 1 doesn't include a group with span 0-2 is
the obvious fail.

With patch this looks like:

  [] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
  []  domain 0: span 0-2 level NUMA
  []   groups: 1 0 2
  []   domain 1: span 0-3 level NUMA
  []    groups: 0-2 (cpu_capacity = 3072) 0,2-3 (cpu_capacity = 3072)
Debugged-by: NLauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: e3589f6c ("sched: Allow for overlapping sched_domain spans")
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Create functions build_group_from_child_sched_domain() and
init_overlap_sched_group(). No functional change.
Signed-off-by: NLauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1492091769-19879-2-git-send-email-lvenanci@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>