Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 2 年 前同步成功

通知 173
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 18 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  3. 10 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • G
      genirq/PM: Restore system wake up from chained interrupts · 4717f133
      由 Grygorii Strashko 提交于 
      Commit e509bd7d ("genirq: Allow migration of chained interrupts
by installing default action") breaks PCS wake up IRQ behaviour on
TI OMAP based platforms (dra7-evm).

TI OMAP IRQ wake up configuration:
GIC-irqchip->PCM_IRQ
  |- omap_prcm_register_chain_handler
     |- PRCM-irqchip -> PRCM_IO_IRQ
        |- pcs_irq_chain_handler
           |- pinctrl-irqchip -> PCS_uart1_wakeup_irq

This happens because IRQ PM code (irq/pm.c) is expected to ignore
chained interrupts by default:
  static bool suspend_device_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
  {
	if (!desc->action || desc->no_suspend_depth)
		return false;
 - it's expected !desc->action = true for chained interrupts;

but, after above change, all chained interrupt descriptors will
have default action handler installed - chained_action.
As result, chained interrupts will be silently disabled during system
suspend.

Hence, fix it by introducing helper function irq_desc_is_chained() and
use it in suspend_device_irq() for chained interrupts identification
and skip them, once detected.

Fixes: e509bd7d ("genirq: Allow migration of chained interrupts..")
Signed-off-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1447149492-20699-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      4717f133
  5. 16 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 12 7月, 2015 2 次提交
  9. 18 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 05 3月, 2015 1 次提交
    • R
      genirq / PM: Add flag for shared NO_SUSPEND interrupt lines · 17f48034
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      It currently is required that all users of NO_SUSPEND interrupt
lines pass the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag when requesting the IRQ or the
WARN_ON_ONCE() in irq_pm_install_action() will trigger.  That is
done to warn about situations in which unprepared interrupt handlers
may be run unnecessarily for suspended devices and may attempt to
access those devices by mistake.  However, it may cause drivers
that have no technical reasons for using IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set
that flag just because they happen to share the interrupt line
with something like a timer.

Moreover, the generic handling of wakeup interrupts introduced by
commit 9ce7a258 (genirq: Simplify wakeup mechanism) only works
for IRQs without any NO_SUSPEND users, so the drivers of wakeup
devices needing to use shared NO_SUSPEND interrupt lines for
signaling system wakeup generally have to detect wakeup in their
interrupt handlers.  Thus if they happen to share an interrupt line
with a NO_SUSPEND user, they also need to request that their
interrupt handlers be run after suspend_device_irqs().

In both cases the reason for using IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is not because
the driver in question has a genuine need to run its interrupt
handler after suspend_device_irqs(), but because it happens to
share the line with some other NO_SUSPEND user.  Otherwise, the
driver would do without IRQF_NO_SUSPEND just fine.

To make it possible to specify that condition explicitly, introduce
a new IRQ action handler flag for shared IRQs, IRQF_COND_SUSPEND,
that, when set, will indicate to the IRQ core that the interrupt
user is generally fine with suspending the IRQ, but it also can
tolerate handler invocations after suspend_device_irqs() and, in
particular, it is capable of detecting system wakeup and triggering
it as appropriate from its interrupt handler.

That will allow us to work around a problem with a shared timer
interrupt line on at91 platforms.

Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142252777602084&w=2
Link: http://marc.info/?t=142252775300011&r=1&w=2
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/15/552Reported-by: NBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
      17f48034
  13. 01 9月, 2014 7 次提交
  15. 26 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  17. 05 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  19. 17 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  21. 12 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • T
      genirq: Add chip flag to force mask on suspend · d209a699
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      On suspend we disable all interrupts in the core code, but this does
not mask the interrupt line in the default implementation as we use a
lazy disable approach. That means we mark the interrupt disabled, but
leave the hardware unmasked. That's an optimization because we avoid
the hardware access for the common case where no interrupt happens
after we marked it disabled. If an interrupt happens, then the
interrupt flow handler masks the line at the hardware level and marks
it pending.

Suspend makes use of this delayed disable as it "disables" all
interrupts when preparing the suspend transition. Right before the
system goes into hardware suspend state it checks whether one of the
interrupts which is marked as a wakeup interrupt came in after
disabling it.

Most interrupt chips have a separate register which selects the
interrupts which can wake up the system from suspend, so we don't have
to mask any on the non wakeup interrupts.

But now we have to deal with brilliant designed hardware which lacks
such a wakeup configuration facility. For such hardware it's necessary
to mask all non wakeup interrupts before going into suspend in order
to avoid the wakeup from random interrupts.

Rather than working around this in the affected interrupt chip
implementations we can solve this elegant in the core code itself.

Add a flag IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND which can be set by the irq chip
implementation to indicate, that the interrupts which are not selected
as wakeup sources must be masked in the suspend path. Mask them in the
loop which checks the wakeup interrupts pending flag.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NAbhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>
LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103112112310.2787@localhost6.localdomain6>
      d209a699
  23. 19 2月, 2011 4 次提交
  25. 08 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  27. 15 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  29. 05 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  31. 31 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • R
      PM: Introduce functions for suspending and resuming device interrupts · 0a0c5168
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Introduce helper functions allowing us to prevent device drivers from
getting any interrupts (without disabling interrupts on the CPU)
during suspend (or hibernation) and to make them start to receive
interrupts again during the subsequent resume.  These functions make it
possible to keep timer interrupts enabled while the "late" suspend and
"early" resume callbacks provided by device drivers are being
executed.  In turn, this allows device drivers' "late" suspend and
"early" resume callbacks to sleep, execute ACPI callbacks etc.

The functions introduced here will be used to rework the handling of
interrupts during suspend (hibernation) and resume.  Namely,
interrupts will only be disabled on the CPU right before suspending
sysdevs, while device drivers will be prevented from receiving
interrupts, with the help of the new helper function, before their
"late" suspend callbacks run (and analogously during resume).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      0a0c5168