1. 09 5月, 2007 2 次提交
  2. 08 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 02 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  4. 28 4月, 2007 31 次提交
  5. 27 4月, 2007 5 次提交
    • M
      [S390] split page_test_and_clear_dirty. · 6c210482
      Martin Schwidefsky 提交于
      The page_test_and_clear_dirty primitive really consists of two
      operations, page_test_dirty and the page_clear_dirty. The combination
      of the two is not an atomic operation, so it makes more sense to have
      two separate operations instead of one.
      In addition to the improved readability of the s390 version of
      SetPageUptodate, it now avoids the page_test_dirty operation which is
      an insert-storage-key-extended (iske) instruction which is an expensive
      operation.
      Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      6c210482
    • A
      UBI: Unsorted Block Images · 801c135c
      Artem B. Bityutskiy 提交于
      UBI (Latin: "where?") manages multiple logical volumes on a single
      flash device, specifically supporting NAND flash devices. UBI provides
      a flexible partitioning concept which still allows for wear-levelling
      across the whole flash device.
      
      In a sense, UBI may be compared to the Logical Volume Manager
      (LVM). Whereas LVM maps logical sector numbers to physical HDD sector
      numbers, UBI maps logical eraseblocks to physical eraseblocks.
      
      More information may be found at
      http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubi.html
      
      Partitioning/Re-partitioning
      
        An UBI volume occupies a certain number of erase blocks. This is
        limited by a configured maximum volume size, which could also be
        viewed as the partition size. Each individual UBI volume's size can
        be changed independently of the other UBI volumes, provided that the
        sum of all volume sizes doesn't exceed a certain limit.
      
        UBI supports dynamic volumes and static volumes. Static volumes are
        read-only and their contents are protected by CRC check sums.
      
      Bad eraseblocks handling
      
        UBI transparently handles bad eraseblocks. When a physical
        eraseblock becomes bad, it is substituted by a good physical
        eraseblock, and the user does not even notice this.
      
      Scrubbing
      
        On a NAND flash bit flips can occur on any write operation,
        sometimes also on read. If bit flips persist on the device, at first
        they can still be corrected by ECC, but once they accumulate,
        correction will become impossible. Thus it is best to actively scrub
        the affected eraseblock, by first copying it to a free eraseblock
        and then erasing the original. The UBI layer performs this type of
        scrubbing under the covers, transparently to the UBI volume users.
      
      Erase Counts
      
        UBI maintains an erase count header per eraseblock. This frees
        higher-level layers (like file systems) from doing this and allows
        for centralized erase count management instead. The erase counts are
        used by the wear-levelling algorithm in the UBI layer. The algorithm
        itself is exchangeable.
      
      Booting from NAND
      
        For booting directly from NAND flash the hardware must at least be
        capable of fetching and executing a small portion of the NAND
        flash. Some NAND flash controllers have this kind of support. They
        usually limit the window to a few kilobytes in erase block 0. This
        "initial program loader" (IPL) must then contain sufficient logic to
        load and execute the next boot phase.
      
        Due to bad eraseblocks, which may be randomly scattered over the
        flash device, it is problematic to store the "secondary program
        loader" (SPL) statically. Also, due to bit-flips it may become
        corrupted over time. UBI allows to solve this problem gracefully by
        storing the SPL in a small static UBI volume.
      
      UBI volumes vs. static partitions
      
        UBI volumes are still very similar to static MTD partitions:
      
          * both consist of eraseblocks (logical eraseblocks in case of UBI
            volumes, and physical eraseblocks in case of static partitions;
          * both support three basic operations - read, write, erase.
      
        But UBI volumes have the following advantages over traditional
        static MTD partitions:
      
          * there are no eraseblock wear-leveling constraints in case of UBI
            volumes, so the user should not care about this;
          * there are no bit-flips and bad eraseblocks in case of UBI volumes.
      
        So, UBI volumes may be considered as flash devices with relaxed
        restrictions.
      
      Where can it be found?
      
        Documentation, kernel code and applications can be found in the MTD
        gits.
      
      What are the applications for?
      
        The applications help to create binary flash images for two purposes: pfi
        files (partial flash images) for in-system update of UBI volumes, and plain
        binary images, with or without OOB data in case of NAND, for a manufacturing
        step. Furthermore some tools are/and will be created that allow flash content
        analysis after a system has crashed..
      
      Who did UBI?
      
        The original ideas, where UBI is based on, were developed by Andreas
        Arnez, Frank Haverkamp and Thomas Gleixner. Josh W. Boyer and some others
        were involved too. The implementation of the kernel layer was done by Artem
        B. Bityutskiy. The user-space applications and tools were written by Oliver
        Lohmann with contributions from Frank Haverkamp, Andreas Arnez, and Artem.
        Joern Engel contributed a patch which modifies JFFS2 so that it can be run on
        a UBI volume. Thomas Gleixner did modifications to the NAND layer. Alexander
        Schmidt made some testing work as well as core functionality improvements.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NFrank Haverkamp <haver@vnet.ibm.com>
      801c135c
    • J
      [WEXT] net_device: Don't include wext bits if not required. · b86e0280
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      This patch makes the wext bits in struct net_device depend on
      CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT.
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b86e0280
    • D
      [AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both · 17926a79
      David Howells 提交于
      Provide AF_RXRPC sockets that can be used to talk to AFS servers, or serve
      answers to AFS clients.  KerberosIV security is fully supported.  The patches
      and some example test programs can be found in:
      
      	http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/rxrpc/
      
      This will eventually replace the old implementation of kernel-only RxRPC
      currently resident in net/rxrpc/.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      17926a79
    • D
      [AF_RXRPC]: Key facility changes for AF_RXRPC · 7318226e
      David Howells 提交于
      Export the keyring key type definition and document its availability.
      
      Add alternative types into the key's type_data union to make it more useful.
      Not all users necessarily want to use it as a list_head (AF_RXRPC doesn't, for
      example), so make it clear that it can be used in other ways.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7318226e