Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 161
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 08 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  3. 07 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 14 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • T
      x86/mce: Do not use bank 1 for APEI generated error logs · b2de4360
      由 Tony Luck 提交于 
      BIOS can report a memory error to Linux using ACPI/APEI mechanism. When
it does this, we create a fictitious machine check error record and
feed it into the standard mce_log() function. The error record needs a
machine check bank number, and for some reason we chose "1" for this.

But "1" is a valid bank number, and this causes confusion and heartburn
among h/w folks who are concerned that a memory error signature was
somehow logged in bank 1.

Change to use "-1" (field is a "u8" so will typically print as 255).
This should make it clearer that this error did not originate in a
machine check bank.
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b7fffb2b326bc1dd150ffceb9919a803f9496e0e.1464805958.git.tony.luck@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      b2de4360
  7. 12 5月, 2016 4 次提交
  9. 03 5月, 2016 7 次提交
  11. 13 4月, 2016 3 次提交
  13. 26 3月, 2016 1 次提交
    • S
      ACPI / processor: Request native thermal interrupt handling via _OSC · a2121167
      由 Srinivas Pandruvada 提交于 
      There are several reports of freeze on enabling HWP (Hardware PStates)
feature on Skylake-based systems by the Intel P-states driver. The root
cause is identified as the HWP interrupts causing BIOS code to freeze.

HWP interrupts use the thermal LVT which can be handled by Linux
natively, but on the affected Skylake-based systems SMM will respond
to it by default.  This is a problem for several reasons:
 - On the affected systems the SMM thermal LVT handler is broken (it
   will crash when invoked) and a BIOS update is necessary to fix it.
 - With thermal interrupt handled in SMM we lose all of the reporting
   features of the arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt driver.
 - Some thermal drivers like x86-package-temp depend on the thermal
   threshold interrupts signaled via the thermal LVT.
 - The HWP interrupts are useful for debugging and tuning
   performance (if the kernel can handle them).
The native handling of thermal interrupts needs to be enabled
because of that.

This requires some way to tell SMM that the OS can handle thermal
interrupts.  That can be done by using _OSC/_PDC in processor
scope very early during ACPI initialization.

The meaning of _OSC/_PDC bit 12 in processor scope is whether or
not the OS supports native handling of interrupts for Collaborative
Processor Performance Control (CPPC) notifications.  Since on
HWP-capable systems CPPC is a firmware interface to HWP, setting
this bit effectively tells the firmware that the OS will handle
thermal interrupts natively going forward.

For details on _OSC/_PDC refer to:
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/standards/processor-vendor-specific-acpi-specification.html

To implement the _OSC/_PDC handshake as described, introduce a new
function, acpi_early_processor_osc(), that walks the ACPI
namespace looking for ACPI processor objects and invokes _OSC for
them with bit 12 in the capabilities buffer set and terminates the
namespace walk on the first success.

Also modify intel_thermal_interrupt() to clear HWP status bits in
the HWP_STATUS MSR to acknowledge HWP interrupts (which prevents
them from firing continuously).
Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog, function rename ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      a2121167
  15. 08 3月, 2016 3 次提交
  17. 18 2月, 2016 2 次提交
  19. 03 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  21. 01 2月, 2016 6 次提交
  23. 19 12月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      x86/mce: Ensure offline CPUs don't participate in rendezvous process · d90167a9
      由 Ashok Raj 提交于 
      Intel's MCA implementation broadcasts MCEs to all CPUs on the
node. This poses a problem for offlined CPUs which cannot
participate in the rendezvous process:

  Kernel panic - not syncing: Timeout: Not all CPUs entered broadcast exception handler
  Kernel Offset: disabled
  Rebooting in 100 seconds..

More specifically, Linux does a soft offline of a CPU when
writing a 0 to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online, which
doesn't prevent the #MC exception from being broadcasted to that
CPU.

Ensure that offline CPUs don't participate in the MCE rendezvous
and clear the RIP valid status bit so that a second MCE won't
cause a shutdown.

Without the patch, mce_start() will increment mce_callin and
wait for all CPUs. Offlined CPUs should avoid participating in
the rendezvous process altogether.
Signed-off-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
[ Massage commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449742346-21470-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      d90167a9
  25. 24 11月, 2015 4 次提交
  27. 01 11月, 2015 2 次提交
  29. 21 10月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      x86/mce: Fix thermal throttling reporting after kexec · 81ffdcdd
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      The per CPU thermal vector init code checks if the thermal
vector is already installed and complains and bails out if it
is.

This happens after kexec, as kernel shut down does not clear the
thermal vector APIC register.

This causes two problems:

1. So we always do not fully initialize thermal reports after
   kexec. The CPU is still likely initialized, as the previous
   kernel should have done it. But we don't set up the software
   pointer to the thermal vector, so reporting may end up with a
   unknown thermal interrupt message.

2. Also it complains for every logical CPU, even though the
   value is actually derived from BP only.

The problem is that we end up with one message per CPU, so on
larger systems it becomes very noisy and messes up the otherwise
nicely formatted CPU bootup numbers in the kernel log.

Just remove the check. I checked the code and there's no valid
code paths where the thermal init code for a CPU could be called
multiple times.

Why the kernel does not clean up this value on shutdown:

The thermal monitoring is controlled per logical CPU thread.
Normal shutdown code is just running on one CPU. To disable it
we would need a broadcast NMI to all CPUs on shut down. That's
overkill for this. So we just ignore it after kexec.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1445246268-26285-9-git-send-email-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      81ffdcdd
  31. 28 9月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      x86/mce: Don't clear shared banks on Intel when offlining CPUs · 6e06780a
      由 Ashok Raj 提交于 
      It is not safe to clear global MCi_CTL banks during CPU offline
or suspend/resume operations. These MSRs are either
thread-scoped (meaning private to a thread), or core-scoped
(private to threads in that core only), or with a socket scope:
visible and controllable from all threads in the socket.

When we offline a single CPU, clearing those MCi_CTL bits will
stop signaling for all the shared, i.e., socket-wide resources,
such as LLC, iMC, etc.

In addition, it might be possible to compromise the integrity of
an Intel Secure Guard eXtentions (SGX) system if the attacker
has control of the host system and is able to inject errors
which would be otherwise ignored when MCi_CTL bits are cleared.

Hence on SGX enabled systems, if MCi_CTL is cleared, SGX gets
disabled.
Tested-by: NSerge Ayoun <serge.ayoun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
[ Cleanup text. ]
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1441391390-16985-1-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6e06780a