1. 14 5月, 2010 2 次提交
  2. 07 5月, 2010 2 次提交
  3. 05 2月, 2010 2 次提交
  4. 26 11月, 2009 7 次提交
  5. 26 8月, 2009 4 次提交
    • C
      davinci: Audio support for DA830 EVM · e33ef5e3
      Chaithrika U S 提交于
      Define resources for McASP1 used on DA830/OMAP-L137 EVM, add platform
      device defintion, initialization function.  Additionally, this patch
      also adds version and FIFO related members to platform data structure.
      Signed-off-by: NChaithrika U S <chaithrika@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
      e33ef5e3
    • S
      davinci: Rearrange the da830/omap-l137 macros and functions · c96b56c5
      Sudhakar Rajashekhara 提交于
      Rearrange the PINMUX macros and pinmux_setup function which
      are common between da830/omap-l137 and da850/omap-l138.
      
      Also, replace the da830 string in function names to da8xx.
      Signed-off-by: NSudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
      c96b56c5
    • R
      davinci: Move the da830/omap-l137 #defines to header file · bea238f6
      Rajashekhara, Sudhakar 提交于
      With the introduction of TI da850/omap-l138, some of the macros
      defined for da830/omap-l137 will be needed in da850 source file.
      So, move the common macros to da8xx.h header file.
      
      Also, modify the macro names from DA830_... to DA8XX_.
      Signed-off-by: NSudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
      bea238f6
    • M
      davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support · 55c79a40
      Mark A. Greer 提交于
      The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar
      to the davinci line.  Since its so similar to davinci,
      put the support for the da830 in the same directory as
      the davinci code.
      
      There are differences, however.  Some of those differences
      prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work
      in the same kernel binary.  Those differences are:
      
      1) Different physical address for RAM.  This is relevant
         to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET.  The
         Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but
         it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including
         both architectures.  The PHYS_OFFSET issue is
         addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined
         PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it
         hasn't been accepted yet.
      
      2) Different uart addresses.  This is only an issue
         for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL
         is enabled.  Since the code in that macro is called
         so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when
         the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what
         platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use
         the correct uart address.
      
      These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted
      to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong.
      
      A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added
      to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and
      the da830 architecture.
      
      Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback
      data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be
      enabled when building a da830 kernel.
      
      Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by
      Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori.
      Signed-off-by: NSteve Chen <schen@mvista.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
      Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
      Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
      55c79a40