Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

If the disk has failed already, there is no point trying to change the
bitmap. drbd_set_out_of_sync() already had this safeguard,
time to add it to drbd_set_in_sync() as well.

This also prevents some warning messages, like
 FIXME asender in bm_change_bits_to, bitmap locked for 'detach' by worker
if our disk fails during resync, while there are some resync acks queued up.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

recent commit
    drbd: always write bitmap on detach
introduced a bitmap writeout during detach,
which obviously needs some meta data device to write to.

Unfortunately, that same error path may be taken if we fail to attach,
e.g. due to UUID mismatch, after we changed state to D_ATTACHING,
but before the lower level device pointer is even assigned.

We need to test for presence of mdev->ldev.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

If we detach due to local read-error (which sets a bit in the bitmap),
stay Primary, and then re-attach (which re-reads the bitmap from disk),
we potentially lost the "out-of-sync" (or, "bad block") information in
the bitmap.

Always (try to) write out the changed bitmap pages before going diskless.

That way, we don't lose the bit for the bad block,
the next resync will fetch it from the peer, and rewrite
it locally, which may result in block reallocation in some
lower layer (or the hardware), and thereby "heal" the bad blocks.

If the bitmap writeout errors out as well, we will (again: try to)
mark the "we need a full sync" bit in our super block,
if it was a READ error; writes are covered by the activity log already.

If that superblock does not make it to disk either, we are sorry.

Maybe we just lost an entire disk or controller (or iSCSI connection),
and there actually are no bad blocks at all, so we don't need to
re-fetch from the peer, there is no "auto-healing" necessary.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

The intention of force-detach is to be able to deal with a completely
unresponsive lower level IO stack, which does not even deliver error
completions anymore, but no completion at all.

In all other cases, we must still wait for the meta data IO completion.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

This has not yet been observed, but conceivably, when using GFP_KERNEL
allocations from drbd_md_sync(), drbd_flush_after_epoch() or
receive_SyncParam(), we could trigger additional IO to our own device,
or an other device in a criss-cross setup, and end up in a local
deadlock, or potentially a distributed deadlock in a criss-cross setup
involving the peer blocked in a similar way waiting for us to make
progress.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

The former comment arguing that GFP_KERNEL was good enough was wrong: it
did not take resize into account at all, and assumed the only path
leading here was the normal attach on a still secondary device, so no
deadlock would be possible.

Both resize on a Primary, or attach on a diskless Primary,
could potentially deadlock.

drbd_bm_resize() is called while IO to the respective device is
suspended, so we must use GFP_NOIO to avoid potential deadlock.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Using list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail().

spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem.
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

"aborting" requests, or force-detaching the disk, is intended for
completely blocked/hung local backing devices which do no longer
complete requests at all, not even do error completions.  In this
situation, usually a hard-reset and failover is the only way out.

By "aborting", basically faking a local error-completion,
we allow for a more graceful swichover by cleanly migrating services.
Still the affected node has to be rebooted "soon".

By completing these requests, we allow the upper layers to re-use
the associated data pages.

If later the local backing device "recovers", and now DMAs some data
from disk into the original request pages, in the best case it will
just put random data into unused pages; but typically it will corrupt
meanwhile completely unrelated data, causing all sorts of damage.

Which means delayed successful completion,
especially for READ requests,
is a reason to panic().

We assume that a delayed *error* completion is OK,
though we still will complain noisily about it.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

is_valid_transition() might return SS_NOTHING_TO_DO.

The condition function _req_st_cond() returned SS_NOTHING_TO_DO, which
caused the wait_event to abort too early. Therefore drbd_req_state()
did not consume the next CL_ST_CHG_SUCCESS or SS_CW_FAILED_BY_PEER
causing serve disruption of the state machine logic...

Detaching from a single volue was one way to trigger this bug.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

We use the RQ_POSTPONED flag to mark a request for several reasons.

It may be a conflicting request in a dual-primary setup,
where conflict detection and resolution on the peer decided that
this request needs to be re-submitted, it needs to re-enter
drbd_make_request() to fix the data divergence caused by these
conflicting, partially overlapping, quasi-simultaneous requests.

In this case we need to mark the corresponding area as out-of-sync,
before we call drbd_al_complete_io().

We also use the RQ_POSTPONED flag to just "push back" a request,
before even processing it, if IO is suspended for some reason.
In this case, as this request was neither submitted nor sent yet,
we must not touch the bitmap.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

A postponed request might has RQ_IN_ACT_LOG already set, but
is POSTPONED before it gets something in the RQ_LOCAL_MASK
set. Up to now this caused a left-over active extent.

Fix that by only testing for the RQ_IN_ACT_LOG bit in drbd_req_destroy()
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Without this, the meta-data gets updates after 5 seconds by the
md_sync_timer. Better to do it immeditaly after a state change.

If the asender detects a network failure, it may take a bit until
the worker processes the according after-conn-state-change work item.

  The worker might be blocked in sending something, i.e. it
  takes until it gets into its timeout. That is 6 seconds by
  default which is longer than the 5 seconds of the md_sync_timer.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

* Postponed requests should not set or clear out-of-sync marks
* When a request gets postponed we need to drop its reference
  mdev->local_cnt (put_ldev()).
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

With merging the commit
'drbd: Delay/reject other state changes while establishing a connection'
the condition check for clearing the flag was wrong.

Move the bit clearing to the __drbd_set_state() function
in order to have it already cleared for the other parts of
the function. I.e. clearing the susp_fen in the after_state_ch() function.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

When _conn_requests_state() is used to change other parts of the state
than the connection, do not check for a valid connection transition.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

The previous way of doing the state change was also okay since the
state change on the susp flag gets propagated from the mdev
to the tconn.

Fortunately all this goes away in drbd-9.0
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

If the md_sync_timer triggers a second time,
while the work queued during the first time is still pending,
this could result in list_add() of an already added item,
and corrupt the work item list.

This likely only triggered because of the erroneous
batch-dequeueing of work items fixed with
  drbd: dequeue single work items in wait_for_work()

Still, skip queueing if md_sync_work is already queued.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

As long as we still use drbd_queue_work_front(),
we must only dequeue the single first item during normal operation.

The comment in drbd_worker() even says so,
but bc8a5a1 drbd: remove struct drbd_tl_epoch objects (barrier works)
introduced the batch dequeueing again via list_splice_init() in
wait_for_work().

Change back to list_move() of the first item, if any.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Documentation of mutex_unlock says
we must not use it in interrupt context.
So do not call it while holding the spin_lock_irq,
but give up the spinlock temporarily.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

If the preconditions for a state change change after the wait_event() we
might hit the BUG() statement in conn_set_state().

With holding the spin_lock while evaluating the condition AND until the
actual state change we ensure the the preconditions can not change anymore.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

drbd_adm_disk_opts() does
	wait_event(mdev->al_wait, lc_try_lock(mdev->act_log));
	drbd_al_shrink(mdev);

If the device is very busy, this can take a very long time to succeed.
Fix this by temporarily suspending IO,
then quickly change the settings, and resume.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

We must only send P_BARRIER for epochs we actually sent P_DATA in.

If we (re-)establish a connection, we reinitialized the
send.current_epoch_nr, but forgot to reset send.current_epoch_writes.

This could result in a spurious P_BARRIER with stale epoch information,
and a disconnect/reconnect cycle once the then "unexpected"
P_BARRIER_ACK is received:
  BAD! BarrierAck #28823 received, expected #28829!

Introduce re_init_if_first_write() and maybe_send_barrier() helpers,
and call them appropriately for read/write/set-out-of-sync requests.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

drbd_disconnected() is supposed to clear the resync lru cache,
by calling drbd_rs_cancel_all().

We must do so before we call drbd_flush_workqueue(), as at least the
callback w_restart_disk_io() may wait for resync progres, and would
otherwise deadlock.

drbd_finish_peer_reqs() may again populate that cache, which will
then potentially be stale after the next resync handshake and bitmap
exchange, we have to do it again after that.

A stale resync lru cache causes no harm but ugly messages like this:
 BAD! sector=196608s enr=6 rs_left=-256 rs_failed=0 count=256 cstate=SyncTarget
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Disconnecting is a cluster wide state change. In case the peer node agrees
to the state transition, it sends back the fact on the meta-data connection
and closes both sockets.

In case the node node that initiated the state transfer sees the closing
action on the data-socket, before the P_STATE_CHG_REPLY packet, it was
going into one of the network failure states.

At least with the fencing option set to something else thatn "dont-care",
the unclean shutdown of the connection causes a short IO freeze or
a fence operation.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

There is at least the worker context, the receiver context, the context of
receiving netlink packts.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

We need to write the whole bitmap after we moved the meta data
due to an online resize operation.

With the support for one peta byte devices bitmap IO was optimized
to only write out touched pages. This optimization must be turned
off when writing the bitmap after an online resize.

This issue was introduced with drbd-8.3.10.

The impact of this bug is that after an online resize, the next
resync could become larger than expected.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

In various places (E.g. CONNECTION_LOST_WHILE_PENDING) the
RQ_COMPLETION_SUSP mask is passed in the clear set to mod_rq_state().

The issue was that it tried to clear the RQ_COMPLETION_SUSP bit
out of the state mask first, and eventuelly set it afterwards,
in the drbd_req_put_completion_ref() function.

Fixed that by moving the reference getting out of
drbd_req_put_completion_ref() into the mod_rq_state(), before the place
where the extra reference might be put.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

If for some reason (typically "split-brained" cluster manager)
drbd replica data has diverged, we can chose a victim,
and reconnect using "--discard-my-data", causing the victim
to become sync-target, fetching all changed blocks from the peer.

If we are Primary, we are potentially in use, and we refuse to
"roll back" changes to the data below the page cache and other users.

Rename the error symbol for this to ERR_DISCARD_IMPOSSIBLE.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

We don't discard anything here, really.
We resolve conflicting, concurrent writes to overlapping data blocks.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

To avoid confusion with REQ_DISCARD aka TRIM, rename our
"discard concurrent write acks" from P_DISCARD_WRITE to P_SUPERSEDED.

At the same time, rename the drbd request event DISCARD_WRITE
to CONFLICT_RESOLVED. It already triggers both successful completion
or restart of the request, depending on our RQ_POSTPONED flag.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

Don't drop a request from the transfer log just because it was NEG_ACKED.
We need it around to be able to verify P_BARRIER_ACKs against the
transver log.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>