- 19 9月, 2018 7 次提交
-
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
In order to determine a sane default cache allocation for a new CAT/CDP resource group, all resource groups are checked to determine which cache portions are available to share. At this time all possible CLOSIDs that can be supported by the resource is checked. This is problematic if the resource supports more CLOSIDs than another CAT/CDP resource. In this case, the number of CLOSIDs that could be allocated are fewer than the number of CLOSIDs that can be supported by the resource. Limit the check of closids to that what is supported by the system based on the minimum across all resources. Fixes: 95f0b77e ("x86/intel_rdt: Initialize new resource group with sane defaults") Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com> Cc: "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-10-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
It is possible for a resource group to consist out of MBA as well as CAT/CDP resources. The "exclusive" resource mode only applies to the CAT/CDP resources since MBA allocations cannot be specified to overlap or not. When a user requests a resource group to become "exclusive" then it can only be successful if there are CAT/CDP resources in the group and none of their CBMs associated with the group's CLOSID overlaps with any other resource group. Fix the "exclusive" mode setting by failing if there isn't any CAT/CDP resource in the group and ensuring that the CBM checking is only done on CAT/CDP resources. Fixes: 49f7b4ef ("x86/intel_rdt: Enable setting of exclusive mode") Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com> Cc: "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-9-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
A loop is used to check if a CAT resource's CBM of one CLOSID overlaps with the CBM of another CLOSID of the same resource. The loop is run over all CLOSIDs supported by the resource. The problem with running the loop over all CLOSIDs supported by the resource is that its number of supported CLOSIDs may be more than the number of supported CLOSIDs on the system, which is the minimum number of CLOSIDs supported across all resources. Fix the loop to only consider the number of system supported CLOSIDs, not all that are supported by the resource. Fixes: 49f7b4ef ("x86/intel_rdt: Enable setting of exclusive mode") Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com> Cc: "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-8-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
When a new resource group is created, it is initialized with sane defaults that currently assume the resource being initialized is a CAT resource. This code path is also followed by a MBA resource that is not allocated the same as a CAT resource and as a result we encounter the following unchecked MSR access error: unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0xd51 (tried to write 0x0000 000000000064) at rIP: 0xffffffffae059994 (native_write_msr+0x4/0x20) Call Trace: mba_wrmsr+0x41/0x80 update_domains+0x125/0x130 rdtgroup_mkdir+0x270/0x500 Fix the above by ensuring the initial allocation is only attempted on a CAT resource. Fixes: 95f0b77e ("x86/intel_rdt: Initialize new resource group with sane defaults") Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com> Cc: "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-6-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
When multiple resources are managed by RDT, the number of CLOSIDs used is the minimum of the CLOSIDs supported by each resource. In the function rdt_bit_usage_show(), the annotated bitmask is created to depict how the CAT supporting caches are being used. During this annotated bitmask creation, each resource group is queried for its mode that is used as a label in the annotated bitmask. The maximum number of resource groups is currently assumed to be the number of CLOSIDs supported by the resource for which the information is being displayed. This is incorrect since the number of active CLOSIDs is the minimum across all resources. If information for a cache instance with more CLOSIDs than another is being generated we thus encounter a warning like: invalid mode for closid 8 WARNING: CPU: 88 PID: 1791 at [SNIP]/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c :827 rdt_bit_usage_show+0x221/0x2b0 Fix this by ensuring that only the number of supported CLOSIDs are considered. Fixes: e6519011 ("x86/intel_rdt: Introduce "bit_usage" to display cache allocations details") Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com> Cc: "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-5-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
The number of CLOSIDs supported by a system is the minimum number of CLOSIDs supported by any of its resources. Care should be taken when iterating over the CLOSIDs of a resource since it may be that the number of CLOSIDs supported on the system is less than the number of CLOSIDs supported by the resource. Introduce a helper function that can be used to query the number of CLOSIDs that is supported by all resources, irrespective of how many CLOSIDs are supported by a particular resource. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com> Cc: "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-4-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
Chen Yu reported a divide-by-zero error when accessing the 'size' resctrl file when a MBA resource is enabled. divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 93 PID: 1929 Comm: cat Not tainted 4.19.0-rc2-debug-rdt+ #25 RIP: 0010:rdtgroup_cbm_to_size+0x7e/0xa0 Call Trace: rdtgroup_size_show+0x11a/0x1d0 seq_read+0xd8/0x3b0 Quoting Chen Yu's report: This is because for MB resource, the r->cache.cbm_len is zero, thus calculating size in rdtgroup_cbm_to_size() will trigger the exception. Fix this issue in the 'size' file by getting correct memory bandwidth value which is in MBps when MBA software controller is enabled or in percentage when MBA software controller is disabled. Fixes: d9b48c86 ("x86/intel_rdt: Display resource groups' allocations in bytes") Reported-by: NChen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: NChen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180904174614.26682-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-3-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
-
- 21 7月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Torokhov 提交于
This change allows creating kernfs files and directories with arbitrary uid/gid instead of always using GLOBAL_ROOT_UID/GID by extending kernfs_create_dir_ns() and kernfs_create_file_ns() with uid/gid arguments. The "simple" kernfs_create_file() and kernfs_create_dir() are left alone and always create objects belonging to the global root. When creating symlinks ownership (uid/gid) is taken from the target kernfs object. Co-Developed-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 7月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
When a resource group enters pseudo-locksetup mode it reflects that the platform supports cache pseudo-locking and the resource group is unused, ready to be used for a pseudo-locked region. Until it is set up as a pseudo-locked region the resource group is "locked down" such that no new tasks or cpus can be assigned to it. This is accomplished in a user visible way by making the cpus, cpus_list, and tasks resctrl files inaccassible (user cannot read from or write to these files). When the resource group changes to pseudo-locked mode it represents a cache pseudo-locked region. While not appropriate to make any changes to the cpus assigned to this region it is useful to make it easy for the user to see which cpus are associated with the pseudo-locked region. Modify the permissions of the cpus/cpus_list file when the resource group changes to pseudo-locked mode to support reading (not writing). The information presented to the user when reading the file are the cpus associated with the pseudo-locked region. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/12756b7963b6abc1bffe8fb560b87b75da827bd1.1530421961.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
As the mode of a resource group changes, the operations it can support may also change. One way in which the supported operations are managed is to modify the permissions of the files within the resource group's resctrl directory. At the moment only two possible permissions are supported: the default permissions or no permissions in support for when the operation is "locked down". It is possible where an operation on a resource group may have more possibilities. For example, if by default changes can be made to the resource group by writing to a resctrl file while the current settings can be obtained by reading from the file, then it may be possible that in another mode it is only possible to read the current settings, and not change them. Make it possible to modify some of the permissions of a resctrl file in support of a more flexible way to manage the operations on a resource group. In this preparation work the original behavior is maintained where all permissions are restored. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8773aadfade7bcb2c48a45fa294a04d2c03bb0a1.1530421961.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
- 24 6月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
After a pseudo-locked region is created it needs to be made available to user space for usage. A character device supporting mmap() is created for each pseudo-locked region. A user space application can now use mmap() system call to map pseudo-locked region into its virtual address space. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/fccbb9b20f07655ab0a4df9fa1c1babc0288aea0.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
- 23 6月, 2018 22 次提交
-
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
In preparation for support of debugging of RDT sub features the user can now enable a RDT debugfs region. The debug area is always enabled when CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is set as advised in http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180523080501.GA6822@kroah.com Also from same discussion in above linked email, no error checking on the debugfs creation return value since code should not behave differently when debugging passes or fails. Even on failure the returned value can be passed safely to other debugfs calls. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9f553faf30866a6317f1aaaa2fe9f92de66a10d2.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
The RDT system's initialization does not have the corresponding exit handling to ensure everything initialized on load is cleaned up also. Introduce the cleanup routines that complement all initialization. This includes the removal of a duplicate rdtgroup_init() declaration. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a9e3a2bbd731d13915d2d7bf05d4f675b4fa109b.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
Information about resources as well as resource groups are contained in a variety of resctrl files. Now that pseudo-locked regions can be created the files can be updated to present appropriate information to the user. Update the resource group's schemata file to show only the information of the pseudo-locked region. Update the resource group's size file to show the size in bytes of only the pseudo-locked region. Update the bit_usage file to use the letter 'P' for all pseudo-locked regions. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5ece82869b651c2178b278e00bca959f7626b6e9.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
The user triggers the creation of a pseudo-locked region when writing a valid schemata to the schemata file of a resource group in the pseudo-locksetup mode. A valid schemata is one that: (1) does not overlap with any other resource group, (2) does not involve a cache that already contains a pseudo-locked region within its hierarchy. After a valid schemata is parsed the system is programmed to associate the to be pseudo-lock bitmask with the closid associated with the resource group. With the system set up the pseudo-locked region can be created. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8929c3a9e2ba600e79649abe584aa28b8d0ff639.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
Resource groups used for pseudo-locking do not require the same work on removal as the other resource groups. The resource group removal is split in two in preparation for support of pseudo-locking resource groups. A single re-ordering occurs - the setting of the rdtgrp flag is moved to later. This flag is not used by any of the code between its original and new location. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c8cbf7a7c72480b39bb946a929dbae96c0f9aca1.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
The user can request entering pseudo-locksetup mode by writing "pseudo-locksetup" to the mode file. Act on this request as well as support switching from a pseudo-locksetup mode (before pseudo-locked mode was entered). It is not supported to modify the mode once pseudo-locked mode has been entered. The schemata reflects the new mode by adding "uninitialized" to all resources. The size resctrl file reports zero for all cache domains in support of the uninitialized nature. Since there are no users of this class of service its allocations can be ignored when searching for appropriate default allocations for new resource groups. For the same reason resource groups in pseudo-locksetup mode are not considered when testing if new resource groups may overlap. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/56f553334708022903c296284e62db3bbc1ff150.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
We intend to modify file permissions to make the "tasks", "cpus", and "cpus_list" not accessible to the user when cache pseudo-locking in progress. Even so, it is still possible for the user to force the file permissions (using chmod) to make them writeable. Similarly, directory permissions will be modified to prevent future monitor group creation but the user can override these restrictions also. Add additional checks to the files we intend to restrict to ensure that no modifications from user space are attempted while setting up a pseudo-locking or after a pseudo-locked region is set up. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0c5cb006e81ead0b8bfff2df530c5d3017fd31d1.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
When a resource group is used for Cache Pseudo-Locking then the region of cache ends up being orphaned with no class of service referring to it. The resctrl files intended to manage how the classes of services are utilized thus become irrelevant. The fact that a resctrl file is not relevant can be communicated to the user by setting all of its permissions to zero. That is, its read, write, and execute permissions are unset for all users. Introduce two utilities, rdtgroup_kn_mode_restrict() and rdtgroup_kn_mode_restore(), that can be used to restrict and restore the permissions of a file or directory belonging to a resource group. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/7afdbf5551b2f93cd45d61fbf5e01d87331f529a.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
In considering changes to a resource group it becomes necessary to know whether tasks have been assigned to the resource group in question. Introduce a new utility that can be used to check if any tasks have been assigned to a particular resource group. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/be9ea3969ffd731dfd90c0ebcd5a0e0a2d135bb2.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
By default, if the opener has CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE, a kernfs file can be opened regardless of RW permissions. Writing to a kernfs file will thus succeed even if permissions are 0000. It's required to restrict the actions that can be performed on a resource group from userspace based on the mode of the resource group. This restriction will be done through a modification of the file permissions. That is, for example, if a resource group is locked then the user cannot add tasks to the resource group. For this restriction through file permissions to work it has to be ensured that the permissions are always respected. To do so the resctrl filesystem is created with the KERNFS_ROOT_EXTRA_OPEN_PERM_CHECK flag that will result in open(2) failing with -EACCESS regardless of CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE if the permission does not have the respective read or write access. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/26f4fc25f110bfc07c2d2c8b2c4ee904922fedf7.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
The two modes used to manage Cache Pseudo-Locked regions are introduced. A resource group is assigned "pseudo-locksetup" mode when the user indicates that this resource group will be used for a Cache Pseudo-Locked region. When the Cache Pseudo-Locked region has been set up successfully after the user wrote the requested schemata to the "schemata" file, then the mode will automatically changed to "pseudo-locked". The user is not able to modify the mode to "pseudo-locked" by writing "pseudo-locked" to the "mode" file directly. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/98d6ca129bbe7dd0932d1fcfeb3cbb65f29a8d9d.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
The schemata file displays the allocations associated with each domain of each resource. The syntax of this file reflects the capacity bitmask (CBM) of the actual allocation. In order to determine the actual size of an allocation the user needs to dig through three different files to query the variables needed to compute it (the cache size, the CBM length, and the schemata). Introduce a new file "size" associated with each resource group that will mirror the schemata file syntax and display the size in bytes of each allocation. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cc0058014c30adb88ca7d1a5abfadacbfb5edd0d.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
With cache regions now explicitly marked as "shareable" or "exclusive" we would like to communicate to the user how portions of the cache are used. Introduce "bit_usage" that indicates for each resource how portions of the cache are configured to be used. To assist the user to distinguish whether the sharing is from software or hardware we add the following annotation: 0 - currently unused X - currently available for sharing and used by software and hardware H - currently used by hardware only but available for software use S - currently used and shareable by software only E - currently used exclusively by one resource group Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/105d44c40e582c2b7e2dccf0ae247e5e61137d4b.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
When the administrator requests a change in a resource group's schemata we have to ensure that the new schemata respects the current resource group as well as the other active resource groups' schemata. The new schemata is not allowed to overlap with the schemata of any exclusive resource groups. Similarly, if the resource group being changed is exclusive then its new schemata is not allowed to overlap with any schemata of any other active resource group. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b0c05b21110d3040fff45f4c1d2cfda8dba3f207.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
The new "mode" file now accepts "exclusive" that means that the allocations of this resource group cannot be shared. Enable users to modify a resource group's mode to "exclusive". To succeed it is required that there is no overlap between resource group's current schemata and that of all the other active resource groups as well as cache regions potentially used by other hardware entities. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/83642cbba3c8c21db7fa6bb36fe7d385d3b275f2.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
At the moment all allocations are shareable. There is no way for a user to designate that an allocation associated with a resource group cannot be shared by another. Introduce the new mode "exclusive". When a resource group is marked as such it implies that no overlap is allowed between its allocation and that of another resource group. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/f6d24672a4280fe3b24cd2da9b5f50214439c1af.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
Currently when a new resource group is created its allocations would be those that belonged to the resource group to which its closid belonged previously. That is, we can encounter a case like: mkdir newgroup cat newgroup/schemata L2:0=ff;1=ff echo 'L2:0=0xf0;1=0xf0' > newgroup/schemata cat newgroup/schemata L2:0=0xf0;1=0xf0 rmdir newgroup mkdir newnewgroup cat newnewgroup/schemata L2:0=0xf0;1=0xf0 When the new group is created it would be reasonable to expect its allocations to be initialized with all regions that it can possibly use. At this time these regions would be all that are shareable by other resource groups as well as regions that are not currently used. If the available cache region is found to be non-contiguous the available region is adjusted to enforce validity. When a new resource group is created the hardware is initialized with these new default allocations. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c468ed79340b63024111978e01430bb9589d85c0.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
In support of the work done to enable resource groups to have different modes some static functions need to be available for sharing amongst all RDT components. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2af8fd6e937ae4fbdaa52dee1123823cb4993176.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
During CAT feature discovery the capacity bitmasks (CBMs) associated with all the classes of service are initialized to all ones, even if the class of service is not in use. Introduce a test that can be used to determine if a class of service is in use. This test enables code interested in parsing the CBMs to know if its values are meaningful or can be ignored. Temporarily mark the function as unused to silence compile warnings until it is used. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/798f8d89cd9b12df492d48c14bdc8ee3b39b1c6f.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
A new resctrl file "mode" associated with each resource group is introduced. This file will display the resource group's current mode and an administrator can also use it to modify the resource group's mode. Only shareable mode is currently supported. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20ab78fda26a8c8d98e18ec555f6a1f728948972.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
Each RDT resource group is associated with a mode that will reflect the level of sharing of its allocations. The default, shareable, will be associated with each resource group on creation since it is zero and resource groups are created with kzalloc. The managing of the mode of a resource group will follow. The default resource group always remain though so ensure that it is reset to the default mode when the resctrl filesystem is unmounted. Also introduce a utility that can be used to determine the mode of a resource group when it is searched for based on its class of service. Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/797e4e1de4e4fcdf5b5e0039354d6a28079e2015.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
Stephen Rothwell reported that the Cache Pseudo-Locking enabling and the kernfs support for mounting with fs_context are conflicting. In preparation for a conflict-free merge between the two repos some no-op hooks are created within the RDT mount function being changed by the two features. The goal is for this commit to be placed on a minimal no-rebase branch to be consumed by both features. Reported-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Suggested-by: NAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/410697ead08978bd12111c0afc4ce9e7bd71a5fe.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
- 19 5月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vikas Shivappa 提交于
When MBA software controller is enabled, a per domain storage is required for user specified bandwidth in "MBps" and the "percentage" values which are programmed into the IA32_MBA_THRTL_MSR. Add support for these data structures and initialization. The MBA percentage values have a default max value of 100 but however the max value in MBps is not available from the hardware so it's set to U32_MAX. This simply says that the control group can use all bandwidth by default but does not say what is the actual max bandwidth available. The actual bandwidth that is available may depend on lot of factors like QPI link, number of memory channels, memory channel frequency, its width and memory speed, how many channels are configured and also if memory interleaving is enabled. So there is no way to determine the maximum at runtime reliably. Signed-off-by: NVikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: ravi.v.shankar@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@intel.com Cc: ak@linux.intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1524263781-14267-4-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com
-
由 Vikas Shivappa 提交于
Currently user does memory bandwidth allocation(MBA) by specifying the bandwidth in percentage via the resctrl schemata file: "/sys/fs/resctrl/schemata" Add a new mount option "mba_MBps" to enable the user to specify MBA in MBps: $mount -t resctrl resctrl [-o cdp[,cdpl2][mba_MBps]] /sys/fs/resctrl Signed-off-by: NVikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: ravi.v.shankar@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@intel.com Cc: ak@linux.intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1524263781-14267-3-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com
-
- 23 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wang Hui 提交于
x86/intel_rdt: Fix incorrect returned value when creating rdgroup sub-directory in resctrl file system If no monitoring feature is detected because all monitoring features are disabled during boot time or there is no monitoring feature in hardware, creating rdtgroup sub-directory by "mkdir" command reports error: mkdir: cannot create directory ‘/sys/fs/resctrl/p1’: No such file or directory But the sub-directory actually is generated and content is correct: cpus cpus_list schemata tasks The error is because rdtgroup_mkdir_ctrl_mon() returns non zero value after the sub-directory is created and the returned value is reported as an error to user. Clear the returned value to report to user that the sub-directory is actually created successfully. Signed-off-by: NWang Hui <john.wanghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NZhang Yanfei <yanfei.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vikas <vikas.shivappa@intel.com> Cc: Xiaochen Shen <xiaochen.shen@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519356363-133085-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 18 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Fenghua Yu 提交于
Bit 0 in MSR IA32_L2_QOS_CFG (0xc82) is L2 CDP enable bit. By default, the bit is zero, i.e. L2 CAT is enabled, and L2 CDP is disabled. When the resctrl mount parameter "cdpl2" is given, the bit is set to 1 and L2 CDP is enabled. In L2 CDP mode, the L2 CAT mask MSRs are re-mapped into interleaved pairs of mask MSRs for code (referenced by an odd CLOSID) and data (referenced by an even CLOSID). Signed-off-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vikas" <vikas.shivappa@intel.com> Cc: Sai Praneeth" <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> Cc: Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1513810644-78015-6-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
-
- 21 10月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
Sai reported a warning during some MBA tests: [ 236.755559] ====================================================== [ 236.762443] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 236.769328] 4.14.0-rc4-yocto-standard #8 Not tainted [ 236.774857] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 236.781738] mount/10091 is trying to acquire lock: [ 236.787071] (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: [<ffffffff8117f892>] static_key_enable+0x12/0x30 [ 236.797058] but task is already holding lock: [ 236.803552] (&type->s_umount_key#37/1){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81208b2f>] sget_userns+0x32f/0x520 [ 236.813247] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 236.822353] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 236.830686] -> #4 (&type->s_umount_key#37/1){+.+.}: [ 236.837756] __lock_acquire+0x1100/0x11a0 [ 236.842799] lock_acquire+0xdf/0x1d0 [ 236.847363] down_write_nested+0x46/0x80 [ 236.852310] sget_userns+0x32f/0x520 [ 236.856873] kernfs_mount_ns+0x7e/0x1f0 [ 236.861728] rdt_mount+0x30c/0x440 [ 236.866096] mount_fs+0x38/0x150 [ 236.870262] vfs_kern_mount+0x67/0x150 [ 236.875015] do_mount+0x1df/0xd50 [ 236.879286] SyS_mount+0x95/0xe0 [ 236.883464] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad [ 236.889183] -> #3 (rdtgroup_mutex){+.+.}: [ 236.895292] __lock_acquire+0x1100/0x11a0 [ 236.900337] lock_acquire+0xdf/0x1d0 [ 236.904899] __mutex_lock+0x80/0x8f0 [ 236.909459] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [ 236.914407] intel_rdt_online_cpu+0x3b/0x4a0 [ 236.919745] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xce/0xb80 [ 236.925177] cpuhp_thread_fun+0x1c5/0x230 [ 236.930222] smpboot_thread_fn+0x11a/0x1e0 [ 236.935362] kthread+0x152/0x190 [ 236.939536] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 [ 236.944097] -> #2 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}: [ 236.950199] __lock_acquire+0x1100/0x11a0 [ 236.955241] lock_acquire+0xdf/0x1d0 [ 236.959800] cpuhp_issue_call+0x12e/0x1c0 [ 236.964845] __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x13b/0x2f0 [ 236.971242] __cpuhp_setup_state+0xa7/0x120 [ 236.976483] page_writeback_init+0x43/0x67 [ 236.981623] pagecache_init+0x38/0x3b [ 236.986281] start_kernel+0x3c6/0x41a [ 236.990931] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c [ 236.996650] x86_64_start_kernel+0x72/0x75 [ 237.001793] verify_cpu+0x0/0xfb [ 237.005966] -> #1 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}: [ 237.012364] __lock_acquire+0x1100/0x11a0 [ 237.017408] lock_acquire+0xdf/0x1d0 [ 237.021969] __mutex_lock+0x80/0x8f0 [ 237.026527] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [ 237.031475] __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x54/0x2f0 [ 237.037777] __cpuhp_setup_state+0xa7/0x120 [ 237.043013] page_alloc_init+0x28/0x30 [ 237.047769] start_kernel+0x148/0x41a [ 237.052425] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c [ 237.058145] x86_64_start_kernel+0x72/0x75 [ 237.063284] verify_cpu+0x0/0xfb [ 237.067456] -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: [ 237.074436] check_prev_add+0x401/0x800 [ 237.079286] __lock_acquire+0x1100/0x11a0 [ 237.084330] lock_acquire+0xdf/0x1d0 [ 237.088890] cpus_read_lock+0x42/0x90 [ 237.093548] static_key_enable+0x12/0x30 [ 237.098496] rdt_mount+0x406/0x440 [ 237.102862] mount_fs+0x38/0x150 [ 237.107035] vfs_kern_mount+0x67/0x150 [ 237.111787] do_mount+0x1df/0xd50 [ 237.116058] SyS_mount+0x95/0xe0 [ 237.120233] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad [ 237.125952] other info that might help us debug this: [ 237.134867] Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> rdtgroup_mutex --> &type->s_umount_key#37/1 [ 237.148425] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 237.155015] CPU0 CPU1 [ 237.160057] ---- ---- [ 237.165100] lock(&type->s_umount_key#37/1); [ 237.169952] lock(rdtgroup_mutex); [ 237.176641] lock(&type->s_umount_key#37/1); [ 237.184287] lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem); [ 237.189041] *** DEADLOCK *** When the resctrl filesystem is mounted the locks must be acquired in the same order as was done when the cpus came online: cpu_hotplug_lock before rdtgroup_mutex. This also requires to switch the static_branch_enable() calls to the _cpulocked variant because now cpu hotplug lock is held already. [ tglx: Switched to cpus_read_[un]lock ] Reported-by: NSai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Tested-by: NSai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> Acked-by: NVikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9c41b91bc2f47d9e95b62b213ecdb45623c47a9f.1508490116.git.reinette.chatre@intel.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Reinette Chatre 提交于
Lockdep warns about a potential deadlock: [ 66.782842] ====================================================== [ 66.782888] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 66.782937] 4.14.0-rc2-test-test+ #48 Not tainted [ 66.782983] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 66.783052] umount/336 is trying to acquire lock: [ 66.783117] (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: [<ffffffff81032395>] rdt_kill_sb+0x215/0x390 [ 66.783193] but task is already holding lock: [ 66.783244] (rdtgroup_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810321b6>] rdt_kill_sb+0x36/0x390 [ 66.783305] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 66.783364] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 66.783419] -> #3 (rdtgroup_mutex){+.+.}: [ 66.783467] __lock_acquire+0x1293/0x13f0 [ 66.783509] lock_acquire+0xaf/0x220 [ 66.783543] __mutex_lock+0x71/0x9b0 [ 66.783575] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [ 66.783610] intel_rdt_online_cpu+0x3b/0x430 [ 66.783649] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xab/0x8e0 [ 66.783687] cpuhp_thread_fun+0x7a/0x150 [ 66.783722] smpboot_thread_fn+0x1cc/0x270 [ 66.783764] kthread+0x16e/0x190 [ 66.783794] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 [ 66.783825] -> #2 (cpuhp_state){+.+.}: [ 66.783870] __lock_acquire+0x1293/0x13f0 [ 66.783906] lock_acquire+0xaf/0x220 [ 66.783938] cpuhp_issue_call+0x102/0x170 [ 66.783974] __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x154/0x2a0 [ 66.784023] __cpuhp_setup_state+0xc7/0x170 [ 66.784061] page_writeback_init+0x43/0x67 [ 66.784097] pagecache_init+0x43/0x4a [ 66.784131] start_kernel+0x3ad/0x3f7 [ 66.784165] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c [ 66.784204] x86_64_start_kernel+0x72/0x75 [ 66.784241] verify_cpu+0x0/0xfb [ 66.784270] -> #1 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}: [ 66.784319] __lock_acquire+0x1293/0x13f0 [ 66.784355] lock_acquire+0xaf/0x220 [ 66.784387] __mutex_lock+0x71/0x9b0 [ 66.784419] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [ 66.784454] __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x52/0x2a0 [ 66.784497] __cpuhp_setup_state+0xc7/0x170 [ 66.784535] page_alloc_init+0x28/0x30 [ 66.784569] start_kernel+0x148/0x3f7 [ 66.784602] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c [ 66.784642] x86_64_start_kernel+0x72/0x75 [ 66.784678] verify_cpu+0x0/0xfb [ 66.784707] -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: [ 66.784759] check_prev_add+0x32f/0x6e0 [ 66.784794] __lock_acquire+0x1293/0x13f0 [ 66.784830] lock_acquire+0xaf/0x220 [ 66.784863] cpus_read_lock+0x3d/0xb0 [ 66.784896] rdt_kill_sb+0x215/0x390 [ 66.784930] deactivate_locked_super+0x3e/0x70 [ 66.784968] deactivate_super+0x40/0x60 [ 66.785003] cleanup_mnt+0x3f/0x80 [ 66.785034] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20 [ 66.785070] task_work_run+0x8b/0xc0 [ 66.785103] exit_to_usermode_loop+0x94/0xa0 [ 66.786804] syscall_return_slowpath+0xe8/0x150 [ 66.788502] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0xab/0xad [ 66.790194] other info that might help us debug this: [ 66.795139] Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> cpuhp_state --> rdtgroup_mutex [ 66.800035] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 66.803267] CPU0 CPU1 [ 66.804867] ---- ---- [ 66.806443] lock(rdtgroup_mutex); [ 66.808002] lock(cpuhp_state); [ 66.809565] lock(rdtgroup_mutex); [ 66.811110] lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem); [ 66.812608] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 66.816983] 2 locks held by umount/336: [ 66.818418] #0: (&type->s_umount_key#35){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81229738>] deactivate_super+0x38/0x60 [ 66.819922] #1: (rdtgroup_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810321b6>] rdt_kill_sb+0x36/0x390 When the resctrl filesystem is unmounted the locks should be obtain in the locks in the same order as was done when the cpus came online: cpu_hotplug_lock before rdtgroup_mutex. This also requires to switch the static_branch_disable() calls to the _cpulocked variant because now cpu hotplug lock is held already. [ tglx: Switched to cpus_read_[un]lock ] Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: NSai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> Acked-by: NVikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Acked-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cc292e76be073f7260604651711c47b09fd0dc81.1508490116.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
-
- 05 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jithu Joseph 提交于
The assignment to the 'files' variable is immediately overwritten in the following line. Remove the older assignment, which was meant specifially for creating control groups files. Fixes: c7d9aac6 ("x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Add mkdir support for RDT monitoring") Reported-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: vikas.shivappa@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507157337-18118-1-git-send-email-jithu.joseph@intel.com
-