Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 29 1月, 2014 2 次提交
  3. 25 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 21 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 12 11月, 2013 7 次提交
  9. 11 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: limit delalloc pages outside of find_delalloc_range · 7bf811a5
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      Liu fixed part of this problem and unfortunately I steered him in slightly the
wrong direction and so didn't completely fix the problem.  The problem is we
limit the size of the delalloc range we are looking for to max bytes and then we
try to lock that range.  If we fail to lock the pages in that range we will
shrink the max bytes to a single page and re loop.  However if our first page is
inside of the delalloc range then we will end up limiting the end of the range
to a period before our first page.  This is illustrated below

[0 -------- delalloc range --------- 256mb]
                                  [page]

So find_delalloc_range will return with delalloc_start as 0 and end as 128mb,
and then we will notice that delalloc_start < *start and adjust it up, but not
adjust delalloc_end up, so things go sideways.  To fix this we need to not limit
the max bytes in find_delalloc_range, but in find_lock_delalloc_range and that
way we don't end up with this confusion.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      7bf811a5
  11. 05 10月, 2013 2 次提交
    • D
      btrfs: Fix crash due to not allocating integrity data for a bioset · b208c2f7
      由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于 
      When btrfs creates a bioset, we must also allocate the integrity data pool.
Otherwise btrfs will crash when it tries to submit a bio to a checksumming
disk:

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018
 IP: [<ffffffff8111e28a>] mempool_alloc+0x4a/0x150
 PGD 2305e4067 PUD 23063d067 PMD 0
 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
 Modules linked in: btrfs scsi_debug xfs ext4 jbd2 ext3 jbd mbcache
sch_fq_codel eeprom lpc_ich mfd_core nfsd exportfs auth_rpcgss af_packet
raid6_pq xor zlib_deflate libcrc32c [last unloaded: scsi_debug]
 CPU: 1 PID: 4486 Comm: mount Not tainted 3.12.0-rc1-mcsum #2
 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 task: ffff8802451c9720 ti: ffff880230698000 task.ti: ffff880230698000
 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8111e28a>]  [<ffffffff8111e28a>] mempool_alloc+0x4a/0x150
 RSP: 0018:ffff880230699688  EFLAGS: 00010286
 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000005f8445
 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: 0000000000000000
 RBP: ffff8802306996f8 R08: 0000000000011200 R09: 0000000000000008
 R10: 0000000000000020 R11: ffff88009d6e8000 R12: 0000000000011210
 R13: 0000000000000030 R14: ffff8802306996b8 R15: ffff8802451c9720
 FS:  00007f25b8a16800(0000) GS:ffff88024fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
 CR2: 0000000000000018 CR3: 0000000230576000 CR4: 00000000000007e0
 Stack:
  ffff8802451c9720 0000000000000002 ffffffff81a97100 0000000000281250
  ffffffff81a96480 ffff88024fc99150 ffff880228d18200 0000000000000000
  0000000000000000 0000000000000040 ffff880230e8c2e8 ffff8802459dc900
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff811b2208>] bio_integrity_alloc+0x48/0x1b0
  [<ffffffff811b26fc>] bio_integrity_prep+0xac/0x360
  [<ffffffff8111e298>] ? mempool_alloc+0x58/0x150
  [<ffffffffa03e8041>] ? alloc_extent_state+0x31/0x110 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff81241579>] blk_queue_bio+0x1c9/0x460
  [<ffffffff8123e58a>] generic_make_request+0xca/0x100
  [<ffffffff8123e639>] submit_bio+0x79/0x160
  [<ffffffffa03f865e>] btrfs_map_bio+0x48e/0x5b0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03c821a>] btree_submit_bio_hook+0xda/0x110 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03e7eba>] submit_one_bio+0x6a/0xa0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03ef450>] read_extent_buffer_pages+0x250/0x310 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff8125eef6>] ? __radix_tree_preload+0x66/0xf0
  [<ffffffff8125f1c5>] ? radix_tree_insert+0x95/0x260
  [<ffffffffa03c66f6>] btree_read_extent_buffer_pages.constprop.128+0xb6/0x120
[btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03c8c1a>] read_tree_block+0x3a/0x60 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03caefd>] open_ctree+0x139d/0x2030 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03a282a>] btrfs_mount+0x53a/0x7d0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff8113ab0b>] ? pcpu_alloc+0x8eb/0x9f0
  [<ffffffff81167305>] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x35/0x1e0
  [<ffffffff81176ba0>] mount_fs+0x20/0xd0
  [<ffffffff81191096>] vfs_kern_mount+0x76/0x120
  [<ffffffff81193320>] do_mount+0x200/0xa40
  [<ffffffff81135cdb>] ? strndup_user+0x5b/0x80
  [<ffffffff81193bf0>] SyS_mount+0x90/0xe0
  [<ffffffff8156d31d>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
 Code: 4c 8d 75 a8 4c 89 6d e8 45 89 e0 4c 8d 6f 30 48 89 5d d8 41 83 e0 af 48
89 fb 49 83 c6 18 4c 89 7d f8 65 4c 8b 3c 25 c0 b8 00 00 <48> 8b 73 18 44 89 c7
44 89 45 98 ff 53 20 48 85 c0 48 89 c2 74
 RIP  [<ffffffff8111e28a>] mempool_alloc+0x4a/0x150
  RSP <ffff880230699688>
 CR2: 0000000000000018
 ---[ end trace 7a96042017ed21e2 ]---
Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      b208c2f7
    • L
      Btrfs: fix crash of compressed writes · 385fe0be
      由 Liu Bo 提交于 
      The crash[1] is found by xfstests/generic/208 with "-o compress",
it's not reproduced everytime, but it does panic.

The bug is quite interesting, it's actually introduced by a recent commit
(573aecaf,
Btrfs: actually limit the size of delalloc range).

Btrfs implements delay allocation, so during writeback, we
(1) get a page A and lock it
(2) search the state tree for delalloc bytes and lock all pages within the range
(3) process the delalloc range, including find disk space and create
    ordered extent and so on.
(4) submit the page A.

It runs well in normal cases, but if we're in a racy case, eg.
buffered compressed writes and aio-dio writes,
sometimes we may fail to lock all pages in the 'delalloc' range,
in which case, we need to fall back to search the state tree again with
a smaller range limit(max_bytes = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - offset).

The mentioned commit has a side effect, that is, in the fallback case,
we can find delalloc bytes before the index of the page we already have locked,
so we're in the case of (delalloc_end <= *start) and return with (found > 0).

This ends with not locking delalloc pages but making ->writepage still
process them, and the crash happens.

This fixes it by just thinking that we find nothing and returning to caller
as the caller knows how to deal with it properly.

[1]:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:2170!
[...]
CPU: 2 PID: 11755 Comm: btrfs-delalloc- Tainted: G           O 3.11.0+ #8
[...]
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810f5093>]  [<ffffffff810f5093>] clear_page_dirty_for_io+0x1e/0x83
[...]
[ 4934.248731] Stack:
[ 4934.248731]  ffff8801477e5dc8 ffffea00049b9f00 ffff8801869f9ce8 ffffffffa02b841a
[ 4934.248731]  0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000fff 0000000000000620
[ 4934.248731]  ffff88018db59c78 ffffea0005da8d40 ffffffffa02ff860 00000001810016c0
[ 4934.248731] Call Trace:
[ 4934.248731]  [<ffffffffa02b841a>] extent_range_clear_dirty_for_io+0xcf/0xf5 [btrfs]
[ 4934.248731]  [<ffffffffa02a8889>] compress_file_range+0x1dc/0x4cb [btrfs]
[ 4934.248731]  [<ffffffff8104f7af>] ? detach_if_pending+0x22/0x4b
[ 4934.248731]  [<ffffffffa02a8bad>] async_cow_start+0x35/0x53 [btrfs]
[ 4934.248731]  [<ffffffffa02c694b>] worker_loop+0x14b/0x48c [btrfs]
[ 4934.248731]  [<ffffffffa02c6800>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x25c/0x25c [btrfs]
[ 4934.248731]  [<ffffffff810608f5>] kthread+0x8d/0x95
[ 4934.248731]  [<ffffffff81060868>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x43/0x43
[ 4934.248731]  [<ffffffff814fe09c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[ 4934.248731]  [<ffffffff81060868>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x43/0x43
[ 4934.248731] Code: ff 85 c0 0f 94 c0 0f b6 c0 59 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 54 53 48 89 fb e8 2c de 00 00 49 89 c4 48 8b 03 a8 01 75 02 <0f> 0b 4d 85 e4 74 52 49 8b 84 24 80 00 00 00 f6 40 20 01 75 44
[ 4934.248731] RIP  [<ffffffff810f5093>] clear_page_dirty_for_io+0x1e/0x83
[ 4934.248731]  RSP <ffff8801869f9c48>
[ 4934.280307] ---[ end trace 36f06d3f8750236a ]---
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      385fe0be
  13. 21 9月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: actually limit the size of delalloc range · 573aecaf
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      So forever we have had this thing to limit the amount of delalloc pages we'll
setup to be written out to 128mb.  This is because we have to lock all the pages
in this range, so anything above this gets a bit unweildly, and also without a
limit we'll happily allocate gigantic chunks of disk space.  Turns out our check
for this wasn't quite right, we wouldn't actually limit the chunk we wanted to
write out, we'd just stop looking for more space after we went over the limit.
So if you do a giant 20gb dd on my box with lots of ram I could get 2gig
extents.  This is fine normally, except when you go to relocate these extents
and we can't find enough space to relocate these moster extents, since we have
to be able to allocate exactly the same sized extent to move it around.  So fix
this by actually enforcing the limit.  With this patch I'm no longer seeing
giant 1.5gb extents.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      573aecaf
  15. 01 9月, 2013 14 次提交
  17. 10 8月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: do not offset physical if we're compressed · b76bb701
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      xfstest btrfs/276 was freaking out on slower boxes partly because fiemap was
offsetting the physical based on the extent offset.  This is perfectly fine with
uncompressed extents, however the extent offset is into the uncompressed area,
not the compressed.  So we can return a physical value that isn't at all within
the area we have allocated on disk.  Fix this by returning the start of the
extent if it is compressed no matter what the offset.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      b76bb701
  19. 02 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: check if we can nocow if we don't have data space · 7ee9e440
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      We always just try and reserve data space when we write, but if we are out of
space but have prealloc'ed extents we should still successfully write.  This
patch will try and see if we can write to prealloc'ed space and if we can go
ahead and allow the write to continue.  With this patch we now pass xfstests
generic/274.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      7ee9e440
  21. 01 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: move btrfs_truncate_page to btrfs_cont_expand instead of btrfs_truncate · a71754fc
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      This has plagued us forever and I'm so over working around it.  When we truncate
down to a non-page aligned offset we will call btrfs_truncate_page to zero out
the end of the page and write it back to disk, this will keep us from exposing
stale data if we truncate back up from that point.  The problem with this is it
requires data space to do this, and people don't really expect to get ENOSPC
from truncate() for these sort of things.  This also tends to bite the orphan
cleanup stuff too which keeps people from mounting.  To get around this we can
just move this into btrfs_cont_expand() to make sure if we are truncating up
from a non-page size aligned i_size we will zero out the rest of this page so
that we don't expose stale data.  This will give ENOSPC if you try to truncate()
up or if you try to write past the end of isize, which is much more reasonable.
This fixes xfstests generic/083 failing to mount because of the orphan cleanup
failing.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      a71754fc
  23. 14 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  25. 22 5月, 2013 1 次提交
    • L
      mm: change invalidatepage prototype to accept length · d47992f8
      由 Lukas Czerner 提交于 
      Currently there is no way to truncate partial page where the end
truncate point is not at the end of the page. This is because it was not
needed and the functionality was enough for file system truncate
operation to work properly. However more file systems now support punch
hole feature and it can benefit from mm supporting truncating page just
up to the certain point.

Specifically, with this functionality truncate_inode_pages_range() can
be changed so it supports truncating partial page at the end of the
range (currently it will BUG_ON() if 'end' is not at the end of the
page).

This commit changes the invalidatepage() address space operation
prototype to accept range to be invalidated and update all the instances
for it.

We also change the block_invalidatepage() in the same way and actually
make a use of the new length argument implementing range invalidation.

Actual file system implementations will follow except the file systems
where the changes are really simple and should not change the behaviour
in any way .Implementation for truncate_page_range() which will be able
to accept page unaligned ranges will follow as well.
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
      d47992f8
  27. 18 5月, 2013 3 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: use a btrfs bioset instead of abusing bio internals · 9be3395b
      由 Chris Mason 提交于 
      Btrfs has been pointer tagging bi_private and using bi_bdev
to store the stripe index and mirror number of failed IOs.

As bios bubble back up through the call chain, we use these
to decide if and how to retry our IOs.  They are also used
to count IO failures on a per device basis.

Recently a bio tracepoint was added lead to crashes because
we were abusing bi_bdev.

This commit adds a btrfs bioset, and creates explicit fields
for the mirror number and stripe index.  The plan is to
extend this structure for all of the fields currently in
struct btrfs_bio, which will mean one less kmalloc in
our IO path.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Reported-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      9be3395b
    • A
      btrfs: do away with non-whole_page extent I/O · 17a5adcc
      由 Alexandre Oliva 提交于 
      end_bio_extent_readpage computes whole_page based on bv_offset and
bv_len, without taking into account that blk_update_request may modify
them when some of the blocks to be read into a page produce a read
error.  This would cause the read to unlock only part of the file
range associated with the page, which would in turn leave the entire
page locked, which would not only keep the process blocked instead of
returning -EIO to it, but also prevent any further access to the file.

It turns out that btrfs always issues whole-page reads and writes.
The special handling of non-whole_page appears to be a mistake or a
left-over from a time when this wasn't the case.  Indeed,
end_bio_extent_writepage distinguished between whole_page and
non-whole_page writes but behaved identically in both cases!

I've replaced the whole_page computations with warnings, just to be
sure that we're not issuing partial page reads or writes.  The
warnings should probably just go away some time.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      17a5adcc
    • L
      Btrfs: fix off-by-one in fiemap · a52f4cd2
      由 Liu Bo 提交于 
      lock_extent/unlock_extent expect an exclusive end.
Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      a52f4cd2
  29. 07 5月, 2013 3 次提交