Use WARN rather than printk followed by WARN_ON(1), for conciseness.

A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation
is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression list es;
@@

-printk(
+WARN(1,
  es);
-WARN_ON(1);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

If we set BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC, we should log all the extent,
but now we forget to take it into account, and set a wrong max key,
if so, we will skip the file extent metadata when doing logging. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

We forget to protect the modified_extents list, fix it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

There are two types of the file extent - inline extent and regular extent,
When we log file extents, we didn't take inline extent into account, fix it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Consider the following case:
	Task1				Task2
	start_transaction
					commit_transaction
					  check pending snapshots list and the
					  list is empty.
	add pending snapshot into list
					  skip the delalloc flush
	end_transaction
					  ...

And then the problem that the snapshot is different with the source subvolume
happen.

This patch fixes the above problem by flush all pending stuffs when all the
other tasks end the transaction.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

If we flush inodes with pending delalloc in a transaction, we may join
the same transaction handler more than 2 times.

The reason is:
  Task						use_count of trans handle
  commit_transaction				1
    |-> btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes		1
	  |-> run_delalloc_nocow		1
		|-> join_transaction		2
		|-> cow_file_range		2
			|-> join_transaction	3

In fact, cow_file_range needn't join the transaction again because the caller
have joined the transaction, so we fix this problem by this way.
Reported-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Variable 'found' is no more used.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

btrfs_wait_ordered_range expects for 'len' instead of 'end'.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

When we log new names, we need to log just enough to recreate the inode
during log replay, and there is no need to log extents along with it.

This actually fixes a bug revealed by xfstests 241, where it shows
that we're logging some extents that have not updated metadata,
so we don't get proper EXTENT_DATA items to be copied to log tree.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

The current behavior is to allow mounting or remounting a filesystem
writeable in degraded mode if at least one writeable device is
present.
The next failed write access to a missing device which is above
the tolerance of the configured level of redundancy results in an
read-only enforcement. Even without this, the next time
barrier_all_devices() is called and more devices are missing than
tolerable, the switch to read-only mode takes place.

In order to behave predictably and to provide proper feedback to
the user at mount time, this patch compares the number of missing
devices with the number of devices that are tolerated to be missing
according to the configured RAID level. If more devices are missing
than tolerated, e.g. if two devices are missing in case of RAID1,
only a read-only mount and remount is allowed.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Correct spelling typo in btrfs.
Signed-off-by: NMasanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Remove an invalid size check up from btrfs_shrink_dev().

The new size should not larger than the device->total_bytes as it was
already verified before coming to here(i.e. new_size < old_size).

Remove invalid check up for btrfs_shrink_dev().
Signed-off-by: NJie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Though the process of the ordered extents is a bit different with the delalloc inode
flush, but we can see it as a subset of the delalloc inode flush, so we also handle
them by flush workers.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

The process of the ordered operations is similar to the delalloc inode flush, so
we handle them by flush workers.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

This patch introduce a new worker pool named "flush_workers", and if we
want to force all the inode with pending delalloc to the disks, we can
queue those inodes into the work queue of the worker pool, in this way,
those inodes will be flushed by multi-task.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Dave gave me an image of a very full file system that would abort the
transaction because it ran out of space while committing the transaction.
This is because we would think there was plenty of room to create a snapshot
even though the global reserve was not full.  This happens because we
calculate the global reserve size before we unpin any space, so after we
unpin the space we allow reservations to occur even though we haven't
reserved all of the space for our global reserve.  Fix this by adding to the
global reserve while unpinning in order to make sure we always have enough
space to do our work.  With this patch we no longer end up with an aborted
transaction, we return ENOSPC properly to the person trying to create the
snapshot.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

'disk_key' is not used at all.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

The argument 'tree_mod_log' is not necessary since all of callers enable it.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Since we don't use MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING to add nritems
during rewinding, we should insert a MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE operation first.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Key MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING means that we're doing memmove inside
an extent buffer node, and the node's number of items remains unchanged
(unless we are inserting a single pointer, but we have MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD for that).

So we don't need to increase node's number of items during rewinding,
otherwise we may get an node larger than leafsize and cause general protection
errors later.

Here is the details,
- If we do memory move for inserting a single pointer, we need to
  add node's nritems by one, and we honor MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD for adding.

- If we do memory move for deleting a single pointer, we need to
  decrease node's nritems by one, and we honor MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE for
  deleting.

- If we do memory move for balance left/right, we need to decrease
  node's nritems, and we honor MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE for balaning.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

When we find a bitmap free space entry, we may check the previous extent
entry covers the offset or not. But if we find this entry is also a bitmap
entry, we will continue to check the previous entry of the current one by
a while loop. It is unnecessary because it is impossible that the extent
entry which is in front of a bitmap entry can cover the offset of the entry
after that bitmap entry.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Alex reported a problem where we were writing between chunks on a rbd
device.  The thing is we do bio_add_page using logical offsets, but the
physical offset may be different.  So when we map the bio now check to see
if the bio is still ok with the physical offset, and if it is not split the
bio up and redo the bio_add_page with the physical sector.  This fixes the
problem for Alex and doesn't affect performance in the normal case.  Thanks,
Reported-and-tested-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

In some places(such as: evicting inode), we just can not flush the reserved
space of delalloc, flushing the delayed directory index and delayed inode
is OK, but we don't try to flush those things and just go back when there is
no enough space to be reserved. This patch fixes this problem.

We defined 3 types of the flush operations: NO_FLUSH, FLUSH_LIMIT and FLUSH_ALL.
If we can in the transaction, we should not flush anything, or the deadlock
would happen, so use NO_FLUSH. If we flushing the reserved space of delalloc
would cause deadlock, use FLUSH_LIMIT. In the other cases, FLUSH_ALL is used,
and we will flush all things.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

The comment is not coincident with the code. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

div_factor{_fine} has been implemented for two times, cleanup it.
And I move them into a independent file named math.h because they are
common math functions.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

We BUG if we fail to commit the transaction when creating a snapshot, which
is just obnoxious.  Remove the BUG_ON().  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

After cloning root's node, we forgot to dec the src's ref
which can lead to a memory leak.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

On a really full file system I was getting ENOSPC back from
btrfs_update_inode when trying to update the parent inode when creating a
snapshot.  Just use the fallback method so we can update the inode and not
have to worry about having a delayed ref.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

This patch also requires a change in the user-space part of "receive".
We need to use "lchown" instead of "chown". We will do this in the
following patch.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@zadarastorage.com>

 	if (S_ISREG(sctx->cur_inode_mode)) {

Steps to reproduce:
 # mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 <disk1> <disk2>
 # btrfstune -S 1 <disk1>
 # mount <disk1> <mnt>
 # btrfs device add <disk3> <disk4> <mnt>
 # mount -o remount,rw <mnt>
 # dd if=/dev/zero of=<mnt>/tmpfile bs=1M count=1
 Deadlock happened.

It is because of the nested chunk allocation. When we wrote the data
into the filesystem, we would allocate the data chunk because there was
no data chunk in the filesystem. At the end of the data chunk allocation,
we should insert the metadata of the data chunk into the extent tree, but
there was no raid1 chunk, so we tried to lock the chunk allocation mutex to
allocate the new chunk, but we had held the mutex, the deadlock happened.

By rights, we would allocate the raid1 chunk when we added the second device
because the profile of the seed filesystem is raid1 and we had two devices.
But we didn't do that in fact. It is because the last step of the first device
insertion didn't commit the transaction. So when we added the second device,
we didn't cow the tree, and just inserted the relative metadata into the leaves
which were generated by the first device insertion, and its profile was dup.

So, I fix this problem by commiting the transaction at the end of the first
device insertion.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

Currently if len argument in btrfs_ioctl_fitrim() is smaller than
one FSB we will continue and finally return 0 bytes discarded.
However if the length to discard is smaller then file system block
we should really return EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>

We should free quota_root before returning from the error
handling code.
Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>

When sending a device file, the stream was missing the mode. Also the
rdev was encoded wrongly.
Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>

This adds support for the new extended inode refs to btrfs send.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

gcc says "warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always
true" because i is an unsigned long. And gcc is right this time.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>

To see the problem, create many hardlinks to the same file (120 should do it),
then look up paths by inode with:

  ls -i
  btrfs inspect inode-resolve -v $ino /mnt/btrfs

I noticed the memory layout of the fspath->val data had some irregularities
(some unnecessary gaps that stop appearing about halfway),
so I'm not sure there aren't any bugs left in it.

Emphasis the way tree_mod_log_insert_move avoids adding
MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING operations, depending on the direction of
the move operation.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

In get_old_root we grab a lock on the extent buffer before we obtain a
reference on that buffer. That order is changed now.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

In btrfs_find_all_roots' termination condition, we compare the level of the
old buffer we got from btrfs_search_old_slot to the level of the current
root node. We'd better compare it to the level of the rewinded root node.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

Tree mod log treated old root buffers as always empty buffers when starting
the rewind operations. However, the old root may still be part of the
current tree at a lower level, with still some valid entries.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>