- 28 7月, 2011 11 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Before the reader/writer locks, btrfs_next_leaf needed to keep the path blocking to avoid making lockdep upset. Now that btrfs_next_leaf only takes read locks, this isn't required. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This patch was originally from Tejun Heo. lockdep complains about the btrfs locking because we sometimes take btree locks from two different trees at the same time. The current classes are based only on level in the btree, which isn't enough information for lockdep to figure out if the lock is safe. This patch makes a class for each type of tree, and lumps all the FS trees that actually have files and directories into the same class. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The btrfs metadata btree is the source of significant lock contention, especially in the root node. This commit changes our locking to use a reader/writer lock. The lock is built on top of rw spinlocks, and it extends the lock tracking to remember if we have a read lock or a write lock when we go to blocking. Atomics count the number of blocking readers or writers at any given time. It removes all of the adaptive spinning from the old code and uses only the spinning/blocking hints inside of btrfs to decide when it should continue spinning. In read heavy workloads this is dramatically faster. In write heavy workloads we're still faster because of less contention on the root node lock. We suffer slightly in dbench because we schedule more often during write locks, but all other benchmarks so far are improved. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Hit this nice little deadlock. What happens is this __btrfs_end_transaction with throttle set, --use_count so it equals 0 btrfs_commit_transaction <somebody else actually manages to start the commit> btrfs_end_transaction --use_count so now its -1 <== BAD we just return and wait on the transaction This is bad because we just return after our use_count is -1 and don't let go of our num_writer count on the transaction, so the guy committing the transaction just sits there forever. Fix this by inc'ing our use_count if we're going to call commit_transaction so that if we call btrfs_end_transaction it's valid. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The extent_buffers have a very complex interface where we use HIGHMEM for metadata and try to cache a kmap mapping to access the memory. The next commit adds reader/writer locks, and concurrent use of this kmap cache would make it even more complex. This commit drops the ability to use HIGHMEM with extent buffers, and rips out all of the related code. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we balanced the chunks across the devices, BUG_ON() in __finish_chunk_alloc() was triggered. ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2568! [SNIP] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa049525e>] btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x8e/0xa0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04546b0>] do_chunk_alloc+0x330/0x3a0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa045c654>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb4/0x1f0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa045c86b>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xdb/0x350 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa048a8d8>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xd8/0x1d0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04476fd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x14d/0x5e0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa044660d>] ? read_block_for_search+0x14d/0x4d0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0447c9b>] btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x240 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa044dd5e>] btrfs_search_slot+0x49e/0x7a0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa044f07d>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x8d/0xf0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa045e973>] insert_with_overflow+0x43/0x110 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa045eb0d>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0xcd/0x1f0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0489bd0>] ? map_extent_buffer+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff812276ad>] ? rb_insert_color+0x9d/0x160 [<ffffffffa046cc40>] ? inode_tree_add+0xf0/0x150 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0474801>] btrfs_add_link+0xc1/0x1c0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff811dacac>] ? security_inode_init_security+0x1c/0x30 [<ffffffffa04a28aa>] ? btrfs_init_acl+0x4a/0x180 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa047492f>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x2f/0x70 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa046af16>] ? btrfs_init_inode_security+0x46/0x60 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0474ac0>] btrfs_create+0x150/0x1d0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81159c63>] ? generic_permission+0x23/0xb0 [<ffffffff8115b415>] vfs_create+0xa5/0xc0 [<ffffffff8115ce6e>] do_last+0x5fe/0x880 [<ffffffff8115dc0d>] path_openat+0xcd/0x3d0 [<ffffffff8115e029>] do_filp_open+0x49/0xa0 [<ffffffff8116a965>] ? alloc_fd+0x95/0x160 [<ffffffff8114f0c7>] do_sys_open+0x107/0x1e0 [<ffffffff810bcc3f>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1bf/0x1f0 [<ffffffff8114f1e0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30 [<ffffffff81484ec2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [SNIP] RIP [<ffffffffa049444a>] __finish_chunk_alloc+0x20a/0x220 [btrfs] The reason is: Task1 Space balance task do_chunk_alloc() __finish_chunk_alloc() update device info in the chunk tree alloc system metadata block relocate system metadata block group set system metadata block group readonly, This block group is the only one that can allocate space. So there is no free space that can be allocated now. find no space and don't try to alloc new chunk, and then return ENOSPC BUG_ON() in __finish_chunk_alloc() was triggered. Fix this bug by allocating a new system metadata chunk before relocating the old one if we find there is no free space which can be allocated after setting the old block group to be read-only. Reported-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Everybody else does this, we need to do it too. If we're syncing, we need to tag the pages we're going to write for writeback so we don't end up writing the same stuff over and over again if somebody is constantly redirtying our file. This will keep us from having latencies with heavy sync workloads. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
So I had this brilliant idea to use atomic counters for outstanding and reserved extents, but this turned out to be a bad idea. Consider this where we have 1 outstanding extent and 1 reserved extent Reserver Releaser atomic_dec(outstanding) now 0 atomic_read(outstanding)+1 get 1 atomic_read(reserved) get 1 don't actually reserve anything because they are the same atomic_cmpxchg(reserved, 1, 0) atomic_inc(outstanding) atomic_add(0, reserved) free reserved space for 1 extent Then the reserver now has no actual space reserved for it, and when it goes to finish the ordered IO it won't have enough space to do it's allocation and you get those lovely warnings. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Kill the check to see if we have 512mb of reserved space in delalloc and shrink_delalloc if we do. This causes unexpected latencies and we have other logic to see if we need to throttle. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
grab_cache_page will use mapping_gfp_mask(), which for all inodes is set to GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE. So instead use find_or_create_page in all cases where we need GFP_NOFS so we don't deadlock. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
A user reported a deadlock when copying a bunch of files. This is because they were low on memory and kthreadd got hung up trying to migrate pages for an allocation when starting the caching kthread. The page was locked by the person starting the caching kthread. To fix this we just need to use the async thread stuff so that the threads are already created and we don't have to worry about deadlocks. Thanks, Reported-by: NRoman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 11 7月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
First, we can sometimes free the state we're merging, which means anybody who calls merge_state() may have the state it passed in free'ed. This is problematic because we could end up caching the state, which makes caching useless as the state will no longer be part of the tree. So instead of free'ing the state we passed into merge_state(), set it's end to the other->end and free the other state. This way we are sure to cache the correct state. Also because we can merge states together, instead of only using the cache'd state if it's start == the start we are looking for, go ahead and use it if the start we are looking for is within the range of the cached state. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We used to store the checksums of the space cache directly in the space cache, however that doesn't work out too well if we have more space than we can fit the checksums into the first page. So instead use the normal checksumming infrastructure. There were problems with doing this originally but those problems don't exist now so this works out fine. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We keep having problems with early enospc, and that's because our method of making space is inherently racy. The problem is we can have one guy trying to make space for himself, and in the meantime people come in and steal his reservation. In order to stop this we make a waitqueue and put anybody who comes into reserve_metadata_bytes on that waitqueue if somebody is trying to make more space. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have to do weird things when handling enospc in the transaction joining code. Because we've already joined the transaction we cannot commit the transaction within the reservation code since it will deadlock, so we have to return EAGAIN and then make sure we don't retry too many times. Instead of doing this, just do the reservation the normal way before we join the transaction, that way we can do whatever we want to try and reclaim space, and then if it fails we know for sure we are out of space and we can return ENOSPC. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I've been watching how many btrfs_search_slot()'s we do and I noticed that when we create a file with selinux enabled we were doing 2 each time we initialize the security context. That's because we lookup the xattr first so we can delete it if we're setting a new value to an existing xattr. But in the create case we don't have any xattrs, so it is completely useless to have the extra lookup. So re-arrange things so that we only lookup first if we specifically have XATTR_REPLACE. That way in the basic case we only do 1 search, and in the more complicated case we do the normal 2 lookups. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 07 7月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We need to make sure the data relocation inode doesn't go through the delayed metadata updates, otherwise we get an oops during balance: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4303! [SNIP] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa03143fd>] ? update_ref_for_cow+0x22d/0x330 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0314951>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x451/0x5e0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa031355d>] ? read_block_for_search+0x14d/0x4d0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0314beb>] btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x240 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa031acae>] btrfs_search_slot+0x49e/0x7a0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa032d8af>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0xa0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8147bf0e>] ? mutex_lock+0x1e/0x50 [<ffffffffa0380cf1>] btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x71/0x160 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa037ff27>] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x67/0x190 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0381cf8>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0xe8/0x120 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa03365e0>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x250/0x850 [btrfs] [<ffffffff810f91d9>] ? find_get_pages+0x39/0x130 [<ffffffffa0336cd5>] ? join_transaction+0x25/0x250 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81081de0>] ? wake_up_bit+0x40/0x40 [<ffffffffa03785fa>] prepare_to_relocate+0xda/0xf0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa037f2bb>] relocate_block_group+0x4b/0x620 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0334cf5>] ? btrfs_clean_old_snapshots+0x35/0x150 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa037fa43>] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x1b3/0x2e0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0368ec0>] ? btrfs_tree_unlock+0x50/0x50 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa035e39b>] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x8b/0x670 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa031303d>] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0x3d/0x50 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa03577d8>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xd8/0x1d0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa031bea1>] ? btrfs_previous_item+0xb1/0x150 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa03577d8>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xd8/0x1d0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa035f5aa>] btrfs_balance+0x21a/0x2b0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0368898>] btrfs_ioctl+0x798/0xd20 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8111e358>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x148/0x270 [<ffffffff814809e8>] ? do_page_fault+0x1d8/0x4b0 [<ffffffff81160d6a>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x9a/0x540 [<ffffffff811612b1>] sys_ioctl+0xa1/0xb0 [<ffffffff81484ec2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [SNIP] RIP [<ffffffffa037c1cc>] btrfs_reloc_cow_block+0x22c/0x270 [btrfs] Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
A user reported an error where if we try to balance an fs after a device has been removed it will blow up. This is because we get an EIO back and this is where BUG_ON(ret) bites us in the ass. To fix we just exit. Thanks, Reported-by: NAnand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
There are three missed mount options settable by user which are not currently displayed in mount output. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 27 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: NJim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NJim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 25 6月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
A user reported this bug again where we have more bitmaps than we are supposed to. This is because we failed to load the free space cache, but don't update the ctl->total_bitmaps counter when we remove entries from the tree. This patch fixes this problem and we should be good to go again. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
data parameter should be u64 because a full-sized chunk flags field is passed instead of 0/1 for distinguishing data from metadata. All underlying functions expect u64. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
When we create a new inode, we aren't filling in the field that records the transaction that last changed this inode. If we then go to fsync that inode, it will be skipped because the field isn't filled in. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 18 6月, 2011 7 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Snapshot creation has two phases. One is the initial snapshot setup, and the second is done during commit, while nobody is allowed to modify the root we are snapshotting. The delayed metadata insertion code can break that rule, it does a delayed inode update on the inode of the parent of the snapshot, and delayed directory item insertion. This makes sure to run the pending delayed operations before we record the snapshot root, which avoids corruptions. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
When allocation fails in btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name, ret is not set although it is returned, holding a garbage value. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We have migrated the space for the delayed inode items from trans_block_rsv to global_block_rsv, but we forgot to set trans->block_rsv to global_block_rsv when we doing delayed inode operations, and the following Oops happened: [ 9792.654889] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]() [ 9792.654899] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. [ 9792.654900] Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables arc4 rt61pci rt2x00pci rt2x00lib snd_hda_codec_hdmi mac80211 snd_hda_codec_realtek cfg80211 snd_hda_intel edac_core snd_seq rfkill pcspkr serio_raw snd_hda_codec eeprom_93cx6 edac_mce_amd sp5100_tco i2c_piix4 k10temp snd_hwdep snd_seq_device snd_pcm floppy r8169 xhci_hcd mii snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc ipv6 firewire_ohci pata_acpi ata_generic firewire_core pata_via crc_itu_t radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 9792.654919] Pid: 2762, comm: rm Tainted: G W 2.6.39+ #1 [ 9792.654920] Call Trace: [ 9792.654922] [<ffffffff81053c4a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 9792.654925] [<ffffffff81053c7c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 9792.654933] [<ffffffffa038e747>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs] [ 9792.654945] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.654953] [<ffffffffa038189b>] __btrfs_cow_block+0xfc/0x30c [btrfs] [ 9792.654963] [<ffffffffa0396aa6>] ? btrfs_buffer_uptodate+0x47/0x58 [btrfs] [ 9792.654970] [<ffffffffa0382e48>] ? read_block_for_search+0x94/0x368 [btrfs] [ 9792.654978] [<ffffffffa0381ba9>] btrfs_cow_block+0xfe/0x146 [btrfs] [ 9792.654986] [<ffffffffa03848b0>] btrfs_search_slot+0x14d/0x4b6 [btrfs] [ 9792.654997] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.655022] [<ffffffffa03938e8>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0x8f [btrfs] [ 9792.655025] [<ffffffff8147afac>] ? _cond_resched+0xe/0x22 [ 9792.655027] [<ffffffff8147b892>] ? mutex_lock+0x29/0x50 [ 9792.655039] [<ffffffffa03d41b1>] btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x72/0x137 [btrfs] [ 9792.655051] [<ffffffffa03d4ea2>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x90/0xdb [btrfs] [ 9792.655062] [<ffffffffa039a69b>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x228/0x654 [btrfs] [ 9792.655064] [<ffffffff8106e8da>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x3a/0x3a [ 9792.655075] [<ffffffffa03a2fa5>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x14d/0x202 [btrfs] [ 9792.655077] [<ffffffff81132bd6>] evict+0x71/0x111 [ 9792.655079] [<ffffffff81132de0>] iput+0x12a/0x132 [ 9792.655081] [<ffffffff8112aa3a>] do_unlinkat+0x106/0x155 [ 9792.655083] [<ffffffff81127b83>] ? path_put+0x1f/0x23 [ 9792.655085] [<ffffffff8109c53c>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x145/0x171 [ 9792.655087] [<ffffffff81128410>] ? putname+0x34/0x36 [ 9792.655090] [<ffffffff8112b441>] sys_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b [ 9792.655092] [<ffffffff81482c42>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 9792.655093] ---[ end trace 02b696eb02b3f768 ]--- This patch fix it by setting the reservation of the transaction handle to the correct one. Reported-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Maarten Lankhorst 提交于
Removes code no longer used. The sysfs file itself is kept, because the btrfs developers expressed interest in putting new entries to sysfs. Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
smatch reports: btrfs_recover_log_trees error: 'wc.replay_dest' dereferencing possible ERR_PTR() Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Merge branch 'for-chris' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-work into for-linus Conflicts: fs/btrfs/transaction.c Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The recent commit to get rid of our trans_mutex introduced some races with block group relocation. The problem is that relocation needs to do some record keeping about each root, and it was relying on the transaction mutex to coordinate things in subtle ways. This fix adds a mutex just for the relocation code and makes sure it doesn't have a big impact on normal operations. The race is really fixed in btrfs_record_root_in_trans, which is where we step back and wait for the relocation code to finish accounting setup. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 16 6月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We can lockup if we try to allow new writers join the transaction and we have flushoncommit set or have a pending snapshot. This is because we set no_trans_join and then loop around and try to wait for ordered extents again. The problem is the ordered endio stuff needs to join the transaction, which it can't do because no_trans_join is set. So instead wait until after this loop to set no_trans_join and then make sure to wait for num_writers == 1 in case anybody got started in between us exiting the loop and setting no_trans_join. This could easily be reproduced by mounting -o flushoncommit and running xfstest 13. It cannot be reproduced with this patch. Thanks, Reported-by: NJim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Currently there is nothing protecting the pending_snapshots list on the transaction. We only hold the directory mutex that we are snapshotting and a read lock on the subvol_sem, so we could race with somebody else creating a snapshot in a different directory and end up with list corruption. So protect this list with the trans_lock. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
The delayed ref patch accidently removed the btrfs_free_path in btrfs_unlink_subvol, this puts it back and means we don't leak a path. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 13 6月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Even when delalloc_bytes is zero, we may need to sleep while waiting for delalloc space. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Al Viro noticed we weren't checking for set_anon_super failures. This adds the required checks. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 11 6月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
The WARN_ON() in start_transaction() was triggered while balancing. The cause is btrfs_relocate_chunk() started a transaction and then called iput() on the inode that stores free space cache, and iput() called btrfs_start_transaction() again. Reported-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Get rid of FIXME comment. Uuids from dmesg are now the same as uuids given by btrfs-progs. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When encountering an EIO while reading from a nodatasum extent, we insert an error record into the inode's failure tree. btrfs_readpage_end_io_hook returns early for nodatasum inodes. We'd better clear the failure tree in that case, otherwise the kernel complains about BUG extent_state: Objects remaining on kmem_cache_close() on rmmod. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Merge branch 'for-chris' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arne/btrfs-unstable-arne into for-linus
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
list_splice_init will make delalloc_inodes empty, but without a spinlock around, this may produce corrupted list head, accessed in many placess, The race window is very tight and nobody seems to have hit it so far. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-