1. 11 7月, 2007 2 次提交
  2. 13 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 04 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  4. 06 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  5. 21 10月, 2006 2 次提交
  6. 23 9月, 2006 6 次提交
  7. 09 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 25 8月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 29 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 25 6月, 2006 2 次提交
    • T
      Merge branch 'odirect' · ccf01ef7
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      ccf01ef7
    • C
      NFS: Eliminate nfs_get_user_pages() · 06cf6f2e
      Chuck Lever 提交于
      Neil Brown observed that the kmalloc() in nfs_get_user_pages() is more
      likely to fail if the I/O is large enough to require the allocation of more
      than a single page to keep track of all the pinned pages in the user's
      buffer.
      
      Instead of tracking one large page array per dreq/iocb, track pages per
      nfs_read/write_data, just like the cached I/O path does.  An array for
      pages is already allocated for us by nfs_readdata_alloc() (and the write
      and commit equivalents).
      
      This is also required for adding support for vectored I/O to the NFS direct
      I/O path.
      
      The original reason to pin the user buffer and allocate all the NFS data
      structures before trying to schedule I/O was to ensure all needed resources
      are allocated on the client before starting to send requests.  This reduces
      the chance that resource exhaustion on the client will cause a short read
      or write.
      
      On the other hand, for an application making very large application I/O
      requests, this means that it will be nearly impossible for the application
      to make forward progress on a resource-limited client.
      
      Thus, moving the buffer pinning functionality into the I/O scheduling
      loops should be good for scalability.  The next patch will do the same for
      NFS data structure allocation.
      Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      06cf6f2e
  11. 09 6月, 2006 6 次提交
  12. 21 3月, 2006 2 次提交
    • T
      NFS: Cleanup of NFS read code · ec06c096
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      Same callback hierarchy inversion as for the NFS write calls. This patch is
      not strictly speaking needed by the O_DIRECT code, but avoids confusing
      differences between the asynchronous read and write code.
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      ec06c096
    • T
      NFS: Cleanup of NFS write code in preparation for asynchronous o_direct · 788e7a89
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      This patch inverts the callback hierarchy for NFS write calls.
      
      Instead of having the NFSv2/v3/v4-specific code set up the RPC callback
      ops, we allow the original caller to do so. This allows for more
      flexibility w.r.t. how to set up and tear down the nfs_write_data
      structure while still allowing the NFSv3/v4 code to perform error
      handling.
      
      The greater flexibility is needed by the asynchronous O_DIRECT code, which
      wants to be able to hold on to the original nfs_write_data structures after
      the WRITE RPC call has completed in order to be able to replay them if the
      COMMIT call determines that the server has rebooted.
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      788e7a89
  13. 07 1月, 2006 4 次提交
  14. 28 10月, 2005 7 次提交
  15. 19 10月, 2005 3 次提交