1. 31 7月, 2014 2 次提交
  2. 09 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 07 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  4. 15 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • P
      x86: delete __cpuinit usage from all x86 files · 148f9bb8
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
      notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
      are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
      arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
      As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
      content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
      of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
      
      This removes all the arch/x86 uses of the __cpuinit macros from
      all C files.  x86 only had the one __CPUINIT used in assembly files,
      and it wasn't paired off with a .previous or a __FINIT, so we can
      delete it directly w/o any corresponding additional change there.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
      
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: x86@kernel.org
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Acked-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      148f9bb8
  5. 06 7月, 2012 3 次提交
  6. 14 6月, 2012 2 次提交
  7. 08 6月, 2012 2 次提交
    • A
      x86/apic: Make cpu_mask_to_apicid() operations check cpu_online_mask · 4988a40c
      Alexander Gordeev 提交于
      Currently cpu_mask_to_apicid() should not get a offline CPU with
      the cpumask. Otherwise some apic drivers might try to access
      non-existent per-cpu variables (i.e. x2apic). In that regard
      cpu_mask_to_apicid() and cpu_mask_to_apicid_and() operations are
      inconsistent.
      
      This fix makes the two operations do not rely on calling
      functions and always return the apicid for only online CPUs. As
      result, the meaning and implementations of cpu_mask_to_apicid()
      and cpu_mask_to_apicid_and() operations become straight.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120607131624.GG4759@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      4988a40c
    • A
      x86/apic: Make cpu_mask_to_apicid() operations return error code · ff164324
      Alexander Gordeev 提交于
      Current cpu_mask_to_apicid() and cpu_mask_to_apicid_and()
      implementations have few shortcomings:
      
      1. A value returned by cpu_mask_to_apicid() is written to
      hardware registers unconditionally. Should BAD_APICID get ever
      returned it will be written to a hardware too. But the value of
      BAD_APICID is not universal across all hardware in all modes and
      might cause unexpected results, i.e. interrupts might get routed
      to CPUs that are not configured to receive it.
      
      2. Because the value of BAD_APICID is not universal it is
      counter- intuitive to return it for a hardware where it does not
      make sense (i.e. x2apic).
      
      3. cpu_mask_to_apicid_and() operation is thought as an
      complement to cpu_mask_to_apicid() that only applies a AND mask
      on top of a cpumask being passed. Yet, as consequence of 18374d89
      commit the two operations are inconsistent in that of:
        cpu_mask_to_apicid() should not get a offline CPU with the cpumask
        cpu_mask_to_apicid_and() should not fail and return BAD_APICID
      These limitations are impossible to realize just from looking at
      the operations prototypes.
      
      Most of these shortcomings are resolved by returning a error
      code instead of BAD_APICID. As the result, faults are reported
      back early rather than possibilities to cause a unexpected
      behaviour exist (in case of [1]).
      
      The only exception is setup_timer_IRQ0_pin() routine. Although
      obviously controversial to this fix, its existing behaviour is
      preserved to not break the fragile check_timer() and would
      better addressed in a separate fix.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120607131559.GF4759@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      ff164324
  8. 06 6月, 2012 3 次提交
  9. 18 5月, 2012 2 次提交
  10. 23 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • S
      x86/apic: Add separate apic_id_valid() functions for selected apic drivers · b7157acf
      Steffen Persvold 提交于
      As suggested by Suresh Siddha and Yinghai Lu:
      
      For x2apic pre-enabled systems, apic driver is set already early
      through early_acpi_boot_init()/early_acpi_process_madt()/
      acpi_parse_madt()/default_acpi_madt_oem_check() path so that
      apic_id_valid() checking will be sufficient during MADT and SRAT
      parsing.
      
      For non-x2apic pre-enabled systems, all apic ids should be less
      than 255.
      
      This allows us to substitute the checks in
      arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c::acpi_parse_x2apic() and
      arch/x86/mm/srat.c::acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init() with
      apic->apic_id_valid().
      
      In addition we can avoid feigning the x2apic cpu feature in the
      NumaChip apic code.
      
      The following apic drivers have separate apic_id_valid()
      functions which will accept x2apic type IDs :
      
       x2apic_phys
       x2apic_cluster
       x2apic_uv_x
       apic_numachip
      Signed-off-by: NSteffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
      Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1331925935-13372-1-git-send-email-sp@numascale.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      b7157acf
  11. 14 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  12. 22 5月, 2011 2 次提交
  13. 20 5月, 2011 5 次提交
  14. 28 1月, 2011 2 次提交
    • T
      x86: Replace apic->apicid_to_node() with ->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() · 89e5dc21
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      apic->apicid_to_node() is 32bit specific apic operation which
      determines NUMA node for a CPU.  Depending on the APIC
      implementation, it can be easier to determine NUMA node from
      either physical or logical apicid.  Currently,
      ->apicid_to_node() takes @logical_apicid and calls
      hard_smp_processor_id() if the physical apicid is needed.
      
      This prevents NUMA mapping from being queried from a different
      CPU, which in turn makes it impossible to initialize NUMA
      mapping before SMP bringup.
      
      This patch replaces apic->apicid_to_node() with
      ->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() which takes @cpu, from which both
      logical and physical apicids can easily be determined.  While at
      it, drop duplicate implementations from bigsmp_32 and summit_32,
      and use the default one.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Reviewed-by: NPekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
      Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
      Cc: yinghai@kernel.org
      Cc: brgerst@gmail.com
      Cc: gorcunov@gmail.com
      Cc: shaohui.zheng@intel.com
      Cc: rientjes@google.com
      LKML-Reference: <1295789862-25482-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      89e5dc21
    • T
      x86: Kill apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() · 7632611f
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      After the previous patch, apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() is no
      longer used.  Kill it.
      
      For apic types with custom cpu_to_logical_apicid() which is also
      used for other purposes, remove the function and modify its
      users to do the mapping directly.
      
      #ifdef's on CONFIG_SMP in es7000_32 and summit_32 are ignored
      during conversion as they are not used for UP kernels.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
      Cc: yinghai@kernel.org
      Cc: brgerst@gmail.com
      Cc: gorcunov@gmail.com
      Cc: penberg@kernel.org
      Cc: shaohui.zheng@intel.com
      Cc: rientjes@google.com
      LKML-Reference: <1295789862-25482-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      7632611f
  15. 18 12月, 2009 1 次提交
    • S
      x86, irq: Allow 0xff for /proc/irq/[n]/smp_affinity on an 8-cpu system · 18374d89
      Suresh Siddha 提交于
      John Blackwood reported:
      > on an older Dell PowerEdge 6650 system with 8 cpus (4 are hyper-threaded),
      > and  32 bit (x86) kernel, once you change the irq smp_affinity of an irq
      > to be less than all cpus in the system, you can never change really the
      > irq smp_affinity back to be all cpus in the system (0xff) again,
      > even though no error status is returned on the "/bin/echo ff >
      > /proc/irq/[n]/smp_affinity" operation.
      >
      > This is due to that fact that BAD_APICID has the same value as
      > all cpus (0xff) on 32bit kernels, and thus the value returned from
      > set_desc_affinity() via the cpu_mask_to_apicid_and() function is treated
      > as a failure in set_ioapic_affinity_irq_desc(), and no affinity changes
      > are made.
      
      set_desc_affinity() is already checking if the incoming cpu mask
      intersects with the cpu online mask or not. So there is no need
      for the apic op cpu_mask_to_apicid_and() to check again
      and return BAD_APICID.
      
      Remove the BAD_APICID return value from cpu_mask_to_apicid_and()
      and also fix set_desc_affinity() to return -1 instead of using BAD_APICID
      to represent error conditions (as cpu_mask_to_apicid_and() can return
      logical or physical apicid values and BAD_APICID is really to represent
      bad physical apic id).
      Reported-by: NJohn Blackwood <john.blackwood@ccur.com>
      Root-caused-by: NJohn Blackwood <john.blackwood@ccur.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      LKML-Reference: <1261103386.2535.409.camel@sbs-t61>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      18374d89
  16. 08 8月, 2009 1 次提交
    • Y
      x86: Fix MSI-X initialization by using online_mask for x2apic target_cpus · 087d7e56
      Yinghai Lu 提交于
      found a system where x2apic reports an MSI-X irq initialization
      failure:
      
      [  302.859446] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
      [  302.874369] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: using 64bit DMA mask
      [  302.879023] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: using 64bit consistent DMA mask
      [  302.894386] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: enabling bus mastering
      [  302.898171] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: setting latency timer to 64
      [  302.914050] reserve_memtype added 0xefb08000-0xefb0c000, track uncached-minus, req uncached-minus, ret uncached-minus
      [  302.933839] reserve_memtype added 0xefb28000-0xefb29000, track uncached-minus, req uncached-minus, ret uncached-minus
      [  302.940367]   alloc irq_desc for 265 on node 4
      [  302.956874]   alloc kstat_irqs on node 4
      [  302.959452] alloc irq_2_iommu on node 0
      [  302.974328] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: irq 265 for MSI/MSI-X
      [  302.977778]   alloc irq_desc for 266 on node 4
      [  302.980347]   alloc kstat_irqs on node 4
      [  302.995312] free_memtype request 0xefb28000-0xefb29000
      [  302.998816] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: Failed to initialize MSI-X interrupts.
      
      ... it turns out that when trying to enable MSI-X,
      __assign_irq_vector(new, cfg_new, apic->target_cpus()) can not
      get vector because for x2apic target-cpus returns cpumask_of(0)
      
      Update that to online_mask like xapic.
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      LKML-Reference: <4A785AFF.3050902@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      087d7e56
  17. 04 8月, 2009 1 次提交
    • Y
      x86: Don't use current_cpu_data in x2apic phys_pkg_id · d8c7eb34
      Yinghai Lu 提交于
      One system has socket 1 come up as BSP.
      
      kexeced kernel reports BSP as:
      
      [    1.524550] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct
      [    1.536064] initial_apicid:20
      [    1.537135] ht_mask_width:1
      [    1.538128] core_select_mask:f
      [    1.539126] core_plus_mask_width:5
      [    1.558479] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
      [    1.559501] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
      [    1.560539] CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
      [    1.579098] CPU: L2 cache: 256K
      [    1.580085] CPU: L3 cache: 24576K
      [    1.581108] CPU 0/0x20 -> Node 0
      [    1.596193] CPU 0 microcode level: 0xffff0008
      
      It doesn't have correct physical processor id and will get an
      error:
      
      [   38.840859] CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
      [   38.848287]  domain 0: span 0,8,72 level SIBLING
      [   38.851151]   groups: 0 8 72
      [   38.858137]   domain 1: span 0,8-15,72-79 level MC
      [   38.868944]    groups: 0,8,72 9,73 10,74 11,75 12,76 13,77 14,78 15,79
      [   38.881383] ERROR: parent span is not a superset of domain->span
      [   38.890724]    domain 2: span 0-7,64-71 level CPU
      [   38.899237] ERROR: domain->groups does not contain CPU0
      [   38.909229]     groups: 8-15,72-79
      [   38.912547] ERROR: groups don't span domain->span
      [   38.919665]     domain 3: span 0-127 level NODE
      [   38.930739]      groups: 0-7,64-71 8-15,72-79 16-23,80-87 24-31,88-95 32-39,96-103 40-47,104-111 48-55,112-119 56-63,120-127
      
      it turns out: we can not use current_cpu_data in phys_pgd_id
      for x2apic.
      
      identify_boot_cpu() is called by check_bugs() before
      smp_prepare_cpus() and till smp_prepare_cpus() current_cpu_data
      for bsp is assigned with boot_cpu_data.
      
      Just make phys_pkg_id for x2apic is aligned to xapic.
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      LKML-Reference: <4A6ADD0D.10002@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      d8c7eb34
  18. 12 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 18 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • S
      x86: add x2apic_wrmsr_fence() to x2apic flush tlb paths · ce4e240c
      Suresh Siddha 提交于
      Impact: optimize APIC IPI related barriers
      
      Uncached MMIO accesses for xapic are inherently serializing and hence
      we don't need explicit barriers for xapic IPI paths.
      
      x2apic MSR writes/reads don't have serializing semantics and hence need
      a serializing instruction or mfence, to make all the previous memory
      stores globally visisble before the x2apic msr write for IPI.
      
      Add x2apic_wrmsr_fence() in flush tlb path to x2apic specific paths.
      Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: "steiner@sgi.com" <steiner@sgi.com>
      Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      LKML-Reference: <1237313814.27006.203.camel@localhost.localdomain>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      ce4e240c
  20. 26 2月, 2009 2 次提交
  21. 23 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  22. 18 2月, 2009 4 次提交