Remove the obsolete workaround for a Toshiba Satellite 4030cdt
S1 problem from drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c .
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Get rid of a superfluous acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() parameter.  The
only legitimate value of that parameter must be derived from the first
parameter, which is what all the callers already do.  (However, this
does not address the fact that ACPI still doesn't set up those flags.)
Signed-off-by: NDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

* Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and
  disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power
  manageable by ACPI.

* Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent)
  subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up
  capability of given device.

* Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and
  for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake().

* Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and
  for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup().

* Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it
  into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(),
  allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of
  generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the
  device's PME# functionality, respectively.

* Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new
  PME#-related functions.

* Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not
  used any more.

* Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the
  power.can_wakeup flag of given device.

* Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is
  capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the
  PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its
  power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is
  unset as appropriate.

* Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be
  wake-up capable by it.

* Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that
  have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their
  wake-up power has been enabled).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

Some Dell laptops enter resume with apparent garbage in the segment
descriptor registers (almost certainly the result of a botched
transition from protected to real mode.)  The only way to clean that
up is to enter protected mode ourselves and clean out the descriptor
registers.

This fixes resume on Dell XPS M1210 and Dell D620.

Reference: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

ACPI PM: Add possibility to change suspend sequence

There are some systems out there that don't work correctly with
our current suspend/hibernation code ordering.  Provide a workaround
for these systems allowing them to pass 'acpi_sleep=old_ordering' in
the kernel command line so that it will use the pre-ACPI 2.0 ("old")
suspend code ordering.

Unfortunately, this requires us to add a platform hook to the
resuming of devices for recovering the platform in case one of the
device drivers' .suspend() routines returns error code.  Namely,
ACPI 1.0 specifies that _PTS should be called before suspending
devices, but _WAK still should be called before resuming them in
order to undo the changes made by _PTS.  However, if there is an
error during suspending devices, they are automatically resumed
without returning control to the PM core, so the _WAK has to be
called from within device_resume() in that cases.

The patch also reorders and refactors the ACPI suspend/hibernation
code to avoid duplication as far as reasonably possible.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

Remove the obsolete workaround for a Toshiba Satellite 4030cdt
S1 problem from drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c .
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Get rid of a superfluous acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() parameter.  The
only legitimate value of that parameter must be derived from the first
parameter, which is what all the callers already do.  (However, this
does not address the fact that ACPI still doesn't set up those flags.)
Signed-off-by: NDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

... as they are platform_suspend_ops after all.

cosmetic re-name only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Some time ago it turned out that our suspend code ordering broke some
NVidia-based systems that hung if _PTS was executed with one of the PCI
devices, specifically a USB controller, in a low power state.

Then, it was noticed that the suspend code ordering was not compliant
with ACPI 1.0, although it was compliant with ACPI 2.0 (and later), and
it was argued that the code had to be changed for that reason (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).

So we did, but evidently we did wrong, because it's now turning out that
some systems have been broken by this change. Refs:
	http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10340
	https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374217#c16

[ I said at that time that something like this might happend, but the
  majority of people involved thought that it was improbable due to the
  necessity to preserve the compliance of hardware with ACPI 1.0. ]

This actually is a quite serious regression from 2.6.24.

Moreover, the ACPI 1.0 ordering of suspend code introduced another issue
that I have only noticed recently.  Namely, if the suspend of one of
devices fails, the already suspended devices will be resumed without
executing _WAK before, which leads to problems on some systems (for
example, in such situations thermal management is broken on my HP
nx6325).  Consequently, it also breaks suspend debugging on the affected
systems.

Note also, that the requirement to execute _PTS before suspending
devices does not really make sense, because the device in question may
be put into a low power state at run time for a reason unrelated to a
system-wide suspend.

For the reasons outlined above, the change of the suspend ordering
should be reverted, which is done by the patch below.

[ Felix Möller: "I am the reporter from the original Novell Bug:

	https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374217

  I just tried current git head (two hours ago) with the patch (the one
  from the beginning of this thread) from Rafael and without it.  With
  the patch my MacBook does suspend without it does not." ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Tested-by: NFelix Möller <felix@derklecks.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__
Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Make acpi_sleep_prepare() static and cause it to print a message
specifying the ACPI system sleep state to be entered (helpful for
debugging the suspend/hibernation code).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power
states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI
2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order.  The current
hibernation code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which may cause some
ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during hibernation (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).

Make the hibernation code execute _PTS before putting devices into
low power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) with the
possibility to override that using the 'acpi_new_pts_ordering' kernel
command line option.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Introduce global hibernation callback .end() and rename global
hibernation callback .start() to .begin(), in analogy with the
recent modifications of the global suspend callbacks.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power
states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI
2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order.  The current
suspend code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which causes some
ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during suspend (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).

Make the suspend code execute _PTS before putting devices into low
power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) and provide a command
line option to override the default if need be.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The preparation to enter an ACPI system sleep state is now tied to
the disabling of GPEs, but the GPEs should not be disabled before
suspending devices.  Since on ACPI 1.0x systems the _PTS global
control method should be executed before suspending devices, we
need to disable GPEs separately.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The execution of ACPI global control methods _GTS and _BFS is
currently tied to the preparation to enter a sleep state and to the
leaving of the sleep state, respectively.  However, these functions
are called before disabling the nonboot CPUs and after enabling
them, respectively (in fact, on ACPI 1.0x systems the first of them
ought to be called before suspending devices), while according to the
ACPI specification, _GTS is to be executed right prior to entering
the system sleep state and _BFS is to be executed right after the
platfor firmware has returned control to the OS on wake up.

Move the execution of _GTS and _BFS to the right places.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

On ACPI systems the target state set by acpi_pm_set_target() is
reset by acpi_pm_finish(), but that need not be called if the
suspend fails.  All platforms that use the .set_target() global
suspend callback are affected by analogous issues.

For this reason, we need an additional global suspend callback that
will reset the target state regardless of whether or not the suspend
is successful.  Also, it is reasonable to rename the .set_target()
callback, since it will be used for a different purpose on ACPI
systems (due to ACPI 1.0x code ordering requirements).

Introduce the global suspend callback .end() to be executed at the
end of the suspend sequence and rename the .set_target() global
suspend callback to .begin().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Wakeup GPE hasn't a handler. If system is waked up by such GPE like a
USB hotplug, I saw a lot of error reporting the GPE hasn't handler.
acpi_leave_sleep_state will clear the GPE but it's too late, we should
do it before interrupt is re-enabled.
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Some code in acpi_hibernation_finish() was moved to acpi_hibernation_leave(),
but the old copy had been left (it's harmless, but also useless).  Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Fix acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() to return the value returned
by _SxD if the device is supposed to wake up the system from
given sleep state and the evaluation of _SxW fails (e.g. _SxW
is not present).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

acpi_leave_sleep_state() should have correct list of wake and
runtime GPEs, which is available only after disable_wakeup_device()
is called.
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Commit 9b039330 removed
acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare(), the only function used at S5 transition
Add call to generic acpi_enable_wake_device().

Reference: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299882Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The following scenario leads to total confusion of the platform firmware on
some boxes (eg. HPC nx6325):
* Hibernate with ACPI enabled
* Resume passing "acpi=off" to the boot kernel

To prevent this from happening it's necessary to check if ACPI is enabled (and
enable it if that's not the case) _right_ _after_ control has been transfered
from the boot kernel to the image kernel, before device_power_up() is called
(ie.  with interrupts disabled).   Enabling ACPI after calling
device_power_up() turns out to be insufficient.

For this reason, introduce new hibernation callback ->leave() that will be
executed before device_power_up() by the restored image kernel.   To make it
work, it also is necessary to move swsusp_suspend() from swsusp.c to disk.c
(it's name is changed to "create_image", which is more up to the point).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Rename 'struct hibernation_ops' to 'struct platform_hibernation_ops' in
analogy with 'struct platform_suspend_ops'.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

During hibernation we also need to tell the ACPI core that we're going to put
the system into the S4 sleep state.  For this reason, an additional method in
'struct hibernation_ops' is needed, playing the role of set_target() in
'struct platform_suspend_operations'.  Moreover, the role of the .prepare()
method is now different, so it's better to introduce another method, that in
general may be different from .prepare(), that will be used to prepare the
platform for creating the hibernation image (.prepare() is used anyway to
notify the platform that we're going to enter the low power state after the
image has been saved).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There is no reason why the .prepare() and .finish() methods in 'struct
platform_suspend_ops' should take any arguments, since architectures don't use
these methods' argument in any practically meaningful way (ie.  either the
target system sleep state is conveyed to the platform by .set_target(), or
there is only one suspend state supported and it is indicated to the PM core
by .valid(), or .prepare() and .finish() aren't defined at all).   There also
is no reason why .finish() should return any result.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The name of 'struct pm_ops' suggests that it is related to the power
management in general, but in fact it is only related to suspend.   Moreover,
its name should indicate what this structure is used for, so it seems
reasonable to change it to 'struct platform_suspend_ops'.   In that case, the
name of the global variable of this type used by the PM core and the names of
related functions should be changed accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

If the BIOS does not enable ACPI and the "acpi=off" command line parameter
is passed to the boot kernel, ACPI may be disabled when the (restored)
image kernel attempts to execute acpi_hibernation_finish().  To prevent
this from happening we can call acpi_enable() from
acpi_hibernation_finish() (if ACPI is already enabled, this will have no
effect).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Three main sets of changes:

1) dmi_get_system_info() return value should have been marked const,
   since callers should not be changing that data.

2) const-ify DMI internals, since DMI firmware tables should,
   whenever possible, be marked const to ensure we never ever write to
   that data area.

3) const-ify DMI API, to enable marking tables const where possible
   in low-level drivers.

And if we're really lucky, this might enable some additional
optimizations on the part of the compiler.

The bulk of the changes are #2 and #3, which are interrelated.  #1 could
have been a separate patch, but it was so small compared to the others,
it was easier to roll it into this changeset.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>

S4 suspend to disk will disable GPE's permanently
because acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare() does not have
a counterpart at resume time.  Thus, those devices
became unavailable for wakeup from subsequent
S3 suspend-to-ram.

Here acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare() is removed, and upon suspend
acpi_enable_wakeup_device() gets its functionality.
Upon resume, acpi_disable_wakeup_device() restores the state.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292300Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

This fixes compilation with CONFIG_SUSPEND unset and CONFIG_HIBERNATION set
(raf. http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=119055289723895&w=4).
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Make the S0 state be always reported as supported

Signed-off: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Acked-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Recent changes to sleep initialization in ACPI dropped reporting of supported Sx
states above S3. Fix that and also move S5 init into same file as other Sx.
The only functional change is adding printk() for S4 and S5 cases.
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND representing the ability to enter system sleep
states, such as the ACPI S3 state, and allow the user to choose SUSPEND
and HIBERNATION independently of each other.

Make HOTPLUG_CPU be selected automatically if SUSPEND or HIBERNATION has
been chosen and the kernel is intended for SMP systems.

Also, introduce CONFIG_PM_SLEEP which is automatically selected if
CONFIG_SUSPEND or CONFIG_HIBERNATION is set and use it to select the
code needed for both suspend and hibernation.

The top-level power management headers and the ACPI code related to
suspend and hibernation are modified to use the new definitions (the
changes in drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c are, mostly, moving code to reduce
the number of ifdefs).

There are many other files in which CONFIG_PM can be replaced with
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP or even with CONFIG_SUSPEND, but they can be updated in
the future.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION to avoid
confusion (among other things, with CONFIG_SUSPEND introduced in the
next patch).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

As it was a synonym for (CONFIG_ACPI && CONFIG_X86),
the ifdefs for it were more clutter than they were worth.

For ia64, just add a few stubs in anticipation of future
S3 or S4 support.
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Remove references to ACPI_STATE_S2, introduced by
acpi-implement-the-set_target-callback-from-pm_ops.patch, from acpi_pm_enter().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>