1. 31 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  2. 09 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  3. 05 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  4. 01 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 12 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  6. 28 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  7. 27 3月, 2018 1 次提交
    • S
      arm64: Delay enabling hardware DBM feature · 05abb595
      Suzuki K Poulose 提交于
      We enable hardware DBM bit in a capable CPU, very early in the
      boot via __cpu_setup. This doesn't give us a flexibility of
      optionally disable the feature, as the clearing the bit
      is a bit costly as the TLB can cache the settings. Instead,
      we delay enabling the feature until the CPU is brought up
      into the kernel. We use the feature capability mechanism
      to handle it.
      
      The hardware DBM is a non-conflicting feature. i.e, the kernel
      can safely run with a mix of CPUs with some using the feature
      and the others don't. So, it is safe for a late CPU to have
      this capability and enable it, even if the active CPUs don't.
      
      To get this handled properly by the infrastructure, we
      unconditionally set the capability and only enable it
      on CPUs which really have the feature. Also, we print the
      feature detection from the "matches" call back to make sure
      we don't mislead the user when none of the CPUs could use the
      feature.
      
      Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      05abb595
  8. 20 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 19 3月, 2018 2 次提交
  10. 09 3月, 2018 2 次提交
    • S
      arm64: Add support for new control bits CTR_EL0.DIC and CTR_EL0.IDC · 6ae4b6e0
      Shanker Donthineni 提交于
      The DCache clean & ICache invalidation requirements for instructions
      to be data coherence are discoverable through new fields in CTR_EL0.
      The following two control bits DIC and IDC were defined for this
      purpose. No need to perform point of unification cache maintenance
      operations from software on systems where CPU caches are transparent.
      
      This patch optimize the three functions __flush_cache_user_range(),
      clean_dcache_area_pou() and invalidate_icache_range() if the hardware
      reports CTR_EL0.IDC and/or CTR_EL0.IDC. Basically it skips the two
      instructions 'DC CVAU' and 'IC IVAU', and the associated loop logic
      in order to avoid the unnecessary overhead.
      
      CTR_EL0.DIC: Instruction cache invalidation requirements for
       instruction to data coherence. The meaning of this bit[29].
        0: Instruction cache invalidation to the point of unification
           is required for instruction to data coherence.
        1: Instruction cache cleaning to the point of unification is
            not required for instruction to data coherence.
      
      CTR_EL0.IDC: Data cache clean requirements for instruction to data
       coherence. The meaning of this bit[28].
        0: Data cache clean to the point of unification is required for
           instruction to data coherence, unless CLIDR_EL1.LoC == 0b000
           or (CLIDR_EL1.LoUIS == 0b000 && CLIDR_EL1.LoUU == 0b000).
        1: Data cache clean to the point of unification is not required
           for instruction to data coherence.
      Co-authored-by: NPhilip Elcan <pelcan@codeaurora.org>
      Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NShanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
      Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      6ae4b6e0
    • A
      arm64/kernel: enable A53 erratum #8434319 handling at runtime · ca79acca
      Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
      Omit patching of ADRP instruction at module load time if the current
      CPUs are not susceptible to the erratum.
      Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
      [will: Drop duplicate initialisation of .def_scope field]
      Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      ca79acca
  11. 16 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  12. 09 1月, 2018 2 次提交
  13. 11 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  14. 03 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  15. 09 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  16. 15 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  17. 07 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  18. 10 2月, 2017 1 次提交
    • C
      arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1003 · 38fd94b0
      Christopher Covington 提交于
      The Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies Falkor v1 CPU may allocate TLB entries
      using an incorrect ASID when TTBRx_EL1 is being updated. When the erratum
      is triggered, page table entries using the new translation table base
      address (BADDR) will be allocated into the TLB using the old ASID. All
      circumstances leading to the incorrect ASID being cached in the TLB arise
      when software writes TTBRx_EL1[ASID] and TTBRx_EL1[BADDR], a memory
      operation is in the process of performing a translation using the specific
      TTBRx_EL1 being written, and the memory operation uses a translation table
      descriptor designated as non-global. EL2 and EL3 code changing the EL1&0
      ASID is not subject to this erratum because hardware is prohibited from
      performing translations from an out-of-context translation regime.
      
      Consider the following pseudo code.
      
        write new BADDR and ASID values to TTBRx_EL1
      
      Replacing the above sequence with the one below will ensure that no TLB
      entries with an incorrect ASID are used by software.
      
        write reserved value to TTBRx_EL1[ASID]
        ISB
        write new value to TTBRx_EL1[BADDR]
        ISB
        write new value to TTBRx_EL1[ASID]
        ISB
      
      When the above sequence is used, page table entries using the new BADDR
      value may still be incorrectly allocated into the TLB using the reserved
      ASID. Yet this will not reduce functionality, since TLB entries incorrectly
      tagged with the reserved ASID will never be hit by a later instruction.
      
      Based on work by Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
      Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChristopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
      Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      38fd94b0
  19. 01 2月, 2017 1 次提交
    • C
      arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1009 · d9ff80f8
      Christopher Covington 提交于
      During a TLB invalidate sequence targeting the inner shareable domain,
      Falkor may prematurely complete the DSB before all loads and stores using
      the old translation are observed. Instruction fetches are not subject to
      the conditions of this erratum. If the original code sequence includes
      multiple TLB invalidate instructions followed by a single DSB, onle one of
      the TLB instructions needs to be repeated to work around this erratum.
      While the erratum only applies to cases in which the TLBI specifies the
      inner-shareable domain (*IS form of TLBI) and the DSB is ISH form or
      stronger (OSH, SYS), this changes applies the workaround overabundantly--
      to local TLBI, DSB NSH sequences as well--for simplicity.
      
      Based on work by Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
      Signed-off-by: NChristopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
      Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      d9ff80f8
  20. 06 11月, 2016 1 次提交