- 13 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Maciej W. Rozycki 提交于
With CPU_DADDI_WORKAROUNDS enabled __delay assembles with a macro in a branch delay slot: {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:18: Warning: Macro instruction expanded into multiple instructions in a branch delay slot and broken code results: 0000000000000000 <__delay>: 0: 1480ffff bnez a0,0 <__delay> 4: 24010001 li at,1 8: 0081202f dsubu a0,a0,at c: 03e00008 jr ra 10: 00000000 nop 14: 00000000 nop Consequently the function loops indefinitely, showing up prominently as a hang in the delay loop calibration at bootstrap. This change corrects the problem by forcing the immediate 1 into a register while keeping code produced identical where CPU_DADDI_WORKAROUNDS is disabled. Signed-off-by: NMaciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/6669/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 01 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling in forever. Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 22 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
When building a 32-bit kernel for RBTX4927 with gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-21), I get: arch/mips/lib/delay.c:24:5: warning: "__SIZEOF_LONG__" is not defined As a consequence, __delay() always uses the 64-bit "dsubu" instruction. Replace the check for "__SIZEOF_LONG__ == 4" by "BITS_PER_LONG == 32" to fix this. Introduced by commit 5210edcd [MIPS: Make __{,n,u}delay declarations match definitions and generic delay.h"] Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/4678/Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 17 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Daney 提交于
At some recent point arch/mips/include/asm/delay.h has started being included into csrc-octeon.c where the __?delay() functions are defined. This causes a compile failure due to conflicting declarations and definitions of the functions. It turns out that the generic definitions in arch/mips/lib/delay.c also conflict. Proposed fix: Declare the functions to take unsigned long parameters just like asm-generic (and x86) does. Update __delay to agree (__ndelay and __udelay need no change). Bonus: Get rid of 'inline' from __delay() definition, as it is globally visible, and the compiler should be making this decision itself (it does in fact inline the function without being told to). Signed-off-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/4354/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 13 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
This may lead to warnings like: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: reboot/1989 caller is __udelay+0x14/0x70 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8110ad28>] dump_stack+0x8/0x34 [<ffffffff812dde04>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xf4/0x110 [<ffffffff812d90bc>] __udelay+0x14/0x70 [<ffffffff81378274>] md_notify_reboot+0x12c/0x148 [<ffffffff81161054>] notifier_call_chain+0x64/0xc8 [<ffffffff811614dc>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x64/0xc0 [<ffffffff8115566c>] kernel_restart_prepare+0x1c/0x38 [<ffffffff811556cc>] kernel_restart+0x14/0x50 [<ffffffff8115581c>] SyS_reboot+0x10c/0x1f0 [<ffffffff81103684>] handle_sysn32+0x44/0x84 Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 17 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Atsushi Nemoto 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAtsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 08 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
Outlining fixes the issue were on certain CPUs such as the R10000 family the delay loop would need an extra cycle if it overlaps a cacheline boundary. The rewrite also fixes build errors with GCC 4.4 which was changed in way incompatible with the kernel's inline assembly. Relying on pure C for computation of the delay value removes the need for explicit. The price we pay is a slight slowdown of the computation - to be fixed on another day. Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-