- 29 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Suman Anna 提交于
The number of hwspinlocks are determined based on the value read from the IP block's SYSSTATUS register. However, the module may not be enabled and clocked, and the read may result in a bus error. This particular issue is seen rather easily on AM33XX, since the module wakeup is software controlled, and it is disabled out of reset. Make sure the module is enabled and clocked before reading the SYSSTATUS register. Signed-off-by: NSuman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> [replace pm_runtime_put_sync with lenient pm_runtime_put] Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
-
- 29 11月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Bill Pemberton 提交于
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: NBill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu> Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Bill Pemberton 提交于
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: NBill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu> Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Bill Pemberton 提交于
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit_p is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: NBill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu> Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 22 9月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
Mark omap_hwspinlock_remove with __devexit (and use __devexit_p appropriately) so the function can be discarded when the conditions are met. Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
-
由 Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
Hardware Spinlock devices usually contain numerous locks (known devices today support between 32 to 256 locks). Originally hwspinlock core required drivers to register (and later, when needed, unregister) each lock separately. That worked, but required hwspinlocks drivers to do a bit extra work when they were probed/removed. This patch changes hwspin_lock_{un}register() to allow a bank of hwspinlocks to be {un}registered in a single invocation. A new 'struct hwspinlock_device', which contains an array of 'struct hwspinlock's is now being passed to the core upon registration (so instead of wrapping each struct hwspinlock, a priv member has been added to allow drivers to piggyback their private data with each hwspinlock). While at it, several per-lock members were moved to be per-device: 1. struct device *dev 2. struct hwspinlock_ops *ops In addition, now that the array of locks is handled by the core, there's no reason to maintain a per-lock 'int id' member: the id of the lock anyway equals to its index in the bank's array plus the bank's base_id. Remove this per-lock id member too, and instead use a simple pointers arithmetic to derive it. As a result of this change, hwspinlocks drivers are now simpler and smaller (about %20 code reduction) and the memory footprint of the hwspinlock framework is reduced. Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
-
由 Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
hwspinlock devices provide system-wide hardware locks that are used by remote processors that have no other way to achieve synchronization. To achieve that, each physical lock must have a system-wide id number that is agreed upon, otherwise remote processors can't possibly assume they're using the same hardware lock. Usually boards have a single hwspinlock device, which provides several hwspinlocks, and in this case, they can be trivially numbered 0 to (num-of-locks - 1). In case boards have several hwspinlocks devices, a different base id should be used for each hwspinlock device (they can't all use 0 as a starting id!). While this is certainly not common, it's just plain wrong to just silently use 0 as a base id whenever the hwspinlock driver is probed. This patch provides a hwspinlock_pdata structure, that boards can use to set a different base id for each of the hwspinlock devices they may have, and demonstrates how to use it with the omap hwspinlock driver. While we're at it, make sure the hwspinlock core prints an explicit error message in case an hwspinlock is registered with an id number that already exists; this will help users catch such base id issues. Reported-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> Acked-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
由 Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
Instead of allocating every hwspinlock separately, allocate them all in one shot. This both simplifies the driver and helps achieving better slab utilization. Reported-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
-
由 Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
Use struct device_driver's owner member instead of asking drivers to explicitly pass the owner again. This simplifies drivers and also save some memory, since there's no point now in maintaining a separate owner pointer per hwspinlock. Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
-
- 18 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Simon Que 提交于
Add hwspinlock support for the OMAP4 Hardware Spinlock device. The Hardware Spinlock device on OMAP4 provides hardware assistance for synchronization between the multiple processors in the system (dual Cortex-A9, dual Cortex-M3 and a C64x+ DSP). [ohad@wizery.com: adapt to hwspinlock framework, tidy up] Signed-off-by: NSimon Que <sque@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NHari Kanigeri <h-kanigeri2@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NKrishnamoorthy, Balaji T <balajitk@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-