- 01 4月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
local_t's were defined to be unsigned. This increases confusion because atomic_t's are signed. The patch goes through and changes all implementations to use signed longs throughout. Also, x86-64 was using 32-bit quantities for the value passed into local_add() and local_sub(). Fixed. All (actually, both) existing users have been audited. (Also s/__inline__/inline/ in x86_64/local.h) Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 26 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
For consistency with other architectures Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 13 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
local_t is actually a win over atomic_t because it does not need lock prefixes. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-