1. 15 8月, 2009 1 次提交
    • M
      ARM: 5677/1: ARM support for TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK/pselect6/ppoll/epoll_pwait · 36984265
      Mikael Pettersson 提交于
      This patch adds support for TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK to ARM's
      signal handling, which allows to hook up the pselect6, ppoll,
      and epoll_pwait syscalls on ARM.
      
      Tested here with eabi userspace and a test program with a
      deliberate race between a child's exit and the parent's
      sigprocmask/select sequence. Using sys_pselect6() instead
      of sigprocmask/select reliably prevents the race.
      
      The other arch's support for TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK has evolved
      over time:
      
      In 2.6.16:
      - add TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK which parallels TIF_SIGPENDING
      - test both when checking for pending signal [changed later]
      - reimplement sys_sigsuspend() to use current->saved_sigmask,
        TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK [changed later], and -ERESTARTNOHAND;
        ditto for sys_rt_sigsuspend(), but drop private code and
        use common code via __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND;
      - there are now no "extra" calls to do_signal() so its oldset
        parameter is always &current->blocked so need not be passed,
        also its return value is changed to void
      - change handle_signal() to return 0/-errno
      - change do_signal() to honor TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK:
        + get oldset from current->saved_sigmask if TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK
          is set
        + if handle_signal() was successful then clear TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK
        + if no signal was delivered and TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK is set then
          clear it and restore the sigmask
      - hook up sys_pselect6() and sys_ppoll()
      
      In 2.6.19:
      - hook up sys_epoll_pwait()
      
      In 2.6.26:
      - allow archs to override how TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK is implemented;
        default set_restore_sigmask() sets both TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK and
        TIF_SIGPENDING; archs need now just test TIF_SIGPENDING again
        when checking for pending signal work; some archs now implement
        TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK as a secondary/non-atomic thread flag bit
      - call set_restore_sigmask() in sys_sigsuspend() instead of setting
        TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK
      
      In 2.6.29-rc:
      - kill sys_pselect7() which no arch wanted
      
      So for 2.6.31-rc6/ARM this patch does the following:
      - Add TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK. Use the generic set_restore_sigmask()
        which sets both TIF_SIGPENDING and TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK, so
        TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK need not claim one of the scarce low thread
        flags, and existing TIF_SIGPENDING and _TIF_WORK_MASK tests need
        not be extended for TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK.
      - sys_sigsuspend() is reimplemented to use current->saved_sigmask
        and set_restore_sigmask(), making it identical to most other archs
      - The private code for sys_rt_sigsuspend() is removed, instead
        generic code supplies it via __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND.
      - sys_sigsuspend() and sys_rt_sigsuspend() no longer need a pt_regs
        parameter, so their assembly code wrappers are removed.
      - handle_signal() is changed to return 0 on success or -errno.
      - The oldset parameter to do_signal() is now redundant and removed,
        and the return value is now also redundant and changed to void.
      - do_signal() is changed to honor TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK:
        + get oldset from current->saved_sigmask if TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK
          is set
        + if handle_signal() was successful then clear TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK
        + if no signal was delivered and TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK is set then
          clear it and restore the sigmask
      - Hook up sys_pselect6, sys_ppoll, and sys_epoll_pwait.
      Signed-off-by: NMikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      36984265
  2. 21 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 20 4月, 2009 1 次提交
    • M
      [ARM] 5456/1: add sys_preadv and sys_pwritev · eb8f3142
      Mikael Pettersson 提交于
      Kernel 2.6.30-rc1 added sys_preadv and sys_pwritev to most archs
      but not ARM, resulting in
      
      <stdin>:1421:2: warning: #warning syscall preadv not implemented
      <stdin>:1425:2: warning: #warning syscall pwritev not implemented
      
      This patch adds sys_preadv and sys_pwritev to ARM.
      
      These syscalls simply take five long-sized parameters, so they
      should have no calling-convention/ABI issues in the kernel.
      
      Tested on armv5tel eabi using a preadv/pwritev test program posted
      on linuxppc-dev earlier this month.
      
      It would be nice to get this into the kernel before 2.6.30 final,
      so that glibc's kernel version feature test for these syscalls
      doesn't have to special-case ARM.
      Signed-off-by: NMikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      eb8f3142
  4. 13 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 03 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  6. 19 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 13 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  8. 20 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  9. 29 6月, 2007 1 次提交
    • D
      Introduce fixed sys_sync_file_range2() syscall, implement on PowerPC and ARM · edd5cd4a
      David Woodhouse 提交于
      Not all the world is an i386.  Many architectures need 64-bit arguments to be
      aligned in suitable pairs of registers, and the original
      sys_sync_file_range(int, loff_t, loff_t, int) was therefore wasting an
      argument register for padding after the first integer.  Since we don't
      normally have more than 6 arguments for system calls, that left no room for
      the final argument on some architectures.
      
      Fix this by introducing sys_sync_file_range2(int, int, loff_t, loff_t) which
      all fits nicely.  In fact, ARM already had that, but called it
      sys_arm_sync_file_range.  Move it to fs/sync.c and rename it, then implement
      the needed compatibility routine.  And stop the missing syscall check from
      bitching about the absence of sys_sync_file_range() if we've implemented
      sys_sync_file_range2() instead.
      
      Tested on PPC32 and with 32-bit and 64-bit userspace on PPC64.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      Acked-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      edd5cd4a
  10. 16 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  11. 02 4月, 2007 1 次提交
  12. 16 2月, 2007 1 次提交
    • R
      [ARM] 4137/1: Add kexec support · c587e4a6
      Richard Purdie 提交于
      Add kexec support to ARM.
      
      Improvements like commandline handling could be made but this patch gives
      basic functional support. It uses the next available syscall number, 347.
      
      Once the syscall number is known, userspace support will be
      finalised/submitted to kexec-tools, various patches already exist.
      
      Originally based on a patch by Maxim Syrchin but updated and forward
      ported by various people.
      Signed-off-by: NRichard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      c587e4a6
  13. 18 12月, 2006 1 次提交
    • R
      [ARM] Add more syscalls · 5a059f1a
      Russell King 提交于
      Add:
        sys_unshare
        sys_set_robust_list
        sys_get_robust_list
        sys_splice
        sys_arm_sync_file_range
        sys_tee
        sys_vmsplice
        sys_move_pages
        sys_getcpu
      
      Special note about sys_arm_sync_file_range(), which is implemented as:
      
      asmlinkage long sys_arm_sync_file_range(int fd, unsigned int flags,
                                              loff_t offset, loff_t nbytes)
      {
              return sys_sync_file_range(fd, offset, nbytes, flags);
      }
      
      We can't export sys_sync_file_range() directly on ARM because the
      argument list someone picked does not fit in the available registers.
      Would be nice if... there was an arch maintainer review mechanism for
      new syscalls before they hit the kernel.
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      5a059f1a
  14. 10 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  15. 08 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  16. 02 10月, 2006 1 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] rename the provided execve functions to kernel_execve · 3db03b4a
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      Some architectures provide an execve function that does not set errno, but
      instead returns the result code directly.  Rename these to kernel_execve to
      get the right semantics there.  Moreover, there is no reasone for any of these
      architectures to still provide __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ or _syscallN macros, so
      remove these right away.
      
      [akpm@osdl.org: build fix]
      [bunk@stusta.de: build fix]
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
      Acked-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
      Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
      Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com>
      Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
      Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
      Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata.hirokazu@renesas.com>
      Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
      Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
      Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
      Cc: Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
      Cc: Richard Curnow <rc@rc0.org.uk>
      Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
      Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      Cc: Miles Bader <uclinux-v850@lsi.nec.co.jp>
      Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
      Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
      Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
      Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      3db03b4a
  17. 27 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  18. 06 5月, 2006 1 次提交
  19. 30 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  20. 29 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  21. 15 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  22. 30 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  23. 17 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  24. 15 1月, 2006 2 次提交
    • N
      [ARM] 3110/5: old ABI compat: multi-ABI syscall entry support · dd35afc2
      Nicolas Pitre 提交于
      Patch from Nicolas Pitre
      
      This patch adds the required code to support both user space ABIs at
      the same time. A second syscall table is created to include legacy ABI
      syscalls that need an ABI compat wrapper.
      Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      dd35afc2
    • N
      [ARM] 3105/4: ARM EABI: new syscall entry convention · 3f2829a3
      Nicolas Pitre 提交于
      Patch from Nicolas Pitre
      
      For a while we wanted to change the way syscalls were called on ARM.
      Instead of encoding the syscall number in the swi instruction which
      requires reading back the instruction from memory to extract that number
      and polluting the data cache, it was decided that simply storing the
      syscall number into r7 would be more efficient. Since this represents
      an ABI change then making that change at the same time as EABI support
      is the right thing to do.
      
      It is now expected that EABI user space binaries put the syscall number
      into r7 and use "swi 0" to call the kernel. Syscall register argument
      are also expected to have "EABI arrangement" i.e. 64-bit arguments
      should be put in a pair of registers from an even register number.
      
      Example with long ftruncate64(unsigned int fd, loff_t length):
      
      	legacy ABI:
      	- put fd into r0
      	- put length into r1-r2
      	- use "swi #(0x900000 + 194)" to call the kernel
      
      	new ARM EABI:
      	- put fd into r0
      	- put length into r2-r3 (skipping over r1)
      	- put 194 into r7
      	- use "swi 0" to call the kernel
      
      Note that it is important to use 0 for the swi argument as backward
      compatibility with legacy ABI user space relies on this.
      The syscall macros in asm-arm/unistd.h were also updated to support
      both ABIs and implement the right call method automatically.
      Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      3f2829a3
  25. 31 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  26. 09 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  27. 01 9月, 2005 1 次提交
    • N
      [ARM] 2865/2: fix fadvise64_64 syscall argument passing · 68d9102f
      Nicolas Pitre 提交于
      Patch from Nicolas Pitre
      
      The prototype for sys_fadvise64_64() is:
          long sys_fadvise64_64(int fd, loff_t offset, loff_t len, int advice)
      The argument list is therefore as follows on legacy ABI:
      	fd: type int (r0)
      	offset: type long long (r1-r2)
      	len: type long long (r3-sp[0])
      	advice: type int (sp[4])
      With EABI this becomes:
      	fd: type int (r0)
      	offset: type long long (r2-r3)
      	len: type long long (sp[0]-sp[4])
      	advice: type int (sp[8])
      Not only do we have ABI differences here, but the EABI version requires
      one additional word on the syscall stack.
      To avoid the ABI mismatch and the extra stack space required with EABI
      this syscall is now defined with a different argument ordering
      on ARM as follows:
          long sys_arm_fadvise64_64(int fd, int advice, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
      This gives us the following ABI independent argument distribution:
      	fd: type int (r0)
      	advice: type int (r1)
      	offset: type long long (r2-r3)
      	len: type long long (sp[0]-sp[4])
      Now, since the syscall entry code takes care of 5 registers only by
      default including the store of r4 to the stack, we need a wrapper to
      store r5 to the stack as well.  Because that wrapper was missing and was
      always required this means that sys_fadvise64_64 never worked on ARM and
      therefore we can safely reuse its syscall number for our new
      sys_arm_fadvise64_64 interface.
      Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      68d9102f
  28. 30 8月, 2005 1 次提交
  29. 15 8月, 2005 1 次提交
  30. 30 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • N
      [PATCH] ARM: 2651/3: kernel helpers for NPTL support · 2d2669b6
      Nicolas Pitre 提交于
      Patch from Nicolas Pitre
      
      This patch entirely reworks the kernel assistance for NPTL on ARM.
      In particular this provides an efficient way to retrieve the TLS
      value and perform atomic operations without any instruction emulation
      nor special system call.  This even allows for pre ARMv6 binaries to
      be forward compatible with SMP systems without any penalty.
      The problematic and performance critical operations are performed
      through segment of kernel provided user code reachable from user space
      at a fixed address in kernel memory.  Those fixed entry points are
      within the vector page so we basically get it for free as no extra
      memory page is required and nothing else may be mapped at that
      location anyway.
      This is different from (but doesn't preclude) a full blown VDSO
      implementation, however a VDSO would prevent some assembly tricks with
      constants that allows for efficient branching to those code segments.
      And since those code segments only use a few cycles before returning to
      user code, the overhead of a VDSO far call would add a significant
      overhead to such minimalistic operations.
      The ARM_NR_set_tls syscall also changed number.  This is done for two
      reasons:
      1) this patch changes the way the TLS value was previously meant to be
         retrieved, therefore we ensure whatever library using the old way
         gets fixed (they only exist in private tree at the moment since the
         NPTL work is still progressing).
      2) the previous number was allocated in a range causing an undefined
         instruction trap on kernels not supporting that syscall and it was
         determined that allocating it in a range returning -ENOSYS would be
         much nicer for libraries trying to determine if the feature is
         present or not.
      
      Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      2d2669b6
  31. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4