1. 04 11月, 2017 2 次提交
  2. 13 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  3. 12 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • T
      iommu/iova: Make rcache flush optional on IOVA allocation failure · 538d5b33
      Tomasz Nowicki 提交于
      Since IOVA allocation failure is not unusual case we need to flush
      CPUs' rcache in hope we will succeed in next round.
      
      However, it is useful to decide whether we need rcache flush step because
      of two reasons:
      - Not scalability. On large system with ~100 CPUs iterating and flushing
        rcache for each CPU becomes serious bottleneck so we may want to defer it.
      - free_cpu_cached_iovas() does not care about max PFN we are interested in.
        Thus we may flush our rcaches and still get no new IOVA like in the
        commonly used scenario:
      
          if (dma_limit > DMA_BIT_MASK(32) && dev_is_pci(dev))
              iova = alloc_iova_fast(iovad, iova_len, DMA_BIT_MASK(32) >> shift);
      
          if (!iova)
              iova = alloc_iova_fast(iovad, iova_len, dma_limit >> shift);
      
         1. First alloc_iova_fast() call is limited to DMA_BIT_MASK(32) to get
            PCI devices a SAC address
         2. alloc_iova() fails due to full 32-bit space
         3. rcaches contain PFNs out of 32-bit space so free_cpu_cached_iovas()
            throws entries away for nothing and alloc_iova() fails again
         4. Next alloc_iova_fast() call cannot take advantage of rcache since we
            have just defeated caches. In this case we pick the slowest option
            to proceed.
      
      This patch reworks flushed_rcache local flag to be additional function
      argument instead and control rcache flush step. Also, it updates all users
      to do the flush as the last chance.
      Signed-off-by: NTomasz Nowicki <Tomasz.Nowicki@caviumnetworks.com>
      Reviewed-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
      Tested-by: NNate Watterson <nwatters@codeaurora.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
      538d5b33
  4. 11 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • T
      iommu/amd: Do not disable SWIOTLB if SME is active · aba2d9a6
      Tom Lendacky 提交于
      When SME memory encryption is active it will rely on SWIOTLB to handle
      DMA for devices that cannot support the addressing requirements of
      having the encryption mask set in the physical address.  The IOMMU
      currently disables SWIOTLB if it is not running in passthrough mode.
      This is not desired as non-PCI devices attempting DMA may fail. Update
      the code to check if SME is active and not disable SWIOTLB.
      
      Fixes: 2543a786 ("iommu/amd: Allow the AMD IOMMU to work with memory encryption")
      Signed-off-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
      aba2d9a6
  5. 10 10月, 2017 2 次提交
  6. 27 9月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 28 8月, 2017 2 次提交
  8. 16 8月, 2017 7 次提交
  9. 25 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  10. 18 7月, 2017 1 次提交
    • T
      iommu/amd: Allow the AMD IOMMU to work with memory encryption · 2543a786
      Tom Lendacky 提交于
      The IOMMU is programmed with physical addresses for the various tables
      and buffers that are used to communicate between the device and the
      driver. When the driver allocates this memory it is encrypted. In order
      for the IOMMU to access the memory as encrypted the encryption mask needs
      to be included in these physical addresses during configuration.
      
      The PTE entries created by the IOMMU should also include the encryption
      mask so that when the device behind the IOMMU performs a DMA, the DMA
      will be performed to encrypted memory.
      Signed-off-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
      Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
      Acked-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
      Cc: <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
      Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
      Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
      Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
      Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
      Cc: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
      Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
      Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
      Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Cc: Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
      Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
      Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/3053631ea25ba8b1601c351cb7c541c496f6d9bc.1500319216.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      2543a786
  11. 28 6月, 2017 3 次提交
  12. 23 6月, 2017 2 次提交
  13. 22 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  14. 16 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  15. 08 6月, 2017 9 次提交
  16. 30 5月, 2017 2 次提交
  17. 30 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  18. 22 3月, 2017 1 次提交
    • R
      iommu: Disambiguate MSI region types · 9d3a4de4
      Robin Murphy 提交于
      The introduction of reserved regions has left a couple of rough edges
      which we could do with sorting out sooner rather than later. Since we
      are not yet addressing the potential dynamic aspect of software-managed
      reservations and presenting them at arbitrary fixed addresses, it is
      incongruous that we end up displaying hardware vs. software-managed MSI
      regions to userspace differently, especially since ARM-based systems may
      actually require one or the other, or even potentially both at once,
      (which iommu-dma currently has no hope of dealing with at all). Let's
      resolve the former user-visible inconsistency ASAP before the ABI has
      been baked into a kernel release, in a way that also lays the groundwork
      for the latter shortcoming to be addressed by follow-up patches.
      
      For clarity, rename the software-managed type to IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI, use
      IOMMU_RESV_MSI to describe the hardware type, and document everything a
      little bit. Since the x86 MSI remapping hardware falls squarely under
      this meaning of IOMMU_RESV_MSI, apply that type to their regions as well,
      so that we tell the same story to userspace across all platforms.
      
      Secondly, as the various region types require quite different handling,
      and it really makes little sense to ever try combining them, convert the
      bitfield-esque #defines to a plain enum in the process before anyone
      gets the wrong impression.
      
      Fixes: d30ddcaa ("iommu: Add a new type field in iommu_resv_region")
      Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
      CC: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
      CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      CC: kvm@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
      9d3a4de4
  19. 25 2月, 2017 1 次提交