Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 155
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 03 12月, 2008 9 次提交
  3. 02 12月, 2008 7 次提交
  5. 28 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • J
      udf: Fix BUG_ON() in destroy_inode() · 52b19ac9
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      udf_clear_inode() can leave behind buffers on mapping's i_private list (when
we truncated preallocation). Call invalidate_inode_buffers() so that the list
is properly cleaned-up before we return from udf_clear_inode(). This is ugly
and suggest that we should cleanup preallocation earlier than in clear_inode()
but currently there's no such call available since drop_inode() is called under
inode lock and thus is unusable for disk operations.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      52b19ac9
  7. 27 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • J
      [CIFS] fix regression in cifs_write_begin/cifs_write_end · a98ee8c1
      由 Jeff Layton 提交于 
      The conversion to write_begin/write_end interfaces had a bug where we
were passing a bad parameter to cifs_readpage_worker. Rather than
passing the page offset of the start of the write, we needed to pass the
offset of the beginning of the page. This was reliably showing up as
data corruption in the fsx-linux test from LTP.

It also became evident that this code was occasionally doing unnecessary
read calls. Optimize those away by using the PG_checked flag to indicate
that the unwritten part of the page has been initialized.

CC: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Acked-by: NDave Kleikamp <shaggy@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      a98ee8c1
  9. 22 11月, 2008 3 次提交
    • A
      UBIFS: pre-allocate bulk-read buffer · 3477d204
      由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于 
      To avoid memory allocation failure during bulk-read, pre-allocate
a bulk-read buffer, so that if there is only one bulk-reader at
a time, it would just use the pre-allocated buffer and would not
do any memory allocation. However, if there are more than 1 bulk-
reader, then only one reader would use the pre-allocated buffer,
while the other reader would allocate the buffer for itself.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      3477d204
    • A
      UBIFS: do not allocate too much · 6c0c42cd
      由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于 
      Bulk-read allocates 128KiB or more using kmalloc. The allocation
starts failing often when the memory gets fragmented. UBIFS still
works fine in this case, because it falls-back to standard
(non-optimized) read method, though. This patch teaches bulk-read
to allocate exactly the amount of memory it needs, instead of
allocating 128KiB every time.

This patch is also a preparation to the further fix where we'll
have a pre-allocated bulk-read buffer as well. For example, now
the @bu object is prepared in 'ubifs_bulk_read()', so we could
path either pre-allocated or allocated information to
'ubifs_do_bulk_read()' later. Or teaching 'ubifs_do_bulk_read()'
not to allocate 'bu->buf' if it is already there.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      6c0c42cd
    • A
      UBIFS: do not print scary memory allocation warnings · 39ce81ce
      由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于 
      Bulk-read allocates a lot of memory with 'kmalloc()', and when it
is/gets fragmented 'kmalloc()' fails with a scarry warning. But
because bulk-read is just an optimization, UBIFS keeps working fine.
Supress the warning by passing __GFP_NOWARN option to 'kmalloc()'.

This patch also introduces a macro for the magic 128KiB constant.
This is just neater.

Note, this is not really fixes the problem we had, but just hides
the warnings. The further patches fix the problem.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      39ce81ce
  11. 21 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • S
      [CIFS] Do not attempt to close invalidated file handles · ddb4cbfc
      由 Steve French 提交于 
      If a connection with open file handles has gone down
and come back up and reconnected without reopening
the file handle yet, do not attempt to send an SMB close
request for this handle in cifs_close.  We were
checking for the connection being invalid in cifs_close
but since the connection may have been reconnected
we also need to check whether the file handle
was marked invalid (otherwise we could close the
wrong file handle by accident).
Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      ddb4cbfc
  13. 20 11月, 2008 3 次提交
  15. 19 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 18 11月, 2008 6 次提交
  19. 17 11月, 2008 3 次提交
  21. 16 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      Fix inotify watch removal/umount races · 8f7b0ba1
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      Inotify watch removals suck violently.

To kick the watch out we need (in this order) inode->inotify_mutex and
ih->mutex.  That's fine if we have a hold on inode; however, for all
other cases we need to make damn sure we don't race with umount.  We can
*NOT* just grab a reference to a watch - inotify_unmount_inodes() will
happily sail past it and we'll end with reference to inode potentially
outliving its superblock.

Ideally we just want to grab an active reference to superblock if we
can; that will make sure we won't go into inotify_umount_inodes() until
we are done.  Cleanup is just deactivate_super().

However, that leaves a messy case - what if we *are* racing with
umount() and active references to superblock can't be acquired anymore?
We can bump ->s_count, grab ->s_umount, which will almost certainly wait
until the superblock is shut down and the watch in question is pining
for fjords.  That's fine, but there is a problem - we might have hit the
window between ->s_active getting to 0 / ->s_count - below S_BIAS (i.e.
the moment when superblock is past the point of no return and is heading
for shutdown) and the moment when deactivate_super() acquires
->s_umount.

We could just do drop_super() yield() and retry, but that's rather
antisocial and this stuff is luser-triggerable.  OTOH, having grabbed
->s_umount and having found that we'd got there first (i.e.  that
->s_root is non-NULL) we know that we won't race with
inotify_umount_inodes().

So we could grab a reference to watch and do the rest as above, just
with drop_super() instead of deactivate_super(), right? Wrong.  We had
to drop ih->mutex before we could grab ->s_umount.  So the watch
could've been gone already.

That still can be dealt with - we need to save watch->wd, do idr_find()
and compare its result with our pointer.  If they match, we either have
the damn thing still alive or we'd lost not one but two races at once,
the watch had been killed and a new one got created with the same ->wd
at the same address.  That couldn't have happened in inotify_destroy(),
but inotify_rm_wd() could run into that.  Still, "new one got created"
is not a problem - we have every right to kill it or leave it alone,
whatever's more convenient.

So we can use idr_find(...) == watch && watch->inode->i_sb == sb as
"grab it and kill it" check.  If it's been our original watch, we are
fine, if it's a newcomer - nevermind, just pretend that we'd won the
race and kill the fscker anyway; we are safe since we know that its
superblock won't be going away.

And yes, this is far beyond mere "not very pretty"; so's the entire
concept of inotify to start with.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: NGreg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      8f7b0ba1
  23. 15 11月, 2008 3 次提交
  25. 14 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • S
      [CIFS] clean up server protocol handling · 3ec332ef
      由 Steve French 提交于 
      We're currently declaring both a sockaddr_in and sockaddr6_in on the
stack, but we really only need storage for one of them. Declare a
sockaddr struct and cast it to the proper type. Also, eliminate the
protocolType field in the TCP_Server_Info struct. It's redundant since
we have a sa_family field in the sockaddr anyway.

We may need to revisit this if SCTP is ever implemented, but for now
this will simplify the code.

CIFS over IPv6 also has a number of problems currently. This fixes all
of them that I found. Eventually, it would be nice to move more of the
code to be protocol independent, but this is a start.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      3ec332ef