Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 4月, 2015 3 次提交
  3. 18 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 06 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 06 1月, 2015 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / PM: Fix PM initialization for devices that are not present · 1b1f3e16
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      If an ACPI device object whose _STA returns 0 (not present and not
functional) has _PR0 or _PS0, its power_manageable flag will be set
and acpi_bus_init_power() will return 0 for it.  Consequently, if
such a device object is passed to the ACPI device PM functions, they
will attempt to carry out the requested operation on the device,
although they should not do that for devices that are not present.

To fix that problem make acpi_bus_init_power() return an error code
for devices that are not present which will cause power_manageable to
be cleared for them as appropriate in acpi_bus_get_power_flags().
However, the lists of power resources should not be freed for the
device in that case, so modify acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to keep
those lists even if acpi_bus_init_power() returns an error.
Accordingly, when deciding whether or not the lists of power
resources need to be freed, acpi_free_power_resources_lists()
should check the power.flags.power_resources flag instead of
flags.power_manageable, so make that change too.

Furthermore, if acpi_bus_attach() sees that flags.initialized is
unset for the given device, it should reset the power management
settings of the device and re-initialize them from scratch instead
of relying on the previous settings (the device may have appeared
after being not present previously, for example), so make it use
the 'valid' flag of the D0 power state as the initial value of
flags.power_manageable for it and call acpi_bus_init_power() to
discover its current power state.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10+
      1b1f3e16
  9. 13 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 24 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  13. 05 11月, 2014 3 次提交
  15. 28 10月, 2014 1 次提交
    • M
      ACPI: Use ACPI companion to match only the first physical device · 52870786
      由 Mika Westerberg 提交于 
      Commit 6ab34301 ("mfd: Add ACPI support") made the MFD subdevices
share the parent MFD ACPI companion if no _HID/_CID is specified for
the subdevice in mfd_cell description. However, since all the subdevices
share the ACPI companion, the match and modalias generation logic started
to use the ACPI companion as well resulting this:

  # cat /sys/bus/platform/devices/HID-SENSOR-200041.6.auto/modalias
  acpi:INT33D1:PNP0C50:

instead of the expected one

  # cat /sys/bus/platform/devices/HID-SENSOR-200041.6.auto/modalias
  platform:HID-SENSOR-200041

In other words the subdevice modalias is overwritten by the one taken from
ACPI companion. This causes udev not to load the driver anymore.

It is useful to be able to share the ACPI companion so that MFD subdevices
(and possibly other devices as well) can access the ACPI resources even if
they do not have ACPI representation in the namespace themselves.

An example where this is used is Minnowboard LPC driver that creates GPIO
as a subdevice among other things. Without the ACPI companion gpiolib is
not able to lookup the corresponding GPIO controller from ACPI GpioIo
resource.

To fix this, restrict the match and modalias logic to be limited to the
first (primary) physical device associated with the given ACPI comapnion.
The secondary devices will still be able to access the ACPI companion,
but they will be matched in a different way.

Fixes: 6ab34301 (mfd: Add ACPI support)
Reported-by: NJarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      52870786
  17. 21 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  19. 22 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  21. 21 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Generate online uevents for ACPI containers · 8ab17fc9
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Commit 46394fd0 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of
the core) removed the generation of "online" uevents for containers,
because "add" uevents are now generated for them automatically when
container system devices are registered.  However, there are user
space tools that need to be notified when the container and all of
its children have been enumerated, which doesn't happen any more.

For this reason, add a mechanism allowing "online" uevents to be
generated for ACPI containers after enumerating the container along
with all of its children.

Fixes: 46394fd0 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core)
Reported-and-tested-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      8ab17fc9
  23. 11 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • Z
      ACPI: introduce ACPI int340x thermal scan handler · 3230bbfc
      由 Zhang Rui 提交于 
      Newer laptops and tablets that use ACPI may have thermal sensors and
other devices with thermal control capabilities outside the core CPU/SOC,
for thermal safety reasons.
They are exposed for the OS to use via
1) INT3400 ACPI device object as the master.
2) INT3401 ~ INT340B ACPI device objects as the slaves.

This patch introduces a scan handler to enumerate the INT3400
ACPI device object to platform bus, and prevent its slaves
from being enumerated before the controller driver being probed.
Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
      3230bbfc
  25. 04 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  27. 26 8月, 2014 2 次提交
  29. 08 8月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      ACPI / hotplug: Check scan handlers in acpi_scan_hot_remove() · dee15926
      由 Tang Chen 提交于 
      When ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY is not configured, memory_device_handler.attach
is not set.  In acpi_scan_attach_handler(), the acpi_device->handler will
not be initialized.

In acpi_scan_hot_remove(), it doesn't check if acpi_device->handler is NULL.
If we do memory hot-remove without ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY configured, the kernel
will panic.

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000088
 IP: [<ffffffff813e318f>] acpi_device_hotplug+0x1d7/0x4c4
 PGD 0
 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
 Modules linked in: sd_mod(E) sr_mod(E) cdrom(E) crc_t10dif(E) crct10dif_common(E) ata_piix(E) libata(E)
 CPU: 0 PID: 41 Comm: kworker/u2:1 Tainted: G            E 3.16.0-rc7--3.16-rc7-tangchen+ #20
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
 Workqueue: kacpi_hotplug acpi_hotplug_work_fn
 task: ffff8800182436c0 ti: ffff880018254000 task.ti: ffff880018254000
 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813e318f>]  [<ffffffff813e318f>] acpi_device_hotplug+0x1d7/0x4c4
 RSP: 0000:ffff880018257da8  EFLAGS: 00000246
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88001cd8d800 RCX: 0000000000000000
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88001e40e6f8 RDI: 0000000000000246
 RBP: ffff880018257df0 R08: 0000000000000096 R09: 00000000000011a0
 R10: 63735f6970636120 R11: 725f746f685f6e61 R12: 0000000000000003
 R13: ffff88001cc1c400 R14: ffff88001e062028 R15: 0000000000000040
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88001e400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
 CR2: 0000000000000088 CR3: 000000001a9a2000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 0000000000000000 DR7: 0000000000000000
 Stack:
  00000000523cab58 ffff88001cd8d9f8 ffff88001852d480 00000000523cab58
  ffff88001852d480 ffff880018221e40 ffff88001cc1c400 ffff88001cce2d00
  0000000000000040 ffff880018257e08 ffffffff813dc31d ffff88001852d480
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff813dc31d>] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1e/0x29
  [<ffffffff8108eefb>] process_one_work+0x17b/0x460
  [<ffffffff8108f69d>] worker_thread+0x11d/0x5b0
  [<ffffffff8108f580>] ? rescuer_thread+0x3a0/0x3a0
  [<ffffffff81096811>] kthread+0xe1/0x100
  [<ffffffff81096730>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1a0/0x1a0
  [<ffffffff816cc6bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
  [<ffffffff81096730>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1a0/0x1a0

This patch fixes this problem by checking if acpi_device->handler is NULL
in acpi_scan_hot_remove().

Fixes: d22ddcbc (ACPI / hotplug: Add demand_offline hotplug profile flag)
Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+
[rjw: Subject]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      dee15926
  31. 24 7月, 2014 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / scan: No implicit wake notification for buttons · bd9b2f9a
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The ACPI device enumeration code in Linux assumes that buttons always
are wakeup devices, so it calls acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake() for them
which leads to undesirable side effects.  Namely, that function sets
up implicit device wake notification mechanism for a given GPE if
there is no handler method in the ACPI namespace, which from the
ACPICA's perspective means that there always is a way to handle
that GPE if enabled.  However, we don't handle wake notify events
for buttons, so if there are no handler methods for their GPEs in
the namespace, enabling a button GPE at run time leads to a GPE
storm in some cases (the GPE triggers, ACPICA carries out the
implicit wake notification for it which isn't handled, so the
GPE triggers again and so on).

To prevent that from happening use acpi_mark_gpe_for_wake()
instead of acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake() for buttons which will cause
ACPICA to only enable button GPEs if there are handler methods for
the in the namespace.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      bd9b2f9a
  33. 16 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  35. 30 5月, 2014 5 次提交
    • Z
      ACPI / scan: use platform bus type by default for _HID enumeration · 48459340
      由 Zhang Rui 提交于 
      Because of the growing demand for enumerating ACPI devices to
platform bus, change the code to enumerate ACPI device objects to
platform bus by default.  Namely, create platform devices for the
ACPI device objects that
 1. Have pnp.type.platform_id set (device objects with _HID currently).
 2. Do not have a scan handler attached.
 3. Are not SPI/I2C slave devices (that should be enumerated to the
    appropriate buses bus by their parent).
Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[rjw: Subject and changelog, rebase and code cleanup]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      48459340
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Change the meaning of missing .attach() in scan handlers · d34afa9d
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Currently, some scan handlers can be compiled out entirely, which
leaves the device objects they normally attach to without a scan
handler.  This isn't a problem as long as we don't have any default
enumeration mechanism that applies to all devices without a scan
handler.  However, if such a default enumeration is added, it still
should not be applied to devices that are normally attached to by
scan handlers, because that may result in creating "physical" device
objects of a wrong type for them.

Since we are going to create platform device objects for all ACPI
device objects with pnp.type.platform_id set by default, clear
pnp.type.platform_id where there is a matching scan handler without
an .attach() callback and otherwise simply treat that scan handler
as though the .attach() callback was present but always returned 0.

This will allow us to compile out scan handler callbacks and leave
the device ID lists used by them so as to prevent creating platform
device objects for the matching ACPI devices.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      d34afa9d
    • R
      ACPI / scan: introduce platform_id device PNP type flag · 549e6845
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Only certain types of ACPI device objects can be enumerated as
platform devices, so in order to distinguish them from the others
introduce a new ACPI device PNP type flag, platform_id, and set it
for devices with a valid _HID to start with.

This change is based on a Zhang Rui's prototype.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      549e6845
    • Z
      ACPI / PNP: use device ID list for PNPACPI device enumeration · eec15edb
      由 Zhang Rui 提交于 
      ACPI can be used to enumerate PNP devices, but the code does not
handle this in the right way currently.  Namely, if an ACPI device
object
 1. Has a _CRS method,
 2. Has an identification of
    "three capital characters followed by four hex digits",
 3. Is not in the excluded IDs list,
it will be enumerated to PNP bus (that is, a PNP device object will
be create for it).  This means that, actually, the PNP bus type is
used as the default bus type for enumerating _HID devices in ACPI.

However, more and more _HID devices need to be enumerated to the
platform bus instead (that is, platform device objects need to be
created for them).  As a result, the device ID list in acpi_platform.c
is used to enforce creating platform device objects rather than PNP
device objects for matching devices.  That list has been continuously
growing recently, unfortunately, and it is pretty much guaranteed to
grow even more in the future.

To address that problem it is better to enumerate _HID devices
as platform devices by default.  To this end, change the way of
enumerating PNP devices by adding a PNP ACPI scan handler that
will use a device ID list to create PNP devices for the ACPI
device objects whose device IDs are present in that list.

The initial device ID list in the PNP ACPI scan handler contains
all of the pnp_device_id strings from all the existing PNP drivers,
so this change should be transparent to the PNP core and all of the
PNP drivers.  Still, in the future it should be possible to reduce
its size by converting PNP drivers that need not be PNP for any
technical reasons into platform drivers.
Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[rjw: Rewrote the changelog, modified the PNP ACPI scan handler code]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      eec15edb
    • R
      ACPI / scan: .match() callback for ACPI scan handlers · aca0a4eb
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Introduce a .match() callback for ACPI scan handlers to allow them to
use more elaborate matching algorithms if necessary.  That is needed
for the upcoming PNP scan handler in particular.

This change is based on a Zhang Rui's prototype.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      aca0a4eb
  37. 20 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  39. 28 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  41. 05 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  43. 22 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  45. 21 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  47. 16 2月, 2014 2 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / dock: Pass ACPI device pointer to acpi_device_is_battery() · b43109fa
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Since we already know what the device's PNP IDs are when
acpi_device_is_battery() is called, it is not necessary to run
acpi_get_object_info() for the device in that function.  Instead, if
acpi_device_is_battery() is passed a pointer to a struct acpi_device
object, it can use the list of PNP IDs from that object, so make that
happen and modify the function's header accordingly
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      b43109fa
    • R
      ACPI / dock: Dispatch dock notifications from the global notify handler · 1e2380cd
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The ACPI dock station code carries out an extra namespace scan
before the main one in order to find and register all of the dock
device objects.  Then, it registers a notify handler for each of
them for handling dock events.

However, dock device objects need not be scanned for upfront.  They
very well can be enumerated and registered during the first phase
of the main namespace scan, before attaching scan handlers and ACPI
drivers to ACPI device objects.  Then, the dependent devices can be
added to the in the second phase.  That makes it possible to drop
the extra namespace scan, so do it.

Moreover, it is not necessary to register notify handlers for all
of the dock stations' namespace nodes, becuase notifications may
be dispatched from the global notify handler for them.  Do that and
drop two functions used for dock notify handling, acpi_dock_deferred_cb()
and dock_notify_handler(), that aren't necessary any more.

Finally, some dock station objects have _HID objects matching the
ACPI container scan handler which causes it to claim those objects
and try to handle their hotplug, but that is not a good idea,
because those objects have their own special hotplug handling anyway.
For this reason, the hotplug_notify flag should not be set for ACPI
device objects representing dock stations and the container scan
handler should be made ignore those objects, so make that happen.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      1e2380cd
  49. 11 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Add bind/unbind callbacks to struct acpi_scan_handler · 9cb32acf
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      In some cases it may be necessary to perform certain setup/cleanup
operations on a device object representing a physical device after
it has been associated with an ACPI companion by acpi_bind_one() or
before disassociating it from that companion by acpi_unbind_one(),
respectively.  If there is a struct acpi_bus_type object for the
given device's bus type, the .setup()/.cleanup() callbacks from there
are executed for these purposes.  However, an analogous mechanism will
be necessary for devices whose bus types don't have corresponding
struct acpi_bus_type objects and that have specific ACPI scan handlers.

For those devices, add new .bind() and .unbind() callbacks to struct
acpi_scan_handler that will be executed by acpi_platform_notify()
right after the given device has been associated with an ACPI
comapnion and by acpi_platform_notify_remove() right before calling
acpi_unbind_one() for that device, respectively.

To make that work for scan handlers registering new devices in their
.attach() callbacks, modify acpi_scan_attach_handler() to set the
ACPI device object's handler field before calling .attach() from the
scan handler at hand.

This changeset includes a fix from Mika Westerberg.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      9cb32acf
  51. 07 2月, 2014 3 次提交