1. 16 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  2. 13 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 10 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  4. 17 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      reiserfs: Don't use MAXQUOTAS value · aca60617
      Jan Kara 提交于
      MAXQUOTAS value defines maximum number of quota types VFS supports.
      This isn't necessarily the number of types reiserfs supports and with
      addition of project quotas these two numbers stop matching. So make
      reiserfs use its private definition.
      
      CC: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
      CC: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      aca60617
  5. 12 8月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      reiserfs: Fix use after free in journal teardown · 01777836
      Jan Kara 提交于
      If do_journal_release() races with do_journal_end() which requeues
      delayed works for transaction flushing, we can leave work items for
      flushing outstanding transactions queued while freeing them. That
      results in use after free and possible crash in run_timers_softirq().
      
      Fix the problem by not requeueing works if superblock is being shut down
      (MS_ACTIVE not set) and using cancel_delayed_work_sync() in
      do_journal_release().
      
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      01777836
  6. 09 8月, 2014 2 次提交
  7. 07 5月, 2014 8 次提交
  8. 04 4月, 2014 2 次提交
  9. 13 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      fs: push sync_filesystem() down to the file system's remount_fs() · 02b9984d
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      Previously, the no-op "mount -o mount /dev/xxx" operation when the
      file system is already mounted read-write causes an implied,
      unconditional syncfs().  This seems pretty stupid, and it's certainly
      documented or guaraunteed to do this, nor is it particularly useful,
      except in the case where the file system was mounted rw and is getting
      remounted read-only.
      
      However, it's possible that there might be some file systems that are
      actually depending on this behavior.  In most file systems, it's
      probably fine to only call sync_filesystem() when transitioning from
      read-write to read-only, and there are some file systems where this is
      not needed at all (for example, for a pseudo-filesystem or something
      like romfs).
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
      Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
      Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
      Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
      Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
      Cc: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>
      Cc: Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>
      Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
      Cc: Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name>
      Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
      Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: samba-technical@lists.samba.org
      Cc: codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu
      Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
      Cc: fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
      Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com
      Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
      Cc: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
      Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
      Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
      Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
      02b9984d
  10. 25 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 09 8月, 2013 3 次提交
    • J
      reiserfs: locking, release lock around quota operations · d2d0395f
      Jeff Mahoney 提交于
      Previous commits released the write lock across quota operations but
      missed several places.  In particular, the free operations can also
      call into the file system code and take the write lock, causing
      deadlocks.
      
      This patch introduces some more helpers and uses them for quota call
      sites.  Without this patch applied, reiserfs + quotas runs into deadlocks
      under anything more than trivial load.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      d2d0395f
    • J
      reiserfs: locking, handle nested locks properly · 278f6679
      Jeff Mahoney 提交于
      The reiserfs write lock replaced the BKL and uses similar semantics.
      
      Frederic's locking code makes a distinction between when the lock is nested
      and when it's being acquired/released, but I don't think that's the right
      distinction to make.
      
      The right distinction is between the lock being released at end-of-use and
      the lock being released for a schedule. The unlock should return the depth
      and the lock should restore it, rather than the other way around as it is now.
      
      This patch implements that and adds a number of places where the lock
      should be dropped.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      278f6679
    • J
      reiserfs: locking, push write lock out of xattr code · 4c05141d
      Jeff Mahoney 提交于
      The reiserfs xattr code doesn't need the write lock and sleeps all over
      the place. We can simplify the locking by releasing it and reacquiring
      after the xattr call.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      4c05141d
  12. 05 8月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      reiserfs: fix deadlock in umount · 672fe15d
      Al Viro 提交于
      Since remove_proc_entry() started to wait for IO in progress (i.e.
      since 2007 or so), the locking in fs/reiserfs/proc.c became wrong;
      if procfs read happens between the moment when umount() locks the
      victim superblock and removal of /proc/fs/reiserfs/<device>/*,
      we'll get a deadlock - read will wait for s_umount (in sget(),
      called by r_start()), while umount will wait in remove_proc_entry()
      for that read to finish, holding s_umount all along.
      
      Fortunately, the same change allows a much simpler race avoidance -
      all we need to do is remove the procfs entries in the very beginning
      of reiserfs ->kill_sb(); that'll guarantee that pointer to superblock
      will remain valid for the duration for procfs IO, so we don't need
      sget() to keep the sucker alive.  As the matter of fact, we can
      get rid of the home-grown iterator completely, and use single_open()
      instead.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      672fe15d
  13. 12 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  14. 04 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • E
      fs: Limit sys_mount to only request filesystem modules. · 7f78e035
      Eric W. Biederman 提交于
      Modify the request_module to prefix the file system type with "fs-"
      and add aliases to all of the filesystems that can be built as modules
      to match.
      
      A common practice is to build all of the kernel code and leave code
      that is not commonly needed as modules, with the result that many
      users are exposed to any bug anywhere in the kernel.
      
      Looking for filesystems with a fs- prefix limits the pool of possible
      modules that can be loaded by mount to just filesystems trivially
      making things safer with no real cost.
      
      Using aliases means user space can control the policy of which
      filesystem modules are auto-loaded by editing /etc/modprobe.d/*.conf
      with blacklist and alias directives.  Allowing simple, safe,
      well understood work-arounds to known problematic software.
      
      This also addresses a rare but unfortunate problem where the filesystem
      name is not the same as it's module name and module auto-loading
      would not work.  While writing this patch I saw a handful of such
      cases.  The most significant being autofs that lives in the module
      autofs4.
      
      This is relevant to user namespaces because we can reach the request
      module in get_fs_type() without having any special permissions, and
      people get uncomfortable when a user specified string (in this case
      the filesystem type) goes all of the way to request_module.
      
      After having looked at this issue I don't think there is any
      particular reason to perform any filtering or permission checks beyond
      making it clear in the module request that we want a filesystem
      module.  The common pattern in the kernel is to call request_module()
      without regards to the users permissions.  In general all a filesystem
      module does once loaded is call register_filesystem() and go to sleep.
      Which means there is not much attack surface exposed by loading a
      filesytem module unless the filesystem is mounted.  In a user
      namespace filesystems are not mounted unless .fs_flags = FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
      which most filesystems do not set today.
      Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
      Acked-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Reported-by: NKees Cook <keescook@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      7f78e035
  15. 20 11月, 2012 4 次提交
  16. 03 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 23 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      quota: Move quota syncing to ->sync_fs method · a1177825
      Jan Kara 提交于
      Since the moment writes to quota files are using block device page cache and
      space for quota structures is reserved at the moment they are first accessed we
      have no reason to sync quota before inode writeback. In fact this order is now
      only harmful since quota information can easily change during inode writeback
      (either because conversion of delayed-allocated extents or simply because of
      allocation of new blocks for simple filesystems not using page_mkwrite).
      
      So move syncing of quota information after writeback of inodes into ->sync_fs
      method. This way we do not have to use ->quota_sync callback which is primarily
      intended for use by quotactl syscall anyway and we get rid of calling
      ->sync_fs() twice unnecessarily. We skip quota syncing for OCFS2 since it does
      proper quota journalling in all cases (unlike ext3, ext4, and reiserfs which
      also support legacy non-journalled quotas) and thus there are no dirty quota
      structures.
      
      CC: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      CC: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
      CC: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
      Acked-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NDave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>
      Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      a1177825
  18. 01 6月, 2012 2 次提交
    • A
      reiserfs: get rid of resierfs_sync_super · 033369d1
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      This patch stops reiserfs using the VFS 'write_super()' method along with the
      s_dirt flag, because they are on their way out.
      
      The whole "superblock write-out" VFS infrastructure is served by the
      'sync_supers()' kernel thread, which wakes up every 5 (by default) seconds and
      writes out all dirty superblock using the '->write_super()' call-back.  But the
      problem with this thread is that it wastes power by waking up the system every
      5 seconds, even if there are no diry superblocks, or there are no client
      file-systems which would need this (e.g., btrfs does not use
      '->write_super()'). So we want to kill it completely and thus, we need to make
      file-systems to stop using the '->write_super()' VFS service, and then remove
      it together with the kernel thread.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      033369d1
    • A
      reiserfs: cleanup reiserfs_fill_super a bit · efaa33eb
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      We have the reiserfs superblock pointer in the 'sbi' variable in this
      function, no need to use the 'REISERFS_SB(s)' macro which is the same.
      This is jut a small clean-up.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      efaa33eb
  19. 16 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  20. 21 3月, 2012 4 次提交
  21. 11 1月, 2012 2 次提交
    • F
      reiserfs: don't lock root inode searching · 9b467e6e
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      Nothing requires that we lock the filesystem until the root inode is
      provided.
      
      Also iget5_locked() triggers a warning because we are holding the
      filesystem lock while allocating the inode, which result in a lockdep
      suspicion that we have a lock inversion against the reclaim path:
      
      [ 1986.896979] =================================
      [ 1986.896990] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
      [ 1986.896997] 3.1.1-main #8
      [ 1986.897001] ---------------------------------
      [ 1986.897007] inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage.
      [ 1986.897016] kswapd0/16 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
      [ 1986.897023]  (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.?.}, at: [<c01f8bd4>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
      [ 1986.897044] {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at:
      [ 1986.897050]   [<c014a5b9>] mark_held_locks+0xae/0xd0
      [ 1986.897060]   [<c014aab3>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x7d/0x91
      [ 1986.897068]   [<c0190ee0>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1a/0x93
      [ 1986.897078]   [<c01e7728>] reiserfs_alloc_inode+0x13/0x3d
      [ 1986.897088]   [<c01a5b06>] alloc_inode+0x14/0x5f
      [ 1986.897097]   [<c01a5cb9>] iget5_locked+0x62/0x13a
      [ 1986.897106]   [<c01e99e0>] reiserfs_fill_super+0x410/0x8b9
      [ 1986.897114]   [<c01953da>] mount_bdev+0x10b/0x159
      [ 1986.897123]   [<c01e764d>] get_super_block+0x10/0x12
      [ 1986.897131]   [<c0195b38>] mount_fs+0x59/0x12d
      [ 1986.897138]   [<c01a80d1>] vfs_kern_mount+0x45/0x7a
      [ 1986.897147]   [<c01a83e3>] do_kern_mount+0x2f/0xb0
      [ 1986.897155]   [<c01a987a>] do_mount+0x5c2/0x612
      [ 1986.897163]   [<c01a9a72>] sys_mount+0x61/0x8f
      [ 1986.897170]   [<c044060c>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
      [ 1986.897181] irq event stamp: 7509691
      [ 1986.897186] hardirqs last  enabled at (7509691): [<c0190f34>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x6e/0x93
      [ 1986.897197] hardirqs last disabled at (7509690): [<c0190eea>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x24/0x93
      [ 1986.897209] softirqs last  enabled at (7508896): [<c01294bd>] __do_softirq+0xee/0xfd
      [ 1986.897222] softirqs last disabled at (7508859): [<c01030ed>] do_softirq+0x50/0x9d
      [ 1986.897234]
      [ 1986.897235] other info that might help us debug this:
      [ 1986.897242]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      [ 1986.897244]
      [ 1986.897250]        CPU0
      [ 1986.897254]        ----
      [ 1986.897257]   lock(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock);
      [ 1986.897265] <Interrupt>
      [ 1986.897269]     lock(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock);
      [ 1986.897276]
      [ 1986.897277]  *** DEADLOCK ***
      [ 1986.897278]
      [ 1986.897286] no locks held by kswapd0/16.
      [ 1986.897291]
      [ 1986.897292] stack backtrace:
      [ 1986.897299] Pid: 16, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 3.1.1-main #8
      [ 1986.897306] Call Trace:
      [ 1986.897314]  [<c0439e76>] ? printk+0xf/0x11
      [ 1986.897324]  [<c01482d1>] print_usage_bug+0x20e/0x21a
      [ 1986.897332]  [<c01479b8>] ? print_irq_inversion_bug+0x172/0x172
      [ 1986.897341]  [<c014855c>] mark_lock+0x27f/0x483
      [ 1986.897349]  [<c0148d88>] __lock_acquire+0x628/0x1472
      [ 1986.897358]  [<c0149fae>] lock_acquire+0x47/0x5e
      [ 1986.897366]  [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
      [ 1986.897384]  [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
      [ 1986.897397]  [<c043b5ef>] mutex_lock_nested+0x35/0x26f
      [ 1986.897409]  [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
      [ 1986.897421]  [<c01f8bd4>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
      [ 1986.897433]  [<c01e2edd>] map_block_for_writepage+0xc9/0x590
      [ 1986.897448]  [<c01b1706>] ? create_empty_buffers+0x33/0x8f
      [ 1986.897461]  [<c0121124>] ? get_parent_ip+0xb/0x31
      [ 1986.897472]  [<c043ef7f>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x81/0x8e
      [ 1986.897485]  [<c043cae0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x3d
      [ 1986.897496]  [<c0121124>] ? get_parent_ip+0xb/0x31
      [ 1986.897508]  [<c01e355d>] reiserfs_writepage+0x1b9/0x3e7
      [ 1986.897521]  [<c0173b40>] ? clear_page_dirty_for_io+0xcb/0xde
      [ 1986.897533]  [<c014a6e3>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x108/0x138
      [ 1986.897546]  [<c014a71e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
      [ 1986.897559]  [<c0177b38>] shrink_page_list+0x34f/0x5e2
      [ 1986.897572]  [<c01780a7>] shrink_inactive_list+0x172/0x22c
      [ 1986.897585]  [<c0178464>] shrink_zone+0x303/0x3b1
      [ 1986.897597]  [<c043cae0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x3d
      [ 1986.897611]  [<c01788c9>] kswapd+0x3b7/0x5f2
      
      The deadlock shouldn't happen since we are doing that allocation in the
      mount path, the filesystem is not available for any reclaim.  Still the
      warning is annoying.
      
      To solve this, acquire the lock later only where we need it, right before
      calling reiserfs_read_locked_inode() that wants to lock to walk the tree.
      Reported-by: NKnut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9b467e6e
    • F
      reiserfs: don't lock journal_init() · 37c69b98
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      journal_init() doesn't need the lock since no operation on the filesystem
      is involved there.  journal_read() and get_list_bitmap() have yet to be
      reviewed carefully though before removing the lock there.  Just keep the
      it around these two calls for safety.
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      37c69b98