When releasing the master pty, the slave pty also needs to be locked
to prevent concurrent tty count changes for the slave pty and to
ensure that only one parallel master and slave release observe the
final close, and proceed to destruct the pty pair. Conversely, when
releasing the slave pty, locking the master pty is not necessary
(since the master's state can be inferred by the slave tty count).

Introduce tty_lock_slave()/tty_unlock_slave() which acquires/releases
the tty lock of the slave pty. Remove tty_lock_pair()/tty_unlock_pair().

Dropping the tty_lock is no longer required to re-establish a stable
lock order.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Here I fixed from printk(KERN_ERR, ... to pr_err(... on tty_mutex.c
Signed-off-by: NSangho Yi <antiroot@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The termios and other changes mean the other protections needed on the driver
tty arrays should be adequate. Turn it all back on.

This contains pieces folded in from the fixes made to the original patches

| From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>	(fix m68k)
| From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>	(fix cris)
| From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suze.cz>			(lockdep)
| From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>		(lockdep)
Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

I sent GregKH this after the pre-requisites. He dropped the pre-requesites
for good reason and unfortunately then applied this patch. Without this
reverted you get random kernel memory corruption which will make bisecting
anything between it and the properly applied patches a complete sod.
Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The termios and other changes mean the other protections needed on the driver
tty arrays should be adequate. Turn it all back on.

This contains pieces folded in from the fixes made to the original patches

| From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>	(fix m68k)
| From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>	(fix cris)
| From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suze.cz>			(lockdep)
| From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>		(lockdep)
Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

This reverts the tty layer change to use per-tty locking, because it's
not correct yet, and fixing it will require some more deep surgery.

The main revert is d29f3ef3 ("tty_lock: Localise the lock"), but
there are several smaller commits that built upon it, they also get
reverted here. The list of reverted commits is:

  fde86d31 - tty: add lockdep annotations
  8f6576ad - tty: fix ldisc lock inversion trace
  d3ca8b64 - pty: Fix lock inversion
  b1d679af - tty: drop the pty lock during hangup
  abcefe5f - tty/amiserial: Add missing argument for tty_unlock()
  fd11b42e - cris: fix missing tty arg in wait_event_interruptible_tty call
  d29f3ef3 - tty_lock: Localise the lock

The revert had a trivial conflict in the 68360serial.c staging driver
that got removed in the meantime.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

tty_lock_pair() do the right thing to avoid deadlocks, but should
instruct LOCKDEP of this to avoid a splat.
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

In each remaining case the tty_lock is associated with a specific tty. This
means we can now lock on a per tty basis. We do need tty_lock_pair() for
the pty case. Uglier but still a step in the right direction.

[fixed up calls in 3 missing drivers - gregkh]
Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

We used it really only serial and ami_serial. The rest of the
callsites were BUG/WARN_ONs to check if BTM is held. Now that we
pruned tty_locked from both of the real users, we can get rid of
tty_lock along with __big_tty_mutex_owner.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

remove invalid location line in each file header after location
moved from driver/char to driver/tty
Signed-off-by: NJovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

The tty code should be in its own subdirectory and not in the char
driver with all of the cruft that is currently there.

Based on work done by Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

The tty locking now follows the rules for mutexes, so
we can replace the BKL usage with a new subsystem
wide mutex.

Using a regular mutex here will change the behaviour
when blocked on the BTM from spinning to sleeping,
but that should not be visible to the user.

Using the mutex also means that all the BTM is now
covered by lockdep.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>