Fixes not being able to init fence subsystem when multiple boards are
present.
Reported-by: NIlia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

nouveau_platform.c was still using the old nouveau_dev() macro,
triggering a compilation error. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

LTC device is now required for PGRAPH to work, add it.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Spotted by Coverity.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

A thinko made me turn this into a u16 when cleaning up.

Spotted by coverity.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Spotted by Coverity.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Reported by Coverity.  The intention is that the return value is
checked, but let's be more paranoid and make it extremely obvious
if something forgets to.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Likely a large part of the GK106 woes..
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Note to self: more sleep
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

No-one has yet had time to move this to debugfs as discussed during
the last merge window.  Until this happens, hide the option to make
it clear it's not going to be here forever.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

We have another version of it implemented in SW, however, that version
isn't serialised with normal PGRAPH operation and can possibly clobber
the enables for another context.

This is the same method that's implemented by the NVIDIA binary driver.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

... and hope that the defaults are good enough.  This was always
supposed to be a read/modify/write thing anyway, so we're writing
very wrong stuff for some boards already.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Should be the same values as before, except:

GF117 has smaller buffer allocated, as per register setup.
GK20A now uses values from Tegra driver, not GK104's.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Removes need for fixed buffer indices, and allows the functions
utilising them to also be run outside of context generation.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Default ZBC table is compatible with binary driver defaults.

Userspace will need to be updated to take full advantage of this
feature, however, some applications will see a performance boost
without updated drivers.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The full object interfaces are about to be exposed to userspace, so we
need to check for any security-related issues and version the structs
to make it easier to handle any changes we may need in the future.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>