- 18 7月, 2015 6 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Sequentially stopping the CPUs slows down expedited grace periods by at least a factor of two, based on rcutorture's grace-period-per-second rate. This is a conservative measure because rcutorture uses unusually long RCU read-side critical sections and because rcutorture periodically quiesces the system in order to test RCU's ability to ramp down to and up from the idle state. This commit therefore replaces the stop_one_cpu() with stop_one_cpu_nowait(), using an atomic-counter scheme to determine when all CPUs have passed through the stopped state. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
This commit gets rid of synchronize_sched_expedited()'s mutex_trylock() polling loop in favor of a funnel-locking scheme based on the rcu_node tree. The work-done check is done at each level of the tree, allowing high-contention situations to be resolved quickly with reasonable levels of mutex contention. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Now that synchronize_sched_expedited() have a mutex, it can use simpler work-already-done detection scheme. This commit simplifies this scheme by using something similar to the sequence-locking counter scheme. A counter is incremented before and after each grace period, so that the counter is odd in the midst of the grace period and even otherwise. So if the counter has advanced to the second even number that is greater than or equal to the snapshot, the required grace period has already happened. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
The synchronize_sched_expedited() currently invokes try_stop_cpus(), which schedules the stopper kthreads on each online non-idle CPU, and waits until all those kthreads are running before letting any of them stop. This is disastrous for real-time workloads, which get hit with a preemption that is as long as the longest scheduling latency on any CPU, including any non-realtime housekeeping CPUs. This commit therefore switches to using stop_one_cpu() on each CPU in turn. This avoids inflicting the worst-case scheduling latency on the worst-case CPU onto all other CPUs, and also simplifies the code a little bit. Follow-up commits will simplify the counter-snapshotting algorithm and convert a number of the counters that are now protected by the new ->expedited_mutex to non-atomic. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [ paulmck: Kept stop_one_cpu(), dropped disabling of "guardrails". ] Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO has been default-y for a couple of releases with no complaints, so it is time to eliminate this Kconfig option entirely, so that the long-form RCU CPU stall warnings cannot be disabled. This commit does just that. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Alexander Gordeev 提交于
Because gcc does not realize a loop would not be entered ever (i.e. in case of rcu_num_lvls == 1): for (i = 1; i < rcu_num_lvls; i++) rsp->level[i] = rsp->level[i - 1] + levelcnt[i - 1]; some compiler (pre- 5.x?) versions give a bogus warning: kernel/rcu/tree.c: In function ‘rcu_init_one.isra.55’: kernel/rcu/tree.c:4108:13: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds] rsp->level[i] = rsp->level[i - 1] + rsp->levelcnt[i - 1]; ^ Fix that warning by adding an extra item to rcu_state::level[] array. Once the bogus warning is fixed in gcc and kernel drops support of older versions, the dummy item may be removed from the array. Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Suggested-by: N"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 16 7月, 2015 6 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Gordeev 提交于
This update makes arithmetic to calculate number of RCU nodes more straight and easy to read. Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Alexander Gordeev 提交于
Although a number of RCU levels may be less than the current maximum of four, some static data associated with each level are allocated for all four levels. As result, the extra data never get accessed and just wast memory. This update limits count of allocated items to the number of used RCU levels. Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Alexander Gordeev 提交于
Members rcu_state::levelcnt[] and rcu_state::levelspread[] are only used at init. There is no reason to keep them afterwards. Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Alexander Gordeev 提交于
Number of items in rcu_capacity[] array is defined by macro MAX_RCU_LVLS. However, that array is never accessed beyond RCU_NUM_LVLS index. Therefore, we can limit the array to RCU_NUM_LVLS items and eliminate MAX_RCU_LVLS. As result, in most cases the memory is conserved. Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Alexander Gordeev 提交于
Variable rcu_num_lvls is limited by RCU_NUM_LVLS macro. In turn, rcu_state::levelcnt[] array is never accessed beyond rcu_num_lvls. Thus, rcu_state::levelcnt[] is safe to limit to RCU_NUM_LVLS items. Since rcu_num_lvls could be changed during boot (as result of rcutree.rcu_fanout_leaf kernel parameter update) one might assume a new value could overflow the value of RCU_NUM_LVLS. However, that is not the case, since leaf-level fanout is only permitted to increase, resulting in rcu_num_lvls possibly to decrease. Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 28 5月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
This commit introduces an RCU_FANOUT_LEAF C-preprocessor macro so that RCU will build even when CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF is undefined. The RCU_FANOUT_LEAF macro is set to the value of CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF when defined, otherwise it is set to 32 for 32-bit systems and 64 for 64-bit systems. This commit then makes CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF depend on CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT, so that Kconfig users won't be asked about CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF unless they want to be. Reported-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
This commit introduces an RCU_FANOUT C-preprocessor macro so that RCU will build even when CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT is undefined. The RCU_FANOUT macro is set to the value of CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT when defined, otherwise it is set to 32 for 32-bit systems and 64 for 64-bit systems. This commit then makes CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT depend on CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT, so that Kconfig users won't be asked about CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT unless they want to be. Reported-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
-
由 Nicolas Iooss 提交于
rcu_bh_data, rcu_sched_data and rcu_preempt_data are never used outside kernel/rcu/tree.c and thus can be made static. Doing so fixes a section mismatch warning reported by clang when building LLVMLinux with -Wsection, because these variables were declared in .data..percpu and defined in .data..percpu..shared_aligned since commit 11bbb235 ("rcu: Use DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED for rcu_data"). Signed-off-by: NNicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
This commit removes a few RCU_BOOST #ifdefs, replacing them with IS_ENABLED()-protected return statements. This relies on the optimizer to remove any resulting dead code. There are several other RCU_BOOST #ifdefs, however these rely on some per-CPU variables that are available only under RCU_BOOST. These might be converted later, if the simplification proves to outweigh the increase in memory footprint. One hoped-for advantage is more easily locating compiler errors in obscure combinations of Kconfig parameters. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
-
- 13 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Because that RCU grace-period initialization need no longer exclude CPU-hotplug operations, this commit eliminates the ->onoff_mutex and its uses. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Races between CPU hotplug and grace periods can be difficult to resolve, so the ->onoff_mutex is used to exclude the two events. Unfortunately, this means that it is impossible for an outgoing CPU to perform the last bits of its offlining from its last pass through the idle loop, because sleeplocks cannot be acquired in that context. This commit avoids these problems by buffering online and offline events in a new ->qsmaskinitnext field in the leaf rcu_node structures. When a grace period starts, the events accumulated in this mask are applied to the ->qsmaskinit field, and, if needed, up the rcu_node tree. The special case of all CPUs corresponding to a given leaf rcu_node structure being offline while there are still elements in that structure's ->blkd_tasks list is handled using a new ->wait_blkd_tasks field. In this case, propagating the offline bits up the tree is deferred until the beginning of the grace period after all of the tasks have exited their RCU read-side critical sections and removed themselves from the list, at which point the ->wait_blkd_tasks flag is cleared. If one of that leaf rcu_node structure's CPUs comes back online before the list empties, then the ->wait_blkd_tasks flag is simply cleared. This of course means that RCU's notion of which CPUs are offline can be out of date. This is OK because RCU need only wait on CPUs that were online at the time that the grace period started. In addition, RCU's force-quiescent-state actions will handle the case where a CPU goes offline after the grace period starts. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 16 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Although cond_resched_rcu_qs() only applies to TASKS_RCU, it is used in places where it would be useful for it to apply to the normal RCU flavors, rcu_preempt, rcu_sched, and rcu_bh. This is especially the case for workloads that aggressively overload the system, particularly those that generate large numbers of RCU updates on systems running NO_HZ_FULL CPUs. This commit therefore communicates quiescent states from cond_resched_rcu_qs() to the normal RCU flavors. Note that it is unfortunately necessary to leave the old ->passed_quiesce mechanism in place to allow quiescent states that apply to only one flavor to be recorded. (Yes, we could decrement ->rcu_qs_ctr_snap in that case, but that is not so good for debugging of RCU internals.) In addition, if one of the RCU flavor's grace period has stalled, this will invoke rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(), resulting in a heavy-weight quiescent state visible from other CPUs. Reported-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ paulmck: Merge commit from Sasha Levin fixing a bug where __this_cpu() was used in preemptible code. ]
-
- 11 1月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Long ago, the various ->completed fields were of type long, but now are unsigned long due to signed-integer-overflow concerns. However, the various _batches_completed() functions remained of type long, even though their only purpose in life is to return the corresponding ->completed field. This patch cleans this up by changing these functions' return types to unsigned long. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2015 8 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Subtle race conditions can result if a CPU stays in dyntick-idle mode long enough for the ->gpnum and ->completed fields to wrap. For example, consider the following sequence of events: o CPU 1 encounters a quiescent state while waiting for grace period 5 to complete, but then enters dyntick-idle mode. o While CPU 1 is in dyntick-idle mode, the grace-period counters wrap around so that the grace period number is now 4. o Just as CPU 1 exits dyntick-idle mode, grace period 4 completes and grace period 5 begins. o The quiescent state that CPU 1 passed through during the old grace period 5 looks like it applies to the new grace period 5. Therefore, the new grace period 5 completes without CPU 1 having passed through a quiescent state. This could clearly be a fatal surprise to any long-running RCU read-side critical section that happened to be running on CPU 1 at the time. At one time, this was not a problem, given that it takes significant time for the grace-period counters to overflow even on 32-bit systems. However, with the advent of NO_HZ_FULL and SMP embedded systems, arbitrarily long idle periods are now becoming quite feasible. It is therefore time to close this race. This commit therefore avoids this race condition by having the quiescent-state forcing code detect when a CPU is falling too far behind, and setting a new rcu_data field ->gpwrap when this happens. Whenever this new ->gpwrap field is set, the CPU's ->gpnum and ->completed fields are known to be untrustworthy, and can be ignored, along with any associated quiescent states. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The current RCU CPU stall warning code will print "Stall ended before state dump start" any time that the stall-warning code is triggered on a CPU that has already reported a quiescent state for the current grace period and if all quiescent states have been reported for the current grace period. However, a true stall can result in these symptoms, for example, by preventing RCU's grace-period kthreads from ever running This commit therefore checks for this condition, reporting the end of the stall only if one of the grace-period counters has actually advanced. Otherwise, it reports the last time that the grace-period kthread made meaningful progress. (In normal situations, the grace-period kthread should make meaningful progress at least every jiffies_till_next_fqs jiffies.) Reported-by: NMiroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NMiroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
One way that an RCU CPU stall warning can happen is if the grace-period kthread is not allowed to execute. One proxy for this kthread's forward progress is the number of force-quiescent-state (fqs) scans. This commit therefore adds the number of fqs scans to the RCU CPU stall warning printouts when CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=y. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
The patch dfeb9765 ("Allow post-unlock reference for rt_mutex") ensured rcu-boost safe even the rt_mutex has post-unlock reference. But rt_mutex allowing post-unlock reference is definitely a bug and it was fixed by the commit 27e35715 ("rtmutex: Plug slow unlock race"). This fix made the previous patch (dfeb9765) useless. And even worse, the priority-inversion introduced by the the previous patch still exists. rcu_read_unlock_special() { rt_mutex_unlock(&rnp->boost_mtx); /* Priority-Inversion: * the current task had been deboosted and preempted as a low * priority task immediately, it could wait long before reschedule in, * and the rcu-booster also waits on this low priority task and sleeps. * This priority-inversion makes rcu-booster can't work * as expected. */ complete(&rnp->boost_completion); } Just revert the patch to avoid it. Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
When the last CPU associated with a given leaf rcu_node structure goes offline, something must be done about the tasks queued on that rcu_node structure. Each of these tasks has been preempted on one of the leaf rcu_node structure's CPUs while in an RCU read-side critical section that it have not yet exited. Handling these tasks is the job of rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(), which migrates them from the leaf rcu_node structure to the root rcu_node structure. Unfortunately, this migration has to be done one task at a time because each tasks allegiance must be shifted from the original leaf rcu_node to the root, so that future attempts to deal with these tasks will acquire the root rcu_node structure's ->lock rather than that of the leaf. Worse yet, this migration must be done with interrupts disabled, which is not so good for realtime response, especially given that there is no bound on the number of tasks on a given rcu_node structure's list. (OK, OK, there is a bound, it is just that it is unreasonably large, especially on 64-bit systems.) This was not considered a problem back when rcu_preempt_offline_tasks() was first written because realtime systems were assumed not to do CPU-hotplug operations while real-time applications were running. This assumption has proved of dubious validity given that people are starting to run multiple realtime applications on a single SMP system and that it is common practice to offline then online a CPU before starting its real-time application in order to clear extraneous processing off of that CPU. So we now need CPU hotplug operations to avoid undue latencies. This commit therefore avoids migrating these tasks, instead letting them be dequeued one by one from the original leaf rcu_node structure by rcu_read_unlock_special(). This means that the clearing of bits from the upper-level rcu_node structures must be deferred until the last such task has been dequeued, because otherwise subsequent grace periods won't wait on them. This commit has the beneficial side effect of simplifying the CPU-hotplug code for TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, especially in CONFIG_RCU_BOOST builds. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
This commit abstracts rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp() from rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu() in preparation for the rework of RCU priority boosting. This new function will be invoked from rcu_read_unlock_special() in the reworked scheme, which is why rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp() assumes that the leaf rcu_node structure's ->qsmaskinit field has already been updated. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
The 48a7639c ("rcu: Make callers awaken grace-period kthread") removed the irq_work_queue(), so the TREE_RCU doesn't need irq work any more. This commit therefore updates RCU's Kconfig and Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The rcu_barrier() no-callbacks check for no-CBs CPUs has race conditions. It checks a given CPU's lists of callbacks, and if all three no-CBs lists are empty, ignores that CPU. However, these three lists could potentially be empty even when callbacks are present if the check executed just as the callbacks were being moved from one list to another. It turns out that recent versions of rcutorture can spot this race. This commit plugs this hole by consolidating the per-list counts of no-CBs callbacks into a single count, which is incremented before the corresponding callback is posted and after it is invoked. Then rcu_barrier() checks this single count to reliably determine whether the corresponding CPU has no-CBs callbacks. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 04 11月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The "cpu" argument to rcu_cleanup_after_idle() is always the current CPU, so drop it. This moves the smp_processor_id() from the caller to rcu_cleanup_after_idle(), saving argument-passing overhead. Again, the anticipated cross-CPU uses of these functions has been replaced by NO_HZ_FULL. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The "cpu" argument to rcu_prepare_for_idle() is always the current CPU, so drop it. This in turn allows two of the uses of "cpu" in this function to be replaced with a this_cpu_ptr() and the third by smp_processor_id(), replacing that of the call to rcu_prepare_for_idle(). Again, the anticipated cross-CPU uses of these functions has been replaced by NO_HZ_FULL. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The "cpu" argument to rcu_note_context_switch() is always the current CPU, so drop it. This in turn allows the "cpu" argument to rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() to be removed, which allows the sole use of "cpu" in both functions to be replaced with a this_cpu_ptr(). Again, the anticipated cross-CPU uses of these functions has been replaced by NO_HZ_FULL. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Because rcu_preempt_check_callbacks()'s argument is guaranteed to always be the current CPU, drop the argument and replace per_cpu() with __this_cpu_read(). Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
-
由 Christoph Lameter 提交于
For some functions in kernel/rcu/tree* the rdtp parameter is always this_cpu_ptr(rdtp). Remove the parameter if constant and calculate the pointer in function. This will have the advantage that it is obvious that the address are all per cpu offsets and thus it will enable the use of this_cpu_ops in the future. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> [ paulmck: Forward-ported to rcu/dev, whitespace adjustment. ] Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
-
- 30 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU serve the same function after TINY_PREEMPT_RCU has been removed. This patch removes TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and uses PREEMPT_RCU config option in its place. Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 29 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Commit 35ce7f29 (rcu: Create rcuo kthreads only for onlined CPUs) avoids creating rcuo kthreads for CPUs that never come online. This fixes a bug in many instances of firmware: Instead of lying about their age, these systems instead lie about the number of CPUs that they have. Before commit 35ce7f29, this could result in huge numbers of useless rcuo kthreads being created. It appears that experience indicates that I should have told the people suffering from this problem to fix their broken firmware, but I instead produced what turned out to be a partial fix. The missing piece supplied by this commit makes sure that rcu_barrier() knows not to post callbacks for no-CBs CPUs that have not yet come online, because otherwise rcu_barrier() will hang on systems having firmware that lies about the number of CPUs. It is tempting to simply have rcu_barrier() refuse to post a callback on any no-CBs CPU that does not have an rcuo kthread. This unfortunately does not work because rcu_barrier() is required to wait for all pending callbacks. It is therefore required to wait even for those callbacks that cannot possibly be invoked. Even if doing so hangs the system. Given that posting a callback to a no-CBs CPU that does not yet have an rcuo kthread can hang rcu_barrier(), It is tempting to report an error in this case. Unfortunately, this will result in false positives at boot time, when it is perfectly legal to post callbacks to the boot CPU before the scheduler has started, in other words, before it is legal to invoke rcu_barrier(). So this commit instead has rcu_barrier() avoid posting callbacks to CPUs having neither rcuo kthread nor pending callbacks, and has it complain bitterly if it finds CPUs having no rcuo kthread but some pending callbacks. And when rcu_barrier() does find CPUs having no rcuo kthread but pending callbacks, as noted earlier, it has no choice but to hang indefinitely. Reported-by: NYanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> Reported-by: NJay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com> Reported-by: NMeelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Reported-by: NEric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NEric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Tested-by: NJay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com> Tested-by: NYanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> Tested-by: NKevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com> Tested-by: NMeelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
-
- 17 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
RCU currently uses for_each_possible_cpu() to spawn rcuo kthreads, which can result in more rcuo kthreads than one would expect, for example, derRichard reported 64 CPUs worth of rcuo kthreads on an 8-CPU image. This commit therefore creates rcuo kthreads only for those CPUs that actually come online. This was reported by derRichard on the OFTC IRC network. Reported-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Currently, RCU spawns kthreads from several different early_initcall() functions. Although this has served RCU well for quite some time, as more kthreads are added a more deterministic approach is required. This commit therefore causes all of RCU's early-boot kthreads to be spawned from a single early_initcall() function. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
- 08 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Currently TASKS_RCU would ignore a CPU running a task in nohz_full= usermode execution. There would be neither a context switch nor a scheduling-clock interrupt to tell TASKS_RCU that the task in question had passed through a quiescent state. The grace period would therefore extend indefinitely. This commit therefore makes RCU's dyntick-idle subsystem record the task_struct structure of the task that is running in dyntick-idle mode on each CPU. The TASKS_RCU grace period can then access this information and record a quiescent state on behalf of any CPU running in dyntick-idle usermode. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Commit 96d3fd0d (rcu: Break call_rcu() deadlock involving scheduler and perf) covered the case where __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue() needs to wake the rcuo kthread due to the queue being initially empty, but did not do anything for the case where the queue was overflowing. This commit therefore also defers wakeup for the overflow case. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-