Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 11月, 2009 16 次提交
    • D
      FS-Cache: Don't delete pending pages from the page-store tracking tree · 285e728b
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      Don't delete pending pages from the page-store tracking tree, but rather send
them for another write as they've presumably been updated.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      285e728b
    • D
      FS-Cache: Fix lock misorder in fscache_write_op() · 1bccf513
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      FS-Cache has two structs internally for keeping track of the internal state of
a cached file: the fscache_cookie struct, which represents the netfs's state,
and fscache_object struct, which represents the cache's state.  Each has a
pointer that points to the other (when both are in existence), and each has a
spinlock for pointer maintenance.

Since netfs operations approach these structures from the cookie side, they get
the cookie lock first, then the object lock.  Cache operations, on the other
hand, approach from the object side, and get the object lock first.  It is not
then permitted for a cache operation to get the cookie lock whilst it is
holding the object lock lest deadlock occur; instead, it must do one of two
things:

 (1) increment the cookie usage counter, drop the object lock and then get both
     locks in order, or

 (2) simply hold the object lock as certain parts of the cookie may not be
     altered whilst the object lock is held.

It is also not permitted to follow either pointer without holding the lock at
the end you start with.  To break the pointers between the cookie and the
object, both locks must be held.

fscache_write_op(), however, violates the locking rules: It attempts to get the
cookie lock without (a) checking that the cookie pointer is a valid pointer,
and (b) holding the object lock to protect the cookie pointer whilst it follows
it.  This is so that it can access the pending page store tree without
interference from __fscache_write_page().

This is fixed by splitting the cookie lock, such that the page store tracking
tree is protected by its own lock, and checking that the cookie pointer is
non-NULL before we attempt to follow it whilst holding the object lock.

The new lock is subordinate to both the cookie lock and the object lock, and so
should be taken after those.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      1bccf513
    • D
      FS-Cache: The object-available state can't rely on the cookie to be available · 6897e3df
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      The object-available state in the object processing state machine (as
processed by fscache_object_available()) can't rely on the cookie to be
available because the FSCACHE_COOKIE_CREATING bit may have been cleared by
fscache_obtained_object() prior to the object being put into the
FSCACHE_OBJECT_AVAILABLE state.

Clearing the FSCACHE_COOKIE_CREATING bit on a cookie permits
__fscache_relinquish_cookie() to proceed and detach the cookie from the
object.

To deal with this, we don't dereference object->cookie in
fscache_object_available() if the object has already been detached.

In addition, a couple of assertions are added into fscache_drop_object() to
make sure the object is unbound from the cookie before it gets there.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      6897e3df
    • D
      FS-Cache: Permit cache retrieval ops to be interrupted in the initial wait phase · 5753c441
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      Permit the operations to retrieve data from the cache or to allocate space in
the cache for future writes to be interrupted whilst they're waiting for
permission for the operation to proceed.  Typically this wait occurs whilst the
cache object is being looked up on disk in the background.

If an interruption occurs, and the operation has not yet been given the
go-ahead to run, the operation is dequeued and cancelled, and control returns
to the read operation of the netfs routine with none of the requested pages
having been read or in any way marked as known by the cache.

This means that the initial wait is done interruptibly rather than
uninterruptibly.

In addition, extra stats values are made available to show the number of ops
cancelled and the number of cache space allocations interrupted.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      5753c441
    • D
      FS-Cache: Use radix tree preload correctly in tracking of pages to be stored · b34df792
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      __fscache_write_page() attempts to load the radix tree preallocation pool for
the CPU it is on before calling radix_tree_insert(), as the insertion must be
done inside a pair of spinlocks.

Use of the preallocation pool, however, is contingent on the radix tree being
initialised without __GFP_WAIT specified.  __fscache_acquire_cookie() was
passing GFP_NOFS to INIT_RADIX_TREE() - but that includes __GFP_WAIT.

The solution is to AND out __GFP_WAIT.

Additionally, the banner comment to radix_tree_preload() is altered to make
note of this prerequisite.  Possibly there should be a WARN_ON() too.

Without this fix, I have seen the following recursive deadlock caused by
radix_tree_insert() attempting to allocate memory inside the spinlocked
region, which resulted in FS-Cache being called back into to release memory -
which required the spinlock already held.

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.32-rc6-cachefs #24
---------------------------------------------
nfsiod/7916 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&cookie->lock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa0076872>] __fscache_uncache_page+0xdb/0x160 [fscache]

but task is already holding lock:
 (&cookie->lock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa0076acc>] __fscache_write_page+0x15c/0x3f3 [fscache]

other info that might help us debug this:
5 locks held by nfsiod/7916:
 #0:  (nfsiod){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81048290>] worker_thread+0x19a/0x2e2
 #1:  (&task->u.tk_work#2){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81048290>] worker_thread+0x19a/0x2e2
 #2:  (&cookie->lock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa0076acc>] __fscache_write_page+0x15c/0x3f3 [fscache]
 #3:  (&object->lock#2){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa0076b07>] __fscache_write_page+0x197/0x3f3 [fscache]
 #4:  (&cookie->stores_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0076b0f>] __fscache_write_page+0x19f/0x3f3 [fscache]

stack backtrace:
Pid: 7916, comm: nfsiod Not tainted 2.6.32-rc6-cachefs #24
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8105ac7f>] __lock_acquire+0x1649/0x16e3
 [<ffffffff81059ded>] ? __lock_acquire+0x7b7/0x16e3
 [<ffffffff8100e27d>] ? dump_trace+0x248/0x257
 [<ffffffff8105ad70>] lock_acquire+0x57/0x6d
 [<ffffffffa0076872>] ? __fscache_uncache_page+0xdb/0x160 [fscache]
 [<ffffffff8135467c>] _spin_lock+0x2c/0x3b
 [<ffffffffa0076872>] ? __fscache_uncache_page+0xdb/0x160 [fscache]
 [<ffffffffa0076872>] __fscache_uncache_page+0xdb/0x160 [fscache]
 [<ffffffffa0077eb7>] ? __fscache_check_page_write+0x0/0x71 [fscache]
 [<ffffffffa00b4755>] nfs_fscache_release_page+0x86/0xc4 [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa00907f0>] nfs_release_page+0x3c/0x41 [nfs]
 [<ffffffff81087ffb>] try_to_release_page+0x32/0x3b
 [<ffffffff81092c2b>] shrink_page_list+0x316/0x4ac
 [<ffffffff81058a9b>] ? mark_held_locks+0x52/0x70
 [<ffffffff8135451b>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x31
 [<ffffffff81093153>] shrink_inactive_list+0x392/0x67c
 [<ffffffff81058a9b>] ? mark_held_locks+0x52/0x70
 [<ffffffff810934ca>] shrink_list+0x8d/0x8f
 [<ffffffff81093744>] shrink_zone+0x278/0x33c
 [<ffffffff81052c70>] ? ktime_get_ts+0xad/0xba
 [<ffffffff8109453b>] try_to_free_pages+0x22e/0x392
 [<ffffffff8109184c>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x212
 [<ffffffff8108e16b>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3dc/0x5cf
 [<ffffffff810ae24a>] cache_alloc_refill+0x34d/0x6c1
 [<ffffffff811bcf74>] ? radix_tree_node_alloc+0x52/0x5c
 [<ffffffff810ae929>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xb2/0x118
 [<ffffffff811bcf74>] radix_tree_node_alloc+0x52/0x5c
 [<ffffffff811bcfd5>] radix_tree_insert+0x57/0x19c
 [<ffffffffa0076b53>] __fscache_write_page+0x1e3/0x3f3 [fscache]
 [<ffffffffa00b4248>] __nfs_readpage_to_fscache+0x58/0x11e [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa009bb77>] nfs_readpage_release+0x34/0x9b [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa009c0d9>] nfs_readpage_release_full+0x32/0x4b [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa0006cff>] rpc_release_calldata+0x12/0x14 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffffa0006e2d>] rpc_free_task+0x59/0x61 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffffa0006f03>] rpc_async_release+0x10/0x12 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffff810482e5>] worker_thread+0x1ef/0x2e2
 [<ffffffff81048290>] ? worker_thread+0x19a/0x2e2
 [<ffffffff81352433>] ? thread_return+0x3e/0x101
 [<ffffffffa0006ef3>] ? rpc_async_release+0x0/0x12 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffff8104bff5>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
 [<ffffffff81058d25>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
 [<ffffffff810480f6>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x2e2
 [<ffffffff8104bd21>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
 [<ffffffff8100beda>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
 [<ffffffff8100b87c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
 [<ffffffff8104c2b9>] ? add_wait_queue+0x15/0x44
 [<ffffffff8104bca7>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82
 [<ffffffff8100bed0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      b34df792
    • D
      FS-Cache: Clear netfs pointers in cookie after detaching object, not before · 7e311a20
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      Clear the pointers from the fscache_cookie struct to netfs private data after
clearing the pointer to the cookie from the fscache_object struct and
releasing the object lock, rather than before.

This allows the netfs private data pointers to be relied on simply by holding
the object lock, rather than having to hold the cookie lock.  This is makes
things simpler as the cookie lock has to be taken before the object lock, but
sometimes the object pointer is all that the code has.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      7e311a20
    • D
      FS-Cache: Add counters for entry/exit to/from cache operation functions · 52bd75fd
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      Count entries to and exits from cache operation table functions.  Maintain
these as a single counter that's added to or removed from as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      52bd75fd
    • D
      FS-Cache: Allow the current state of all objects to be dumped · 4fbf4291
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      Allow the current state of all fscache objects to be dumped by doing:

	cat /proc/fs/fscache/objects

By default, all objects and all fields will be shown.  This can be restricted
by adding a suitable key to one of the caller's keyrings (such as the session
keyring):

	keyctl add user fscache:objlist "<restrictions>" @s

The <restrictions> are:

	K	Show hexdump of object key (don't show if not given)
	A	Show hexdump of object aux data (don't show if not given)

And paired restrictions:

	C	Show objects that have a cookie
	c	Show objects that don't have a cookie
	B	Show objects that are busy
	b	Show objects that aren't busy
	W	Show objects that have pending writes
	w	Show objects that don't have pending writes
	R	Show objects that have outstanding reads
	r	Show objects that don't have outstanding reads
	S	Show objects that have slow work queued
	s	Show objects that don't have slow work queued

If neither side of a restriction pair is given, then both are implied.  For
example:

	keyctl add user fscache:objlist KB @s

shows objects that are busy, and lists their object keys, but does not dump
their auxiliary data.  It also implies "CcWwRrSs", but as 'B' is given, 'b' is
not implied.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      4fbf4291
    • D
      FS-Cache: Annotate slow-work runqueue proc lines for FS-Cache work items · 440f0aff
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      Annotate slow-work runqueue proc lines for FS-Cache work items.  Objects
include the object ID and the state.  Operations include the object ID, the
operation ID and the operation type and state.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      440f0aff
    • D
      SLOW_WORK: Allow a requeueable work item to sleep till the thread is needed · 3bde31a4
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      Add a function to allow a requeueable work item to sleep till the thread
processing it is needed by the slow-work facility to perform other work.

Sometimes a work item can't progress immediately, but must wait for the
completion of another work item that's currently being processed by another
slow-work thread.

In some circumstances, the waiting item could instead - theoretically - put
itself back on the queue and yield its thread back to the slow-work facility,
thus waiting till it gets processing time again before attempting to progress.
This would allow other work items processing time on that thread.

However, this only works if there is something on the queue for it to queue
behind - otherwise it will just get a thread again immediately, and will end
up cycling between the queue and the thread, eating up valuable CPU time.

So, slow_work_sleep_till_thread_needed() is provided such that an item can put
itself on a wait queue that will wake it up when the event it is actually
interested in occurs, then call this function in lieu of calling schedule().

This function will then sleep until either the item's event occurs or another
work item appears on the queue.  If another work item is queued, but the
item's event hasn't occurred, then the work item should requeue itself and
yield the thread back to the slow-work facility by returning.

This can be used by CacheFiles for an object that is being created on one
thread to wait for an object being deleted on another thread where there is
nothing on the queue for the creation to go and wait behind.  As soon as an
item appears on the queue that could be given thread time instead, CacheFiles
can stick the creating object back on the queue and return to the slow-work
facility - assuming the object deletion didn't also complete.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      3bde31a4
    • D
      SLOW_WORK: Allow the owner of a work item to determine if it is queued or not · 31ba99d3
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      Add a function (slow_work_is_queued()) to permit the owner of a work item to
determine if the item is queued or not.

The work item is counted as being queued if it is actually on the queue, not
just if it is pending.  If it is executing and pending, then it is not on the
queue, but will rather be put back on the queue when execution finishes.

This permits a caller to quickly work out if it may be able to put another,
dependent work item on the queue behind it, or whether it will have to wait
till that is finished.

This can be used by CacheFiles to work out whether the creation a new object
can be immediately deferred when it has to wait for an old object to be
deleted, or whether a wait must take place.  If a wait is necessary, then the
slow-work thread can otherwise get blocked, preventing the deletion from
taking place.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      31ba99d3
    • D
      SLOW_WORK: Allow the work items to be viewed through a /proc file · 8fba10a4
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      Allow the executing and queued work items to be viewed through a /proc file
for debugging purposes.  The contents look something like the following:

    THR PID   ITEM ADDR        FL MARK  DESC
    === ===== ================ == ===== ==========
      0  3005 ffff880023f52348  a 952ms FSC: OBJ17d3: LOOK
      1  3006 ffff880024e33668  2 160ms FSC: OBJ17e5 OP60d3b: Write1/Store fl=2
      2  3165 ffff8800296dd180  a 424ms FSC: OBJ17e4: LOOK
      3  4089 ffff8800262c8d78  a 212ms FSC: OBJ17ea: CRTN
      4  4090 ffff88002792bed8  2 388ms FSC: OBJ17e8 OP60d36: Write1/Store fl=2
      5  4092 ffff88002a0ef308  2 388ms FSC: OBJ17e7 OP60d2e: Write1/Store fl=2
      6  4094 ffff88002abaf4b8  2 132ms FSC: OBJ17e2 OP60d4e: Write1/Store fl=2
      7  4095 ffff88002bb188e0  a 388ms FSC: OBJ17e9: CRTN
    vsq     - ffff880023d99668  1 308ms FSC: OBJ17e0 OP60f91: Write1/EnQ fl=2
    vsq     - ffff8800295d1740  1 212ms FSC: OBJ16be OP4d4b6: Write1/EnQ fl=2
    vsq     - ffff880025ba3308  1 160ms FSC: OBJ179a OP58dec: Write1/EnQ fl=2
    vsq     - ffff880024ec83e0  1 160ms FSC: OBJ17ae OP599f2: Write1/EnQ fl=2
    vsq     - ffff880026618e00  1 160ms FSC: OBJ17e6 OP60d33: Write1/EnQ fl=2
    vsq     - ffff880025a2a4b8  1 132ms FSC: OBJ16a2 OP4d583: Write1/EnQ fl=2
    vsq     - ffff880023cbe6d8  9 212ms FSC: OBJ17eb: LOOK
    vsq     - ffff880024d37590  9 212ms FSC: OBJ17ec: LOOK
    vsq     - ffff880027746cb0  9 212ms FSC: OBJ17ed: LOOK
    vsq     - ffff880024d37ae8  9 212ms FSC: OBJ17ee: LOOK
    vsq     - ffff880024d37cb0  9 212ms FSC: OBJ17ef: LOOK
    vsq     - ffff880025036550  9 212ms FSC: OBJ17f0: LOOK
    vsq     - ffff8800250368e0  9 212ms FSC: OBJ17f1: LOOK
    vsq     - ffff880025036aa8  9 212ms FSC: OBJ17f2: LOOK

In the 'THR' column, executing items show the thread they're occupying and
queued threads indicate which queue they're on.  'PID' shows the process ID of
a slow-work thread that's executing something.  'FL' shows the work item flags.
'MARK' indicates how long since an item was queued or began executing.  Lastly,
the 'DESC' column permits the owner of an item to give some information.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      8fba10a4
    • J
      SLOW_WORK: Add delayed_slow_work support · 6b8268b1
      由 Jens Axboe 提交于 
      This adds support for starting slow work with a delay, similar
to the functionality we have for workqueues.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      6b8268b1
    • J
      SLOW_WORK: Add support for cancellation of slow work · 01609502
      由 Jens Axboe 提交于 
      Add support for cancellation of queued slow work and delayed slow work items.
The cancellation functions will wait for items that are pending or undergoing
execution to be discarded by the slow work facility.

Attempting to enqueue work that is in the process of being cancelled will
result in ECANCELED.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      01609502
    • J
      SLOW_WORK: Make slow_work_ops ->get_ref/->put_ref optional · 4d8bb2cb
      由 Jens Axboe 提交于 
      Make the ability for the slow-work facility to take references on a work item
optional as not everyone requires this.

Even the internal slow-work stubs them out, so those can be got rid of too.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      4d8bb2cb
    • D
      SLOW_WORK: Wait for outstanding work items belonging to a module to clear · 3d7a641e
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      Wait for outstanding slow work items belonging to a module to clear when
unregistering that module as a user of the facility.  This prevents the put_ref
code of a work item from being taken away before it returns.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      3d7a641e
  3. 19 11月, 2009 11 次提交
  5. 18 11月, 2009 13 次提交