Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: NDouglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

With the exception of the detached field, sg_mutex no longer adds any
locking.  detached handling has been broken before and is still broken
and this patch does not seem to make things worse than they were to
begin with.

However, I have observed cases of tasks being blocked for >200s waiting
for sg_mutex.  So the removal clearly adds value for very little cost.
Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: NDouglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

sfds is protected by sg_index_lock - except for sg_open(), where it
isn't.  Change that and add some documentation.
Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: NDouglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Changes since v1: set_exclude now returns the new value, which gets
rid of the comma expression and the operator precedence bug.  Thanks
to Douglas for spotting it.

sdp->exclude was previously protected by the BKL.  The sg_mutex, which
replaced the BKL, only semi-protected it, as it was missing from
sg_release() and sg_proc_seq_show_debug().  Take an explicit spinlock
for it.
Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: NDouglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

srp->done is protected by sfp->rq_list_lock everywhere, except for this
one case.  Result can be that the wake-up happens before the cacheline
with the changed srp->done has arrived, so the waiter can go back to
sleep and never be woken up again.

The wait_event_interruptible() means that anyone trying to debug this
unlikely race will likely notice everything working fine again, as the
next signal will unwedge things.  Evil.
Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: NDouglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

After sg_release() has been called, noone should be able to actually use
that filedescriptor anymore.  So if closed ever made a difference in the
past five years or so, it would have meant a bug.  Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: NDouglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
[jejb: fix up checkpatch warnings]
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Afaics the use of __wait_event_interruptible() as opposed to
wait_event_interruptible() is purely historic.  So let's follow the rest
of the kernel and check the condition before prepare_to_wait() - and
also make the code a bit nicer.
Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: NDouglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

The while (1) construct isn't actually a loop at all.  So let's not
pretent and obfuscate the code.
Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: NDouglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

blocking is de-facto a constant and the now-removed comment wasn't all
that useful either.  Without them and the resulting indentation the code
is a bit nicer to read.
Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: NDouglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

sd injects and synchronizes probe work on the global kernel-wide domain.
This runs into conflict with PM that wants to perform resume actions in
async context:

[  494.237079] INFO: task kworker/u:3:554 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  494.294396] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[  494.360809] kworker/u:3     D 0000000000000000     0   554      2 0x00000000
[  494.420739]  ffff88012e4d3af0 0000000000000046 ffff88013200c160 ffff88012e4d3fd8
[  494.484392]  ffff88012e4d3fd8 0000000000012500 ffff8801394ea0b0 ffff88013200c160
[  494.548038]  ffff88012e4d3ae0 00000000000001e3 ffffffff81a249e0 ffff8801321c5398
[  494.611685] Call Trace:
[  494.632649]  [<ffffffff8149dd25>] schedule+0x5a/0x5c
[  494.674687]  [<ffffffff8104b968>] async_synchronize_cookie_domain+0xb6/0x112
[  494.734177]  [<ffffffff810461ff>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x50/0x50
[  494.787134]  [<ffffffff8131a224>] ? scsi_remove_target+0x48/0x48
[  494.837900]  [<ffffffff8104b9d9>] async_synchronize_cookie+0x15/0x17
[  494.891567]  [<ffffffff8104ba49>] async_synchronize_full+0x54/0x70  <-- here we wait for async contexts to complete
[  494.943783]  [<ffffffff8104b9f5>] ? async_synchronize_full_domain+0x1a/0x1a
[  495.002547]  [<ffffffffa00114b1>] sd_remove+0x2c/0xa2 [sd_mod]
[  495.051861]  [<ffffffff812fe94f>] __device_release_driver+0x86/0xcf
[  495.104807]  [<ffffffff812fe9bd>] device_release_driver+0x25/0x32  <-- here we take device_lock()

[  853.511341] INFO: task kworker/u:4:549 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  853.568693] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[  853.635119] kworker/u:4     D ffff88013097b5d0     0   549      2 0x00000000
[  853.695129]  ffff880132773c40 0000000000000046 ffff880130790000 ffff880132773fd8
[  853.758990]  ffff880132773fd8 0000000000012500 ffff88013288a0b0 ffff880130790000
[  853.822796]  0000000000000246 0000000000000040 ffff88013097b5c8 ffff880130790000
[  853.886633] Call Trace:
[  853.907631]  [<ffffffff8149dd25>] schedule+0x5a/0x5c
[  853.949670]  [<ffffffff8149cc44>] __mutex_lock_common+0x220/0x351
[  854.001225]  [<ffffffff81304bd7>] ? device_resume+0x58/0x1c4
[  854.049082]  [<ffffffff81304bd7>] ? device_resume+0x58/0x1c4
[  854.097011]  [<ffffffff8149ce48>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x36   <-- here we wait for device_lock()
[  854.145591]  [<ffffffff81304bd7>] device_resume+0x58/0x1c4
[  854.192066]  [<ffffffff81304d61>] async_resume+0x1e/0x45
[  854.237019]  [<ffffffff8104bc93>] async_run_entry_fn+0xc6/0x173  <-- ...while running in async context

Provide a 'scsi_sd_probe_domain' so that async probe actions actions can
be flushed without regard for the state of PM, and allow for the resume
path to handle devices that have transitioned from SDEV_QUIESCE to
SDEV_DEL prior to resume.
Acked-by: NAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
[alan: uplevel scsi_sd_probe_domain, clarify scsi_device_resume]
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
[jejb: remove unneeded config guards in include file]
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Dial back the aggressiveness of the controller lockup detection thread.
Currently it will declare the controller to be locked up if it goes
for 10 seconds with no interrupts and no change in the heartbeat
register.  Dial back this to 30 seconds with no heartbeat change, and
also snoop the ioctl path and if a firmware flash command is detected,
dial it back further to 4 minutes until the firmware flash command
completes.  The reason for this is that during the firmware flash
operation, the controller apparently doesn't update the heartbeat
register as frequently as it is supposed to, and we can get a false
positive.
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NMike Miller <mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Use spinlocks with finer granularity in the submission and
completion paths to allow concurrent execution for multiple
reply queues.  In particular, do not hold a spin lock while
submitting a request to the device, nor during most of the
interrupt handler.
Signed-off-by: NMatt Gates <matthew.gates@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Smart Arrays can support multiple reply queues onto which command
completions may be deposited.  It can help performance quite a bit
to arrange for command completions to be processed on the same CPU
from which they were submitted to increase the likelihood of cache
hits.
Signed-off-by: NMatt Gates <matthew.gates@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

This is in order to smooth the way for upcoming changes to allow use of
multiple reply queues for command completions.
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Gates <matthew.gates@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

When aborting a command, the tag is supposed to be
specified as 64-bit little endian.  However, some smart
arrays expect the tag of the command to be aborted to be
specified in a strange byte order.  How to tell which sort
of Smart Array firmware we're dealing with is not obvious.
However, because of the way we construct our tags, the values
of any outstanding tag when specified with the "strange" byte
order will not collide with the value specified in the correct
order.  That means we can safely attempt the abort both ways.
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <stephenmcameron@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Instead of giving up after 3 immediate retries of driver initiated
commands, back off the rate of retries and retry a bunch more times.
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@gmail.com> 
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

In shared SAS configurations we might get a busy status
during driver initiated commands (e.g. during rescan for
devices).  We should retry the command in such cases rather
than giving up.
Signed-off-by: NMatt Bondurant <Matthew.dav.bondurant@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

MSI/MSI-X interrupts can't race the DMA completion they are communicating
so no need to read from controller to flush the DMA to the host if
MSI or MSI-X interrupts are being used.
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

Default behavior for any CHECK CONDITION excepting a few special cases is to
print out certain parts of the sense buffer and the CDB.  Default behavior
should be to print nothing and let the upper layers or applications decide what
to do about these.  The same information is already available by setting the
appropriate bits of the scsi_logging_level kernel parameter or via
/proc/sys/dev/scsi/logging_level.
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

pci_disable_device() disables the bus master bit and pci_enable_device does
not re-enable it.  It needs to be enabled.
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>

There was code to skip "disabled" devices which was intended to
skip devices disabled in the BIOS, but it really just checks to
see if the device can write to host memory, which this is disabled
by pci_disable_device on driver unload, so this check has the effect
of preventing subsequent load of the driver.  And devices disabled in
the BIOS don't show up at all anyway, so this check never made any
sense to begin with, and should be removed.
Signed-off-by: NStephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>