- 04 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
Added acpi_evaluate_hotplug_opt(). All ACPI hotplug handlers must call this function when evaluating _OST for hotplug operations. If the platform does not support _OST, this function returns AE_NOT_FOUND and has no effect on the platform. ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST is defined when all relevant ACPI hotplug operations, such as CPU, memory and container hotplug, are enabled. This assures consistent behavior among the hotplug operations with regarding the _OST support. When ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST is not defined, this function is a no-op. ACPI PCI hotplug is not enhanced to support _OST at this time since it is a legacy method being replaced by PCIe native hotplug. _OST support for ACPI PCI hotplug may be added in future if necessary. Some platforms may require the OS to support _OST in order to support ACPI hotplug operations. For example, if a platform has the management console where user can request a hotplug operation from, this _OST support would be required for the management console to show the result of the hotplug request to user. Added macro definitions of _OST source events and status codes. Also renamed OSC_SB_CPUHP_OST_SUPPORT to OSC_SB_HOTPLUG_OST_SUPPORT since this _OSC bit is not specific to CPU hotplug. This bit is defined in Table 6-147 of ACPI 5.0 as follows. Bits: 3 Field Name: Insertion / Ejection _OST Processing Support Definition: This bit is set if OSPM will evaluate the _OST object defined under a device when processing insertion and ejection source event codes. Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 12 5月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
Add a simple helper function to allow drivers to obtain the physical device location data. Acked-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
It's unreasonable to have CONFIG_ACPI for these in drivers, so add some stub functions. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 30 3月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lin Ming 提交于
acpi_dev_run_wake() is a generic function which can be used by other subsystem too. Rename it to acpi_pm_device_run_wake, to be consistent with acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake. Then move it to ACPI core. Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Lin Ming 提交于
Devices may share same list of power resources in _PR0, for example Device(Dev0) { Name (_PR0, Package (0x01) { P0PR, P1PR }) } Device(Dev1) { Name (_PR0, Package (0x01) { P0PR, P1PR } } Assume Dev0 and Dev1 were runtime suspended. Then Dev0 is resumed first and it goes into D0 state. But Dev1 is left in D0_Uninitialised state. This is wrong. In this case, Dev1 must be resumed too. In order to hand this case, each power resource maintains a list of devices which relies on it. When power resource is ON, it will check if the devices on its list can be resumed. The device can only be resumed when all the power resouces of its _PR0 are ON. Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 14 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lin Ming 提交于
Commit 28c2103d added new state ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, so the device power states array must be expanded by one also. v2: Use ACPI_D_STATE_COUNT instead of number 5 for the array size. Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Suggested-by: NOldřich Jedlička <oldium.pro@seznam.cz> Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 15 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After redefining CONFIG_PM to depend on (CONFIG_PM_SLEEP || CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME) the CONFIG_PM_OPS option is redundant and can be replaced with CONFIG_PM. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 25 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field is only used by the PCI runtime PM code to "protect" devices from being prepared for generating wakeup signals more than once in a row. However, it really doesn't provide any protection, because (1) all of the functions it is supposed to protect use their own reference counters effectively ensuring that the device will be set up for generating wakeup signals just once and (2) the PCI runtime PM code uses wakeup.run_wake_count in a racy way, since nothing prevents acpi_dev_run_wake() from being called concurrently from two different threads for the same device. Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field which is unnecessary, confusing and used in a wrong way. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 12 1月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The wake_capable ACPI device flag is not necessary, because it is only used in scan.c for recording the information that _PRW is present for the given device. That information is only used by acpi_add_single_object() to decide whether or not to call acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(), so the flag may be dropped if the _PRW check is moved to acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(). Moreover, acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags() always returns 0, so it really should be void. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There are no more users of acpi_bus_get_power(), so it can be dropped. Moreover, it should be dropped, because it modifies the device->power.state field of an ACPI device without updating the reference counters of the device's power resources, which is wrong. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power() for manipulating power resources used by ACPI fan devices, which allows them to be put into the right state during initialization and resume. Consequently, remove the flags.force_power_state field from struct acpi_device, which is not necessary any more. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Add function acpi_bus_update_power() for reading the actual power state of an ACPI device and updating its device->power.state field in such a way that its power resources' reference counters will remain consistent with that field. For this purpose introduce __acpi_bus_set_power() setting the power state of an ACPI device without updating its device->power.state field and make acpi_bus_set_power() and acpi_bus_update_power() use it (acpi_bus_set_power() retains the current behavior for now). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Drop special ACPI wakeup flags, wakeup.state.enabled and wakeup.flags.always_enabled, that aren't necessary any more after we've started to use standard device wakeup flags for handling ACPI wakeup devices. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 16 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There is a number of problems with acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() now. First, if _S0W is not defined, it prevents devices from being put into D3 by PCI runtime PM, which shouldn't happen. Second, it shouldn't use adev->wakeup.state.enabled, because if it's set, it only means that either the device is permanently enabled to wake up the system, or that it has been enabled to do that through /proc/acpi/wakeup. Finally, it should be compiled if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set, so that PCI runtime PM works correctly in that case. Fix these problems. Reported-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 02 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 25 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There is the assumption in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() that it is always sufficient to compare the mask of _OSC control bits to be requested with the result of an _OSC query where all of the known control bits have been checked. However, in general, that need not be the case. For example, if an _OSC feature A depends on an _OSC feature B and control of A, B plus another _OSC feature C is requested simultaneously, the BIOS may return A, B, C, while it would only return C if A and C were requested without B. That may result in passing a wrong mask of _OSC control bits to an _OSC control request, in which case the BIOS may only grant control of a subset of the requested features. Moreover, acpi_pci_run_osc() will return error code if that happens and the caller of acpi_pci_osc_control_set() will not know that it's been granted control of some _OSC features. Consequently, the system will generally not work as expected. Apart from this acpi_pci_osc_control_set() always uses the mask of _OSC control bits returned by the very first invocation of acpi_pci_query_osc(), but that is done with the second argument equal to OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT which generally happens to affect the returned _OSC control bits. For these reasons, make acpi_pci_osc_control_set() always check if control of the requested _OSC features will be granted before making the final control request. As a result, the osc_control_qry and osc_queried members of struct acpi_pci_root are not necessary any more, so drop them and remove the remaining code referring to them. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 04 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Previously, we only saved the root bus number, i.e., the beginning of the downstream bus range. We now support IORESOURCE_BUS resources, so this patch uses that to keep track of both the beginning and the end of the downstream bus range. It's important to know both the beginning and the end for supporting _CBA (see PCI Firmware spec, rev 3.0, sec 4.1.3) and so we know the limits for any possible PCI bus renumbering (we can't renumber downstream buses to be outside the bus number range claimed by the host bridge). It's clear from the spec that the bus range is supposed to be in _CRS, but if we don't find it there, we'll assume [_BBN - 0xFF] or [0 - 0xFF]. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Reviewed-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Use the run_wake flag to mark all devices for which run-time wake-up events may be generated by the platform. Introduce a new wake-up flag, always_enabled, for marking devices that should be permanently enabled to generate run-time events. Also, introduce a reference counter for run-wake devices and a function that will initialize all of the run-time wake-up fields for given device. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 28 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lin Ming 提交于
acpi_integer is now obsolete and removed from the ACPICA code base, replaced by u64. Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 26 9月, 2009 7 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Nobody uses acpi_device_uid(), so this patch removes it. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Every acpi_device has at least one ID (if there's no _HID or _CID, we give it a synthetic or default ID). So there's no longer a need to check whether an ID exists; we can just use it. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
We now keep a single list of IDs that includes both the _HID and any _CIDs. We no longer need to keep track of whether the device has a _CID. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
There's no need to treat _HID and _CID differently. Keeping them in a single list makes code that uses the IDs a little simpler because it can just traverse the list rather than checking "do we have a HID?", "do we have any CIDs?" Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Add acpi_bus_get_status_handle() so we can get the status of a namespace object before building a struct acpi_device. This removes a use of "device->flags.dynamic_status", a cached indicator of whether _STA exists. It seems simpler and more reliable to just evaluate _STA and catch AE_NOT_FOUND errors. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
We can identify the root of the ACPI device tree by the fact that it has no parent. This is simpler than passing around ACPI_BUS_TYPE_SYSTEM and will help remove special treatment of the device tree root. Currently, we add the root by hand with ACPI_BUS_TYPE_SYSTEM. If we traverse the tree treating the root as just another device and use acpi_get_type(), the root shows up as ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Most uses of the ACPI bus device_type (ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE, ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER, etc) are during device initialization, but we do need it later for notify handler installation, since that is different for fixed hardware devices vs. namespace devices. This patch saves the device_type in the acpi_device structure, so we can check that rather than comparing against the _HID string. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 20 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jaswinder Singh Rajput 提交于
fix the following 'make includecheck' warning: include/acpi/acpi_bus.h: linux/device.h is included more than once. Signed-off-by: NJaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> LKML-Reference: <1247068058.4382.96.camel@ht.satnam> Acked-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 10 9月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The wakeup.prepared flag is used for marking devices that have the wake-up power already enabled, so that the wake-up power is not enabled twice in a row for the same device. This assumes, however, that device wake-up power will only be enabled once, while the device is being prepared for a system-wide sleep transition, and the second attempt is made by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_prep(). With the upcoming PCI wake-up rework this assumption will not hold any more for PCI bridges and the root bridge whose wake-up power may be enabled as a result of wake-up enable propagation from other devices (eg. add-on devices that are not associated with any GPEs). Thus, there may be many attempts to enable wake-up power on a PCI bridge or the root bridge during a system power state transition and it's better to replace wakeup.prepared with a reference counter. Reviewed-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Alex Chiang 提交于
We can simplify ACPI drivers if we can tell whether a handle is an ACPI PCI root or not. Reviewed-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 29 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Len Brown 提交于
Linux/ACPI core files using internal.h all PREFIX "ACPI: ", however, not all ACPI drivers use/want it -- and they should not have to #undef PREFIX to define their own. Add GPL commment to internal.h while we are there. This does not change any actual console output, asside from a whitespace fix. Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 27 8月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bob Moore 提交于
Handler was never invoked. Now invoked if/when host node is deleted. Data object was not automatically deleted when host node was deleted. Interface to handler had an unused parameter, removed it. ACPICA BZ 778. http://acpica.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=778Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Bob Moore 提交于
Completed a major update for the acpi_get_object_info external interface. Changes include: - Support for variable, unlimited length HID, UID, and CID strings - Support Processor objects the same as Devices (HID,UID,CID,ADR,STA, etc.) - Call the _SxW power methods on behalf of a device object - Determine if a device is a PCI root bridge - Change the ACPI_BUFFER parameter to ACPI_DEVICE_INFO. These changes will require an update to all callers of this interface. See the ACPICA Programmer Reference for details. Also, update all invocations of acpi_get_object_info interface Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 26 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
No drivers use the .stop method, so remove it. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 18 6月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
System notify events (0x00-0x7f) are common across all device types and should be handled in Linux/ACPI, not in drivers. However, some BIOSes use system notify events in device-specific ways that require the driver to be involved. This patch adds a ACPI_DRIVER_ALL_NOTIFY_EVENTS driver flag. When a driver sets this flag and supplies a .notify method, Linux/ACPI calls the .notify method for ALL notify events on the device, not just the device-specific (0x80-0xff) events. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Alexander Chiang 提交于
acpi_get_pci_dev() is (hopefully) better, and all callers have been converted, so let's get rid of this duplicated functionality. Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Alexander Chiang 提交于
Returns whether an ACPI CA node is a PCI root bridge or not. This API is generically useful, and shouldn't just be a hotplug function. The implementation becomes much simpler as well. Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 13 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Yakui 提交于
Previously [5], now [8]. sprintf(acpi_device_bid(device), "CPU%X", cpu_id) now looks better on systems with more than 0xFF processors. Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 07 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Len Brown 提交于
unused Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 05 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
This patch adds support for ACPI device driver .notify() methods. If such a method is present, Linux/ACPI installs a handler for device notifications (but not for system notifications such as Bus Check, Device Check, etc). When a device notification occurs, Linux/ACPI passes it on to the driver's .notify() method. In most cases, this removes the need for drivers to install their own handlers for device-specific notifications. For fixed hardware devices like some power and sleep buttons, there's no notification value because there's no control method to execute a Notify opcode. When a fixed hardware device generates an event, we handle it the same as a regular device notification, except we send a ACPI_FIXED_HARDWARE_EVENT value. This is outside the normal 0x0-0xff range used by Notify opcodes. Several drivers install their own handlers for system Bus Check and Device Check notifications so they can support hot-plug. This patch doesn't affect that usage. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-