1. 04 6月, 2018 1 次提交
    • Y
      bpf: implement bpf_get_current_cgroup_id() helper · bf6fa2c8
      Yonghong Song 提交于
      bpf has been used extensively for tracing. For example, bcc
      contains an almost full set of bpf-based tools to trace kernel
      and user functions/events. Most tracing tools are currently
      either filtered based on pid or system-wide.
      
      Containers have been used quite extensively in industry and
      cgroup is often used together to provide resource isolation
      and protection. Several processes may run inside the same
      container. It is often desirable to get container-level tracing
      results as well, e.g. syscall count, function count, I/O
      activity, etc.
      
      This patch implements a new helper, bpf_get_current_cgroup_id(),
      which will return cgroup id based on the cgroup within which
      the current task is running.
      
      The later patch will provide an example to show that
      userspace can get the same cgroup id so it could
      configure a filter or policy in the bpf program based on
      task cgroup id.
      
      The helper is currently implemented for tracing. It can
      be added to other program types as well when needed.
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      bf6fa2c8
  2. 30 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  3. 18 5月, 2018 1 次提交
    • D
      bpf: fix truncated jump targets on heavy expansions · 050fad7c
      Daniel Borkmann 提交于
      Recently during testing, I ran into the following panic:
      
        [  207.892422] Internal error: Accessing user space memory outside uaccess.h routines: 96000004 [#1] SMP
        [  207.901637] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc [...]
        [  207.966530] CPU: 45 PID: 2256 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G        W         4.17.0-rc3+ #7
        [  207.974956] Hardware name: FOXCONN R2-1221R-A4/C2U4N_MB, BIOS G31FB18A 03/31/2017
        [  207.982428] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO)
        [  207.987214] pc : bpf_skb_load_helper_8_no_cache+0x34/0xc0
        [  207.992603] lr : 0xffff000000bdb754
        [  207.996080] sp : ffff000013703ca0
        [  207.999384] x29: ffff000013703ca0 x28: 0000000000000001
        [  208.004688] x27: 0000000000000001 x26: 0000000000000000
        [  208.009992] x25: ffff000013703ce0 x24: ffff800fb4afcb00
        [  208.015295] x23: ffff00007d2f5038 x22: ffff00007d2f5000
        [  208.020599] x21: fffffffffeff2a6f x20: 000000000000000a
        [  208.025903] x19: ffff000009578000 x18: 0000000000000a03
        [  208.031206] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
        [  208.036510] x15: 0000ffff9de83000 x14: 0000000000000000
        [  208.041813] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
        [  208.047116] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff0000089e7f18
        [  208.052419] x9 : fffffffffeff2a6f x8 : 0000000000000000
        [  208.057723] x7 : 000000000000000a x6 : 00280c6160000000
        [  208.063026] x5 : 0000000000000018 x4 : 0000000000007db6
        [  208.068329] x3 : 000000000008647a x2 : 19868179b1484500
        [  208.073632] x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff000009578c08
        [  208.078938] Process test_verifier (pid: 2256, stack limit = 0x0000000049ca7974)
        [  208.086235] Call trace:
        [  208.088672]  bpf_skb_load_helper_8_no_cache+0x34/0xc0
        [  208.093713]  0xffff000000bdb754
        [  208.096845]  bpf_test_run+0x78/0xf8
        [  208.100324]  bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x148/0x230
        [  208.104758]  sys_bpf+0x314/0x1198
        [  208.108064]  el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34
        [  208.111632] Code: 91302260 f9400001 f9001fa1 d2800001 (29500680)
        [  208.117717] ---[ end trace 263cb8a59b5bf29f ]---
      
      The program itself which caused this had a long jump over the whole
      instruction sequence where all of the inner instructions required
      heavy expansions into multiple BPF instructions. Additionally, I also
      had BPF hardening enabled which requires once more rewrites of all
      constant values in order to blind them. Each time we rewrite insns,
      bpf_adj_branches() would need to potentially adjust branch targets
      which cross the patchlet boundary to accommodate for the additional
      delta. Eventually that lead to the case where the target offset could
      not fit into insn->off's upper 0x7fff limit anymore where then offset
      wraps around becoming negative (in s16 universe), or vice versa
      depending on the jump direction.
      
      Therefore it becomes necessary to detect and reject any such occasions
      in a generic way for native eBPF and cBPF to eBPF migrations. For
      the latter we can simply check bounds in the bpf_convert_filter()'s
      BPF_EMIT_JMP helper macro and bail out once we surpass limits. The
      bpf_patch_insn_single() for native eBPF (and cBPF to eBPF in case
      of subsequent hardening) is a bit more complex in that we need to
      detect such truncations before hitting the bpf_prog_realloc(). Thus
      the latter is split into an extra pass to probe problematic offsets
      on the original program in order to fail early. With that in place
      and carefully tested I no longer hit the panic and the rewrites are
      rejected properly. The above example panic I've seen on bpf-next,
      though the issue itself is generic in that a guard against this issue
      in bpf seems more appropriate in this case.
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      050fad7c
  4. 16 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 05 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  6. 04 5月, 2018 1 次提交
    • D
      bpf: implement ld_abs/ld_ind in native bpf · e0cea7ce
      Daniel Borkmann 提交于
      The main part of this work is to finally allow removal of LD_ABS
      and LD_IND from the BPF core by reimplementing them through native
      eBPF instead. Both LD_ABS/LD_IND were carried over from cBPF and
      keeping them around in native eBPF caused way more trouble than
      actually worth it. To just list some of the security issues in
      the past:
      
        * fdfaf64e ("x86: bpf_jit: support negative offsets")
        * 35607b02 ("sparc: bpf_jit: fix loads from negative offsets")
        * e0ee9c12 ("x86: bpf_jit: fix two bugs in eBPF JIT compiler")
        * 07aee943 ("bpf, sparc: fix usage of wrong reg for load_skb_regs after call")
        * 6d59b7db ("bpf, s390x: do not reload skb pointers in non-skb context")
        * 87338c8e ("bpf, ppc64: do not reload skb pointers in non-skb context")
      
      For programs in native eBPF, LD_ABS/LD_IND are pretty much legacy
      these days due to their limitations and more efficient/flexible
      alternatives that have been developed over time such as direct
      packet access. LD_ABS/LD_IND only cover 1/2/4 byte loads into a
      register, the load happens in host endianness and its exception
      handling can yield unexpected behavior. The latter is explained
      in depth in f6b1b3bf ("bpf: fix subprog verifier bypass by
      div/mod by 0 exception") with similar cases of exceptions we had.
      In native eBPF more recent program types will disable LD_ABS/LD_IND
      altogether through may_access_skb() in verifier, and given the
      limitations in terms of exception handling, it's also disabled
      in programs that use BPF to BPF calls.
      
      In terms of cBPF, the LD_ABS/LD_IND is used in networking programs
      to access packet data. It is not used in seccomp-BPF but programs
      that use it for socket filtering or reuseport for demuxing with
      cBPF. This is mostly relevant for applications that have not yet
      migrated to native eBPF.
      
      The main complexity and source of bugs in LD_ABS/LD_IND is coming
      from their implementation in the various JITs. Most of them keep
      the model around from cBPF times by implementing a fastpath written
      in asm. They use typically two from the BPF program hidden CPU
      registers for caching the skb's headlen (skb->len - skb->data_len)
      and skb->data. Throughout the JIT phase this requires to keep track
      whether LD_ABS/LD_IND are used and if so, the two registers need
      to be recached each time a BPF helper would change the underlying
      packet data in native eBPF case. At least in eBPF case, available
      CPU registers are rare and the additional exit path out of the
      asm written JIT helper makes it also inflexible since not all
      parts of the JITer are in control from plain C. A LD_ABS/LD_IND
      implementation in eBPF therefore allows to significantly reduce
      the complexity in JITs with comparable performance results for
      them, e.g.:
      
      test_bpf             tcpdump port 22             tcpdump complex
      x64      - before    15 21 10                    14 19  18
               - after      7 10 10                     7 10  15
      arm64    - before    40 91 92                    40 91 151
               - after     51 64 73                    51 62 113
      
      For cBPF we now track any usage of LD_ABS/LD_IND in bpf_convert_filter()
      and cache the skb's headlen and data in the cBPF prologue. The
      BPF_REG_TMP gets remapped from R8 to R2 since it's mainly just
      used as a local temporary variable. This allows to shrink the
      image on x86_64 also for seccomp programs slightly since mapping
      to %rsi is not an ereg. In callee-saved R8 and R9 we now track
      skb data and headlen, respectively. For normal prologue emission
      in the JITs this does not add any extra instructions since R8, R9
      are pushed to stack in any case from eBPF side. cBPF uses the
      convert_bpf_ld_abs() emitter which probes the fast path inline
      already and falls back to bpf_skb_load_helper_{8,16,32}() helper
      relying on the cached skb data and headlen as well. R8 and R9
      never need to be reloaded due to bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data()
      since all skb access in cBPF is read-only. Then, for the case
      of native eBPF, we use the bpf_gen_ld_abs() emitter, which calls
      the bpf_skb_load_helper_{8,16,32}_no_cache() helper unconditionally,
      does neither cache skb data and headlen nor has an inlined fast
      path. The reason for the latter is that native eBPF does not have
      any extra registers available anyway, but even if there were, it
      avoids any reload of skb data and headlen in the first place.
      Additionally, for the negative offsets, we provide an alternative
      bpf_skb_load_bytes_relative() helper in eBPF which operates
      similarly as bpf_skb_load_bytes() and allows for more flexibility.
      Tested myself on x64, arm64, s390x, from Sandipan on ppc64.
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      e0cea7ce
  7. 30 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  8. 29 4月, 2018 1 次提交
    • Y
      bpf: add bpf_get_stack helper · c195651e
      Yonghong Song 提交于
      Currently, stackmap and bpf_get_stackid helper are provided
      for bpf program to get the stack trace. This approach has
      a limitation though. If two stack traces have the same hash,
      only one will get stored in the stackmap table,
      so some stack traces are missing from user perspective.
      
      This patch implements a new helper, bpf_get_stack, will
      send stack traces directly to bpf program. The bpf program
      is able to see all stack traces, and then can do in-kernel
      processing or send stack traces to user space through
      shared map or bpf_perf_event_output.
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      c195651e
  9. 11 4月, 2018 1 次提交
    • Y
      bpf/tracing: fix a deadlock in perf_event_detach_bpf_prog · 3a38bb98
      Yonghong Song 提交于
      syzbot reported a possible deadlock in perf_event_detach_bpf_prog.
      The error details:
        ======================================================
        WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
        4.16.0-rc7+ #3 Not tainted
        ------------------------------------------------------
        syz-executor7/24531 is trying to acquire lock:
         (bpf_event_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000008a849b07>] perf_event_detach_bpf_prog+0x92/0x3d0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:854
      
        but task is already holding lock:
         (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<0000000038768f87>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x198/0x280 mm/util.c:353
      
        which lock already depends on the new lock.
      
        the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      
        -> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
             __might_fault+0x13a/0x1d0 mm/memory.c:4571
             _copy_to_user+0x2c/0xc0 lib/usercopy.c:25
             copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:155 [inline]
             bpf_prog_array_copy_info+0xf2/0x1c0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1694
             perf_event_query_prog_array+0x1c7/0x2c0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:891
             _perf_ioctl kernel/events/core.c:4750 [inline]
             perf_ioctl+0x3e1/0x1480 kernel/events/core.c:4770
             vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline]
             do_vfs_ioctl+0x1b1/0x1520 fs/ioctl.c:686
             SYSC_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:701 [inline]
             SyS_ioctl+0x8f/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:692
             do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
             entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
      
        -> #0 (bpf_event_mutex){+.+.}:
             lock_acquire+0x1d5/0x580 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920
             __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline]
             __mutex_lock+0x16f/0x1a80 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893
             mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:908
             perf_event_detach_bpf_prog+0x92/0x3d0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:854
             perf_event_free_bpf_prog kernel/events/core.c:8147 [inline]
             _free_event+0xbdb/0x10f0 kernel/events/core.c:4116
             put_event+0x24/0x30 kernel/events/core.c:4204
             perf_mmap_close+0x60d/0x1010 kernel/events/core.c:5172
             remove_vma+0xb4/0x1b0 mm/mmap.c:172
             remove_vma_list mm/mmap.c:2490 [inline]
             do_munmap+0x82a/0xdf0 mm/mmap.c:2731
             mmap_region+0x59e/0x15a0 mm/mmap.c:1646
             do_mmap+0x6c0/0xe00 mm/mmap.c:1483
             do_mmap_pgoff include/linux/mm.h:2223 [inline]
             vm_mmap_pgoff+0x1de/0x280 mm/util.c:355
             SYSC_mmap_pgoff mm/mmap.c:1533 [inline]
             SyS_mmap_pgoff+0x462/0x5f0 mm/mmap.c:1491
             SYSC_mmap arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:100 [inline]
             SyS_mmap+0x16/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:91
             do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
             entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
      
        other info that might help us debug this:
      
         Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      
               CPU0                    CPU1
               ----                    ----
          lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
                                       lock(bpf_event_mutex);
                                       lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
          lock(bpf_event_mutex);
      
         *** DEADLOCK ***
        ======================================================
      
      The bug is introduced by Commit f371b304 ("bpf/tracing: allow
      user space to query prog array on the same tp") where copy_to_user,
      which requires mm->mmap_sem, is called inside bpf_event_mutex lock.
      At the same time, during perf_event file descriptor close,
      mm->mmap_sem is held first and then subsequent
      perf_event_detach_bpf_prog needs bpf_event_mutex lock.
      Such a senario caused a deadlock.
      
      As suggested by Daniel, moving copy_to_user out of the
      bpf_event_mutex lock should fix the problem.
      
      Fixes: f371b304 ("bpf/tracing: allow user space to query prog array on the same tp")
      Reported-by: syzbot+dc5ca0e4c9bfafaf2bae@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
      Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      3a38bb98
  10. 15 2月, 2018 1 次提交
    • D
      bpf: fix bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user warning from perf event prog query · 9c481b90
      Daniel Borkmann 提交于
      syzkaller tried to perform a prog query in perf_event_query_prog_array()
      where struct perf_event_query_bpf had an ids_len of 1,073,741,353 and
      thus causing a warning due to failed kcalloc() allocation out of the
      bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user() helper. Given we cannot attach more than
      64 programs to a perf event, there's no point in allowing huge ids_len.
      Therefore, allow a buffer that would fix the maximum number of ids and
      also add a __GFP_NOWARN to the temporary ids buffer.
      
      Fixes: f371b304 ("bpf/tracing: allow user space to query prog array on the same tp")
      Fixes: 0911287c ("bpf: fix bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user() issues")
      Reported-by: syzbot+cab5816b0edbabf598b3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      9c481b90
  11. 03 2月, 2018 1 次提交
    • A
      bpf: fix bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user() issues · 0911287c
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      1. move copy_to_user out of rcu section to fix the following issue:
      
      ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:302 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
      stack backtrace:
       __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
       dump_stack+0x194/0x257 lib/dump_stack.c:53
       lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x123/0x170 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4592
       rcu_preempt_sleep_check include/linux/rcupdate.h:301 [inline]
       ___might_sleep+0x385/0x470 kernel/sched/core.c:6079
       __might_sleep+0x95/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6067
       __might_fault+0xab/0x1d0 mm/memory.c:4532
       _copy_to_user+0x2c/0xc0 lib/usercopy.c:25
       copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:155 [inline]
       bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user+0x217/0x4d0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1587
       bpf_prog_array_copy_info+0x17b/0x1c0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1685
       perf_event_query_prog_array+0x196/0x280 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:877
       _perf_ioctl kernel/events/core.c:4737 [inline]
       perf_ioctl+0x3e1/0x1480 kernel/events/core.c:4757
      
      2. move *prog under rcu, since it's not ok to dereference it afterwards
      
      3. in a rare case of prog array being swapped between bpf_prog_array_length()
         and bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user() calls make sure to copy zeros to user space,
         so the user doesn't walk over uninited prog_ids while kernel reported
         uattr->query.prog_cnt > 0
      
      Reported-by: syzbot+7dbcd2d3b85f9b608b23@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
      Fixes: 468e2f64 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_QUERY command")
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      0911287c
  12. 27 1月, 2018 2 次提交
    • D
      bpf: fix subprog verifier bypass by div/mod by 0 exception · f6b1b3bf
      Daniel Borkmann 提交于
      One of the ugly leftovers from the early eBPF days is that div/mod
      operations based on registers have a hard-coded src_reg == 0 test
      in the interpreter as well as in JIT code generators that would
      return from the BPF program with exit code 0. This was basically
      adopted from cBPF interpreter for historical reasons.
      
      There are multiple reasons why this is very suboptimal and prone
      to bugs. To name one: the return code mapping for such abnormal
      program exit of 0 does not always match with a suitable program
      type's exit code mapping. For example, '0' in tc means action 'ok'
      where the packet gets passed further up the stack, which is just
      undesirable for such cases (e.g. when implementing policy) and
      also does not match with other program types.
      
      While trying to work out an exception handling scheme, I also
      noticed that programs crafted like the following will currently
      pass the verifier:
      
        0: (bf) r6 = r1
        1: (85) call pc+8
        caller:
         R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1
        callee:
         frame1: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_1
        10: (b4) (u32) r2 = (u32) 0
        11: (b4) (u32) r3 = (u32) 1
        12: (3c) (u32) r3 /= (u32) r2
        13: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +76)
        14: (95) exit
        returning from callee:
         frame1: R0_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)
                 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv0
                 R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
                 R10=fp0,call_1
        to caller at 2:
         R0_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
         R10=fp0,call_-1
      
        from 14 to 2: R0=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)
                      R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1
        2: (bf) r1 = r6
        3: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +80)
        4: (bf) r2 = r0
        5: (07) r2 += 8
        6: (2d) if r2 > r1 goto pc+1
         R0=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0) R1=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
         R2=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8,imm=0) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
         R10=fp0,call_-1
        7: (71) r0 = *(u8 *)(r0 +0)
        8: (b7) r0 = 1
        9: (95) exit
      
        from 6 to 8: safe
        processed 16 insns (limit 131072), stack depth 0+0
      
      Basically what happens is that in the subprog we make use of a
      div/mod by 0 exception and in the 'normal' subprog's exit path
      we just return skb->data back to the main prog. This has the
      implication that the verifier thinks we always get a pkt pointer
      in R0 while we still have the implicit 'return 0' from the div
      as an alternative unconditional return path earlier. Thus, R0
      then contains 0, meaning back in the parent prog we get the
      address range of [0x0, skb->data_end] as read and writeable.
      Similar can be crafted with other pointer register types.
      
      Since i) BPF_ABS/IND is not allowed in programs that contain
      BPF to BPF calls (and generally it's also disadvised to use in
      native eBPF context), ii) unknown opcodes don't return zero
      anymore, iii) we don't return an exception code in dead branches,
      the only last missing case affected and to fix is the div/mod
      handling.
      
      What we would really need is some infrastructure to propagate
      exceptions all the way to the original prog unwinding the
      current stack and returning that code to the caller of the
      BPF program. In user space such exception handling for similar
      runtimes is typically implemented with setjmp(3) and longjmp(3)
      as one possibility which is not available in the kernel,
      though (kgdb used to implement it in kernel long time ago). I
      implemented a PoC exception handling mechanism into the BPF
      interpreter with porting setjmp()/longjmp() into x86_64 and
      adding a new internal BPF_ABRT opcode that can use a program
      specific exception code for all exception cases we have (e.g.
      div/mod by 0, unknown opcodes, etc). While this seems to work
      in the constrained BPF environment (meaning, here, we don't
      need to deal with state e.g. from memory allocations that we
      would need to undo before going into exception state), it still
      has various drawbacks: i) we would need to implement the
      setjmp()/longjmp() for every arch supported in the kernel and
      for x86_64, arm64, sparc64 JITs currently supporting calls,
      ii) it has unconditional additional cost on main program
      entry to store CPU register state in initial setjmp() call,
      and we would need some way to pass the jmp_buf down into
      ___bpf_prog_run() for main prog and all subprogs, but also
      storing on stack is not really nice (other option would be
      per-cpu storage for this, but it also has the drawback that
      we need to disable preemption for every BPF program types).
      All in all this approach would add a lot of complexity.
      
      Another poor-man's solution would be to have some sort of
      additional shared register or scratch buffer to hold state
      for exceptions, and test that after every call return to
      chain returns and pass R0 all the way down to BPF prog caller.
      This is also problematic in various ways: i) an additional
      register doesn't map well into JITs, and some other scratch
      space could only be on per-cpu storage, which, again has the
      side-effect that this only works when we disable preemption,
      or somewhere in the input context which is not available
      everywhere either, and ii) this adds significant runtime
      overhead by putting conditionals after each and every call,
      as well as implementation complexity.
      
      Yet another option is to teach verifier that div/mod can
      return an integer, which however is also complex to implement
      as verifier would need to walk such fake 'mov r0,<code>; exit;'
      sequeuence and there would still be no guarantee for having
      propagation of this further down to the BPF caller as proper
      exception code. For parent prog, it is also is not distinguishable
      from a normal return of a constant scalar value.
      
      The approach taken here is a completely different one with
      little complexity and no additional overhead involved in
      that we make use of the fact that a div/mod by 0 is undefined
      behavior. Instead of bailing out, we adapt the same behavior
      as on some major archs like ARMv8 [0] into eBPF as well:
      X div 0 results in 0, and X mod 0 results in X. aarch64 and
      aarch32 ISA do not generate any traps or otherwise aborts
      of program execution for unsigned divides. I verified this
      also with a test program compiled by gcc and clang, and the
      behavior matches with the spec. Going forward we adapt the
      eBPF verifier to emit such rewrites once div/mod by register
      was seen. cBPF is not touched and will keep existing 'return 0'
      semantics. Given the options, it seems the most suitable from
      all of them, also since major archs have similar schemes in
      place. Given this is all in the realm of undefined behavior,
      we still have the option to adapt if deemed necessary and
      this way we would also have the option of more flexibility
      from LLVM code generation side (which is then fully visible
      to verifier). Thus, this patch i) fixes the panic seen in
      above program and ii) doesn't bypass the verifier observations.
      
        [0] ARM Architecture Reference Manual, ARMv8 [ARM DDI 0487B.b]
            http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0487b.b/DDI0487B_b_armv8_arm.pdf
            1) aarch64 instruction set: section C3.4.7 and C6.2.279 (UDIV)
               "A division by zero results in a zero being written to
                the destination register, without any indication that
                the division by zero occurred."
            2) aarch32 instruction set: section F1.4.8 and F5.1.263 (UDIV)
               "For the SDIV and UDIV instructions, division by zero
                always returns a zero result."
      
      Fixes: f4d7e40a ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)")
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      f6b1b3bf
    • D
      bpf: make unknown opcode handling more robust · 5e581dad
      Daniel Borkmann 提交于
      Recent findings by syzcaller fixed in 7891a87e ("bpf: arsh is
      not supported in 32 bit alu thus reject it") triggered a warning
      in the interpreter due to unknown opcode not being rejected by
      the verifier. The 'return 0' for an unknown opcode is really not
      optimal, since with BPF to BPF calls, this would go untracked by
      the verifier.
      
      Do two things here to improve the situation: i) perform basic insn
      sanity check early on in the verification phase and reject every
      non-uapi insn right there. The bpf_opcode_in_insntable() table
      reuses the same mapping as the jumptable in ___bpf_prog_run() sans
      the non-public mappings. And ii) in ___bpf_prog_run() we do need
      to BUG in the case where the verifier would ever create an unknown
      opcode due to some rewrites.
      
      Note that JITs do not have such issues since they would punt to
      interpreter in these situations. Moreover, the BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
      would also help to avoid such unknown opcodes in the first place.
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      5e581dad
  13. 20 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  14. 15 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  15. 10 1月, 2018 1 次提交
    • A
      bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config · 290af866
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      The BPF interpreter has been used as part of the spectre 2 attack CVE-2017-5715.
      
      A quote from goolge project zero blog:
      "At this point, it would normally be necessary to locate gadgets in
      the host kernel code that can be used to actually leak data by reading
      from an attacker-controlled location, shifting and masking the result
      appropriately and then using the result of that as offset to an
      attacker-controlled address for a load. But piecing gadgets together
      and figuring out which ones work in a speculation context seems annoying.
      So instead, we decided to use the eBPF interpreter, which is built into
      the host kernel - while there is no legitimate way to invoke it from inside
      a VM, the presence of the code in the host kernel's text section is sufficient
      to make it usable for the attack, just like with ordinary ROP gadgets."
      
      To make attacker job harder introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config
      option that removes interpreter from the kernel in favor of JIT-only mode.
      So far eBPF JIT is supported by:
      x64, arm64, arm32, sparc64, s390, powerpc64, mips64
      
      The start of JITed program is randomized and code page is marked as read-only.
      In addition "constant blinding" can be turned on with net.core.bpf_jit_harden
      
      v2->v3:
      - move __bpf_prog_ret0 under ifdef (Daniel)
      
      v1->v2:
      - fix init order, test_bpf and cBPF (Daniel's feedback)
      - fix offloaded bpf (Jakub's feedback)
      - add 'return 0' dummy in case something can invoke prog->bpf_func
      - retarget bpf tree. For bpf-next the patch would need one extra hunk.
        It will be sent when the trees are merged back to net-next
      
      Considered doing:
        int bpf_jit_enable __read_mostly = BPF_EBPF_JIT_DEFAULT;
      but it seems better to land the patch as-is and in bpf-next remove
      bpf_jit_enable global variable from all JITs, consolidate in one place
      and remove this jit_init() function.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      290af866
  16. 21 12月, 2017 1 次提交
    • D
      bpf: allow for correlation of maps and helpers in dump · 7105e828
      Daniel Borkmann 提交于
      Currently a dump of an xlated prog (post verifier stage) doesn't
      correlate used helpers as well as maps. The prog info lists
      involved map ids, however there's no correlation of where in the
      program they are used as of today. Likewise, bpftool does not
      correlate helper calls with the target functions.
      
      The latter can be done w/o any kernel changes through kallsyms,
      and also has the advantage that this works with inlined helpers
      and BPF calls.
      
      Example, via interpreter:
      
        # tc filter show dev foo ingress
        filter protocol all pref 49152 bpf chain 0
        filter protocol all pref 49152 bpf chain 0 handle 0x1 foo.o:[ingress] \
                            direct-action not_in_hw id 1 tag c74773051b364165   <-- prog id:1
      
        * Output before patch (calls/maps remain unclear):
      
        # bpftool prog dump xlated id 1             <-- dump prog id:1
         0: (b7) r1 = 2
         1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r1
         2: (bf) r2 = r10
         3: (07) r2 += -4
         4: (18) r1 = 0xffff95c47a8d4800
         6: (85) call unknown#73040
         7: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+18
         8: (bf) r2 = r10
         9: (07) r2 += -4
        10: (bf) r1 = r0
        11: (85) call unknown#73040
        12: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+23
        [...]
      
        * Output after patch:
      
        # bpftool prog dump xlated id 1
         0: (b7) r1 = 2
         1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r1
         2: (bf) r2 = r10
         3: (07) r2 += -4
         4: (18) r1 = map[id:2]                     <-- map id:2
         6: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#73424     <-- helper call
         7: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+18
         8: (bf) r2 = r10
         9: (07) r2 += -4
        10: (bf) r1 = r0
        11: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#73424
        12: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+23
        [...]
      
        # bpftool map show id 2                     <-- show/dump/etc map id:2
        2: hash_of_maps  flags 0x0
              key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 3  memlock 4096B
      
      Example, JITed, same prog:
      
        # tc filter show dev foo ingress
        filter protocol all pref 49152 bpf chain 0
        filter protocol all pref 49152 bpf chain 0 handle 0x1 foo.o:[ingress] \
                        direct-action not_in_hw id 3 tag c74773051b364165 jited
      
        # bpftool prog show id 3
        3: sched_cls  tag c74773051b364165
              loaded_at Dec 19/13:48  uid 0
              xlated 384B  jited 257B  memlock 4096B  map_ids 2
      
        # bpftool prog dump xlated id 3
         0: (b7) r1 = 2
         1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r1
         2: (bf) r2 = r10
         3: (07) r2 += -4
         4: (18) r1 = map[id:2]                      <-- map id:2
         6: (85) call __htab_map_lookup_elem#77408   <-+ inlined rewrite
         7: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+2                |
         8: (07) r0 += 56                              |
         9: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0)                <-+
        10: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+24
        11: (bf) r2 = r10
        12: (07) r2 += -4
        [...]
      
      Example, same prog, but kallsyms disabled (in that case we are
      also not allowed to pass any relative offsets, etc, so prog
      becomes pointer sanitized on dump):
      
        # sysctl kernel.kptr_restrict=2
        kernel.kptr_restrict = 2
      
        # bpftool prog dump xlated id 3
         0: (b7) r1 = 2
         1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r1
         2: (bf) r2 = r10
         3: (07) r2 += -4
         4: (18) r1 = map[id:2]
         6: (85) call bpf_unspec#0
         7: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+2
        [...]
      
      Example, BPF calls via interpreter:
      
        # bpftool prog dump xlated id 1
         0: (85) call pc+2#__bpf_prog_run_args32
         1: (b7) r0 = 1
         2: (95) exit
         3: (b7) r0 = 2
         4: (95) exit
      
      Example, BPF calls via JIT:
      
        # sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable=1
        net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 1
        # sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_kallsyms=1
        net.core.bpf_jit_kallsyms = 1
      
        # bpftool prog dump xlated id 1
         0: (85) call pc+2#bpf_prog_3b185187f1855c4c_F
         1: (b7) r0 = 1
         2: (95) exit
         3: (b7) r0 = 2
         4: (95) exit
      
      And finally, an example for tail calls that is now working
      as well wrt correlation:
      
        # bpftool prog dump xlated id 2
        [...]
        10: (b7) r2 = 8
        11: (85) call bpf_trace_printk#-41312
        12: (bf) r1 = r6
        13: (18) r2 = map[id:1]
        15: (b7) r3 = 0
        16: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12
        17: (b7) r1 = 42
        18: (6b) *(u16 *)(r6 +46) = r1
        19: (b7) r0 = 0
        20: (95) exit
      
        # bpftool map show id 1
        1: prog_array  flags 0x0
              key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 1  memlock 4096B
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      7105e828
  17. 18 12月, 2017 3 次提交
    • A
      bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs · 1c2a088a
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      Typical JIT does several passes over bpf instructions to
      compute total size and relative offsets of jumps and calls.
      With multitple bpf functions calling each other all relative calls
      will have invalid offsets intially therefore we need to additional
      last pass over the program to emit calls with correct offsets.
      For example in case of three bpf functions:
      main:
        call foo
        call bpf_map_lookup
        exit
      foo:
        call bar
        exit
      bar:
        exit
      
      We will call bpf_int_jit_compile() indepedently for main(), foo() and bar()
      x64 JIT typically does 4-5 passes to converge.
      After these initial passes the image for these 3 functions
      will be good except call targets, since start addresses of
      foo() and bar() are unknown when we were JITing main()
      (note that call bpf_map_lookup will be resolved properly
      during initial passes).
      Once start addresses of 3 functions are known we patch
      call_insn->imm to point to right functions and call
      bpf_int_jit_compile() again which needs only one pass.
      Additional safety checks are done to make sure this
      last pass doesn't produce image that is larger or smaller
      than previous pass.
      
      When constant blinding is on it's applied to all functions
      at the first pass, since doing it once again at the last
      pass can change size of the JITed code.
      
      Tested on x64 and arm64 hw with JIT on/off, blinding on/off.
      x64 jits bpf-to-bpf calls correctly while arm64 falls back to interpreter.
      All other JITs that support normal BPF_CALL will behave the same way
      since bpf-to-bpf call is equivalent to bpf-to-kernel call from
      JITs point of view.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      1c2a088a
    • A
      bpf: fix net.core.bpf_jit_enable race · 60b58afc
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      global bpf_jit_enable variable is tested multiple times in JITs,
      blinding and verifier core. The malicious root can try to toggle
      it while loading the programs. This race condition was accounted
      for and there should be no issues, but it's safer to avoid
      this race condition.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      60b58afc
    • A
      bpf: add support for bpf_call to interpreter · 1ea47e01
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      though bpf_call is still the same call instruction and
      calling convention 'bpf to bpf' and 'bpf to helper' is the same
      the interpreter has to oparate on 'struct bpf_insn *'.
      To distinguish these two cases add a kernel internal opcode and
      mark call insns with it.
      This opcode is seen by interpreter only. JITs will never see it.
      Also add tiny bit of debug code to aid interpreter debugging.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      1ea47e01
  18. 13 12月, 2017 2 次提交
    • J
      bpf: add a bpf_override_function helper · 9802d865
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Error injection is sloppy and very ad-hoc.  BPF could fill this niche
      perfectly with it's kprobe functionality.  We could make sure errors are
      only triggered in specific call chains that we care about with very
      specific situations.  Accomplish this with the bpf_override_funciton
      helper.  This will modify the probe'd callers return value to the
      specified value and set the PC to an override function that simply
      returns, bypassing the originally probed function.  This gives us a nice
      clean way to implement systematic error injection for all of our code
      paths.
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      9802d865
    • Y
      bpf/tracing: allow user space to query prog array on the same tp · f371b304
      Yonghong Song 提交于
      Commit e87c6bc3 ("bpf: permit multiple bpf attachments
      for a single perf event") added support to attach multiple
      bpf programs to a single perf event.
      Although this provides flexibility, users may want to know
      what other bpf programs attached to the same tp interface.
      Besides getting visibility for the underlying bpf system,
      such information may also help consolidate multiple bpf programs,
      understand potential performance issues due to a large array,
      and debug (e.g., one bpf program which overwrites return code
      may impact subsequent program results).
      
      Commit 2541517c ("tracing, perf: Implement BPF programs
      attached to kprobes") utilized the existing perf ioctl
      interface and added the command PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF
      to attach a bpf program to a tracepoint. This patch adds a new
      ioctl command, given a perf event fd, to query the bpf program
      array attached to the same perf tracepoint event.
      
      The new uapi ioctl command:
        PERF_EVENT_IOC_QUERY_BPF
      
      The new uapi/linux/perf_event.h structure:
        struct perf_event_query_bpf {
             __u32	ids_len;
             __u32	prog_cnt;
             __u32	ids[0];
        };
      
      User space provides buffer "ids" for kernel to copy to.
      When returning from the kernel, the number of available
      programs in the array is set in "prog_cnt".
      
      The usage:
        struct perf_event_query_bpf *query =
          malloc(sizeof(*query) + sizeof(u32) * ids_len);
        query.ids_len = ids_len;
        err = ioctl(pmu_efd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_QUERY_BPF, query);
        if (err == 0) {
          /* query.prog_cnt is the number of available progs,
           * number of progs in ids: (ids_len == 0) ? 0 : query.prog_cnt
           */
        } else if (errno == ENOSPC) {
          /* query.ids_len number of progs copied,
           * query.prog_cnt is the number of available progs
           */
        } else {
            /* other errors */
        }
      Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
      Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      f371b304
  19. 01 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  20. 16 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  21. 11 11月, 2017 2 次提交
  22. 05 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • J
      bpf: offload: add infrastructure for loading programs for a specific netdev · ab3f0063
      Jakub Kicinski 提交于
      The fact that we don't know which device the program is going
      to be used on is quite limiting in current eBPF infrastructure.
      We have to reverse or limit the changes which kernel makes to
      the loaded bytecode if we want it to be offloaded to a networking
      device.  We also have to invent new APIs for debugging and
      troubleshooting support.
      
      Make it possible to load programs for a specific netdev.  This
      helps us to bring the debug information closer to the core
      eBPF infrastructure (e.g. we will be able to reuse the verifer
      log in device JIT).  It allows device JITs to perform translation
      on the original bytecode.
      
      __bpf_prog_get() when called to get a reference for an attachment
      point will now refuse to give it if program has a device assigned.
      Following patches will add a version of that function which passes
      the expected netdev in. @type argument in __bpf_prog_get() is
      renamed to attach_type to make it clearer that it's only set on
      attachment.
      
      All calls to ndo_bpf are protected by rtnl, only verifier callbacks
      are not.  We need a wait queue to make sure netdev doesn't get
      destroyed while verifier is still running and calling its driver.
      Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
      Reviewed-by: NSimon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
      Reviewed-by: NQuentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ab3f0063
  23. 25 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • Y
      bpf: permit multiple bpf attachments for a single perf event · e87c6bc3
      Yonghong Song 提交于
      This patch enables multiple bpf attachments for a
      kprobe/uprobe/tracepoint single trace event.
      Each trace_event keeps a list of attached perf events.
      When an event happens, all attached bpf programs will
      be executed based on the order of attachment.
      
      A global bpf_event_mutex lock is introduced to protect
      prog_array attaching and detaching. An alternative will
      be introduce a mutex lock in every trace_event_call
      structure, but it takes a lot of extra memory.
      So a global bpf_event_mutex lock is a good compromise.
      
      The bpf prog detachment involves allocation of memory.
      If the allocation fails, a dummy do-nothing program
      will replace to-be-detached program in-place.
      Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e87c6bc3
  24. 17 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  25. 08 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  26. 05 10月, 2017 2 次提交
    • A
      bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_QUERY command · 468e2f64
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      introduce BPF_PROG_QUERY command to retrieve a set of either
      attached programs to given cgroup or a set of effective programs
      that will execute for events within a cgroup
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
      for cgroup bits
      Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      468e2f64
    • A
      bpf: multi program support for cgroup+bpf · 324bda9e
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      introduce BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI flag that can be used to attach multiple
      bpf programs to a cgroup.
      
      The difference between three possible flags for BPF_PROG_ATTACH command:
      - NONE(default): No further bpf programs allowed in the subtree.
      - BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE: If a sub-cgroup installs some bpf program,
        the program in this cgroup yields to sub-cgroup program.
      - BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI: If a sub-cgroup installs some bpf program,
        that cgroup program gets run in addition to the program in this cgroup.
      
      NONE and BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE existed before. This patch doesn't
      change their behavior. It only clarifies the semantics in relation
      to new flag.
      
      Only one program is allowed to be attached to a cgroup with
      NONE or BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flag.
      Multiple programs are allowed to be attached to a cgroup with
      BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI flag. They are executed in FIFO order
      (those that were attached first, run first)
      The programs of sub-cgroup are executed first, then programs of
      this cgroup and then programs of parent cgroup.
      All eligible programs are executed regardless of return code from
      earlier programs.
      
      To allow efficient execution of multiple programs attached to a cgroup
      and to avoid penalizing cgroups without any programs attached
      introduce 'struct bpf_prog_array' which is RCU protected array
      of pointers to bpf programs.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
      for cgroup bits
      Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      324bda9e
  27. 04 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  28. 17 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  29. 10 8月, 2017 1 次提交
    • D
      bpf: add BPF_J{LT,LE,SLT,SLE} instructions · 92b31a9a
      Daniel Borkmann 提交于
      Currently, eBPF only understands BPF_JGT (>), BPF_JGE (>=),
      BPF_JSGT (s>), BPF_JSGE (s>=) instructions, this means that
      particularly *JLT/*JLE counterparts involving immediates need
      to be rewritten from e.g. X < [IMM] by swapping arguments into
      [IMM] > X, meaning the immediate first is required to be loaded
      into a register Y := [IMM], such that then we can compare with
      Y > X. Note that the destination operand is always required to
      be a register.
      
      This has the downside of having unnecessarily increased register
      pressure, meaning complex program would need to spill other
      registers temporarily to stack in order to obtain an unused
      register for the [IMM]. Loading to registers will thus also
      affect state pruning since we need to account for that register
      use and potentially those registers that had to be spilled/filled
      again. As a consequence slightly more stack space might have
      been used due to spilling, and BPF programs are a bit longer
      due to extra code involving the register load and potentially
      required spill/fills.
      
      Thus, add BPF_JLT (<), BPF_JLE (<=), BPF_JSLT (s<), BPF_JSLE (s<=)
      counterparts to the eBPF instruction set. Modifying LLVM to
      remove the NegateCC() workaround in a PoC patch at [1] and
      allowing it to also emit the new instructions resulted in
      cilium's BPF programs that are injected into the fast-path to
      have a reduced program length in the range of 2-3% (e.g.
      accumulated main and tail call sections from one of the object
      file reduced from 4864 to 4729 insns), reduced complexity in
      the range of 10-30% (e.g. accumulated sections reduced in one
      of the cases from 116432 to 88428 insns), and reduced stack
      usage in the range of 1-5% (e.g. accumulated sections from one
      of the object files reduced from 824 to 784b).
      
      The modification for LLVM will be incorporated in a backwards
      compatible way. Plan is for LLVM to have i) a target specific
      option to offer a possibility to explicitly enable the extension
      by the user (as we have with -m target specific extensions today
      for various CPU insns), and ii) have the kernel checked for
      presence of the extensions and enable them transparently when
      the user is selecting more aggressive options such as -march=native
      in a bpf target context. (Other frontends generating BPF byte
      code, e.g. ply can probe the kernel directly for its code
      generation.)
      
        [1] https://github.com/borkmann/llvm/tree/bpf-insnsSigned-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      92b31a9a
  30. 30 6月, 2017 1 次提交
    • M
      bpf: Fix out-of-bound access on interpreters[] · 8007e40a
      Martin KaFai Lau 提交于
      The index is off-by-one when fp->aux->stack_depth
      has already been rounded up to 32.  In particular,
      if stack_depth is 512, the index will be 16.
      
      The fix is to round_up and then takes -1 instead of round_down.
      
      [   22.318680] ==================================================================
      [   22.319745] BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x48a/0x670
      [   22.320737] Read of size 8 at addr ffffffff82aadae0 by task sockex3/1946
      [   22.321646]
      [   22.321858] CPU: 1 PID: 1946 Comm: sockex3 Tainted: G        W       4.12.0-rc6-01680-g2ee87db3 #22
      [   22.323061] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-1.el7.centos 04/01/2014
      [   22.324260] Call Trace:
      [   22.324612]  dump_stack+0x67/0x99
      [   22.325081]  print_address_description+0x1e8/0x290
      [   22.325734]  ? bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x48a/0x670
      [   22.326360]  kasan_report+0x265/0x350
      [   22.326860]  __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x19/0x20
      [   22.327484]  bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x48a/0x670
      [   22.328109]  bpf_prog_load+0x626/0xd40
      [   22.328637]  ? __bpf_prog_charge+0xc0/0xc0
      [   22.329222]  ? check_nnp_nosuid.isra.61+0x100/0x100
      [   22.329890]  ? __might_fault+0xf6/0x1b0
      [   22.330446]  ? lock_acquire+0x360/0x360
      [   22.331013]  SyS_bpf+0x67c/0x24d0
      [   22.331491]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
      [   22.332049]  ? __getnstimeofday64+0xaf/0x1c0
      [   22.332635]  ? bpf_prog_get+0x20/0x20
      [   22.333135]  ? __audit_syscall_entry+0x300/0x600
      [   22.333770]  ? syscall_trace_enter+0x540/0xdd0
      [   22.334339]  ? exit_to_usermode_loop+0xe0/0xe0
      [   22.334950]  ? do_syscall_64+0x48/0x410
      [   22.335446]  ? bpf_prog_get+0x20/0x20
      [   22.335954]  do_syscall_64+0x181/0x410
      [   22.336454]  entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
      [   22.337121] RIP: 0033:0x7f263fe81f19
      [   22.337618] RSP: 002b:00007ffd9a3440c8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
      [   22.338619] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000aac5fb RCX: 00007f263fe81f19
      [   22.339600] RDX: 0000000000000030 RSI: 00007ffd9a3440d0 RDI: 0000000000000005
      [   22.340470] RBP: 0000000000a9a1e0 R08: 0000000000a9a1e0 R09: 0000009d00000001
      [   22.341430] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000010000
      [   22.342411] R13: 0000000000a9a023 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000003
      [   22.343369]
      [   22.343593] The buggy address belongs to the variable:
      [   22.344241]  interpreters+0x80/0x980
      [   22.344708]
      [   22.344908] Memory state around the buggy address:
      [   22.345556]  ffffffff82aad980: 00 00 00 04 fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
      [   22.346449]  ffffffff82aada00: 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00
      [   22.347361] >ffffffff82aada80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa
      [   22.348301]                                                        ^
      [   22.349142]  ffffffff82aadb00: 00 01 fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
      [   22.350058]  ffffffff82aadb80: 00 00 07 fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 05 fa fa fa fa fa
      [   22.350984] ==================================================================
      
      Fixes: b870aa90 ("bpf: use different interpreter depending on required stack size")
      Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      8007e40a
  31. 01 6月, 2017 3 次提交
    • A
      bpf: use different interpreter depending on required stack size · b870aa90
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      16 __bpf_prog_run() interpreters for various stack sizes add .text
      but not a lot comparing to run-time stack savings
      
         text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
        26350   10328     624   37302    91b6 kernel/bpf/core.o.before_split
        25777   10328     624   36729    8f79 kernel/bpf/core.o.after_split
        26970	  10328	    624	  37922	   9422	kernel/bpf/core.o.now
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b870aa90
    • A
      bpf: split bpf core interpreter · f696b8f4
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      split __bpf_prog_run() interpreter into stack allocation and execution parts.
      The code section shrinks which helps interpreter performance in some cases.
         text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
        26350	  10328	    624	  37302	   91b6	kernel/bpf/core.o.before
        25777	  10328	    624	  36729	   8f79	kernel/bpf/core.o.after
      
      Very short programs got slower (due to extra function call):
      Before:
      test_bpf: #89 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2 = 3 jited:0 7 PASS
      test_bpf: #90 ALU64_ADD_K: 3 + 0 = 3 jited:0 8 PASS
      test_bpf: #91 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2147483646 = 2147483647 jited:0 7 PASS
      test_bpf: #92 ALU64_ADD_K: 4294967294 + 2 = 4294967296 jited:0 11 PASS
      test_bpf: #93 ALU64_ADD_K: 2147483646 + -2147483647 = -1 jited:0 7 PASS
      After:
      test_bpf: #89 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2 = 3 jited:0 11 PASS
      test_bpf: #90 ALU64_ADD_K: 3 + 0 = 3 jited:0 11 PASS
      test_bpf: #91 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2147483646 = 2147483647 jited:0 11 PASS
      test_bpf: #92 ALU64_ADD_K: 4294967294 + 2 = 4294967296 jited:0 14 PASS
      test_bpf: #93 ALU64_ADD_K: 2147483646 + -2147483647 = -1 jited:0 10 PASS
      
      Longer programs got faster:
      Before:
      test_bpf: #266 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:0 20286 20513 PASS
      test_bpf: #267 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:0 31853 31768 PASS
      test_bpf: #268 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:0 9815 PASS
      test_bpf: #269 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:0 6 PASS
      test_bpf: #270 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:0 13959 PASS
      test_bpf: #271 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... jited:0 210 PASS
      test_bpf: #272 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id jited:0 21724 PASS
      test_bpf: #273 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+vlan_push/pop jited:0 19118 PASS
      After:
      test_bpf: #266 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:0 19008 18827 PASS
      test_bpf: #267 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:0 29238 28450 PASS
      test_bpf: #268 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:0 9485 PASS
      test_bpf: #269 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:0 12 PASS
      test_bpf: #270 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:0 13257 PASS
      test_bpf: #271 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... jited:0 213 PASS
      test_bpf: #272 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id jited:0 19389 PASS
      test_bpf: #273 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+vlan_push/pop jited:0 19583 PASS
      
      For real world production programs the difference is noise.
      
      This patch is first step towards reducing interpreter stack consumption.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f696b8f4
    • A
      bpf: free up BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL | BPF_X opcode · 71189fa9
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      free up BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL | BPF_X opcode to be used by actual
      indirect call by register and use kernel internal opcode to
      mark call instruction into bpf_tail_call() helper.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      71189fa9
  32. 09 5月, 2017 1 次提交