1. 20 7月, 2016 7 次提交
  2. 19 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  3. 16 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 14 7月, 2016 4 次提交
  5. 11 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  6. 05 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  7. 04 7月, 2016 8 次提交
  8. 02 7月, 2016 6 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Convert trace-irq to the breadcrumb waiter · c81d4613
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      If we convert the tracing over from direct use of ring->irq_get() and
      over to the breadcrumb infrastructure, we only have a single user of the
      ring->irq_get and so we will be able to simplify the driver routines
      (eliminating the redundant validation and irq refcounting).
      
      Process context is preferred over softirq (or even hardirq) for a couple
      of reasons:
      
       - we already utilize process context to have fast wakeup of a single
         client (i.e. the client waiting for the GPU inspects the seqno for
         itself following an interrupt to avoid the overhead of a context
         switch before it returns to userspace)
      
       - engine->irq_seqno() is not suitable for use from an softirq/hardirq
         context as we may require long waits (100-250us) to ensure the seqno
         write is posted before we read it from the CPU
      
      A signaling framework is a requirement for enabling dma-fences.
      
      v2: Move to a signaling framework based upon the waiter.
      v3: Track the first-signal to avoid having to walk the rbtree everytime.
      v4: Mark the signaler thread as RT priority to reduce latency in the
      indirect wakeups.
      v5: Make failure to allocate the thread fatal.
      v6: Rename kthreads to i915/signal:%u
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467390209-3576-16-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      c81d4613
    • C
      drm/i915: Stop setting wraparound seqno on initialisation · 1137fa86
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      We have testcases to ensure that seqno wraparound works fine, so we can
      forgo forcing everyone to encounter seqno wraparound during early
      uptime. seqno wraparound incurs a full GPU stall so not forcing it
      will eliminate one jitter from the early system. Using the testcases, we
      have very deterministic testing which given how difficult it would be to
      debug an issue (GPU hang) stemming from a wraparound using pure
      postmortem analysis I see no value in forcing a wrap during boot.
      
      Advancing the global next_seqno after a GPU reset is equally pointless.
      
      References? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95023Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467390209-3576-15-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      1137fa86
    • C
      drm/i915: Spin after waking up for an interrupt · f69a02c9
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      When waiting for an interrupt (waiting for the engine to complete some
      work), we know we are the only waiter to be woken on this engine. We also
      know when the GPU has nearly completed our request (or at least started
      processing it), so after being woken and we detect that the GPU is
      active and working on our request, allow us the bottom-half (the first
      waiter who wakes up to handle checking the seqno after the interrupt) to
      spin for a very short while to reduce client latencies.
      
      The impact is minimal, there was an improvement to the realtime-vs-many
      clients case, but exporting the function proves useful later. However,
      it is tempting to adjust irq_seqno_barrier to include the spin. The
      problem is first ensuring that the "start-of-request" seqno is coherent
      as we use that as our basis for judging when it is ok to spin. If we
      could, spinning there could dramatically shorten some sleeps, and allow
      us to make the barriers more conservative to handle missed seqno writes
      on more platforms (all gen7+ are known to have the occasional issue, at
      least).
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467390209-3576-7-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      f69a02c9
    • C
      drm/i915: Slaughter the thundering i915_wait_request herd · 688e6c72
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      One particularly stressful scenario consists of many independent tasks
      all competing for GPU time and waiting upon the results (e.g. realtime
      transcoding of many, many streams). One bottleneck in particular is that
      each client waits on its own results, but every client is woken up after
      every batchbuffer - hence the thunder of hooves as then every client must
      do its heavyweight dance to read a coherent seqno to see if it is the
      lucky one.
      
      Ideally, we only want one client to wake up after the interrupt and
      check its request for completion. Since the requests must retire in
      order, we can select the first client on the oldest request to be woken.
      Once that client has completed his wait, we can then wake up the
      next client and so on. However, all clients then incur latency as every
      process in the chain may be delayed for scheduling - this may also then
      cause some priority inversion. To reduce the latency, when a client
      is added or removed from the list, we scan the tree for completed
      seqno and wake up all the completed waiters in parallel.
      
      Using igt/benchmarks/gem_latency, we can demonstrate this effect. The
      benchmark measures the number of GPU cycles between completion of a
      batch and the client waking up from a call to wait-ioctl. With many
      concurrent waiters, with each on a different request, we observe that
      the wakeup latency before the patch scales nearly linearly with the
      number of waiters (before external factors kick in making the scaling much
      worse). After applying the patch, we can see that only the single waiter
      for the request is being woken up, providing a constant wakeup latency
      for every operation. However, the situation is not quite as rosy for
      many waiters on the same request, though to the best of my knowledge this
      is much less likely in practice. Here, we can observe that the
      concurrent waiters incur extra latency from being woken up by the
      solitary bottom-half, rather than directly by the interrupt. This
      appears to be scheduler induced (having discounted adverse effects from
      having a rbtree walk/erase in the wakeup path), each additional
      wake_up_process() costs approximately 1us on big core. Another effect of
      performing the secondary wakeups from the first bottom-half is the
      incurred delay this imposes on high priority threads - rather than
      immediately returning to userspace and leaving the interrupt handler to
      wake the others.
      
      To offset the delay incurred with additional waiters on a request, we
      could use a hybrid scheme that did a quick read in the interrupt handler
      and dequeued all the completed waiters (incurring the overhead in the
      interrupt handler, not the best plan either as we then incur GPU
      submission latency) but we would still have to wake up the bottom-half
      every time to do the heavyweight slow read. Or we could only kick the
      waiters on the seqno with the same priority as the current task (i.e. in
      the realtime waiter scenario, only it is woken up immediately by the
      interrupt and simply queues the next waiter before returning to userspace,
      minimising its delay at the expense of the chain, and also reducing
      contention on its scheduler runqueue). This is effective at avoid long
      pauses in the interrupt handler and at avoiding the extra latency in
      realtime/high-priority waiters.
      
      v2: Convert from a kworker per engine into a dedicated kthread for the
      bottom-half.
      v3: Rename request members and tweak comments.
      v4: Use a per-engine spinlock in the breadcrumbs bottom-half.
      v5: Fix race in locklessly checking waiter status and kicking the task on
      adding a new waiter.
      v6: Fix deciding when to force the timer to hide missing interrupts.
      v7: Move the bottom-half from the kthread to the first client process.
      v8: Reword a few comments
      v9: Break the busy loop when the interrupt is unmasked or has fired.
      v10: Comments, unnecessary churn, better debugging from Tvrtko
      v11: Wake all completed waiters on removing the current bottom-half to
      reduce the latency of waking up a herd of clients all waiting on the
      same request.
      v12: Rearrange missed-interrupt fault injection so that it works with
      igt/drv_missed_irq_hang
      v13: Rename intel_breadcrumb and friends to intel_wait in preparation
      for signal handling.
      v14: RCU commentary, assert_spin_locked
      v15: Hide BUG_ON behind the compiler; report on gem_latency findings.
      v16: Sort seqno-groups by priority so that first-waiter has the highest
      task priority (and so avoid priority inversion).
      v17: Add waiters to post-mortem GPU hang state.
      v18: Return early for a completed wait after acquiring the spinlock.
      Avoids adding ourselves to the tree if the is already complete, and
      skips the awkward question of why we don't do completion wakeups for
      waits earlier than or equal to ourselves.
      v19: Prepare for init_breadcrumbs to fail. Later patches may want to
      allocate during init, so be prepared to propagate back the error code.
      
      Testcase: igt/gem_concurrent_blit
      Testcase: igt/benchmarks/gem_latency
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: "Rogozhkin, Dmitry V" <dmitry.v.rogozhkin@intel.com>
      Cc: "Gong, Zhipeng" <zhipeng.gong@intel.com>
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
      Cc: "Goel, Akash" <akash.goel@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> #v18
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467390209-3576-6-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      688e6c72
    • C
      drm/i915: Separate GPU hang waitqueue from advance · 1f15b76f
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      Currently __i915_wait_request uses a per-engine wait_queue_t for the dual
      purpose of waking after the GPU advances or for waking after an error.
      In the future, we may add even more wake sources and require greater
      separation, but for now we can conceptually simplify wakeups by separating
      the two sources. In particular, this allows us to use different wait-queues
      (e.g. one on the engine advancement, a global one for errors and one on
      each requests) without any hassle.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467390209-3576-5-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      1f15b76f
    • C
      drm/i915: Delay queuing hangcheck to wait-request · 05535726
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      We can forgo queuing the hangcheck from the start of every request to
      until we wait upon a request. This reduces the overhead of every
      request, but may increase the latency of detecting a hang. However, if
      nothing every waits upon a hang, did it ever hang? It also improves the
      robustness of the wait-request by ensuring that the hangchecker is
      indeed running before we sleep indefinitely (and thereby ensuring that
      we never actually sleep forever waiting for a dead GPU).
      
      As pointed out by Tvrtko, it is possible for a GPU hang to go unnoticed
      for as long as nobody is waiting for the GPU. Though this rare, during
      that time we may be consuming more power than if we had promptly
      recovered, and in the most extreme case we may exhaust all memory before
      forcing the hangcheck. Something to be wary off in future.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467390209-3576-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      05535726
  9. 30 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  10. 24 6月, 2016 2 次提交
  11. 21 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  12. 20 6月, 2016 2 次提交
  13. 13 6月, 2016 2 次提交
    • A
      drm/i915: Support for pread/pwrite from/to non shmem backed objects · b50a5371
      Ankitprasad Sharma 提交于
      This patch adds support for extending the pread/pwrite functionality
      for objects not backed by shmem. The access will be made through
      gtt interface. This will cover objects backed by stolen memory as well
      as other non-shmem backed objects.
      
      v2: Drop locks around slow_user_access, prefault the pages before
      access (Chris)
      
      v3: Rebased to the latest drm-intel-nightly (Ankit)
      
      v4: Moved page base & offset calculations outside the copy loop,
      corrected data types for size and offset variables, corrected if-else
      braces format (Tvrtko/kerneldocs)
      
      v5: Enabled pread/pwrite for all non-shmem backed objects including
      without tiling restrictions (Ankit)
      
      v6: Using pwrite_fast for non-shmem backed objects as well (Chris)
      
      v7: Updated commit message, Renamed i915_gem_gtt_read to i915_gem_gtt_copy,
      added pwrite slow path for non-shmem backed objects (Chris/Tvrtko)
      
      v8: Updated v7 commit message, mutex unlock around pwrite slow path for
      non-shmem backed objects (Tvrtko)
      
      v9: Corrected check during pread_ioctl, to avoid shmem_pread being
      called for non-shmem backed objects (Tvrtko)
      
      v10: Moved the write_domain check to needs_clflush and tiling mode check
      to pwrite_fast (Chris)
      
      v11: Use pwrite_fast fallback for all objects (shmem and non-shmem backed),
      call fast_user_write regardless of pagefault in previous iteration
      
      v12: Use page-by-page copy for slow user access too (Chris)
      
      v13: Handled EFAULT, Avoid use of WARN_ON, put_fence only if whole obj
      pinned (Chris)
      
      v14: Corrected datatypes/initializations (Tvrtko)
      
      Testcase: igt/gem_stolen, igt/gem_pread, igt/gem_pwrite
      Signed-off-by: NAnkitprasad Sharma <ankitprasad.r.sharma@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1465548783-19712-1-git-send-email-ankitprasad.r.sharma@intel.com
      b50a5371
    • A
      drm/i915: Use insert_page for pwrite_fast · 4f1959ee
      Ankitprasad Sharma 提交于
      In pwrite_fast, map an object page by page if obj_ggtt_pin fails. First,
      we try a nonblocking pin for the whole object (since that is fastest if
      reused), then failing that we try to grab one page in the mappable
      aperture. It also allows us to handle objects larger than the mappable
      aperture (e.g. if we need to pwrite with vGPU restricting the aperture
      to a measely 8MiB or something like that).
      
      v2: Pin pages before starting pwrite, Combined duplicate loops (Chris)
      
      v3: Combined loops based on local patch by Chris (Chris)
      
      v4: Added i915 wrapper function for drm_mm_insert_node_in_range (Chris)
      
      v5: Renamed wrapper function for drm_mm_insert_node_in_range (Chris)
      
      v5: Added wrapper for drm_mm_remove_node() (Chris)
      
      v6: Added get_pages call before pinning the pages (Tvrtko)
      Added remove_mappable_node() wrapper for drm_mm_remove_node() (Chris)
      
      v7: Added size argument for insert_mappable_node (Tvrtko)
      
      v8: Do not put_pages after pwrite, do memset of node in the wrapper
      function (insert_mappable_node) (Chris)
      
      v9: Rebase (Ankit)
      Signed-off-by: NAnkitprasad Sharma <ankitprasad.r.sharma@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      4f1959ee