As in del_timer() there has already placed a timer_pending() function
to check whether the timer to be deleted is pending or not, it's
unnecessary to check timer pending state again before del_timer() is
called.
Signed-off-by: NYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This patch fixes the following report, it happens when accepting rfcomm
connections:

[  228.165378] =============================================
[  228.165378] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[  228.165378] 3.7.0-rc1-00536-gc1d5dc4a #120 Tainted: G        W
[  228.165378] ---------------------------------------------
[  228.165378] bluetoothd/1341 is trying to acquire lock:
[  228.165378]  (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM){+.+...}, at:
[<ffffffffa0000aa0>] bt_accept_dequeue+0xa0/0x180 [bluetooth]
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378] but task is already holding lock:
[  228.165378]  (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM){+.+...}, at:
[<ffffffffa0205118>] rfcomm_sock_accept+0x58/0x2d0 [rfcomm]
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378] other info that might help us debug this:
[  228.165378]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378]        CPU0
[  228.165378]        ----
[  228.165378]   lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM);
[  228.165378]   lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM);
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  228.165378]
[  228.165378]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

Since the RFCOMM_PSM is constant, __constant_cpu_to_le16() is
the right go here.
Signed-off-by: NSyam Sidhardhan <s.syam@samsung.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

Instead of old unsafe batostr function use %pMR print specifier
for printing Bluetooth addresses in sprintf and seq_printf
statements.
Signed-off-by: NAndrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

Instead of old unsafe batostr function use %pMR print specifier
for printing Bluetooth addresses in debug and error statements.
Signed-off-by: NAndrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

The RFCOMM code fails to initialize the trailing padding byte of struct
sockaddr_rc added for alignment. It that for leaks one byte kernel stack
via the getsockname() syscall. Add an explicit memset(0) before filling
the structure to avoid the info leak.
Signed-off-by: NMathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The RFCOMM code fails to initialize the two padding bytes of struct
rfcomm_dev_list_req inserted for alignment before copying it to
userland. Additionally there are two padding bytes in each instance of
struct rfcomm_dev_info. The ioctl() that for disclosures two bytes plus
dev_num times two bytes uninitialized kernel heap memory.

Allocate the memory using kzalloc() to fix this issue.
Signed-off-by: NMathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The RFCOMM code fails to initialize the key_size member of struct
bt_security before copying it to userland -- that for leaking one
byte kernel stack. Initialize key_size with 0 to avoid the info
leak.
Signed-off-by: NMathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently we have no way to assign tty->port while performing tty
installation. There are two ways to provide the link tty_struct =>
tty_port. Either by calling tty_port_install from tty->ops->install or
tty_port_register_device called instead of tty_register_device when
the device is being set up after connected.

In this patch we modify most of the drivers to do the latter. When the
drivers use tty_register_device and we have tty_port already, we
switch to tty_port_register_device. So we have the tty_struct =>
tty_port link for free for those.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The termios and other changes mean the other protections needed on the driver
tty arrays should be adequate. Turn it all back on.

This contains pieces folded in from the fixes made to the original patches

| From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>	(fix m68k)
| From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>	(fix cris)
| From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suze.cz>			(lockdep)
| From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>		(lockdep)
Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Added /proc/net/rfcomm via bt_procfs_init().
Signed-off-by: NMasatake YAMATO <yamato@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

This will let us sort out a whole pile of tty related races. The
alternative would be to keep points and refcount the termios objects.
However
1. They are tiny anyway
2. Many devices don't use the stored copies
3. We can remove a pty special case
Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

I sent GregKH this after the pre-requisites. He dropped the pre-requesites
for good reason and unfortunately then applied this patch. Without this
reverted you get random kernel memory corruption which will make bisecting
anything between it and the properly applied patches a complete sod.
Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The termios and other changes mean the other protections needed on the driver
tty arrays should be adequate. Turn it all back on.

This contains pieces folded in from the fixes made to the original patches

| From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>	(fix m68k)
| From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>	(fix cris)
| From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suze.cz>			(lockdep)
| From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>		(lockdep)
Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Most of the include were unnecessary or already included by some other
header.
Replace module.h by export.h where possible.
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

Only obvious cases were left as inline, mostly oneline functions.
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

This reverts the tty layer change to use per-tty locking, because it's
not correct yet, and fixing it will require some more deep surgery.

The main revert is d29f3ef3 ("tty_lock: Localise the lock"), but
there are several smaller commits that built upon it, they also get
reverted here. The list of reverted commits is:

  fde86d31 - tty: add lockdep annotations
  8f6576ad - tty: fix ldisc lock inversion trace
  d3ca8b64 - pty: Fix lock inversion
  b1d679af - tty: drop the pty lock during hangup
  abcefe5f - tty/amiserial: Add missing argument for tty_unlock()
  fd11b42e - cris: fix missing tty arg in wait_event_interruptible_tty call
  d29f3ef3 - tty_lock: Localise the lock

The revert had a trivial conflict in the 68360serial.c staging driver
that got removed in the meantime.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

defer_setup and suspended are now flags into bt_sk().
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>

In each remaining case the tty_lock is associated with a specific tty. This
means we can now lock on a per tty basis. We do need tty_lock_pair() for
the pty case. Uglier but still a step in the right direction.

[fixed up calls in 3 missing drivers - gregkh]
Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

This means converting an atomic counter to a counter protected by
lock. This is the first step needed to convert the rest of the code to
the tty_port helpers.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

tty_wakeup is safe to be called from all contexts. No need to schedule
a work for that. Let us call it directly like in other drivers.

This allows us to kill another member of rfcomm_dev structure.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Switch the refcounting from manual atomic plays with refcounter to the
one offered by tty_port.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

And use tty from there.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Remove all #inclusions of asm/system.h preparatory to splitting and killing
it.  Performed with the following command:

perl -p -i -e 's!^#\s*include\s*<asm/system[.]h>.*\n!!' `grep -Irl '^#\s*include\s*<asm/system[.]h>' *`
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

All num, magic and owner are set by alloc_tty_driver. No need to
re-set them on each allocation site.

pti driver sets something different to what it passes to
alloc_tty_driver. It is not a bug, since we don't use the lines
parameter in any way. Anyway this is fixed, and now we do the right
thing.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NTilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

+ src/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c: warning: 'p' is used uninitialized in this
       function:  => 218
+ src/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c: warning: 'p' may be used uninitialized in
       this function:  => 218
Signed-off-by: NLuiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>

There is an imbalance in the rfcomm_session_hold / rfcomm_session_put
operations which causes the following crash:

[  685.010159] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b
[  685.010169] IP: [<c149d76d>] rfcomm_process_dlcs+0x1b/0x15e
[  685.010181] *pdpt = 000000002d665001 *pde = 0000000000000000
[  685.010191] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[  685.010247]
[  685.010255] Pid: 947, comm: krfcommd Tainted: G         C  3.0.16-mid8-dirty #44
[  685.010266] EIP: 0060:[<c149d76d>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 1
[  685.010274] EIP is at rfcomm_process_dlcs+0x1b/0x15e
[  685.010281] EAX: e79f551c EBX: 6b6b6b6b ECX: 00000007 EDX: e79f40b4
[  685.010288] ESI: e79f4060 EDI: ed4e1f70 EBP: ed4e1f68 ESP: ed4e1f50
[  685.010295]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
[  685.010303] Process krfcommd (pid: 947, ti=ed4e0000 task=ed43e5e0 task.ti=ed4e0000)
[  685.010308] Stack:
[  685.010312]  ed4e1f68 c149eb53 e5925150 e79f4060 ed500000 ed4e1f70 ed4e1f80 c149ec10
[  685.010331]  00000000 ed43e5e0 00000000 ed4e1f90 ed4e1f9c c149ec87 0000bf54 00000000
[  685.010348]  00000000 ee03bf54 c149ec37 ed4e1fe4 c104fe01 00000000 00000000 00000000
[  685.010367] Call Trace:
[  685.010376]  [<c149eb53>] ? rfcomm_process_rx+0x6e/0x74
[  685.010387]  [<c149ec10>] rfcomm_process_sessions+0xb7/0xde
[  685.010398]  [<c149ec87>] rfcomm_run+0x50/0x6d
[  685.010409]  [<c149ec37>] ? rfcomm_process_sessions+0xde/0xde
[  685.010419]  [<c104fe01>] kthread+0x63/0x68
[  685.010431]  [<c104fd9e>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x42/0x42
[  685.010442]  [<c14dae82>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd

This issue has been brought up earlier here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/21/127

The issue appears to be the rfcomm_session_put in rfcomm_recv_ua. This
operation doesn't seem be to required as for the non-initiator case we
have the rfcomm_process_rx doing an explicit put and in the initiator
case the last dlc_unlink will drive the reference counter to 0.

There have been several attempts to fix these issue:

6c2718da Bluetooth: Do not call rfcomm_session_put() for RFCOMM UA on closed socket
683d949a Bluetooth: Never deallocate a session when some DLC points to it

but AFAICS they do not fix the issue just make it harder to reproduce.
Signed-off-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGopala Krishna Murala <gopala.krishna.murala@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>

Since bluetooth uses multiple protocols types, to avoid lockdep
warnings, we need to use different lockdep classes (one for each
protocol type).

This is already done in bt_sock_create but it misses a couple of cases
when new connections are created. This patch corrects that to fix the
following warning:

<4>[ 1864.732366] =======================================================
<4>[ 1864.733030] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
<4>[ 1864.733544] 3.0.16-mid3-00007-gc9a0f62 #3
<4>[ 1864.733883] -------------------------------------------------------
<4>[ 1864.734408] t.android.btclc/4204 is trying to acquire lock:
<4>[ 1864.734869]  (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30
<4>[ 1864.735541]
<4>[ 1864.735549] but task is already holding lock:
<4>[ 1864.736045]  (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1498bf7>] lock_sock+0xa/0xc
<4>[ 1864.736732]
<4>[ 1864.736740] which lock already depends on the new lock.
<4>[ 1864.736750]
<4>[ 1864.737428]
<4>[ 1864.737437] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4>[ 1864.738016]
<4>[ 1864.738023] -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}:
<4>[ 1864.738549]        [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140
<4>[ 1864.738977]        [<c13d35c1>] lock_sock_nested+0x58/0x68
<4>[ 1864.739411]        [<c1493c33>] l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x76
<4>[ 1864.739858]        [<c13d06c3>] __sock_sendmsg+0x50/0x59
<4>[ 1864.740279]        [<c13d0ea2>] sock_sendmsg+0x94/0xa8
<4>[ 1864.740687]        [<c13d0ede>] kernel_sendmsg+0x28/0x37
<4>[ 1864.741106]        [<c14969ca>] rfcomm_send_frame+0x30/0x38
<4>[ 1864.741542]        [<c1496a2a>] rfcomm_send_ua+0x58/0x5a
<4>[ 1864.741959]        [<c1498447>] rfcomm_run+0x441/0xb52
<4>[ 1864.742365]        [<c104f095>] kthread+0x63/0x68
<4>[ 1864.742742]        [<c14d5182>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd
<4>[ 1864.743187]
<4>[ 1864.743193] -> #0 (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}:
<4>[ 1864.743667]        [<c1061ada>] __lock_acquire+0x988/0xc00
<4>[ 1864.744100]        [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140
<4>[ 1864.744519]        [<c14d2c70>] __mutex_lock_common+0x3b/0x33f
<4>[ 1864.744975]        [<c14d303e>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2d/0x36
<4>[ 1864.745412]        [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30
<4>[ 1864.745842]        [<c14990d9>] __rfcomm_sock_close+0x5f/0x6b
<4>[ 1864.746288]        [<c1499114>] rfcomm_sock_shutdown+0x2f/0x62
<4>[ 1864.746737]        [<c13d275d>] sys_socketcall+0x1db/0x422
<4>[ 1864.747165]        [<c14d42f0>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Signed-off-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>

There is an imbalance in the rfcomm_session_hold / rfcomm_session_put
operations which causes the following crash:

[  685.010159] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b
[  685.010169] IP: [<c149d76d>] rfcomm_process_dlcs+0x1b/0x15e
[  685.010181] *pdpt = 000000002d665001 *pde = 0000000000000000
[  685.010191] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[  685.010247]
[  685.010255] Pid: 947, comm: krfcommd Tainted: G         C  3.0.16-mid8-dirty #44
[  685.010266] EIP: 0060:[<c149d76d>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 1
[  685.010274] EIP is at rfcomm_process_dlcs+0x1b/0x15e
[  685.010281] EAX: e79f551c EBX: 6b6b6b6b ECX: 00000007 EDX: e79f40b4
[  685.010288] ESI: e79f4060 EDI: ed4e1f70 EBP: ed4e1f68 ESP: ed4e1f50
[  685.010295]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
[  685.010303] Process krfcommd (pid: 947, ti=ed4e0000 task=ed43e5e0 task.ti=ed4e0000)
[  685.010308] Stack:
[  685.010312]  ed4e1f68 c149eb53 e5925150 e79f4060 ed500000 ed4e1f70 ed4e1f80 c149ec10
[  685.010331]  00000000 ed43e5e0 00000000 ed4e1f90 ed4e1f9c c149ec87 0000bf54 00000000
[  685.010348]  00000000 ee03bf54 c149ec37 ed4e1fe4 c104fe01 00000000 00000000 00000000
[  685.010367] Call Trace:
[  685.010376]  [<c149eb53>] ? rfcomm_process_rx+0x6e/0x74
[  685.010387]  [<c149ec10>] rfcomm_process_sessions+0xb7/0xde
[  685.010398]  [<c149ec87>] rfcomm_run+0x50/0x6d
[  685.010409]  [<c149ec37>] ? rfcomm_process_sessions+0xde/0xde
[  685.010419]  [<c104fe01>] kthread+0x63/0x68
[  685.010431]  [<c104fd9e>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x42/0x42
[  685.010442]  [<c14dae82>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd

This issue has been brought up earlier here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/21/127

The issue appears to be the rfcomm_session_put in rfcomm_recv_ua. This
operation doesn't seem be to required as for the non-initiator case we
have the rfcomm_process_rx doing an explicit put and in the initiator
case the last dlc_unlink will drive the reference counter to 0.

There have been several attempts to fix these issue:

6c2718da Bluetooth: Do not call rfcomm_session_put() for RFCOMM UA on closed socket
683d949a Bluetooth: Never deallocate a session when some DLC points to it

but AFAICS they do not fix the issue just make it harder to reproduce.
Signed-off-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGopala Krishna Murala <gopala.krishna.murala@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>

Since bluetooth uses multiple protocols types, to avoid lockdep
warnings, we need to use different lockdep classes (one for each
protocol type).

This is already done in bt_sock_create but it misses a couple of cases
when new connections are created. This patch corrects that to fix the
following warning:

<4>[ 1864.732366] =======================================================
<4>[ 1864.733030] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
<4>[ 1864.733544] 3.0.16-mid3-00007-gc9a0f62 #3
<4>[ 1864.733883] -------------------------------------------------------
<4>[ 1864.734408] t.android.btclc/4204 is trying to acquire lock:
<4>[ 1864.734869]  (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30
<4>[ 1864.735541]
<4>[ 1864.735549] but task is already holding lock:
<4>[ 1864.736045]  (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1498bf7>] lock_sock+0xa/0xc
<4>[ 1864.736732]
<4>[ 1864.736740] which lock already depends on the new lock.
<4>[ 1864.736750]
<4>[ 1864.737428]
<4>[ 1864.737437] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4>[ 1864.738016]
<4>[ 1864.738023] -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}:
<4>[ 1864.738549]        [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140
<4>[ 1864.738977]        [<c13d35c1>] lock_sock_nested+0x58/0x68
<4>[ 1864.739411]        [<c1493c33>] l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x76
<4>[ 1864.739858]        [<c13d06c3>] __sock_sendmsg+0x50/0x59
<4>[ 1864.740279]        [<c13d0ea2>] sock_sendmsg+0x94/0xa8
<4>[ 1864.740687]        [<c13d0ede>] kernel_sendmsg+0x28/0x37
<4>[ 1864.741106]        [<c14969ca>] rfcomm_send_frame+0x30/0x38
<4>[ 1864.741542]        [<c1496a2a>] rfcomm_send_ua+0x58/0x5a
<4>[ 1864.741959]        [<c1498447>] rfcomm_run+0x441/0xb52
<4>[ 1864.742365]        [<c104f095>] kthread+0x63/0x68
<4>[ 1864.742742]        [<c14d5182>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd
<4>[ 1864.743187]
<4>[ 1864.743193] -> #0 (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}:
<4>[ 1864.743667]        [<c1061ada>] __lock_acquire+0x988/0xc00
<4>[ 1864.744100]        [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140
<4>[ 1864.744519]        [<c14d2c70>] __mutex_lock_common+0x3b/0x33f
<4>[ 1864.744975]        [<c14d303e>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2d/0x36
<4>[ 1864.745412]        [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30
<4>[ 1864.745842]        [<c14990d9>] __rfcomm_sock_close+0x5f/0x6b
<4>[ 1864.746288]        [<c1499114>] rfcomm_sock_shutdown+0x2f/0x62
<4>[ 1864.746737]        [<c13d275d>] sys_socketcall+0x1db/0x422
<4>[ 1864.747165]        [<c14d42f0>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Signed-off-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>

We now run in process context, no need to disable interrupts.
Calls from the tty layer also run in process context.

rw_lock was converted to spinlock, we have more writers than readers in
this case.
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>

Code now run in process context, does not need to disable interrupt
anymore.
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>

sock and sk were leftover from another change.
Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>

RFCOMM needs a proper priority mechanism inside itself and not try to use
l2cap priority to fix its own problem.
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>

The handling of SCO audio links and the L2CAP protocol are essential to
any system with Bluetooth thus are always compiled in from now on.
Signed-off-by: NUlisses Furquim <ulisses@profusion.mobi>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>

module_param(bool) used to counter-intuitively take an int.  In
fddd5201 (mid-2009) we allowed bool or int/unsigned int using a messy
trick.

It's time to remove the int/unsigned int option.  For this version
it'll simply give a warning, but it'll break next kernel version.

(Thanks to Joe Perches for suggesting coccinelle for 0/1 -> true/false).

Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

When the last RFCOMM data channel is closed, a timer is normally set
up to disconnect the control channel at a later time.  If the control
channel disconnect command is sent with the timer pending, the timer
needs to be cancelled.

If the timer is not cancelled in this situation, the reference
counting logic for the RFCOMM session does not work correctly when the
remote device closes the L2CAP connection.  The session is freed at
the wrong time, leading to a kernel panic.
Signed-off-by: NMat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>

This was triggered by turning off encryption on ACL link when rfcomm
was using high security. rfcomm_security_cfm (which is called from rx
task) was closing DLC and this involves sending disconnect message
(and locking socket).

Move closing DLC to rfcomm_process_dlcs and only flag DLC for closure
in rfcomm_security_cfm.

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:2032
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1788, name: kworker/0:3
[<c0068a08>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x108) from [<c05e25dc>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
[<c05e25dc>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c0087ba8>] (__might_sleep+0x110/0x12c)
[<c0087ba8>] (__might_sleep+0x110/0x12c) from [<c04801d8>] (lock_sock_nested+0x2c/0x64)
[<c04801d8>] (lock_sock_nested+0x2c/0x64) from [<c05670c8>] (l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x58/0xcc)
[<c05670c8>] (l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x58/0xcc) from [<c047cf6c>] (sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xd0)
[<c047cf6c>] (sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xd0) from [<c047cfc8>] (kernel_sendmsg+0x3c/0x44)
[<c047cfc8>] (kernel_sendmsg+0x3c/0x44) from [<c056b0e8>] (rfcomm_send_frame+0x50/0x58)
[<c056b0e8>] (rfcomm_send_frame+0x50/0x58) from [<c056b168>] (rfcomm_send_disc+0x78/0x80)
[<c056b168>] (rfcomm_send_disc+0x78/0x80) from [<c056b9f4>] (__rfcomm_dlc_close+0x2d0/0x2fc)
[<c056b9f4>] (__rfcomm_dlc_close+0x2d0/0x2fc) from [<c056bbac>] (rfcomm_security_cfm+0x140/0x1e0)
[<c056bbac>] (rfcomm_security_cfm+0x140/0x1e0) from [<c0555ec0>] (hci_event_packet+0x1ce8/0x4d84)
[<c0555ec0>] (hci_event_packet+0x1ce8/0x4d84) from [<c0550380>] (hci_rx_task+0x1d0/0x2d0)
[<c0550380>] (hci_rx_task+0x1d0/0x2d0) from [<c009ee04>] (tasklet_action+0x138/0x1e4)
[<c009ee04>] (tasklet_action+0x138/0x1e4) from [<c009f21c>] (__do_softirq+0xcc/0x274)
[<c009f21c>] (__do_softirq+0xcc/0x274) from [<c009f6c0>] (do_softirq+0x60/0x6c)
[<c009f6c0>] (do_softirq+0x60/0x6c) from [<c009f794>] (local_bh_enable_ip+0xc8/0xd4)
[<c009f794>] (local_bh_enable_ip+0xc8/0xd4) from [<c05e5804>] (_raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x48/0x4c)
[<c05e5804>] (_raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x48/0x4c) from [<c040d470>] (data_from_chip+0xf4/0xaec)
[<c040d470>] (data_from_chip+0xf4/0xaec) from [<c04136c0>] (send_skb_to_core+0x40/0x178)
[<c04136c0>] (send_skb_to_core+0x40/0x178) from [<c04139f4>] (cg2900_hu_receive+0x15c/0x2d0)
[<c04139f4>] (cg2900_hu_receive+0x15c/0x2d0) from [<c0414cb8>] (hci_uart_tty_receive+0x74/0xa0)
[<c0414cb8>] (hci_uart_tty_receive+0x74/0xa0) from [<c02cbd9c>] (flush_to_ldisc+0x188/0x198)
[<c02cbd9c>] (flush_to_ldisc+0x188/0x198) from [<c00b2774>] (process_one_work+0x144/0x4b8)
[<c00b2774>] (process_one_work+0x144/0x4b8) from [<c00b2e8c>] (worker_thread+0x198/0x468)
[<c00b2e8c>] (worker_thread+0x198/0x468) from [<c00b9bc8>] (kthread+0x98/0xa0)
[<c00b9bc8>] (kthread+0x98/0xa0) from [<c0061744>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
Signed-off-by: NSzymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>

Signed-off-by: NLuiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>

When all items in the list have the same type there is no much of a point
to use list_for_each except if you want to use the list pointer itself.
Signed-off-by: NLuiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>