1. 08 5月, 2007 14 次提交
  2. 03 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 26 4月, 2007 2 次提交
  4. 03 4月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 29 3月, 2007 5 次提交
  6. 28 3月, 2007 1 次提交
    • J
      [PATCH] uml: use correct register file size everywhere · b92c4f92
      Jeff Dike 提交于
      This patch uses MAX_REG_NR consistently to refer to the register file size.
       FRAME_SIZE isn't sufficient because on x86_64, it is smaller than the
      ptrace register file size.  MAX_REG_NR was introduced as a consistent way
      to get the number of registers, but wasn't used everywhere it should be.
      
      When this causes a problem, it makes PTRACE_SETREGS fail on x86_64 because
      of a corrupted segment register value in the known-good register file.  The
      patch also adds a register dump at that point in case there are any future
      problems here.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b92c4f92
  7. 15 3月, 2007 2 次提交
  8. 08 3月, 2007 7 次提交
  9. 07 3月, 2007 3 次提交
  10. 02 3月, 2007 4 次提交