- 28 4月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
The patch renames btrfs_dev_replace_find_srcdev() to btrfs_find_device_by_user_input() and moves it to volumes.c, so that delete device can use it. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
__check_raid_min_device() which was pealed from btrfs_rm_device() maintianed its original code to show the block move. This patch cleans up __check_raid_min_device(). Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
move a section of btrfs_rm_device() code to check for min number of the devices into the function __check_raid_min_devices() Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
A part of code from btrfs_scan_one_device() is moved to a new function btrfs_read_disk_super(), so that former function looks cleaner. (In this process it also moves the code which ensures null terminating label). So this creates easy opportunity to merge various duplicate codes on read disk super. Earlier attempt to merge duplicate codes highlighted that there were some issues for which there are duplicate codes (to read disk super), however it was not clear what was the issue. So until we figure that out, its better to keep them in a separate functions. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> [ use GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_CACHE_ removal related fixups ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 14 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adam Buchbinder 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAdam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Xfstests btrfs/011 complains about a deadlock warning, [ 1226.649039] ========================================================= [ 1226.649039] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] [ 1226.649039] 4.1.0+ #270 Not tainted [ 1226.649039] --------------------------------------------------------- [ 1226.652955] kswapd0/46 just changed the state of lock: [ 1226.652955] (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0 [ 1226.652955] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past: [ 1226.652955] (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [ 1226.652955] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1226.652955] Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock [ 1226.652955] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 1226.652955] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1226.652955] ---- ---- [ 1226.652955] lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock); [ 1226.652955] local_irq_disable(); [ 1226.652955] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1226.652955] lock(&found->groups_sem); [ 1226.652955] <Interrupt> [ 1226.652955] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1226.652955] *** DEADLOCK *** Commit 084b6e7c ("btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.") tried to fix a similar one that has the exactly same warning, but with that, we still run to this. The above lock chain comes from btrfs_commit_transaction ->btrfs_run_delayed_items ... ->__btrfs_update_delayed_inode ... ->__btrfs_cow_block ... ->find_free_extent ->cache_block_group ->load_free_space_cache ->btrfs_readpages ->submit_one_bio ... ->__btrfs_map_block ->btrfs_dev_replace_lock However, with high memory pressure, tasks which hold dev_replace.lock can be interrupted by kswapd and then kswapd is intended to release memory occupied by superblock, inodes and dentries, where we may call evict_inode, and it comes to [ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0 [ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff81459e74>] btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x24/0x30 [ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff8140c5fe>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x34e/0x700 delayed_node->mutex may be acquired in __btrfs_release_delayed_node(), and it leads to a ABBA deadlock. To fix this, we can use "blocking rwlock" used in the case of extent_buffer, but things are simpler here since we only needs read's spinlock to blocking lock. With this, btrfs/011 no more produces warnings in dmesg. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 11 2月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
No visible change. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can safely use GFP_KERNEL in the functions called from the ioctl handlers. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 30 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This reverts commit 14e46e04. This ends up doing sysfs operations from deep in balance (where we should be GFP_NOFS) and under heavy balance load, we're making races against sysfs internals. Revert it for now while we figure things out. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 22 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The files under /sys/fs/UUID/features get out of sync with the actual incompat bits set for the filesystem if they change after mount (eg. the LZO compression). Synchronize the feature bits with the sysfs files representing them right after we set/clear them. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 20 1月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Old code used bbio->raid_map to determine whether in raid56 write/recover operation, because we didn't't have bbio->map_type. Now we have direct way for this condition, rid of using the function-relative data, and make the code more readable. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
1: Adjust condition in loop to make less TAB 2: Move btrfs_put_bbio()'s line for combine, and makes logic clean. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Enhance chunk validation: 1) Num_stripes We already have such check but it's only in super block sys chunk array. Now check all on-disk chunks. 2) Chunk logical It should be aligned to sector size. This behavior should be *DOUBLE CHECKED* for 64K sector size like PPC64 or AArch64. Maybe we can found some hidden bugs. 3) Chunk length Same as chunk logical, should be aligned to sector size. 4) Stripe length It should be power of 2. 5) Chunk type Any bit out of TYPE_MAS | PROFILE_MASK is invalid. With all these much restrict rules, several fuzzed image reported in mail list should no longer cause kernel panic. Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
The recent change titled "Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance" (already in linux-next) left a typo in a message for users: metatdata -> metadata. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 19 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
duplicate const is redundant so remove it Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 16 1月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
I managed to trigger this: | INFO: trying to register non-static key. | the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. | turning off the locking correctness validator. | CPU: 1 PID: 781 Comm: systemd-gpt-aut Not tainted 4.4.0-rt2+ #14 | Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express | [<80307cec>] (dump_stack) | [<80070e98>] (__lock_acquire) | [<8007184c>] (lock_acquire) | [<80287800>] (btrfs_ioctl) | [<8012a8d4>] (do_vfs_ioctl) | [<8012ac14>] (SyS_ioctl) so I think that btrfs_device_data_ordered_init() is not invoked behind a macro somewhere. Fixes: 7cc8e58d ("Btrfs: fix unprotected device's variants on 32bits machine") Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
Overloading extent_map->bdev to struct map_lookup * might have started out as a means to an end, but it's a pattern that's used all over the place now. Let's get rid of the casting and just add a union instead. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 08 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
As of the 4.3 kernel release, the fitrim ioctl can now discard any region of a disk that is not allocated to any chunk/block group, including the first megabyte which is used for our primary superblock and by the boot loader (grub for example). Fix this by not allowing to trim/discard any region in the device starting with an offset not greater than min(alloc_start_mount_option, 1Mb), just as it was not possible before 4.3. A reproducer test case for xfstests follows. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { cd / rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _need_to_be_root _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch rm -f $seqres.full _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 # Write to the [0, 64Kb[ and [68Kb, 1Mb[ ranges of the device. These ranges are # reserved for a boot loader to use (GRUB for example) and btrfs should never # use them - neither for allocating metadata/data nor should trim/discard them. # The range [64Kb, 68Kb[ is used for the primary superblock of the filesystem. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xfd 0 64K" $SCRATCH_DEV | _filter_xfs_io $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xfd 68K 956K" $SCRATCH_DEV | _filter_xfs_io # Now mount the filesystem and perform a fitrim against it. _scratch_mount _require_batched_discard $SCRATCH_MNT $FSTRIM_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT # Now unmount the filesystem and verify the content of the ranges was not # modified (no trim/discard happened on them). _scratch_unmount echo "Content of the ranges [0, 64Kb] and [68Kb, 1Mb[ after fitrim:" od -t x1 -N $((64 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV od -t x1 -j $((68 * 1024)) -N $((956 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV status=0 exit Reported-by: NVincent Petry <PVince81@yahoo.fr> Reported-by: NAndrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109341 Fixes: 499f377f (btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.3+ Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2016 7 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Tygier 提交于
When converting a filesystem via balance check that metadata mode is at least as redundant as the data mode. For example give warning when: -dconvert=raid1 -mconvert=single Signed-off-by: NSam Tygier <samtygier@yahoo.co.uk> [ minor message reformatting ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Replace the integers by enums for better readability. The value 2 does not have any meaning since a7175319 "Btrfs: do less aggressive btree readahead" (2009-01-22). Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Byongho Lee 提交于
We use many constants to represent size and offset value. And to make code readable we use '256 * 1024 * 1024' instead of '268435456' to represent '256MB'. However we can make far more readable with 'SZ_256MB' which is defined in the 'linux/sizes.h'. So this patch replaces 'xxx * 1024 * 1024' kind of expression with single 'SZ_xxxMB' if 'xxx' is a power of 2 then 'xxx * SZ_1M' if 'xxx' is not a power of 2. And I haven't touched to '4096' & '8192' because it's more intuitive than 'SZ_4KB' & 'SZ_8KB'. Signed-off-by: NByongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can handle the special case of num_stripes == 0 directly inside btrfs_read_sys_array. The BUG_ON in btrfs_chunk_item_size is there to catch other unhandled cases where we fail to validate external data. A crafted or corrupted image crashes at mount time: BTRFS: device fsid 9006933e-2a9a-44f0-917f-514252aeec2c devid 1 transid 7 /dev/loop0 BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled BUG: failure at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:337/btrfs_chunk_item_size()! Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG! CPU: 0 PID: 313 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.2.5-00657-ge047887-dirty #25 Stack: 637af890 60062489 602aeb2e 604192ba 60387961 00000011 637af8a0 6038a835 637af9c0 6038776b 634ef32b 00000000 Call Trace: [<6001c86d>] show_stack+0xfe/0x15b [<6038a835>] dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c [<6038776b>] panic+0x13e/0x2b3 [<6020f099>] btrfs_read_sys_array+0x25d/0x2ff [<601cfbbe>] open_ctree+0x192d/0x27af [<6019c2c1>] btrfs_mount+0x8f5/0xb9a [<600bc9a7>] mount_fs+0x11/0xf3 [<600d5167>] vfs_kern_mount+0x75/0x11a [<6019bcb0>] btrfs_mount+0x2e4/0xb9a [<600bc9a7>] mount_fs+0x11/0xf3 [<600d5167>] vfs_kern_mount+0x75/0x11a [<600d710b>] do_mount+0xa35/0xbc9 [<600d7557>] SyS_mount+0x95/0xc8 [<6001e884>] handle_syscall+0x6b/0x8e Reported-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com> Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.19+ Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Since we will add support for -d dup for non-mixed filesystem, kernel need to support converting to this raid-type. This patch remove limitation of above case. Tested by following script: (combination of dup conversion with fsck): export TEST_DEV='/dev/vdc' export TEST_DIR='/var/ltf/tester/mnt' do_dup_test() { local m_from="$1" local d_from="$2" local m_to="$3" local d_to="$4" echo "Convert from -m $m_from -d $d_from to -m $m_to -d $d_to" umount "$TEST_DIR" &>/dev/null ./mkfs.btrfs -f -m "$m_from" -d "$d_from" "$TEST_DEV" >/dev/null || return 1 mount "$TEST_DEV" "$TEST_DIR" || return 1 cp -a /sbin/* "$TEST_DIR" [[ "$m_from" != "$m_to" ]] && { ./btrfs balance start -f -mconvert="$m_to" "$TEST_DIR" || return 1 } [[ "$d_from" != "$d_to" ]] && { local opt=() [[ "$d_to" == single ]] && opt+=("-f") ./btrfs balance start "${opt[@]}" -dconvert="$d_to" "$TEST_DIR" || return 1 } umount "$TEST_DIR" || return 1 ./btrfsck "$TEST_DEV" || return 1 echo return 0 } test_all() { for m_from in single dup; do for d_from in single dup; do for m_to in single dup; do for d_to in single dup; do do_dup_test "$m_from" "$d_from" "$m_to" "$d_to" || return 1 done done done done } test_all Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 24 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
map->num_stripes really can't be zero, but just in case. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 17 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
During the final phase of a device replace operation, I ran into a transaction abort that resulted in the following trace: [23919.655368] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 30175 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:9843 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs]() [23919.664742] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) [23919.665749] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse parport_pc i2c_piix4 parport psmouse acpi_cpufreq processor i2c_core evdev microcode pcspkr button serio_raw ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sd_mod sg sr_mod cdrom virtio_scsi ata_generic ata_piix virtio_pci floppy virtio_ring libata e1000 virtio scsi_mod [last unloaded: btrfs] [23919.679442] CPU: 10 PID: 30175 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 4.3.0-rc5-btrfs-next-17+ #1 [23919.682392] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 [23919.689151] 0000000000000000 ffff8804020cbb50 ffffffff812566f4 ffff8804020cbb98 [23919.692604] ffff8804020cbb88 ffffffff8104d0a6 ffffffffa03eea69 ffff88041b678a48 [23919.694230] ffff88042ac38000 ffff88041b678930 00000000fffffffe ffff8804020cbbf0 [23919.696716] Call Trace: [23919.698669] [<ffffffff812566f4>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79 [23919.700597] [<ffffffff8104d0a6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x9f/0xb8 [23919.701958] [<ffffffffa03eea69>] ? btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs] [23919.703612] [<ffffffff8104d107>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x48/0x50 [23919.705047] [<ffffffffa03eea69>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs] [23919.706967] [<ffffffffa0402097>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x2dd [btrfs] [23919.708611] [<ffffffffa0402300>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs] [23919.710099] [<ffffffffa03ef0b8>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x121/0x28b [btrfs] [23919.711970] [<ffffffffa0413025>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7d3/0xc6d [btrfs] [23919.713602] [<ffffffff8108b78f>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194 [23919.714756] [<ffffffff81086dbc>] ? percpu_down_read+0x51/0x78 [23919.716155] [<ffffffff8116ef1d>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0 [23919.718918] [<ffffffff8116ef1d>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0 [23919.724170] [<ffffffff8116b579>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff [23919.725482] [<ffffffff8117c1d7>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b [23919.726790] [<ffffffff8117c5ef>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x406/0x4e6 [23919.728428] [<ffffffff81171175>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e [23919.729642] [<ffffffff8118574d>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71 [23919.730782] [<ffffffff8117c726>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [23919.731847] [<ffffffff8147cd97>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [23919.733330] ---[ end trace 166ef301a335832a ]--- This is due to a race between device replace and chunk allocation, which the following diagram illustrates: CPU 1 CPU 2 btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() at this point dev_replace->tgtdev->devid == BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID (0ULL) ... btrfs_start_transaction() btrfs_commit_transaction() btrfs_fallocate() btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand() btrfs_join_transaction() --> starts a new transaction do_chunk_alloc() lock fs_info->chunk_mutex btrfs_alloc_chunk() --> creates extent map for the new chunk with em->bdev->map->stripes[i]->dev->devid == X (X > 0) --> extent map is added to fs_info->mapping_tree --> initial phase of bg A allocation completes unlock fs_info->chunk_mutex lock fs_info->chunk_mutex btrfs_dev_replace_update_device_in_mapping_tree() --> iterates fs_info->mapping_tree and replaces the device in every extent map's map->stripes[] with dev_replace->tgtdev, which still has an id of 0ULL (BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID) btrfs_end_transaction() btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() --> starts final phase of bg A creation (update device, extent, and chunk trees, etc) btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc() btrfs_update_device() --> attempts to update a device item with ID == 0ULL (BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID) which is the current ID of bg A's em->bdev->map->stripes[i]->dev->devid --> doesn't find such item returns -ENOENT --> the device id should have been X and not 0ULL got -ENOENT from btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc() and aborts current transaction finishes setting up the target device, namely it sets tgtdev->devid to the value of srcdev->devid, which is X (and X > 0) frees the srcdev unlock fs_info->chunk_mutex So fix this by taking the device list mutex when processing the chunk's extent map stripes to update the device items. This avoids getting the wrong device id and use-after-free problems if the task finishing a chunk allocation grabs the replaced device, which is freed while the dev replace task is holding the device list mutex. This happened while running fstest btrfs/071. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
- 10 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If we fail to allocate a new data chunk, we were jumping to the error path without release the transaction handle we got before. Fix this by always releasing it before doing the jump. Fixes: 2c9fe835 ("btrfs: Fix lost-data-profile caused by balance bg") Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 03 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 25 11月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Holger Hoffstätte 提交于
There's a regression in 4.4-rc since commit bc309467 (btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and maximum) in that existing (non-ranged) balance with -dusage=x no longer works; all chunks are skipped. After staring at the code for a while and wondering why a non-ranged balance would even need min and max thresholds (..which then were not set correctly, leading to the bug) I realized that the only problem was the fact that the filter functions were named wrong, thanks to patching copypasta. Simply renaming both functions lets the existing btrfs-progs call balance with -dusage=x and now the non-ranged filter function is invoked, properly using only a single chunk limit. Signed-off-by: NHolger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com> Fixes: bc309467 ("btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and maximum") Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The test btrfs/011 triggers a rcu warning Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> =============================== [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ] 4.4.0-rc1-default+ #286 Tainted: G W ------------------------------- fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1977 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0 4 locks held by btrfs/28786: 0: (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc785>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x45/0xa00 [btrfs] 1: (uuid_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc84f>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x10f/0xa00 [btrfs] 2: (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc868>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x128/0xa00 [btrfs] 3: (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc87d>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x13d/0xa00 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 28786 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.4.0-rc1-default+ #286 Hardware name: Intel Corporation SandyBridge Platform/To be filled by O.E.M., BIOS ASNBCPT1.86C.0031.B00.1006301607 06/30/2010 0000000000000001 ffff8800a07dfb48 ffffffff8141d47b 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffff8801464a4f00 ffff8800a07dfb78 ffffffff810cd883 ffff880146eb9400 ffff8800a3698600 ffff8800a33fe220 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8141d47b>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x74 [<ffffffff810cd883>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x103/0x140 [<ffffffffa0071261>] btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev+0x111/0x130 [btrfs] [<ffffffff810d354d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffff81449536>] ? __percpu_counter_sum+0x66/0x80 [<ffffffffa00bcc15>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x4d5/0xa00 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa00bc96e>] ? btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x22e/0xa00 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa00a8795>] ? btrfs_scrub_dev+0x415/0x6d0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa003ea69>] ? btrfs_start_transaction+0x9/0x20 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa00bda79>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x339/0x590 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81196aa5>] ? __might_fault+0x95/0xa0 [<ffffffffa0078638>] btrfs_ioctl_dev_replace+0x118/0x160 [btrfs] [<ffffffff811409c6>] ? stack_trace_call+0x46/0x70 [<ffffffffa007c914>] ? btrfs_ioctl+0x24/0x1770 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa007ce43>] btrfs_ioctl+0x553/0x1770 [btrfs] [<ffffffff811409c6>] ? stack_trace_call+0x46/0x70 [<ffffffff811d6eb1>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x5a0 [<ffffffff811d6f1c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8c/0x5a0 [<ffffffff811e3336>] ? __fget_light+0x86/0xb0 [<ffffffff811e3369>] ? __fdget+0x9/0x20 [<ffffffff811d7451>] ? SyS_ioctl+0x21/0x80 [<ffffffff811d7483>] SyS_ioctl+0x53/0x80 [<ffffffff81b1efd7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f This is because of unprotected use of rcu_dereference in btrfs_scratch_superblocks. We can't add rcu locks around the whole function because we read the superblock. The fix will use the rcu string buffer directly without the rcu locking. Thi is safe as the device will not go away in the meantime. We're holding the device list mutexes. Restructuring the code to narrow down the rcu section turned out to be impossible, we need to call filp_open (through update_dev_time) on the buffer and this could call kmalloc/__might_sleep. We could call kstrdup with GFP_ATOMIC but it's not absolutely necessary. Fixes: 12b1c263 (Btrfs: enhance btrfs_scratch_superblock to scratch all superblocks) Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
We were using only 1 transaction unit when attempting to delete an unused block group but in reality we need 3 + N units, where N corresponds to the number of stripes. We were accounting only for the addition of the orphan item (for the block group's free space cache inode) but we were not accounting that we need to delete one block group item from the extent tree, one free space item from the tree of tree roots and N device extent items from the device tree. While one unit is not enough, it worked most of the time because for each single unit we are too pessimistic and assume an entire tree path, with the highest possible heigth (8), needs to be COWed with eventual node splits at every possible level in the tree, so there was usually enough reserved space for removing all the items and adding the orphan item. However after adding the orphan item, writepages() can by called by the VM subsystem against the btree inode when we are under memory pressure, which causes writeback to start for the nodes we COWed before, this forces the operation to remove the free space item to COW again some (or all of) the same nodes (in the tree of tree roots). Even without writepages() being called, we could fail with ENOSPC because these items are located in multiple trees and one of them might have a higher heigth and require node/leaf splits at many levels, exhausting all the reserved space before removing all the items and adding the orphan. In the kernel 4.0 release, commit 3d84be79 ("Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_orphan_add() when delete unused block group"), we attempted to fix a BUG_ON due to ENOSPC when trying to add the orphan item by making the cleaner kthread reserve one transaction unit before attempting to remove the block group, but this was not enough. We had a couple user reports still hitting the same BUG_ON after 4.0, like Stefan Priebe's report on a 4.2-rc6 kernel for example: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg46070.html So fix this by reserving all the necessary units of metadata. Reported-by: NStefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag> Fixes: 3d84be79 ("Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_orphan_add() when delete unused block group") Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
It's possible to reach a state where the cleaner kthread isn't able to start a transaction to delete an unused block group due to lack of enough free metadata space and due to lack of unallocated device space to allocate a new metadata block group as well. If this happens try to use space from the global block group reserve just like we do for unlink operations, so that we don't reach a permanent state where starting a transaction for filesystem operations (file creation, renames, etc) keeps failing with -ENOSPC. Such an unfortunate state was observed on a machine where over a dozen unused data block groups existed and the cleaner kthread was failing to delete them due to ENOSPC error when attempting to start a transaction, and even running balance with a -dusage=0 filter failed with ENOSPC as well. Also unmounting and mounting again the filesystem didn't help. Allowing the cleaner kthread to use the global block reserve to delete the unused data block groups fixed the problem. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 11 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Reproduce: (In integration-4.3 branch) TEST_DEV=(/dev/vdg /dev/vdh) TEST_DIR=/mnt/tmp umount "$TEST_DEV" >/dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid1 "${TEST_DEV[@]}" mount -o nospace_cache "$TEST_DEV" "$TEST_DIR" btrfs balance start -dusage=0 $TEST_DIR btrfs filesystem usage $TEST_DIR dd if=/dev/zero of="$TEST_DIR"/file count=100 btrfs filesystem usage $TEST_DIR Result: We can see "no data chunk" in first "btrfs filesystem usage": # btrfs filesystem usage $TEST_DIR Overall: ... Metadata,single: Size:8.00MiB, Used:0.00B /dev/vdg 8.00MiB Metadata,RAID1: Size:122.88MiB, Used:112.00KiB /dev/vdg 122.88MiB /dev/vdh 122.88MiB System,single: Size:4.00MiB, Used:0.00B /dev/vdg 4.00MiB System,RAID1: Size:8.00MiB, Used:16.00KiB /dev/vdg 8.00MiB /dev/vdh 8.00MiB Unallocated: /dev/vdg 1.06GiB /dev/vdh 1.07GiB And "data chunks changed from raid1 to single" in second "btrfs filesystem usage": # btrfs filesystem usage $TEST_DIR Overall: ... Data,single: Size:256.00MiB, Used:0.00B /dev/vdh 256.00MiB Metadata,single: Size:8.00MiB, Used:0.00B /dev/vdg 8.00MiB Metadata,RAID1: Size:122.88MiB, Used:112.00KiB /dev/vdg 122.88MiB /dev/vdh 122.88MiB System,single: Size:4.00MiB, Used:0.00B /dev/vdg 4.00MiB System,RAID1: Size:8.00MiB, Used:16.00KiB /dev/vdg 8.00MiB /dev/vdh 8.00MiB Unallocated: /dev/vdg 1.06GiB /dev/vdh 841.92MiB Reason: btrfs balance delete last data chunk in case of no data in the filesystem, then we can see "no data chunk" by "fi usage" command. And when we do write operation to fs, the only available data profile is 0x0, result is all new chunks are allocated single type. Fix: Allocate a data chunk explicitly to ensure we don't lose the raid profile for data. Test: Test by above script, and confirmed the logic by debug output. Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd __GFP_WAIT has been used to identify atomic context in callers that hold spinlocks or are in interrupts. They are expected to be high priority and have access one of two watermarks lower than "min" which can be referred to as the "atomic reserve". __GFP_HIGH users get access to the first lower watermark and can be called the "high priority reserve". Over time, callers had a requirement to not block when fallback options were available. Some have abused __GFP_WAIT leading to a situation where an optimisitic allocation with a fallback option can access atomic reserves. This patch uses __GFP_ATOMIC to identify callers that are truely atomic, cannot sleep and have no alternative. High priority users continue to use __GFP_HIGH. __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM identifies callers that can sleep and are willing to enter direct reclaim. __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to identify callers that want to wake kswapd for background reclaim. __GFP_WAIT is redefined as a caller that is willing to enter direct reclaim and wake kswapd for background reclaim. This patch then converts a number of sites o __GFP_ATOMIC is used by callers that are high priority and have memory pools for those requests. GFP_ATOMIC uses this flag. o Callers that have a limited mempool to guarantee forward progress clear __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but keep __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. bio allocations fall into this category where kswapd will still be woken but atomic reserves are not used as there is a one-entry mempool to guarantee progress. o Callers that are checking if they are non-blocking should use the helper gfpflags_allow_blocking() where possible. This is because checking for __GFP_WAIT as was done historically now can trigger false positives. Some exceptions like dm-crypt.c exist where the code intent is clearer if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used instead of the helper due to flag manipulations. o Callers that built their own GFP flags instead of starting with GFP_KERNEL and friends now also need to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. The first key hazard to watch out for is callers that removed __GFP_WAIT and was depending on access to atomic reserves for inconspicuous reasons. In some cases it may be appropriate for them to use __GFP_HIGH. The second key hazard is callers that assembled their own combination of GFP flags instead of starting with something like GFP_KERNEL. They may now wish to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. It's almost certainly harmless if it's missed in most cases as other activity will wake kswapd. Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 27 10月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Similar to the 'limit' filter, we can enhance the 'usage' filter to accept a range. The change is backward compatible, the range is applied only in connection with the BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_USAGE_RANGE flag. We don't have a usecase yet, the current syntax has been sufficient. The enhancement should provide parity with other range-like filters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Gabríel Arthúr Pétursson 提交于
Balance block groups which have the given number of stripes, defined by a range min..max. This is useful to selectively rebalance only chunks that do not span enough devices, applies to RAID0/10/5/6. Signed-off-by: NGabríel Arthúr Pétursson <gabriel@system.is> [ renamed bargs members, added to the UAPI, wrote the changelog ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-