- 03 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
We can free memory allocated with lmb_alloc() by removing it from the list of reserved LMBs. Rework lmb_remove() to allow that possibility and add lmb_free() which exploits it. BenH: Removed some useless parenthesis Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 13 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Albert Herranz 提交于
Add a flag to let a platform ioremap memory regions marked as reserved. This flag will be used later by the Nintendo Wii support code to allow ioremapping the I/O region sitting between MEM1 and MEM2 and marked as reserved RAM in the patch "wii: use both mem1 and mem2 as ram". This will no longer be needed when proper discontig memory support for 32-bit PowerPC is added to the kernel. Signed-off-by: NAlbert Herranz <albert_herranz@yahoo.es> Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
-
- 28 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
We call lmb_end_of_DRAM() to test whether a DMA mask is ok on a machine without IOMMU, but this function is marked as __init. I don't think there's a clean way to get the top of RAM max_pfn doesn't appear to include highmem or I missed (or we have a bug :-) so for now, let's just avoid having a broken 2.6.31 by making this function non-__init and we can revisit later. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
The lmb_dump_all() output didn't include the RMO size, which is interesting on powerpc. The output was also a bit spacey and not well aligned, and didn't show you the end addresses. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 16 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
The idea of the implementation of this fix is from Michael Ellerman. This function has two loops, but they each interpret the memory_limit value differently. The first loop interprets it as a "size limit" whereas the second loop interprets it as an "address limit". Before the second loop runs, reset memory_limit to lmb_end_of_DRAM() so that it all works out. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
-
- 19 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kumar Gala 提交于
lib/lmb.c: In function 'lmb_dump_all': lib/lmb.c:51: warning: format '%lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'u64' Signed-off-by: NKumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 13 5月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Having to muck with the build and set DEBUG just to get lmb_dump_all() to print things isn't very useful. So use pr_info() and use an early boot param "lmb=debug" so we can simply ask users to reboot with this option when we need some debugging from them. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
When allocating, if we will align up the size when making the reservation, we should also align the size for the check that the space is actually available. The simplest thing is to just aling the size up from the beginning, then we can use plain 'size' throughout. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 4月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Badari Pulavarty 提交于
Provide walk_memory_resource() for 64-bit powerpc. PowerPC maintains logical memory region mapping in the lmb.memory structure. Walk through these structures and do the callbacks for the contiguous chunks. Signed-off-by: NBadari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> Cc: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
由 Badari Pulavarty 提交于
The powerpc kernel maintains information about logical memory blocks in the lmb.memory structure, which is initialized and updated at boot time, but not when memory is added or removed while the kernel is running. This adds a hotplug memory notifier which updates lmb.memory when memory is added or removed. This information is useful for eHEA driver to find out the memory layout and holes. NOTE: No special locking is needed for lmb_add() and lmb_remove(). Calls to these are serialized by caller. (pSeries_reconfig_chain). Signed-off-by: NBadari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> Cc: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 24 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Changeset d9024df0 ("[LMB] Restructure allocation loops to avoid unsigned underflow") removed the alignment of the 'size' argument to call lmb_add_region() done by __lmb_alloc_base(). In doing so it reintroduced the bug fixed by changeset eea89e13 ("[LMB]: Fix bug in __lmb_alloc_base()."). This puts it back. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 15 4月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mackerras 提交于
There is a potential bug in __lmb_alloc_base where we subtract `size' from the base address of a reserved region without checking whether the subtraction could wrap around and produce a very large unsigned value. In fact it probably isn't possible to hit the bug in practice since it would only occur in the situation where we can't satisfy the allocation request and there is a reserved region starting at 0. This fixes the potential bug by breaking out of the loop when we get to the point where the base of the reserved region is less than the size requested. This also restructures the loop to be a bit easier to follow. The same logic got copied into lmb_alloc_nid_unreserved, so this makes a similar change there. Here the bug is more likely to be hit because the outer loop (in lmb_alloc_nid) goes through the memory regions in increasing order rather than decreasing order as __lmb_alloc_base does, and we are therefore more likely to hit the case where we are testing against a reserved region with a base address of 0. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
由 Paul Mackerras 提交于
This makes no semantic changes. It fixes the whitespace and formatting a bit, gets rid of a local DBG macro and uses the equivalent pr_debug instead, and restructures one while loop that had a function call and assignment in the condition to be a bit more readable. Some comments about functions being called with relocation disabled were also removed as they would just be confusing to most readers now that the code is in lib/. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
A variant of lmb_alloc() that tries to allocate memory on a specified NUMA node 'nid' but falls back to normal lmb_alloc() if that fails. The caller provides a 'nid_range' function pointer which assists the allocator. It is given args 'start', 'end', and pointer to integer 'this_nid'. It places at 'this_nid' the NUMA node id that corresponds to 'start', and returns the end address within 'start' to 'end' at which memory assosciated with 'nid' ends. This callback allows a platform to use lmb_alloc_nid() in just about any context, even ones in which early_pfn_to_nid() might not be working yet. This function will be used by the NUMA setup code on sparc64, and also it can be used by powerpc, replacing it's hand crafted "careful_allocation()" function in arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c If x86 ever converts it's NUMA support over to using the LMB helpers, it can use this too as it has something entirely similar. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 20 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kumar Gala 提交于
We introduced a bug in fixing lmb_add_region to handle an initial region being non-zero. Before that fix it was impossible to insert a region at the head of the list since the first region always started at zero. Now that its possible for the first region to be non-zero we need to check to see if the new region should be added at the head and if so actually add it. Signed-off-by: NKumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 14 2月, 2008 4 次提交
-
-
由 Becky Bruce 提交于
Convert the lmb code to use u64 instead of unsigned long for physical addresses and sizes. This is needed to support large amounts of RAM on 32-bit systems that support 36-bit physical addressing. Signed-off-by: NBecky Bruce <becky.bruce@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Kumar Gala 提交于
If we add to an empty lmb region with a non-zero base we will not coalesce the number of regions down to one. This causes problems on ppc32 for the memory region as its assumed to only have one region. We can fix this be easily specially casing the initial add to just replace the dummy region. Signed-off-by: NKumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
We need to check lmb_add_region() for errors, it can run out of regions etc. Also, the size needs to be padded to the given alignment or else the lmb.reserved regions don't get expanded and instead we get tons of holes and eventually run out of regions prematurely. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kumar Gala 提交于
There were several issues if a memreserve range existed and happened to be in highmem: * The bootmem allocator is only aware of lowmem so calling reserve_bootmem with a highmem address would cause a BUG_ON * All highmem pages were provided to the buddy allocator Added a lmb_is_reserved() api that we now use to determine if a highem page should continue to be PageReserved or provided to the buddy allocator. Also, we incorrectly reported the amount of pages reserved since all highmem pages are initally marked reserved and we clear the PageReserved flag as we "free" up the highmem pages. Signed-off-by: NKumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 26 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Manish Ahuja 提交于
This fixes a possible infinite loop when the unsigned long counter "i" is used in lmb_add_region() in the following for loop: for (i = rgn->cnt-1; i >= 0; i--) by making the loop counter "i" be signed. Signed-off-by: NManish Ahuja <ahuja@austin.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 08 3月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Gibson 提交于
At present calling lmb_reserve() (and hence lmb_add_region()) twice for exactly the same memory region will cause strange behaviour. This makes life difficult when booting from a flat device tree with memory reserve map. Which regions are automatically reserved by the kernel has changed over time, so it's quite possible a newer kernel could attempt to auto-reserve a region which is also explicitly listed in the device tree's reserve map, leading to trouble. This patch avoids the problem by making lmb_reserve() ignore a call to reserve a previously reserved region. It also removes a now redundant test designed to avoid one specific case of the problem noted above. At present, this patch deals only with duplicate reservations of an identical region. Attempting to reserve two different, but overlapping regions will still cause problems. I might post another patch later dealing with this case, but I'm avoiding it now since it is substantially more complicated to deal with, less likely to occur and more likely to indicate a genuine bug elsewhere if it does occur. Signed-off-by: NDavid Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 25 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
There's a bug in my cleaned up mem= handling, if the memory limit is larger than the RMO size we'll erroneously enlarge the RMO size. Fix is to only change the RMO size if the memory limit is less than the current RMO value. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 07 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
There's a bug in my cleaned up mem= handling, if the memory limit is larger than the RMO size we'll erroneously enlarge the RMO size. Fix is to only change the RMO size if the memory limit is less than the current RMO value. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jörn Engel 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
-
- 19 5月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
We currently do mem= handling in three seperate places. And as benh pointed out I wrote two of them. Now that we parse command line parameters earlier we can clean this mess up. Moving the parsing out of prom_init means the device tree might be allocated above the memory limit. If that happens we'd have to move it. As it happens we already have logic to do that for kdump, so just genericise it. This also means we might have reserved regions above the memory limit, if we do the bootmem allocator will blow up, so we have to modify lmb_enforce_memory_limit() to truncate the reserves as well. Tested on P5 LPAR, iSeries, F50, 44p. Tested moving device tree on P5 and 44p and F50. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 17 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
My patch (d7a5b2ff) to always panic if lmb_alloc() fails is broken because it checks alloc < 0, but should be checking alloc == 0. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 07 2月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE doesn't need to be part of the API, it's only used in lmb.c - so move it out of the header file. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Currently most callers of lmb_alloc() don't check if it worked or not, if it ever does weird bad things will probably happen. The few callers who do check just panic or BUG_ON. So make lmb_alloc() panic internally, to catch bugs at the source. The few callers who did check the result no longer need to. The only caller that did anything interesting with the return result was careful_allocation(). For it we create __lmb_alloc_base() which _doesn't_ panic automatically, a little messy, but passable. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
To prevent problems later in boot, make sure we don't create zero-size lmb regions. I've checked all the callers, and at the moment no one should ever hit this. All callers use a constant size, or they check the computed size before they call us. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 16 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Somewhere we lost the include of udbg.h in lmb.c. While we're there, add a DBG macro like every other file has and use it in lmb_dump_all(). Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 06 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mackerras 提交于
This also creates merged versions of do_init_bootmem, paging_init and mem_init and moves them to arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c. It gets rid of the mem_pieces stuff. I made memory_limit a parameter to lmb_enforce_memory_limit rather than a global referenced by that function. This will require some small changes to ppc64 if we want to continue building ARCH=ppc64 using the merged lmb.c. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 29 8月, 2005 4 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
lmb_phys_mem_size() can always return lmb.memory.size, as long as it's called after lmb_analyze(), which it is. There's no need to recalculate the size on every call. lmb_analyze() was calculating a few things we then threw away, so just don't calculate them to start with. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
We no longer need the lmb code to know about abs and phys addresses, so remove the physbase variable from the lmb_property struct. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
abs_to_phys() is a macro that turns out to do nothing, and also has the unfortunate property that it's not the inverse of phys_to_abs() on iSeries. The following is for my benefit as much as everyone else. With CONFIG_MSCHUNKS enabled, the lmb code is changed such that it keeps a physbase variable for each lmb region. This is used to take the possibly discontiguous lmb regions and present them as a contiguous address space beginning from zero. In this context each lmb region's base address is its "absolute" base address, and its physbase is it's "physical" address (from Linux's point of view). The abs_to_phys() macro does the mapping from "absolute" to "physical". Note: This is not related to the iSeries mapping of physical to absolute (ie. Hypervisor) addresses which is maintained with the msChunks structure. And the msChunks structure is not controlled via CONFIG_MSCHUNKS. Once upon a time you could compile for non-iSeries with CONFIG_MSCHUNKS enabled. But these days CONFIG_MSCHUNKS depends on CONFIG_PPC_ISERIES, so for non-iSeries code abs_to_phys() is a no-op. On iSeries we always have one lmb region which spans from 0 to systemcfg->physicalMemorySize (arch/ppc64/kernel/iSeries_setup.c line 383). This region has a base (ie. absolute) address of 0, and a physbase address of 0 (as calculated in lmb_analyze() (arch/ppc64/kernel/lmb.c line 144)). On iSeries, abs_to_phys(aa) is defined as lmb_abs_to_phys(aa), which finds the lmb region containing aa (and there's only one, ie. 0), and then does: return lmb.memory.region[0].physbase + (aa - lmb.memory.region[0].base) physbase == base == 0, so you're left with "return aa". So remove abs_to_phys(), and lmb_abs_to_phys() which is the implementation of abs_to_phys() for iSeries. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
The lmb code is all written to use a pointer to an lmb struct. But it's always the same lmb struct, called "lmb". So we take the address of lmb, call it _lmb and then start using _lmb->foo everywhere, which is silly. This patch removes the _lmb pointers and replaces them with direct references to the one "lmb" struct. We do the same for some _mem and _rsv pointers which point to lmb.memory and lmb.reserved respectively. This patch looks quite busy, but it's basically just: s/_lmb->/lmb./g s/_mem->/lmb.memory./g s/_rsv->/lmb.reserved./g s/_rsv/&lmb.reserved/g s/mem->/lmb.memory./g Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-