- 08 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
The call to cpufreq_update_policy() is placed in the CPU hotplug callback of cpufreq_stats, which has a higher priority than the CPU hotplug callback of cpufreq-core. As a result, during CPU_ONLINE/CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN, we end up calling cpufreq_update_policy() *before* calling cpufreq_add_dev() ! And for uninitialized CPUs, it just returns silently, not doing anything. To add to that, cpufreq_stats is not even the right place to call cpufreq_update_policy() to begin with. The cpufreq core ought to handle this in its own callback, from an elegance/relevance perspective. So move the invocation of cpufreq_update_policy() to cpufreq_cpu_callback, and place it *after* cpufreq_add_dev(). Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since cpufreq_cpu_put() called by __cpufreq_remove_dev() drops the driver module refcount, __cpufreq_remove_dev() causes that refcount to become negative for the cpufreq driver after a suspend/resume cycle. This is not the only bad thing that happens there, however, because kobject_put() should only be called for the policy kobject at this point if the CPU is not the last one for that policy. Namely, if the given CPU is the last one for that policy, the policy kobject's refcount should be 1 at this point, as set by cpufreq_add_dev_interface(), and only needs to be dropped once for the kobject to go away. This actually happens under the cpu == 1 check, so it need not be done before by cpufreq_cpu_put(). On the other hand, if the given CPU is not the last one for that policy, this means that cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() has been called at least once for that policy and cpufreq_cpu_get() has been called for it too. To balance that cpufreq_cpu_get(), we need to call cpufreq_cpu_put() in that case. Thus, to fix the described problem and keep the reference counters balanced in both cases, move the cpufreq_cpu_get() call in __cpufreq_remove_dev() to the code path executed only for CPUs that share the policy with other CPUs. Reported-and-tested-by: NToralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
-
- 23 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dirk Brandewie 提交于
Change to using max P-state instead of max turbo P-state. This change resolves two issues. On a quiet system intel_pstate can fail to respond to a load change. On CPU SKUs that have a limited number of P-states and no turbo range intel_pstate fails to select the highest available P-state. This change is suitable for stable v3.9+ References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59481Reported-and-tested-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Reported-and-tested-by: dsmythies@telus.net Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 17 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
commit 2f7021a8 "cpufreq: protect 'policy->cpus' from offlining during __gov_queue_work()" caused a regression in CPU hotplug, because it lead to a deadlock between cpufreq governor worker thread and the CPU hotplug writer task. Lockdep splat corresponding to this deadlock is shown below: [ 60.277396] ====================================================== [ 60.277400] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 60.277407] 3.10.0-rc7-dbg-01385-g241fd04-dirty #1744 Not tainted [ 60.277411] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 60.277417] bash/2225 is trying to acquire lock: [ 60.277422] ((&(&j_cdbs->work)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff810621b5>] flush_work+0x5/0x280 [ 60.277444] but task is already holding lock: [ 60.277449] (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81042d8b>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x2b/0x60 [ 60.277465] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 60.277472] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 60.277477] -> #2 (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}: [ 60.277490] [<ffffffff810ac6d4>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x200 [ 60.277503] [<ffffffff815b6157>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x410 [ 60.277514] [<ffffffff81042cbc>] get_online_cpus+0x3c/0x60 [ 60.277522] [<ffffffff814b842a>] gov_queue_work+0x2a/0xb0 [ 60.277532] [<ffffffff814b7891>] cs_dbs_timer+0xc1/0xe0 [ 60.277543] [<ffffffff8106302d>] process_one_work+0x1cd/0x6a0 [ 60.277552] [<ffffffff81063d31>] worker_thread+0x121/0x3a0 [ 60.277560] [<ffffffff8106ae2b>] kthread+0xdb/0xe0 [ 60.277569] [<ffffffff815bb96c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 60.277580] -> #1 (&j_cdbs->timer_mutex){+.+...}: [ 60.277592] [<ffffffff810ac6d4>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x200 [ 60.277600] [<ffffffff815b6157>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x410 [ 60.277608] [<ffffffff814b785d>] cs_dbs_timer+0x8d/0xe0 [ 60.277616] [<ffffffff8106302d>] process_one_work+0x1cd/0x6a0 [ 60.277624] [<ffffffff81063d31>] worker_thread+0x121/0x3a0 [ 60.277633] [<ffffffff8106ae2b>] kthread+0xdb/0xe0 [ 60.277640] [<ffffffff815bb96c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 60.277649] -> #0 ((&(&j_cdbs->work)->work)){+.+...}: [ 60.277661] [<ffffffff810ab826>] __lock_acquire+0x1766/0x1d30 [ 60.277669] [<ffffffff810ac6d4>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x200 [ 60.277677] [<ffffffff810621ed>] flush_work+0x3d/0x280 [ 60.277685] [<ffffffff81062d8a>] __cancel_work_timer+0x8a/0x120 [ 60.277693] [<ffffffff81062e53>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20 [ 60.277701] [<ffffffff814b89d9>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x529/0x6f0 [ 60.277709] [<ffffffff814b76a7>] cs_cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x17/0x20 [ 60.277719] [<ffffffff814b5df8>] __cpufreq_governor+0x48/0x100 [ 60.277728] [<ffffffff814b6b80>] __cpufreq_remove_dev.isra.14+0x80/0x3c0 [ 60.277737] [<ffffffff815adc0d>] cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x38/0x4c [ 60.277747] [<ffffffff81071a4d>] notifier_call_chain+0x5d/0x110 [ 60.277759] [<ffffffff81071b0e>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10 [ 60.277768] [<ffffffff815a0a68>] _cpu_down+0x88/0x330 [ 60.277779] [<ffffffff815a0d46>] cpu_down+0x36/0x50 [ 60.277788] [<ffffffff815a2748>] store_online+0x98/0xd0 [ 60.277796] [<ffffffff81452a28>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30 [ 60.277806] [<ffffffff811d9edb>] sysfs_write_file+0xdb/0x150 [ 60.277818] [<ffffffff8116806d>] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1f0 [ 60.277826] [<ffffffff811686fc>] SyS_write+0x4c/0xa0 [ 60.277834] [<ffffffff815bbbbe>] tracesys+0xd0/0xd5 [ 60.277842] other info that might help us debug this: [ 60.277848] Chain exists of: (&(&j_cdbs->work)->work) --> &j_cdbs->timer_mutex --> cpu_hotplug.lock [ 60.277864] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 60.277869] CPU0 CPU1 [ 60.277873] ---- ---- [ 60.277877] lock(cpu_hotplug.lock); [ 60.277885] lock(&j_cdbs->timer_mutex); [ 60.277892] lock(cpu_hotplug.lock); [ 60.277900] lock((&(&j_cdbs->work)->work)); [ 60.277907] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 60.277915] 6 locks held by bash/2225: [ 60.277919] #0: (sb_writers#6){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81168173>] vfs_write+0x1c3/0x1f0 [ 60.277937] #1: (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811d9e3c>] sysfs_write_file+0x3c/0x150 [ 60.277954] #2: (s_active#61){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811d9ec3>] sysfs_write_file+0xc3/0x150 [ 60.277972] #3: (x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81024cf7>] cpu_hotplug_driver_lock+0x17/0x20 [ 60.277990] #4: (cpu_add_remove_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815a0d32>] cpu_down+0x22/0x50 [ 60.278007] #5: (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81042d8b>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x2b/0x60 [ 60.278023] stack backtrace: [ 60.278031] CPU: 3 PID: 2225 Comm: bash Not tainted 3.10.0-rc7-dbg-01385-g241fd04-dirty #1744 [ 60.278037] Hardware name: Acer Aspire 5741G /Aspire 5741G , BIOS V1.20 02/08/2011 [ 60.278042] ffffffff8204e110 ffff88014df6b9f8 ffffffff815b3d90 ffff88014df6ba38 [ 60.278055] ffffffff815b0a8d ffff880150ed3f60 ffff880150ed4770 3871c4002c8980b2 [ 60.278068] ffff880150ed4748 ffff880150ed4770 ffff880150ed3f60 ffff88014df6bb00 [ 60.278081] Call Trace: [ 60.278091] [<ffffffff815b3d90>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [ 60.278101] [<ffffffff815b0a8d>] print_circular_bug+0x2b6/0x2c5 [ 60.278111] [<ffffffff810ab826>] __lock_acquire+0x1766/0x1d30 [ 60.278123] [<ffffffff81067e08>] ? __kernel_text_address+0x58/0x80 [ 60.278134] [<ffffffff810ac6d4>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x200 [ 60.278142] [<ffffffff810621b5>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x280 [ 60.278151] [<ffffffff810621ed>] flush_work+0x3d/0x280 [ 60.278159] [<ffffffff810621b5>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x280 [ 60.278169] [<ffffffff810a9b14>] ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0x140 [ 60.278178] [<ffffffff81062d77>] ? __cancel_work_timer+0x77/0x120 [ 60.278188] [<ffffffff810a9cbd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfd/0x1c0 [ 60.278196] [<ffffffff81062d8a>] __cancel_work_timer+0x8a/0x120 [ 60.278206] [<ffffffff81062e53>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20 [ 60.278214] [<ffffffff814b89d9>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x529/0x6f0 [ 60.278225] [<ffffffff814b76a7>] cs_cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x17/0x20 [ 60.278234] [<ffffffff814b5df8>] __cpufreq_governor+0x48/0x100 [ 60.278244] [<ffffffff814b6b80>] __cpufreq_remove_dev.isra.14+0x80/0x3c0 [ 60.278255] [<ffffffff815adc0d>] cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x38/0x4c [ 60.278265] [<ffffffff81071a4d>] notifier_call_chain+0x5d/0x110 [ 60.278275] [<ffffffff81071b0e>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10 [ 60.278284] [<ffffffff815a0a68>] _cpu_down+0x88/0x330 [ 60.278292] [<ffffffff81024cf7>] ? cpu_hotplug_driver_lock+0x17/0x20 [ 60.278302] [<ffffffff815a0d46>] cpu_down+0x36/0x50 [ 60.278311] [<ffffffff815a2748>] store_online+0x98/0xd0 [ 60.278320] [<ffffffff81452a28>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30 [ 60.278329] [<ffffffff811d9edb>] sysfs_write_file+0xdb/0x150 [ 60.278337] [<ffffffff8116806d>] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1f0 [ 60.278347] [<ffffffff81185950>] ? fget_light+0x320/0x4b0 [ 60.278355] [<ffffffff811686fc>] SyS_write+0x4c/0xa0 [ 60.278364] [<ffffffff815bbbbe>] tracesys+0xd0/0xd5 [ 60.280582] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline The intention of that commit was to avoid warnings during CPU hotplug, which indicated that offline CPUs were getting IPIs from the cpufreq governor's work items. But the real root-cause of that problem was commit a66b2e50 (cpufreq: Preserve sysfs files across suspend/resume) because it totally skipped all the cpufreq callbacks during CPU hotplug in the suspend/resume path, and hence it never actually shut down the cpufreq governor's worker threads during CPU offline in the suspend/resume path. Reflecting back, the reason why we never suspected that commit as the root-cause earlier, was that the original issue was reported with just the halt command and nobody had brought in suspend/resume to the equation. The reason for _that_ in turn, as it turns out, is that earlier halt/shutdown was being done by disabling non-boot CPUs while tasks were frozen, just like suspend/resume.... but commit cf7df378 (reboot: migrate shutdown/reboot to boot cpu) which came somewhere along that very same time changed that logic: shutdown/halt no longer takes CPUs offline. Thus, the test-cases for reproducing the bug were vastly different and thus we went totally off the trail. Overall, it was one hell of a confusion with so many commits affecting each other and also affecting the symptoms of the problems in subtle ways. Finally, now since the original problematic commit (a66b2e50) has been completely reverted, revert this intermediate fix too (2f7021a8), to fix the CPU hotplug deadlock. Phew! Reported-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Reported-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NPeter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 15 7月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the drivers/cpufreq uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 [v2: leave 2nd lines of args misaligned as requested by Viresh] Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Paul Bolle 提交于
The Kconfig symbol CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX_DEBUGFS was renamed to ARM_S3C24XX_CPUFREQ_DEBUGFS in commit f023f8dd ("cpufreq: s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq"). But that commit missed one instance of its macro CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX_DEBUGFS. Rename it too. Signed-off-by: NPaul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
commit a66b2e (cpufreq: Preserve sysfs files across suspend/resume) has unfortunately caused several things in the cpufreq subsystem to break subtly after a suspend/resume cycle. The intention of that patch was to retain the file permissions of the cpufreq related sysfs files across suspend/resume. To achieve that, the commit completely removed the calls to cpufreq_add_dev() and __cpufreq_remove_dev() during suspend/resume transitions. But the problem is that those functions do 2 kinds of things: 1. Low-level initialization/tear-down that are critical to the correct functioning of cpufreq-core. 2. Kobject and sysfs related initialization/teardown. Ideally we should have reorganized the code to cleanly separate these two responsibilities, and skipped only the sysfs related parts during suspend/resume. Since we skipped the entire callbacks instead (which also included some CPU and cpufreq-specific critical components), cpufreq subsystem started behaving erratically after suspend/resume. So revert the commit to fix the regression. We'll revisit and address the original goal of that commit separately, since it involves quite a bit of careful code reorganization and appears to be non-trivial. (While reverting the commit, note that another commit f51e1eb6 (cpufreq: Fix cpufreq regression after suspend/resume) already reverted part of the original set of changes. So revert only the remaining ones). Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: NPaul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 04 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Commit 7c30ed ("cpufreq: make sure frequency transitions are serialized") interacts poorly with systems that have a single core freqency for all cores. On such systems we have a single policy for all cores with several CPUs. When we do a frequency transition the governor calls the pre and post change notifiers which causes cpufreq_notify_transition() per CPU. Since the policy is the same for all of them all CPUs after the first and the warnings added are generated by checking a per-policy flag the warnings will be triggered for all cores after the first. Fix this by allowing notifier to be called for n times. Where n is the number of cpus in policy->cpus. Reported-and-tested-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 01 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
Toralf Förster reported that the cpufreq ondemand governor behaves erratically (doesn't scale well) after a suspend/resume cycle. The problem was that the cpufreq subsystem's idea of the cpu frequencies differed from the actual frequencies set in the hardware after a suspend/resume cycle. Toralf bisected the problem to commit a66b2e50 (cpufreq: Preserve sysfs files across suspend/resume). Among other (harmless) things, that commit skipped the call to cpufreq_update_policy() in the resume path. But cpufreq_update_policy() plays an important role during resume, because it is responsible for checking if the BIOS changed the cpu frequencies behind our back and resynchronize the cpufreq subsystem's knowledge of the cpu frequencies, and update them accordingly. So, restore the call to cpufreq_update_policy() in the resume path to fix the cpufreq regression. Reported-and-tested-by: NToralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 28 6月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jacob Shin 提交于
Clear ->cur_policy when stopping a governor, or the ->cur_policy pointer may be stale on systems with have_governor_per_policy when a new policy is allocated due to CPU hotplug offline/online. [rjw: Changelog] Suggested-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NJacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Lan Tianyu 提交于
Commits fcf80582 (cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()) and aa77a527 (cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Don't set policy->related_cpus from .init()) changed the contents of the "related_cpus" sysfs attribute on systems where acpi-cpufreq is used and user space can't get the list of CPUs which are in the same hardware coordination CPU domain (provided by the ACPI AML method _PSD) via "related_cpus" any more. To make up for that loss add a new sysfs attribute "freqdomian_cpus" for the acpi-cpufreq driver which exposes the list of CPUs in the same domain regardless of whether it is coordinated by hardware or software. [rjw: Changelog, documentation] References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58761Reported-by: NJean-Philippe Halimi <jean-philippe.halimi@exascale-computing.eu> Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Whenever we are changing frequency of a cpu, we are calling PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers. They must be serialized. i.e. PRECHANGE or POSTCHANGE shouldn't be called twice contiguously. This can happen due to bugs in users of __cpufreq_driver_target() or actual cpufreq drivers who are sending these notifiers. This patch adds some protection against this. Now, we keep track of the last transaction and see if something went wrong. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jacob Shin 提交于
When initializing the default powersave_bias value, we need to first make sure that this policy is running the ondemand governor. Reported-and-tested-by: NTim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NJacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 24 6月, 2013 13 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both should be called or both shouldn't be. In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of calling notifiers is complete. This patch fixes it. Acked-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both should be called or both shouldn't be. In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of calling notifiers is complete. This patch fixes it. Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both should be called or both shouldn't be. In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of calling notifiers is complete. Omap driver was taking care of it well, but wasn't restoring freqs.new to freqs.old in some cases. I wasn't required to add code for it as moving PRECHANGE notifier down was a better option, so that we call it just before starting frequency transition. Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both should be called or both shouldn't be. In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of calling notifiers is complete. This patch fixes it. This also moves PRECHANGE notifier down so that we call it just before starting frequency transition. Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both should be called or both shouldn't be. In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of calling notifiers is complete. This patch fixes it. Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both should be called or both shouldn't be. In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of calling notifiers is complete. This patch fixes it. Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both should be called or both shouldn't be. In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of calling notifiers is complete. Davinci driver was taking care of it but frequency isn't restored to freqs.old. This patch fixes it. Acked-by: NSekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both should be called or both shouldn't be. In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of calling notifiers is complete. This patch fixes it. This also removes code setting policy->cur as this is also done by POSTCHANGE notifier. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e. either both should be called or both shouldn't be. In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of calling notifiers is complete. This patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both should be called or both shouldn't be. In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that the sequence of calling notifiers is complete. This patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old. This driver does take care of it, but the POSTCHANGE is called with freqs.new on errors too, which is incorrect, so fix it. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both should be called or both shouldn't be. In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that the sequence of calling notifiers is complete. This patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Heiko Stübner 提交于
Commit 50701588 (cpufreq: rename index as driver_data in cpufreq_frequency_table) renamed the index field to driver_data. But it seems some uses in the s3c2416 driver were forgotten. So convert the last index users to read driver_data. Signed-off-by: NHeiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 21 6月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
__cpufreq_notify_transition() is used only in cpufreq.c, make it static. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
There were a few noticeable formatting issues in core cpufreq code. This cleans them up to make code look better. The changes include: - Whitespace cleanup. - Rearrangements of code. - Multiline comments fixes. - Formatting changes to fit 80 columns. Copyright information in cpufreq.c is also updated to include my name for 2013. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Xiaoguang Chen 提交于
Cpufreq governors' stop and start operations should be carried out in sequence. Otherwise, there will be unexpected behavior, like in the example below. Suppose there are 4 CPUs and policy->cpu=CPU0, CPU1/2/3 are linked to CPU0. The normal sequence is: 1) Current governor is userspace. An application tries to set the governor to ondemand. It will call __cpufreq_set_policy() in which it will stop the userspace governor and then start the ondemand governor. 2) Current governor is userspace. The online of CPU3 runs on CPU0. It will call cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() in which it will first stop the userspace governor, and then start it again. If the sequence of the above two cases interleaves, it becomes: 1) Application stops userspace governor 2) Hotplug stops userspace governor which is a problem, because the governor shouldn't be stopped twice in a row. What happens next is: 3) Application starts ondemand governor 4) Hotplug starts a governor In step 4, the hotplug is supposed to start the userspace governor, but now the governor has been changed by the application to ondemand, so the ondemand governor is started once again, which is incorrect. The solution is to prevent policy governors from being stopped multiple times in a row. A governor should only be stopped once for one policy. After it has been stopped, no more governor stop operations should be executed. Also add a mutex to serialize governor operations. [rjw: Changelog. And you owe me a beverage of my choice.] Signed-off-by: NXiaoguang Chen <chenxg@marvell.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 19 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Userspace governor has got more code than what it needs for its functioning, so simplify it. Portions of code removed are: - Extra header files which aren't required anymore (rearrange them as well). - cpu_{max|min|cur|set}_freq, as they are always the same as policy->{max|min|cur}. - userspace_cpufreq_notifier_block as we don't need to set cpu_cur_freq anymore. - cpus_using_userspace_governor as it was for the notifier code. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 18 6月, 2013 9 次提交
-
-
由 Masanari Iida 提交于
Correct spelling typo in printk within various drivers. Signed-off-by: NMasanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com> Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This CPUFreq driver uses APIs from freq_table.c and so must select CPU_FREQ_TABLE. Acked-by: NJacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
currently Tegra cpufreq driver gets built based on ARCH_TEGRA, which doesn't depend on nor select CPU_FREQ itself, so: select CPU_FREQ_TABLE if CPU_FREQ ... isn't guaranteed to fire. The correct solution seems to be: * Add CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA_CPUFREQ to drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm. * Make that Kconfig option selct CPU_FREQ_TABLE. * Make that Kconfig option be def_bool ARCH_TEGRA. * Modify drivers/cpufreq/Makefile to build tegra-cpufreq.c based on that. * Remove all the cpufreq-related stuff from arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig. That way, tegra-cpufreq.c can't be built if !CPU_FREQ, and Tegra's cpufreq works the same way as all the other cpufreq drivers. This patch does it. Suggested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
CPUFreq driver of this platform uses APIs from freq_table.c and so must select CPU_FREQ_TABLE. Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: NHeiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
CPUFreq driver of this platform uses APIs from freq_table.c and so must select CPU_FREQ_TABLE. Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
CPUFreq driver of this platform uses APIs from freq_table.c and so must select CPU_FREQ_TABLE. Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Highbank cpufreq driver doesn't use any APIs from freq_table.c and so must not select CPU_FREQ_TABLE. Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: NMark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
CPUFreq driver of this platform uses APIs from freq_table.c and so must select CPU_FREQ_TABLE. Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
By mistake blackfin's cpufreq driver is enabled when CONFIG_BLACKFIN was present, whereas it should have been enabled only when CONFIG_BFIN_CPU_FREQ is present. Fix it. Acked-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 07 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Move cpufreq driver of powerpc platform to drivers/cpufreq. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-