1. 26 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      cpufreq: pxa2xx: initialize variables · 7264a2bb
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      gcc-3.8 correctly found that the variables set by find_freq_tables()
      are not initialized if this function is called on something other
      than a pxa2xx or pxa3xx:
      
      pxa2xx-cpufreq.c: In function 'pxa_verify_policy':
      pxa2xx-cpufreq.c:272:6: warning: 'pxa_freqs_table' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
      pxa2xx-cpufreq.c: In function 'pxa_set_target':
      pxa2xx-cpufreq.c:345:23: warning: 'pxa_freq_settings' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
      
      Rather than adding a bogus initialization that would let us
      get a little further before crashing, add an explicit BUG().
      We know that this code is designed to run on only these cpus,
      so this will fix the build warning and give a more helpful
      diagnostic if the code ever changes to run on other machines.
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      7264a2bb
  2. 08 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 02 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 16 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 25 9月, 2010 1 次提交
  6. 30 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 05 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  8. 13 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 21 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 12 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 05 6月, 2009 1 次提交
    • R
      [ARM] pxa: add vcc_core regulation for cpufreq on pxa2xx · 3dbeef23
      Robert Jarzmik 提交于
      Add voltage regulation capability to pxa2xx cpufreq
      driver. The cpufreq will ask for a "vcc_core" regulator to
      the regulator framework.
      
      If a regulator is found at probe time, it will be used with
      values specified in PXA270 Electrical, Mechanical, and
      Thermal Specifications.
      
      If not, it will be assumed for now that frequency change
      will work without voltage control. This assumes that the
      IPL/SPL installs sane values to an existing voltage
      regulator (ie. voltage high enough to support the full
      range).
      Signed-off-by: NRobert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
      Signed-off-by: NEric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
      3dbeef23
  12. 09 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • E
      [ARM] pxa: introduce pxa{25x,27x,300,320,930}.h for board usage · 51c62982
      Eric Miao 提交于
      Considering the header mess ATM, it is not always possible to include
      the correct header files within board code. Let's keep this simple:
      
        <mach/pxa25x.h>  - for pxa25x based platforms
        <mach/pxa27x.h>  - for pxa27x based platforms
        <mach/pxa300.h>  - for pxa300 based platforms
        <mach/pxa320.h>  - for pxa320 based platforms
        <mach/pxa930.h>  - for pxa930 based platforms
      
      NOTE:
      
      1. one header one board file, they are not compatible (i.e. they have
         conflicting definitions which won't compile if included together).
      
      2. Unless strictly necessary, the following header files are considered
         to be SoC files use _only_, and is not recommended to be included in
         board code:
      
          <mach/hardware.h>
          <mach/pxa-regs.h>
          <mach/pxa2xx-regs.h>
          <mach/pxa3xx-regs.h>
          <mach/mfp.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa2xx.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa25x.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa27x.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa3xx.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa300.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa320.h>
          <mach/mfp-pxa930.h>
      Signed-off-by: NEric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
      51c62982
  13. 02 12月, 2008 2 次提交
  14. 16 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 08 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  16. 07 8月, 2008 2 次提交
  17. 08 5月, 2008 2 次提交
  18. 01 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 17 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  20. 26 1月, 2008 2 次提交