- 10 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Krzysztof Kozlowski 提交于
SRAM bindings for various SoCs, using the mmio-sram genalloc API, are spread over different places - per SoC vendor. Since all of these are quite similar (they depend on mmio-sram) move them to a common place. Suggested-by: NRob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Acked-by: NMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NHeiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
-
- 18 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Zapolskiy 提交于
This change adds functionality to operate on reserved SRAM partitions described in device tree file. Two partition properties are added, "pool" and "export", the first one allows to share a specific partition for usage by a kernel consumer in the same manner as it is done for the whole SRAM device, and "export" property provides access to some SRAM area from userspace over sysfs interface. Practically it is possible to specify both properties for an SRAM partition, however simultaneous access from a kernel consumer and from userspace is not serialized, but still the combination may be useful for debugging purpose. The change opens the following scenarios of SRAM usage: * updates in a particular SRAM area specified by offset and size are done by bootloader, then this information is utilized by the kernel, * a particular SRAM area is rw accessed from userspace, the stored data is persistent on soft reboots, * a device driver secures SRAM area for its purposes, * etc. Note, strictly speaking the added optional properties describe policy of SRAM usage, rather than hardware, but here the policy mostly resembles flash partitions in devicetree, which is undoubtedly a very popular option but it does not describe hardware. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 01 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heiko Stübner 提交于
Some SoCs need parts of their sram for special purposes. So while being part of the peripheral, it should not be part of the genpool controlling the sram. Therefore add the option to define reserved regions as subnodes of the sram-node similar to defining reserved global memory regions. Originally Suggested-by: NRob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> Using subnodes for reserved regions Suggested-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NHeiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Tested-by: NUlrich Prinz <ulrich.prinz@googlemail.com> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 30 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Philipp Zabel 提交于
This driver requests and remaps a memory region as configured in the device tree. It serves memory from this region via the genalloc API. It optionally enables the SRAM clock. Other drivers can retrieve the genalloc pool from a phandle pointing to this drivers' device node in the device tree. The allocation granularity is hard-coded to 32 bytes for now, to make the SRAM driver useful for the 6502 remoteproc driver. There is overhead for bigger SRAMs, where only a much coarser allocation granularity is needed: At 32 bytes minimum allocation size, a 256 KiB SRAM needs a 1 KiB bitmap to track allocations. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix Kconfig text, make sram_init static] Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Tested-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com> Cc: Javier Martin <javier.martin@vista-silicon.com> Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@ti.com> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-