1. 04 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      rxrpc: Use pr_<level> and pr_fmt, reduce object size a few KB · 9b6d5398
      Joe Perches 提交于
      Use the more common kernel logging style and reduce object size.
      
      The logging message prefix changes from a mixture of
      "RxRPC:" and "RXRPC:" to "af_rxrpc: ".
      
      $ size net/rxrpc/built-in.o*
         text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
        64172	   1972	   8304	  74448	  122d0	net/rxrpc/built-in.o.new
        67512	   1972	   8304	  77788	  12fdc	net/rxrpc/built-in.o.old
      
      Miscellanea:
      
      o Consolidate the ASSERT macros to use a single pr_err call with
        decimal and hexadecimal output and a stringified #OP argument
      Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9b6d5398
  2. 28 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 12 4月, 2016 10 次提交
  4. 14 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 05 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 04 3月, 2016 12 次提交
  7. 27 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  8. 04 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 02 12月, 2015 1 次提交
    • E
      net: rename SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE and SOCK_ASYNC_WAITDATA · 9cd3e072
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      This patch is a cleanup to make following patch easier to
      review.
      
      Goal is to move SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE and SOCK_ASYNC_WAITDATA
      from (struct socket)->flags to a (struct socket_wq)->flags
      to benefit from RCU protection in sock_wake_async()
      
      To ease backports, we rename both constants.
      
      Two new helpers, sk_set_bit(int nr, struct sock *sk)
      and sk_clear_bit(int net, struct sock *sk) are added so that
      following patch can change their implementation.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9cd3e072
  10. 01 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 25 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Correctly handle ack at end of client call transmit phase · 33c40e24
      David Howells 提交于
      Normally, the transmit phase of a client call is implicitly ack'd by the
      reception of the first data packet of the response being received.
      However, if a security negotiation happens, the transmit phase, if it is
      entirely contained in a single packet, may get an ack packet in response
      and then may get aborted due to security negotiation failure.
      
      Because the client has shifted state to RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_AWAIT_REPLY due
      to having transmitted all the data, the code that handles processing of the
      received ack packet doesn't note the hard ack the data packet.
      
      The following abort packet in the case of security negotiation failure then
      incurs an assertion failure when it tries to drain the Tx queue because the
      hard ack state is out of sync (hard ack means the packets have been
      processed and can be discarded by the sender; a soft ack means that the
      packets are received but could still be discarded and rerequested by the
      receiver).
      
      To fix this, we should record the hard ack we received for the ack packet.
      
      The assertion failure looks like:
      
      	RxRPC: Assertion failed
      	1 <= 0 is false
      	0x1 <= 0x0 is false
      	------------[ cut here ]------------
      	kernel BUG at ../net/rxrpc/ar-ack.c:431!
      	...
      	RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa006857b>]  [<ffffffffa006857b>] rxrpc_rotate_tx_window+0xbc/0x131 [af_rxrpc]
      	...
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      33c40e24
  12. 07 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep... · d0164adc
      Mel Gorman 提交于
      mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd
      
      __GFP_WAIT has been used to identify atomic context in callers that hold
      spinlocks or are in interrupts.  They are expected to be high priority and
      have access one of two watermarks lower than "min" which can be referred
      to as the "atomic reserve".  __GFP_HIGH users get access to the first
      lower watermark and can be called the "high priority reserve".
      
      Over time, callers had a requirement to not block when fallback options
      were available.  Some have abused __GFP_WAIT leading to a situation where
      an optimisitic allocation with a fallback option can access atomic
      reserves.
      
      This patch uses __GFP_ATOMIC to identify callers that are truely atomic,
      cannot sleep and have no alternative.  High priority users continue to use
      __GFP_HIGH.  __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM identifies callers that can sleep and
      are willing to enter direct reclaim.  __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to identify
      callers that want to wake kswapd for background reclaim.  __GFP_WAIT is
      redefined as a caller that is willing to enter direct reclaim and wake
      kswapd for background reclaim.
      
      This patch then converts a number of sites
      
      o __GFP_ATOMIC is used by callers that are high priority and have memory
        pools for those requests. GFP_ATOMIC uses this flag.
      
      o Callers that have a limited mempool to guarantee forward progress clear
        __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but keep __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. bio allocations fall
        into this category where kswapd will still be woken but atomic reserves
        are not used as there is a one-entry mempool to guarantee progress.
      
      o Callers that are checking if they are non-blocking should use the
        helper gfpflags_allow_blocking() where possible. This is because
        checking for __GFP_WAIT as was done historically now can trigger false
        positives. Some exceptions like dm-crypt.c exist where the code intent
        is clearer if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used instead of the helper due to
        flag manipulations.
      
      o Callers that built their own GFP flags instead of starting with GFP_KERNEL
        and friends now also need to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.
      
      The first key hazard to watch out for is callers that removed __GFP_WAIT
      and was depending on access to atomic reserves for inconspicuous reasons.
      In some cases it may be appropriate for them to use __GFP_HIGH.
      
      The second key hazard is callers that assembled their own combination of
      GFP flags instead of starting with something like GFP_KERNEL.  They may
      now wish to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.  It's almost certainly harmless
      if it's missed in most cases as other activity will wake kswapd.
      Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
      Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
      Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
      Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
      Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
      Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d0164adc
  13. 21 10月, 2015 1 次提交
    • D
      KEYS: Merge the type-specific data with the payload data · 146aa8b1
      David Howells 提交于
      Merge the type-specific data with the payload data into one four-word chunk
      as it seems pointless to keep them separate.
      
      Use user_key_payload() for accessing the payloads of overloaded
      user-defined keys.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
      cc: ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org
      cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
      cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
      cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
      cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
      cc: linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
      146aa8b1
  14. 21 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 11 5月, 2015 2 次提交
  16. 12 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 01 4月, 2015 3 次提交