Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 16 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 09 8月, 2019 1 次提交
    • A
      compat_ioctl: pppoe: fix PPPOEIOCSFWD handling · e6e9bcef
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit 055d88242a6046a1ceac3167290f054c72571cd9 ]

Support for handling the PPPOEIOCSFWD ioctl in compat mode was added in
linux-2.5.69 along with hundreds of other commands, but was always broken
sincen only the structure is compatible, but the command number is not,
due to the size being sizeof(size_t), or at first sizeof(sizeof((struct
sockaddr_pppox)), which is different on 64-bit architectures.

Guillaume Nault adds:

  And the implementation was broken until 2016 (see 29e73269 ("pppoe:
  fix reference counting in PPPoE proxy")), and nobody ever noticed. I
  should probably have removed this ioctl entirely instead of fixing it.
  Clearly, it has never been used.

Fix it by adding a compat_ioctl handler for all pppoe variants that
translates the command number and then calls the regular ioctl function.

All other ioctl commands handled by pppoe are compatible between 32-bit
and 64-bit, and require compat_ptr() conversion.

This should apply to all stable kernels.
Acked-by: NGuillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      e6e9bcef
  5. 07 8月, 2019 9 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race leading to fs corruption after transaction abort · 50d70040
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      commit cb2d3daddbfb6318d170e79aac1f7d5e4d49f0d7 upstream.

When one transaction is finishing its commit, it is possible for another
transaction to start and enter its initial commit phase as well. If the
first ends up getting aborted, we have a small time window where the second
transaction commit does not notice that the previous transaction aborted
and ends up committing, writing a superblock that points to btrees that
reference extent buffers (nodes and leafs) that were not persisted to disk.
The consequence is that after mounting the filesystem again, we will be
unable to load some btree nodes/leafs, either because the content on disk
is either garbage (or just zeroes) or corresponds to the old content of a
previouly COWed or deleted node/leaf, resulting in the well known error
messages "parent transid verify failed on ...".
The following sequence diagram illustrates how this can happen.

        CPU 1                                           CPU 2

 <at transaction N>

 btrfs_commit_transaction()
   (...)
   --> sets transaction state to
       TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED
   --> sets fs_info->running_transaction
       to NULL

                                                    (...)
                                                    btrfs_start_transaction()
                                                      start_transaction()
                                                        wait_current_trans()
                                                          --> returns immediately
                                                              because
                                                              fs_info->running_transaction
                                                              is NULL
                                                        join_transaction()
                                                          --> creates transaction N + 1
                                                          --> sets
                                                              fs_info->running_transaction
                                                              to transaction N + 1
                                                          --> adds transaction N + 1 to
                                                              the fs_info->trans_list list
                                                        --> returns transaction handle
                                                            pointing to the new
                                                            transaction N + 1
                                                    (...)

                                                    btrfs_sync_file()
                                                      btrfs_start_transaction()
                                                        --> returns handle to
                                                            transaction N + 1
                                                      (...)

   btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction()
     --> writeback of some extent
         buffer fails, returns an
	 error
   btrfs_handle_fs_error()
     --> sets BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR in
         fs_info->fs_state
   --> jumps to label "scrub_continue"
   cleanup_transaction()
     btrfs_abort_transaction(N)
       --> sets BTRFS_FS_STATE_TRANS_ABORTED
           flag in fs_info->fs_state
       --> sets aborted field in the
           transaction and transaction
	   handle structures, for
           transaction N only
     --> removes transaction from the
         list fs_info->trans_list
                                                      btrfs_commit_transaction(N + 1)
                                                        --> transaction N + 1 was not
							    aborted, so it proceeds
                                                        (...)
                                                        --> sets the transaction's state
                                                            to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START
                                                        --> does not find the previous
                                                            transaction (N) in the
                                                            fs_info->trans_list, so it
                                                            doesn't know that transaction
                                                            was aborted, and the commit
                                                            of transaction N + 1 proceeds
                                                        (...)
                                                        --> sets transaction N + 1 state
                                                            to TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED
                                                        btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction()
                                                          --> succeeds writing all extent
                                                              buffers created in the
                                                              transaction N + 1
                                                        write_all_supers()
                                                           --> succeeds
                                                           --> we now have a superblock on
                                                               disk that points to trees
                                                               that refer to at least one
                                                               extent buffer that was
                                                               never persisted

So fix this by updating the transaction commit path to check if the flag
BTRFS_FS_STATE_TRANS_ABORTED is set on fs_info->fs_state if after setting
the transaction to the TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START we do not find any previous
transaction in the fs_info->trans_list. If the flag is set, just fail the
transaction commit with -EROFS, as we do in other places. The exact error
code for the previous transaction abort was already logged and reported.

Fixes: 49b25e05 ("btrfs: enhance transaction abort infrastructure")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      50d70040
    • F
      Btrfs: fix incremental send failure after deduplication · 009d7a4e
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      commit b4f9a1a87a48c255bb90d8a6c3d555a1abb88130 upstream.

When doing an incremental send operation we can fail if we previously did
deduplication operations against a file that exists in both snapshots. In
that case we will fail the send operation with -EIO and print a message
to dmesg/syslog like the following:

  BTRFS error (device sdc): Send: inconsistent snapshot, found updated \
  extent for inode 257 without updated inode item, send root is 258, \
  parent root is 257

This requires that we deduplicate to the same file in both snapshots for
the same amount of times on each snapshot. The issue happens because a
deduplication only updates the iversion of an inode and does not update
any other field of the inode, therefore if we deduplicate the file on
each snapshot for the same amount of time, the inode will have the same
iversion value (stored as the "sequence" field on the inode item) on both
snapshots, therefore it will be seen as unchanged between in the send
snapshot while there are new/updated/deleted extent items when comparing
to the parent snapshot. This makes the send operation return -EIO and
print an error message.

Example reproducer:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  # Create our first file. The first half of the file has several 64Kb
  # extents while the second half as a single 512Kb extent.
  $ xfs_io -f -s -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 -b 64K 0 512K" /mnt/foo
  $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 512K 512K" /mnt/foo

  # Create the base snapshot and the parent send stream from it.
  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
  $ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/mysnap1

  # Create our second file, that has exactly the same data as the first
  # file.
  $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 0 1M" /mnt/bar

  # Create the second snapshot, used for the incremental send, before
  # doing the file deduplication.
  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2

  # Now before creating the incremental send stream:
  #
  # 1) Deduplicate into a subrange of file foo in snapshot mysnap1. This
  #    will drop several extent items and add a new one, also updating
  #    the inode's iversion (sequence field in inode item) by 1, but not
  #    any other field of the inode;
  #
  # 2) Deduplicate into a different subrange of file foo in snapshot
  #    mysnap2. This will replace an extent item with a new one, also
  #    updating the inode's iversion by 1 but not any other field of the
  #    inode.
  #
  # After these two deduplication operations, the inode items, for file
  # foo, are identical in both snapshots, but we have different extent
  # items for this inode in both snapshots. We want to check this doesn't
  # cause send to fail with an error or produce an incorrect stream.

  $ xfs_io -r -c "dedupe /mnt/bar 0 0 512K" /mnt/mysnap1/foo
  $ xfs_io -r -c "dedupe /mnt/bar 512K 512K 512K" /mnt/mysnap2/foo

  # Create the incremental send stream.
  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/mysnap2
  ERROR: send ioctl failed with -5: Input/output error

This issue started happening back in 2015 when deduplication was updated
to not update the inode's ctime and mtime and update only the iversion.
Back then we would hit a BUG_ON() in send, but later in 2016 send was
updated to return -EIO and print the error message instead of doing the
BUG_ON().

A test case for fstests follows soon.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203933
Fixes: 1c919a5e ("btrfs: don't update mtime/ctime on deduped inodes")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      009d7a4e
    • Z
      coda: add error handling for fget · cf3ddc00
      由 Zhouyang Jia 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit 02551c23bcd85f0c68a8259c7b953d49d44f86af ]

When fget fails, the lack of error-handling code may cause unexpected
results.

This patch adds error-handling code after calling fget.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2514ec03df9c33b86e56748513267a80dd8004d9.1558117389.git.jaharkes@cs.cmu.eduSigned-off-by: NZhouyang Jia <jiazhouyang09@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Cc: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@iki.fi>
Cc: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Cc: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      cf3ddc00
    • J
      ceph: return -ERANGE if virtual xattr value didn't fit in buffer · c47e2552
      由 Jeff Layton 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit 3b421018f48c482bdc9650f894aa1747cf90e51d ]

The getxattr manpage states that we should return ERANGE if the
destination buffer size is too small to hold the value.
ceph_vxattrcb_layout does this internally, but we should be doing
this for all vxattrs.

Fix the only caller of getxattr_cb to check the returned size
against the buffer length and return -ERANGE if it doesn't fit.
Drop the same check in ceph_vxattrcb_layout and just rely on the
caller to handle it.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: N"Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      c47e2552
    • A
      ceph: fix improper use of smp_mb__before_atomic() · b39c377e
      由 Andrea Parri 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit 749607731e26dfb2558118038c40e9c0c80d23b5 ]

This barrier only applies to the read-modify-write operations; in
particular, it does not apply to the atomic64_set() primitive.

Replace the barrier with an smp_mb().

Fixes: fdd4e158 ("ceph: rework dcache readdir")
Reported-by: N"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
Reviewed-by: N"Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      b39c377e
    • R
      cifs: Fix a race condition with cifs_echo_request · d29fbf67
      由 Ronnie Sahlberg 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit f2caf901c1b7ce65f9e6aef4217e3241039db768 ]

There is a race condition with how we send (or supress and don't send)
smb echos that will cause the client to incorrectly think the
server is unresponsive and thus needs to be reconnected.

Summary of the race condition:
 1) Daisy chaining scheduling creates a gap.
 2) If traffic comes unfortunate shortly after
    the last echo, the planned echo is suppressed.
 3) Due to the gap, the next echo transmission is delayed
    until after the timeout, which is set hard to twice
    the echo interval.

This is fixed by changing the timeouts from 2 to three times the echo interval.

Detailed description of the bug: https://lutz.donnerhacke.de/eng/Blog/Groundhog-Day-with-SMB-remountSigned-off-by: NRonnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      d29fbf67
    • Q
      btrfs: qgroup: Don't hold qgroup_ioctl_lock in btrfs_qgroup_inherit() · f96c70fa
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit e88439debd0a7f969b3ddba6f147152cd0732676 ]

[BUG]
Lockdep will report the following circular locking dependency:

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.2.0-rc2-custom #24 Tainted: G           O
  ------------------------------------------------------
  btrfs/8631 is trying to acquire lock:
  000000002536438c (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock#2){+.+.}, at: btrfs_qgroup_inherit+0x40/0x620 [btrfs]

  but task is already holding lock:
  000000003d52cc23 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}, at: create_pending_snapshot+0x8b6/0xe60 [btrfs]

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}:
         __mutex_lock+0x76/0x940
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
         btrfs_commit_transaction+0x475/0xa00 [btrfs]
         btrfs_commit_super+0x71/0x80 [btrfs]
         close_ctree+0x2bd/0x320 [btrfs]
         btrfs_put_super+0x15/0x20 [btrfs]
         generic_shutdown_super+0x72/0x110
         kill_anon_super+0x18/0x30
         btrfs_kill_super+0x16/0xa0 [btrfs]
         deactivate_locked_super+0x3a/0x80
         deactivate_super+0x51/0x60
         cleanup_mnt+0x3f/0x80
         __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20
         task_work_run+0x94/0xb0
         exit_to_usermode_loop+0xd8/0xe0
         do_syscall_64+0x210/0x240
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

  -> #1 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}:
         __mutex_lock+0x76/0x940
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
         btrfs_commit_transaction+0x40d/0xa00 [btrfs]
         btrfs_quota_enable+0x2da/0x730 [btrfs]
         btrfs_ioctl+0x2691/0x2b40 [btrfs]
         do_vfs_ioctl+0xa9/0x6d0
         ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x20
         do_syscall_64+0x65/0x240
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

  -> #0 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock#2){+.+.}:
         lock_acquire+0xa7/0x190
         __mutex_lock+0x76/0x940
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
         btrfs_qgroup_inherit+0x40/0x620 [btrfs]
         create_pending_snapshot+0x9d7/0xe60 [btrfs]
         create_pending_snapshots+0x94/0xb0 [btrfs]
         btrfs_commit_transaction+0x415/0xa00 [btrfs]
         btrfs_mksubvol+0x496/0x4e0 [btrfs]
         btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x174/0x180 [btrfs]
         btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x11c/0x180 [btrfs]
         btrfs_ioctl+0xa90/0x2b40 [btrfs]
         do_vfs_ioctl+0xa9/0x6d0
         ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x20
         do_syscall_64+0x65/0x240
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock#2 --> &fs_info->reloc_mutex --> &fs_info->tree_log_mutex

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0                    CPU1
         ----                    ----
    lock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex);
                                 lock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
                                 lock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex);
    lock(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock#2);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  6 locks held by btrfs/8631:
   #0: 00000000ed8f23f6 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x28/0x60
   #1: 000000009fb1597a (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10/1){+.+.}, at: btrfs_mksubvol+0x70/0x4e0 [btrfs]
   #2: 0000000088c5ad88 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}, at: btrfs_mksubvol+0x128/0x4e0 [btrfs]
   #3: 000000009606fc3e (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x37a/0x520 [btrfs]
   #4: 00000000f82bbdf5 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}, at: btrfs_commit_transaction+0x40d/0xa00 [btrfs]
   #5: 000000003d52cc23 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}, at: create_pending_snapshot+0x8b6/0xe60 [btrfs]

[CAUSE]
Due to the delayed subvolume creation, we need to call
btrfs_qgroup_inherit() inside commit transaction code, with a lot of
other mutex hold.
This hell of lock chain can lead to above problem.

[FIX]
On the other hand, we don't really need to hold qgroup_ioctl_lock if
we're in the context of create_pending_snapshot().
As in that context, we're the only one being able to modify qgroup.

All other qgroup functions which needs qgroup_ioctl_lock are either
holding a transaction handle, or will start a new transaction:
  Functions will start a new transaction():
  * btrfs_quota_enable()
  * btrfs_quota_disable()
  Functions hold a transaction handler:
  * btrfs_add_qgroup_relation()
  * btrfs_del_qgroup_relation()
  * btrfs_create_qgroup()
  * btrfs_remove_qgroup()
  * btrfs_limit_qgroup()
  * btrfs_qgroup_inherit() call inside create_subvol()

So we have a higher level protection provided by transaction, thus we
don't need to always hold qgroup_ioctl_lock in btrfs_qgroup_inherit().

Only the btrfs_qgroup_inherit() call in create_subvol() needs to hold
qgroup_ioctl_lock, while the btrfs_qgroup_inherit() call in
create_pending_snapshot() is already protected by transaction.

So the fix is to detect the context by checking
trans->transaction->state.
If we're at TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING, then we're in commit transaction
context and no need to get the mutex.
Reported-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      f96c70fa
    • D
      btrfs: fix minimum number of chunk errors for DUP · d9245dab
      由 David Sterba 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit 0ee5f8ae082e1f675a2fb6db601c31ac9958a134 ]

The list of profiles in btrfs_chunk_max_errors lists DUP as a profile
DUP able to tolerate 1 device missing. Though this profile is special
with 2 copies, it still needs the device, unlike the others.

Looking at the history of changes, thre's no clear reason why DUP is
there, functions were refactored and blocks of code merged to one
helper.

d20983b4 Btrfs: fix writing data into the seed filesystem
  - factor code to a helper

de11cc12 Btrfs: don't pre-allocate btrfs bio
  - unrelated change, DUP still in the list with max errors 1

a236aed1 Btrfs: Deal with failed writes in mirrored configurations
  - introduced the max errors, leaves DUP and RAID1 in the same group
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      d9245dab
    • R
      fs/adfs: super: fix use-after-free bug · a093208b
      由 Russell King 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit 5808b14a1f52554de612fee85ef517199855e310 ]

Fix a use-after-free bug during filesystem initialisation, where we
access the disc record (which is stored in a buffer) after we have
released the buffer.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      a093208b
  7. 04 8月, 2019 8 次提交
  9. 31 7月, 2019 11 次提交
  11. 28 7月, 2019 5 次提交
    • T
      ext4: allow directory holes · 3a17ca86
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      commit 4e19d6b65fb4fc42e352ce9883649e049da14743 upstream.

The largedir feature was intended to allow ext4 directories to have
unmapped directory blocks (e.g., directory holes).  And so the
released e2fsprogs no longer enforces this for largedir file systems;
however, the corresponding change to the kernel-side code was not made.

This commit fixes this oversight.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      3a17ca86
    • R
      ext4: use jbd2_inode dirty range scoping · caa4e082
      由 Ross Zwisler 提交于 
      commit 73131fbb003b3691cfcf9656f234b00da497fcd6 upstream.

Use the newly introduced jbd2_inode dirty range scoping to prevent us
from waiting forever when trying to complete a journal transaction.
Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      caa4e082
    • R
      jbd2: introduce jbd2_inode dirty range scoping · af3812b6
      由 Ross Zwisler 提交于 
      commit 6ba0e7dc64a5adcda2fbe65adc466891795d639e upstream.

Currently both journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() operate on the entire address space
of each of the inodes associated with a given journal entry.  The
consequence of this is that if we have an inode where we are constantly
appending dirty pages we can end up waiting for an indefinite amount of
time in journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() while we wait for all the
pages under writeback to be written out.

The easiest way to cause this type of workload is do just dd from
/dev/zero to a file until it fills the entire filesystem.  This can
cause journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() to wait for the duration of
the entire dd operation.

We can improve this situation by scoping each of the inode dirty ranges
associated with a given transaction.  We do this via the jbd2_inode
structure so that the scoping is contained within jbd2 and so that it
follows the lifetime and locking rules for that structure.

This allows us to limit the writeback & wait in
journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() respectively to the dirty range for
a given struct jdb2_inode, keeping us from waiting forever if the inode
in question is still being appended to.
Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      af3812b6
    • T
      ext4: enforce the immutable flag on open files · c9ea4620
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      commit 02b016ca7f99229ae6227e7b2fc950c4e140d74a upstream.

According to the chattr man page, "a file with the 'i' attribute
cannot be modified..."  Historically, this was only enforced when the
file was opened, per the rest of the description, "... and the file
can not be opened in write mode".

There is general agreement that we should standardize all file systems
to prevent modifications even for files that were opened at the time
the immutable flag is set.  Eventually, a change to enforce this at
the VFS layer should be landing in mainline.  Until then, enforce this
at the ext4 level to prevent xfstests generic/553 from failing.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      c9ea4620
    • D
      ext4: don't allow any modifications to an immutable file · 29171e82
      由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于 
      commit 2e53840362771c73eb0a5ff71611507e64e8eecd upstream.

Don't allow any modifications to a file that's marked immutable, which
means that we have to flush all the writable pages to make the readonly
and we have to check the setattr/setflags parameters more closely.
Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      29171e82
  13. 26 7月, 2019 5 次提交