- 30 5月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When a fresh transaction begins, the tree mod log must be clean. Users of the tree modification log must ensure they never span across transaction boundaries. We reset the sequence to 0 in this safe situation to make absolutely sure overflow can't happen. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 19 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Added in commit 49b25e05 ("btrfs: enhance transaction abort infrastructure") Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 13 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
49b25e05 introduced a use-after-free bug that caused spurious -EIO's to be returned. Do the check before we free the transaction. Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
o For space info, the type of space info is useful for debug. o For transaction handle, its transid is useful. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 27 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
The two helper functions commit_cowonly_roots() and create_pending_snapshot() failed to check the return value from btrfs_cow_block(), which could at least in theory fail with -ENOSPC from btrfs_alloc_free_block(). This commit adds the missing checks. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 22 3月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
btrfs currently handles most errors with BUG_ON. This patch is a work-in- progress but aims to handle most errors other than internal logic errors and ENOMEM more gracefully. This iteration prevents most crashes but can run into lockups with the page lock on occasion when the timing "works out." Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
Commit cb1b69f4 (Btrfs: forced readonly when btrfs_drop_snapshot() fails) made btrfs_drop_snapshot return void because there were no callers checking the return value. That is the wrong order to handle error propogation since the caller will have no idea that an error has occured and continue on as if nothing went wrong. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
- 24 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The enospc tracing code added some interesting uses of u64 pointer casts. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This allows us to gracefully continue if we aren't able to insert directory items, both for normal files/dirs and snapshots. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This in addition to a script in my btrfs-tracing tree will help track down space leaks when we're getting space left over in block groups on umount. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Btrfs tries to batch extent allocation tree changes to improve performance and reduce metadata trashing. But it doesn't allocate new metadata chunks while it is doing allocations for the extent allocation tree. This commit changes the delayed refence code to do chunk allocations if we're getting low on room. It prevents crashes and improves performance. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 04 1月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Now that we may be holding back delayed refs for a limited period, we might end up having no runnable delayed refs. Without this commit, we'd do busy waiting in that thread until another (runnable) ref arives. Instead, we're detecting this situation and use a waitqueue, such that we only try to run more refs after a) another runnable ref was added or b) delayed refs are no longer held back Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Sequence numbers are needed to reconstruct the backrefs of a given extent to a certain point in time. The total set of backrefs consist of the set of backrefs recorded on disk plus the enqueued delayed refs for it that existed at that moment. This patch also adds a list that records all delayed refs which are currently in the process of being added. When walking all refs of an extent in btrfs_find_all_roots(), we freeze the current state of delayed refs, honor anythinh up to this point and prevent processing newer delayed refs to assert consistency. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 22 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Add a for_cow parameter to add_delayed_*_ref and pass the appropriate value from every call site. The for_cow parameter will later on be used to determine if a ref will change anything with respect to qgroups. Delayed refs coming from relocation are always counted as for_cow, as they don't change subvol quota. Also pass in the fs_info for later use. btrfs_find_all_roots() will use this as an optimization, as changes that are for_cow will not change anything with respect to which root points to a certain leaf. Thus, we don't need to add the current sequence number to those delayed refs. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 15 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
The btrfs snapshotting code requires that once a root has been snapshotted, we don't change it during a commit. But there are two cases to lead to tree corruptions: 1) multi-thread snapshots can commit serveral snapshots in a transaction, and this may change the src root when processing the following pending snapshots, which lead to the former snapshots corruptions; 2) the free inode cache was changing the roots when it root the cache, which lead to corruptions. This fixes things by making sure we force COW the block after we create a snapshot during commiting a transaction, then any changes to the roots will result in COW, and we get all the fs roots and snapshot roots to be consistent. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 11 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We can not do flushable reservation for the relocation when we create snapshot, because it may make the transaction commit task and the flush task wait for each other and the deadlock happens. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 06 11月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
While we're allocating ram for a new transaction, we drop our spinlock. When we get the lock back, we do check to see if a transaction started while we slept, but we don't check to make sure it isn't blocked because a commit has already started. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Failure testing was tripping up over stale PageError bits in metadata pages. If we have an io error on a block, and later on end up reusing it, nobody ever clears PageError on those pages. During commit, we'll find PageError and think we had trouble writing the block, which will lead to aborts and other problems. This changes clean_tree_block and the btrfs writepage code to clear the PageError bit. In both cases we're either completely done with the page or the page has good stuff and the error bit is no longer valid. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
fs_info has now ~9kb, more than fits into one page. This will cause mount failure when memory is too fragmented. Top space consumers are super block structures super_copy and super_for_commit, ~2.8kb each. Allocate them dynamically. fs_info will be ~3.5kb. (measured on x86_64) Add a wrapper for freeing fs_info and all of it's dynamically allocated members. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 20 10月, 2011 9 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Currently btrfs_block_rsv_check does 2 things, it will either refill a block reserve like in the truncate or refill case, or it will check to see if there is enough space in the global reserve and possibly refill it. However because of overcommit we could be well overcommitting ourselves just to try and refill the global reserve, when really we should just be committing the transaction. So breack this out into btrfs_block_rsv_refill and btrfs_block_rsv_check. Refill will try to reserve more metadata if it can and btrfs_block_rsv_check will not, it will only tell you if the factor of the total space is still reserved. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We started setting trans->block_rsv = NULL to allow the delayed refs flushing stuff to use the right block_rsv and then just made btrfs_trans_release_metadata() unconditionally use the trans block rsv. The problem with this is we need to reserve some space in the transaction and then migrate it to the global block rsv, so we need to be able to free that out properly. So instead just move btrfs_trans_release_metadata() before the delayed ref flushing and use trans->block_rsv for the freeing. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Some users have requested this and I've found I needed a way to disable cache loading without actually clearing the cache, so introduce the no_space_cache option. Before we check the super blocks cache generation field and if it was populated we always turned space caching on. Now we check this and set the space cache option on, and then parse the mount options so that if we want it off it get's turned off. Then we check the mount option all the places we do the caching work instead of checking the super's cache generation. This makes things more consistent and lets us turn space caching off. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
While looking for a performance regression a user was complaining about, I noticed that we had a regression with the varmail test of filebench. This was introduced by 0d10ee2e which keeps us from calling writepages in writepage. This is a correct change, however it happens to help the varmail test because we write out in larger chunks. This is largly to do with how we write out dirty pages for each transaction. If you run filebench with load varmail set $dir=/mnt/btrfs-test run 60 prior to this patch you would get ~1420 ops/second, but with the patch you get ~1200 ops/second. This is a 16% decrease. So since we know the range of dirty pages we want to write out, don't write out in one page chunks, write out in ranges. So to do this we call filemap_fdatawrite_range() on the range of bytes. Then we convert the DIRTY extents to NEED_WAIT extents. When we then call btrfs_wait_marked_extents() we only have to filemap_fdatawait_range() on that range and clear the NEED_WAIT extents. This doesn't get us back to our original speeds, but I've been seeing ~1380 ops/second, which is a <5% regression as opposed to a >15% regression. That is acceptable given that the original commit greatly reduces our latency to begin with. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Checksums are charged in 2 different ways. The first case is when we're writing to the disk, we account for the new checksums with the delalloc block rsv. In order for this to work we check if we're allocating a block for the csum root and if trans->block_rsv == the delalloc block rsv. But when we're deleting the csums because of cow, this is charged to the global block rsv, and is done when we run the delayed refs. So we need to make sure that trans->block_rsv == NULL when running the delayed refs. So set it to NULL and reset it in should_end_transaction, and set it to NULL in commit_transaction. This got rid of the ridiculous amount of warnings I was seeing when trying to do a balance. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
The only thing that we need to have a trans handle for is in reserve_metadata_bytes and thats to know how much flushing we can do. So instead of passing it around, just check current->journal_info for a trans_handle so we know if we can commit a transaction to try and free up space or not. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
The alloc warnings everybody has been seeing is because we have been reserving space for csums, but we weren't actually using that space. So make get_block_rsv() return the trans->block_rsv if we're modifying the csum root. Also set the trans->block_rsv to NULL so that if we modify the csum root when running delayed ref's that comes out of the global reserve like it's supposed to. With this patch I'm not seeing those alloc warnings anymore. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If you run xfstest 224 it you will get lots of messages about not being able to delete inodes and that they will be cleaned up next mount. This is because btrfs_block_rsv_check was not calling reserve_metadata_bytes with the ability to flush, so if there was not enough space, it simply failed. But in truncate and evict case we could easily flush space to try and get enough space to do our work, so make btrfs_block_rsv_check take a flush argument to pass down to reserve_metadata_bytes. Now xfstests 224 runs fine without all those complaints. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This patch kills off the calculation for the amount of space needed for the orphan operations during a snapshot. The thing is we only do snapshots on commit, so any space that is in the block_rsv->freed[] isn't going to be in the new snapshot anyway, so there isn't any reason to require that space to be reserved for the snapshot to occur. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 11 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
At the beginning of create_pending_snapshot, trans->block_rsv is set to pending->block_rsv and is used for snapshot things, however, when it is done, we do not recover it as will. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 02 8月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
wait_for_commit() always returns 0. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
Use wait_event() when possible to avoid code duplication. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 28 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Hit this nice little deadlock. What happens is this __btrfs_end_transaction with throttle set, --use_count so it equals 0 btrfs_commit_transaction <somebody else actually manages to start the commit> btrfs_end_transaction --use_count so now its -1 <== BAD we just return and wait on the transaction This is bad because we just return after our use_count is -1 and don't let go of our num_writer count on the transaction, so the guy committing the transaction just sits there forever. Fix this by inc'ing our use_count if we're going to call commit_transaction so that if we call btrfs_end_transaction it's valid. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 11 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have to do weird things when handling enospc in the transaction joining code. Because we've already joined the transaction we cannot commit the transaction within the reservation code since it will deadlock, so we have to return EAGAIN and then make sure we don't retry too many times. Instead of doing this, just do the reservation the normal way before we join the transaction, that way we can do whatever we want to try and reclaim space, and then if it fails we know for sure we are out of space and we can return ENOSPC. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 18 6月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Snapshot creation has two phases. One is the initial snapshot setup, and the second is done during commit, while nobody is allowed to modify the root we are snapshotting. The delayed metadata insertion code can break that rule, it does a delayed inode update on the inode of the parent of the snapshot, and delayed directory item insertion. This makes sure to run the pending delayed operations before we record the snapshot root, which avoids corruptions. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The recent commit to get rid of our trans_mutex introduced some races with block group relocation. The problem is that relocation needs to do some record keeping about each root, and it was relying on the transaction mutex to coordinate things in subtle ways. This fix adds a mutex just for the relocation code and makes sure it doesn't have a big impact on normal operations. The race is really fixed in btrfs_record_root_in_trans, which is where we step back and wait for the relocation code to finish accounting setup. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 16 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We can lockup if we try to allow new writers join the transaction and we have flushoncommit set or have a pending snapshot. This is because we set no_trans_join and then loop around and try to wait for ordered extents again. The problem is the ordered endio stuff needs to join the transaction, which it can't do because no_trans_join is set. So instead wait until after this loop to set no_trans_join and then make sure to wait for num_writers == 1 in case anybody got started in between us exiting the loop and setting no_trans_join. This could easily be reproduced by mounting -o flushoncommit and running xfstest 13. It cannot be reproduced with this patch. Thanks, Reported-by: NJim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 11 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Normally current->jouranl_info is cleared by commit_transaction. For an async snap or subvol creation, though, it runs in a work queue. Clear it in btrfs_commit_transaction_async() to avoid leaking a non-NULL journal_info when we return to userspace. When the actual commit runs in the other thread it won't care that it's current->journal_info is already NULL. Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Tested-by: NJim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-