- 05 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sinan Kaya 提交于
acpi_irq_get_penalty is now calculating the penalty on the fly now. No need to maintain global list of penalties or calculate them at the init time. Removing duplicate code in acpi_irq_penalty_init. Signed-off-by: NSinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 17 10月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Use common interface to simplify ACPI PCI host bridge implementation. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Reset acpi_root_dev->domain to 0 when pci_ignore_seg is set to keep consistence between ACPI PCI root device and PCI host bridge device. Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 18 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
We enable _CRS on all systems from 2008 and later. On older systems, we ignore _CRS and assume the whole physical address space (excluding RAM and other devices) is available for PCI devices, but on systems that support physical address spaces larger than 4GB, it's doubtful that the area above 4GB is really available for PCI. After d56dbf5b ("PCI: Allocate 64-bit BARs above 4G when possible"), we try to use that space above 4GB *first*, so we're more likely to put a device there. On Juan's Toshiba Satellite Pro U200, BIOS left the graphics, sound, 1394, and card reader devices unassigned (but only after Windows had been booted). Only the sound device had a 64-bit BAR, so it was the only device placed above 4GB, and hence the only device that didn't work. Keep _CRS enabled even on pre-2008 systems if they support physical address space larger than 4GB. Fixes: d56dbf5b ("PCI: Allocate 64-bit BARs above 4G when possible") Reported-and-tested-by: NJuan Dayer <jdayer@outlook.com> Reported-and-tested-by: NAlan Horsfield <alan@hazelgarth.co.uk> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99221 Link: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=907092Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.14+
-
- 10 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
The Foxconn K8M890-8237A has two PCI host bridges, and we can't assign resources correctly without the information from _CRS that tells us which address ranges are claimed by which bridge. In the bugs mentioned below, we incorrectly assign a sound card address (this example is from 1033299): bus: 00 index 2 [mem 0x80000000-0xfcffffffff] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain 0000 [bus 00-7f]) pci_root PNP0A08:00: host bridge window [mem 0x80000000-0xbfefffff] (ignored) pci_root PNP0A08:00: host bridge window [mem 0xc0000000-0xdfffffff] (ignored) pci_root PNP0A08:00: host bridge window [mem 0xf0000000-0xfebfffff] (ignored) ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI1] (domain 0000 [bus 80-ff]) pci_root PNP0A08:01: host bridge window [mem 0xbff00000-0xbfffffff] (ignored) pci 0000:80:01.0: [1106:3288] type 0 class 0x000403 pci 0000:80:01.0: reg 10: [mem 0xbfffc000-0xbfffffff 64bit] pci 0000:80:01.0: address space collision: [mem 0xbfffc000-0xbfffffff 64bit] conflicts with PCI Bus #00 [mem 0x80000000-0xfcffffffff] pci 0000:80:01.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xfd00000000-0xfd00003fff 64bit] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc90000378000 IP: [<ffffffffa0345f63>] azx_create+0x37c/0x822 [snd_hda_intel] We assigned 0xfd_0000_0000, but that is not in any of the host bridge windows, and the sound card doesn't work. Turn on pci=use_crs automatically for this system. Link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/931368 Link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1033299Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 28 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit 97badf87 (device property: Make it possible to use secondary firmware nodes) uncovered a bug in the x86 (and ia64) PCI host bridge initialization code that assumes bridge->bus->sysdata to always point to a struct pci_sysdata object which need not be the case (in particular, the Xen PCI frontend driver sets it to point to a different data type). If it is not the case, an incorrect pointer (or a piece of data that is not a pointer at all) will be passed to ACPI_COMPANION_SET() and that may cause interesting breakage to happen going forward. To work around this problem use the observation that the ACPI host bridge initialization always passes NULL as parent to pci_create_root_bus(), so if pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() sees a non-NULL parent of the bridge, it should not attempt to set an ACPI companion for it, because that means that pci_create_root_bus() has been called by someone else. Fixes: 97badf87 (device property: Make it possible to use secondary firmware nodes) Reported-and-tested-by: NSander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 01 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
An IO port or MMIO resource assigned to a PCI host bridge may be consumed by the host bridge itself or available to its child bus/devices. The ACPI specification defines a bit (Producer/Consumer) to tell whether the resource is consumed by the host bridge itself, but firmware hasn't used that bit consistently, so we can't rely on it. Before commit 593669c2 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation"), arch/x86/pci/acpi.c ignored all IO port resources defined by acpi_resource_io and acpi_resource_fixed_io to filter out IO ports consumed by the host bridge itself. Commit 593669c2 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation") started accepting all IO port and MMIO resources, which caused a regression that IO port resources consumed by the host bridge itself became available to its child devices. Then commit 63f1789e ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Ignore resources consumed by host bridge itself") ignored resources consumed by the host bridge itself by checking the IORESOURCE_WINDOW flag, which accidently removed MMIO resources defined by acpi_resource_memory24, acpi_resource_memory32 and acpi_resource_fixed_memory32. On x86 and IA64 platforms, all IO port and MMIO resources are assumed to be available to child bus/devices except one special case: IO port [0xCF8-0xCFF] is consumed by the host bridge itself to access PCI configuration space. So explicitly filter out PCI CFG IO ports[0xCF8-0xCFF]. This solution will also ease the way to consolidate ACPI PCI host bridge common code from x86, ia64 and ARM64. Related ACPI table are archived at: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94221 Related discussions at: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/461633/ https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/29/304 Fixes: 63f1789e (Ignore resources consumed by host bridge itself) Reported-by: NBernhard Thaler <bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at> Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: 4.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+ Reviewed-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 04 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
When parsing resources for PCI host bridge, we should ignore resources consumed by host bridge itself and only report window resources available to child PCI busses. Fixes: 593669c2 (x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces ...) Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 05 2月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Use common ACPI resource discovery interfaces to simplify PCI host bridge resource enumeration. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
The range check in setup_res() checks the IO range against iomem_resource. That's just wrong. Reworked based on Thomas original patch. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
struct acpi_resource_address and struct acpi_resource_extended_address64 share substracts just at different offsets. To unify the parsing functions, OSPMs like Linux need a new ACPI_ADDRESS64_ATTRIBUTE as their substructs, so they can extract the shared data. This patch also synchronizes the structure changes to the Linux kernel. The usages are searched by matching the following keywords: 1. acpi_resource_address 2. acpi_resource_extended_address 3. ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_ADDRESS 4. ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_ADDRESS And we found and fixed the usages in the following files: arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-ext.c arch/ia64/pci/pci.c arch/x86/pci/acpi.c arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c drivers/xen/xen-acpi-memhotplug.c drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c drivers/acpi/pci_root.c drivers/acpi/resource.c drivers/char/hpet.c drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c Build tests are passed with defconfig/allnoconfig/allyesconfig and defconfig+CONFIG_ACPI=n. Original-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Original-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 22 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Use kmalloc_node() instead of kmalloc() when possible to optimize for performance on NUMA platforms. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1402302011-23642-6-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 22 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Myron Stowe 提交于
The vast majority of platforms are not supplying ACPI _PXM (proximity) information corresponding to host bridge (PNP0A03/PNP0A08) devices resulting in sysfs "numa_node" values of -1 (NUMA_NO_NODE): # for i in /sys/devices/pci0000\:00/*/numa_node; do cat $i; done | uniq -1 # find /sys/ -name "numa_node" | while read fname; do cat $fname; \ done | uniq -1 AMD based platforms provide a fall-back for this situation via amd_bus.c. These platforms snoop out the information by directly reading specific registers from the Northbridge and caching them via alloc_pci_root_info(). Later during boot processing when host bridges are discovered - pci_acpi_scan_root() - the kernel looks for their corresponding ACPI _PXM method - drivers/acpi/numa.c::acpi_get_node(). If the BIOS supplied a _PXM method then that node (proximity) value is associated. If the BIOS did not supply a _PXM method *and* the platform is AMD-based, the fall-back cached values obtained directly from the Northbridge are used; otherwise, "NUMA_NO_NODE" is associated. There are a number of issues with this fall-back mechanism the most notable being that amd_bus.c extracts a 3-bit number from a CPU register and uses it as the node number. The node numbers used by Linux are logical and there's no reason they need to be identical to settings in the CPU registers. So if we have some node information obtained in the normal way (from _PXM, SLIT, SRAT, etc.) and some from amd_bus.c, there's no reason to believe they will be compatible. This patch warns when this situation occurs: pci_root PNP0A08:00: [Firmware Bug]: no _PXM; falling back to node 0 from hardware (may be inconsistent with ACPI node numbers) Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72051Signed-off-by: NMyron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 13 2月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Consistently put the function type, name, and parameters on one line, wrapping only as necessary. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Reword comments so they make sense. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 04 2月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
The PCI host bridge code doesn't care about _PXM values directly; it only needs to know what NUMA node the hardware is on. This uses acpi_get_node() directly and removes the _PXM stuff. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
NUMA_NO_NODE is the usual value for "we don't know what node this is on," e.g., it is the error return from acpi_get_node(). This changes uses of -1 to NUMA_NO_NODE. NUMA_NO_NODE is #defined to be -1 already, so this is not a functional change. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
There are no callers of get_mp_bus_to_node(), so we no longer need mp_bus_to_node[], get_mp_bus_to_node(), or set_mp_bus_to_node(). This removes them. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
This replaces all uses of get_mp_bus_to_node() with x86_pci_root_bus_node(). I think these uses are all on root buses, except possibly for blind probing, where NUMA node information is unimportant. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify struct acpi_dev_node to contain a pointer to struct acpi_device associated with the given device object (that is, its ACPI companion device) instead of an ACPI handle corresponding to it. Introduce two new macros for manipulating that pointer in a CONFIG_ACPI-safe way, ACPI_COMPANION() and ACPI_COMPANION_SET(), and rework the ACPI_HANDLE() macro to take the above changes into account. Drop the ACPI_HANDLE_SET() macro entirely and rework its users to use ACPI_COMPANION_SET() instead. For some of them who used to pass the result of acpi_get_child() directly to ACPI_HANDLE_SET() introduce a helper routine acpi_preset_companion() doing an equivalent thing. The main motivation for doing this is that there are things represented by struct acpi_device objects that don't have valid ACPI handles (so called fixed ACPI hardware features, such as power and sleep buttons) and we would like to create platform device objects for them and "glue" them to their ACPI companions in the usual way (which currently is impossible due to the lack of valid ACPI handles). However, there are more reasons why it may be useful. First, struct acpi_device pointers allow of much better type checking than void pointers which are ACPI handles, so it should be more difficult to write buggy code using modified struct acpi_dev_node and the new macros. Second, the change should help to reduce (over time) the number of places in which the result of ACPI_HANDLE() is passed to acpi_bus_get_device() in order to obtain a pointer to the struct acpi_device associated with the given "physical" device, because now that pointer is returned by ACPI_COMPANION() directly. Finally, the change should make it easier to write generic code that will build both for CONFIG_ACPI set and unset without adding explicit compiler directives to it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> # on Haswell Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA and SDIO part
-
- 10 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Neyman 提交于
Previously we coalesced windows by expanding the first overlapping one and making the second invalid. But we never look at the expanded first window again, so we fail to notice other windows that overlap it. For example, we coalesced these: [io 0x0000-0x03af] // #0 [io 0x03e0-0x0cf7] // #1 [io 0x0000-0xdfff] // #2 into these, which still overlap: [io 0x0000-0xdfff] // #0 [io 0x03e0-0x0cf7] // #1 The fix is to expand the *second* overlapping resource and ignore the first, so we get this instead with no overlaps: [io 0x0000-0xdfff] // #2 [bhelgaas: changelog] Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62511Signed-off-by: NAlexey Neyman <stilor@att.net> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 23 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Based on a patch by Jon Mason (see URL below). All users of pcie_bus_configure_settings() pass arguments of the form "bus, bus->self->pcie_mpss". The "mpss" argument is redundant since we can easily look it up internally. In addition, all callers check "bus->self" for NULL, which we can also do internally. This patch simplifies the interface and the callers. No functional change. Reference: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317048850-30728-2-git-send-email-mason@myri.comSigned-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
We should increase info->res_num before we checking pci_use_crs return when pci=nocrs set. No functional change, since we don't use res_num and res_offset[] in the "!pci_use_crs" case anyway, but this makes the code read better. Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
-
- 14 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI handles of PCI root bridges need to be known to acpi_bind_one(), so that it can create the appropriate "firmware_node" and "physical_node" files for them, but currently the way it gets to know those handles is not exactly straightforward (to put it lightly). This is how it works, roughly: 1. acpi_bus_scan() finds the handle of a PCI root bridge, creates a struct acpi_device object for it and passes that object to acpi_pci_root_add(). 2. acpi_pci_root_add() creates a struct acpi_pci_root object, populates its "device" field with its argument's address (device->handle is the ACPI handle found in step 1). 3. The struct acpi_pci_root object created in step 2 is passed to pci_acpi_scan_root() and used to get resources that are passed to pci_create_root_bus(). 4. pci_create_root_bus() creates a struct pci_host_bridge object and passes its "dev" member to device_register(). 5. platform_notify(), which for systems with ACPI is set to acpi_platform_notify(), is called. So far, so good. Now it starts to be "interesting". 6. acpi_find_bridge_device() is used to find the ACPI handle of the given device (which is the PCI root bridge) and executes acpi_pci_find_root_bridge(), among other things, for the given device object. 7. acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() uses the name (sic!) of the given device object to extract the segment and bus numbers of the PCI root bridge and passes them to acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle(). 8. acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() browses the list of ACPI PCI root bridges and finds the one that matches the given segment and bus numbers. Its handle is then used to initialize the ACPI handle of the PCI root bridge's device object by acpi_bind_one(). However, this is *exactly* the ACPI handle we started with in step 1. Needless to say, this is quite embarassing, but it may be avoided thanks to commit f3fd0c8a (ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be initialized in advance), which makes it possible to initialize the ACPI handle of a device before passing it to device_register(). Accordingly, add a new __weak routine, pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(), defaulting to an empty implementation that can be replaced by the interested architecutres (x86 and ia64 at the moment) with functions that will set the root bridge's ACPI handle before its dev member is passed to device_register(). Make both x86 and ia64 provide such implementations of pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() and remove acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() and acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() that aren't necessary any more. Included is a fix for breakage on systems with non-ACPI PCI host bridges from Bjorn Helgaas. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 04 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option. As a result, the __dev* markings need to be removed. This change removes the use of __devinit, __devexit_p, __devinitconst, and __devexit from these drivers. Based on patches originally written by Bill Pemberton, but redone by me in order to handle some of the coding style issues better, by hand. Cc: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 16 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
This reverts commit 0a290ac4 on the basis of the following comment from Bjorn Helgaas: Here's my reasoning: this is a CheckPoint product, and it looks like an appliance, not really a general-purpose machine. The issue has apparently been there from day one, and the kernel shipped on the machine complains noisily about the issue, but apparently nobody bothered to investigate it. This corruption will clearly break other ACPI-related things. We can sort of work around this one (though the workaround does prevent us from doing any PCI resource reassignment), but we have no idea what the other lurking ACPI issues are (and we have no assurance that *only* ACPI things are broken -- maybe the memory corruption affects other unknown things). It may take significant debugging effort to identify the next problem. The only report I've seen (this one) is apparently from a CheckPoint employee, so it's not clear that anybody else is trying to run upstream Linux on it. Being a CheckPoint employee, [...] is probably in a position to get the BIOS fixed. You might still be able to convince me, but it seems like the benefit to a quirk for this platform is small, and it does cost everybody else something in code size and complexity. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47981#c36Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Feng Tang 提交于
This is to fix a regression https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47981 The CheckPoint P-20-00 works ok before new machines (2008 and later) are forced to use the bridge _CRS info by default in 2.6.34. Add this quirk to restore its old way of working: not using bridge _CRS info. Signed-off-by: NFeng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 08 11月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Yoknis 提交于
The memory range descriptors in the _CRS control method contain an address translation offset for host bridges. This value is used to translate addresses across the bridge. The support to use _TRA values is present for other architectures but not for X86 platforms. For existing X86 platforms the _TRA value is zero. Non-zero _TRA values are expected on future X86 platforms. This change will register that value with the resource. Signed-off-by: NMike Yoknis <mike.yoknis@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
The xw9300 BIOS supplies _SEG methods that are incorrect, which results in some LSI SCSI devices not being discovered. This adds a quirk to ignore _SEG on this machine and default to zero. The xw9300 has three host bridges: ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain 0000 [bus 00-3f]) ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI1] (domain 0001 [bus 40-7f]) ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI2] (domain 0002 [bus 80-ff]) When the BIOS "ACPI Bus Segmentation" option is enabled (as it is by default), the _SEG methods of the PCI1 and PCI2 bridges return 1 and 2, respectively. However, the BIOS implementation appears to be incomplete, and we can't enumerate devices in those domains. But if we assume PCI1 and PCI2 really lead to buses in domain 0, everything works fine. Windows XP and Vista also seem to ignore these _SEG methods. Reference: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543308 Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15362Reported-and-Tested-by: NSean M. Pappalardo <pegasus@renegadetech.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 22 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Use kzalloc() so the struct resource doesn't contain garbage in fields we don't initialize. [bhelgaas: changelog] Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: x86@kernel.org
-
- 23 6月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
For each resource of a PCI host bridge, the arch code and PCI code log following messages. We don't need both, so drop the arch-specific printing. pci_root PNP0A08:00: host bridge window [io 0x0000-0x03af] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x0000-0x03af] Reviewed-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
This patch enhances x86 arch-specific code to update MMCONFIG information when PCI host bridge hotplug event happens. Reviewed-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 14 6月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Add the host bridge bus number aperture from _CRS to the resource list. Like the MMIO and I/O port apertures, this will be used when assigning resources to hot-added devices or in the case of conflicts. Note that we always use the _CRS bus number aperture, even if we're ignoring _CRS otherwise. [bhelgaas: changelog] Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Replace the struct pci_bus secondary/subordinate members with the struct resource busn_res. Later we'll build a resource tree of these bus numbers. [bhelgaas: changelog] Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 08 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yang 提交于
Add resource_overlaps(), which returns true if two resources overlap at all. Use this to replace the complicated check in coalesce_windows(). Signed-Off-By: NWei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 01 5月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Embed the x86 struct pci_sysdata in the struct pci_root_info so it will be automatically freed in the remove path. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
We now keep the pci_root_info struct for the entire lifetime of the host bridge, so just embed the name in the struct rather than allocating it separately. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
1. Allocate pci_root_info instead of using stack. We need to pass around info for release function. 2. Add release_pci_root_info 3. Set x86 host bridge release function to make sure root bridge related resources get freed during root bus removal. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Rename get_current_resources() to probe_pci_root_info. 1. Remove resource list head from pci_root_info 2. Make get_current_resources() not pass resources 3. Rename get_current_resources() to probe_pci_root_info() Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-