1. 20 3月, 2014 2 次提交
  2. 19 3月, 2014 2 次提交
  3. 18 3月, 2014 12 次提交
  4. 08 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • D
      SUNRPC: Fix oops when trace sunrpc_task events in nfs client · 2ca310fc
      Ditang Chen 提交于
      When tracking sunrpc_task events in nfs client, the clnt pointer may be NULL.
      
      [  139.269266] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000004
      [  139.269915] IP: [<ffffffffa026f216>] ftrace_raw_event_rpc_task_running+0x86/0xf0 [sunrpc]
      [  139.269915] PGD 1d293067 PUD 1d294067 PMD 0
      [  139.269915] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
      [  139.269915] Modules linked in: nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs lockd sunrpc fscache sg ppdev e1000
      serio_raw pcspkr parport_pc parport i2c_piix4 i2c_core microcode xfs libcrc32c sd_mod sr_mod
      cdrom ata_generic crc_t10dif crct10dif_common pata_acpi ahci libahci ata_piix libata dm_mirror
      dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
      [  139.269915] CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 3.10.0-84.el7.x86_64 #1
      [  139.269915] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
      [  139.269915] Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
      [  139.269915] task: ffff88001b598000 ti: ffff88001b632000 task.ti: ffff88001b632000
      [  139.269915] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa026f216>]  [<ffffffffa026f216>] ftrace_raw_event_rpc_task_running+0x86/0xf0 [sunrpc]
      [  139.269915] RSP: 0018:ffff88001b633d70  EFLAGS: 00010206
      [  139.269915] RAX: ffff88001dfc5338 RBX: ffff88001cc37a00 RCX: ffff88001dfc5334
      [  139.269915] RDX: ffff88001dfc5338 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88001dfc533c
      [  139.269915] RBP: ffff88001b633db0 R08: 000000000000002c R09: 000000000000000a
      [  139.269915] R10: 0000000000062180 R11: 00000020759fb9dc R12: ffffffffa0292c20
      [  139.269915] R13: ffff88001dfc5334 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
      [  139.269915] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88001fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [  139.269915] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
      [  139.269915] CR2: 0000000000000004 CR3: 000000001d290000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
      [  139.269915] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
      [  139.269915] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
      [  139.269915] Stack:
      [  139.269915]  000000001b633d98 0000000000000246 ffff88001df1dc00 ffff88001cc37a00
      [  139.269915]  ffff88001bc35e60 0000000000000000 ffff88001ffa0a48 ffff88001bc35ee0
      [  139.269915]  ffff88001b633e08 ffffffffa02704b5 0000000000010000 ffff88001cc37a70
      [  139.269915] Call Trace:
      [  139.269915]  [<ffffffffa02704b5>] __rpc_execute+0x1d5/0x400 [sunrpc]
      [  139.269915]  [<ffffffffa0270706>] rpc_async_schedule+0x26/0x30 [sunrpc]
      [  139.269915]  [<ffffffff8107867b>] process_one_work+0x17b/0x460
      [  139.269915]  [<ffffffff8107942b>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x400
      [  139.269915]  [<ffffffff81079310>] ? rescuer_thread+0x3e0/0x3e0
      [  139.269915]  [<ffffffff8107fc80>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
      [  139.269915]  [<ffffffff8107fbc0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110
      [  139.269915]  [<ffffffff815d122c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
      [  139.269915]  [<ffffffff8107fbc0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110
      [  139.269915] Code: 4c 8b 45 c8 48 8d 7d d0 89 4d c4 41 89 c9 b9 28 00 00 00 e8 9d b4 e9
      e0 48 85 c0 49 89 c5 74 a2 48 89 c7 e8 9d 3f e9 e0 48 89 c2 <41> 8b 46 04 48 8b 7d d0 4c
      89 e9 4c 89 e6 89 42 0c 0f b7 83 d4
      [  139.269915] RIP  [<ffffffffa026f216>] ftrace_raw_event_rpc_task_running+0x86/0xf0 [sunrpc]
      [  139.269915]  RSP <ffff88001b633d70>
      [  139.269915] CR2: 0000000000000004
      [  140.946406] ---[ end trace ba486328b98d7622 ]---
      Signed-off-by: NDitang Chen <chendt.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      2ca310fc
  5. 06 3月, 2014 4 次提交
  6. 03 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 02 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  8. 20 2月, 2014 7 次提交
  9. 19 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  10. 18 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 17 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  12. 12 2月, 2014 3 次提交
  13. 11 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  14. 10 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      NFS: Do not set NFS_INO_INVALID_LABEL unless server supports labeled NFS · fd1defc2
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      Commit aa9c2669 (NFS: Client implementation of Labeled-NFS) introduces
      a performance regression. When nfs_zap_caches_locked is called, it sets
      the NFS_INO_INVALID_LABEL flag irrespectively of whether or not the
      NFS server supports security labels. Since that flag is never cleared,
      it means that all calls to nfs_revalidate_inode() will now trigger
      an on-the-wire GETATTR call.
      
      This patch ensures that we never set the NFS_INO_INVALID_LABEL unless the
      server advertises support for labeled NFS.
      It also causes nfs_setsecurity() to clear NFS_INO_INVALID_LABEL when it
      has successfully set the security label for the inode.
      Finally it gets rid of the NFS_INO_INVALID_LABEL cruft from nfs_update_inode,
      which has nothing to do with labeled NFS.
      Reported-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.11+
      Tested-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      fd1defc2