This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip
to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on
container_of().
Acked-by: NWilliam Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both
by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and
for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip
is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several
steps of dereferencing necessary.

Make things simpler: include the fields directly into
<linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and
get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix
some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper
kerneldoc while we're at it.

Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct
gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all
container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and
registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data().

Cc: arm@kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Acked-by: NGregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NLiviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Acked-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Acked-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

In the same spirit as we add an optional void *data argument
to the gpiochip_add_data() call, we need this also for
of_mm_gpiochip_add().
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

This adds a void * pointer to gpio_chip so that driver can
assign and retrieve some states. This is done to get rid of
container_of() calls for gpio_chips embedded inside state
containers, so we can remove the need to have the gpio_chip
or later (planned) struct gpio_device be dynamically allocated
at registration time, so that its struct device can be properly
reference counted and not bound to its parent device (e.g.
a platform_device) but instead live on after unregistration
if it is opened by e.g. a char device or sysfs.

The data is added with the new function gpiochip_add_data()
and for compatibility we add static inline wrapper function
gpiochip_add() that will call gpiochip_add_data() with
NULL as argument. The latter will be removed once we have
exorcised gpiochip_add() from the kernel.

gpiochip_get_data() is added as a static inline accessor
for drivers to quickly get their data out.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

irq_domain_add_legacy() returns NULL on error, it doesn't return error
pointers.

Fixes: 384ca3c6 ('gpio: pxa: change the interrupt management')
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

cppcheck reports this:

(style) int result is returned as long value. If the return
value is long to avoid loss of information, then you have
loss of information.

This can be fixed with (1UL << pin) but that is the same
as using <linux/bitops.h> that already use 1UL so take
this approach.
Reported-by: NDavid Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
Acked-by: NTomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

This fixes up:
commit 464231fb
"pinctrl: ssbi-gpio: Be sure to clamp return value"
commit b9164f04
"gpio: ssbi-mpp: Be sure to clamp return value"
as I managed to screw up some of the logic when clamping
the return values.

Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn@kryo.se>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

We were getting build warning about "iterator" being used uninitialized.
Use iterator properly to fix the build warning and in the process remove
the variable "pos" which is not required now.
Signed-off-by: NSudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

This reverts commit 45ad7db9.

We have fixed all the drivers that were returning ambious values
not clamped to [0,1] or an error code, so return the error
propagating behaviour of the API.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: NChen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

This code was also double-inverting a bool which makes no sense
so I removed that code and moved clamping toward the end.

Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Also, this code was double-inverting a bool. That makes no
sense whatsoever, so I removed the double-invert.

Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Cc: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>
Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: NJames Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: NJames Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

This also makes the driver start to return the error code, as the
end of the series make this work.

Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

This also starts to propagate the error code from the I2C
transaction as the end of the series adds support for that.

Cc: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@csr.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Cc: Daniel Krueger <daniel.krueger@systec-electronic.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Also start returning the error code if something fails, as the
end of the series augment the core to support this.

Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: George Cherian <george.cherian@ti.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: NMathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@dsn.okisemi.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Also start to propagate the error code here as the end of the
series fixes this to work for all drivers.

Cc: Semen Protsenko <semen.protsenko@globallogic.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: NNicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Brunner Michael <Michael.Brunner@kontron.com>
Reviewed-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Ira W. Snyder <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: NDavid Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@kpitcummins.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>