1. 07 2月, 2016 2 次提交
  2. 30 1月, 2016 4 次提交
  3. 24 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  4. 21 11月, 2015 2 次提交
  5. 27 10月, 2015 2 次提交
  6. 24 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 22 10月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      clk: Add a basic multiplier clock · f2e0a532
      Maxime Ripard 提交于
      Some clocks are using a multiplier component, however, unlike their mux,
      gate or divider counterpart, these factors don't have a basic clock
      implementation.
      
      This leads to code duplication across platforms that want to use that kind
      of clocks, and the impossibility to use the composite clocks with such a
      clock without defining your own rate operations.
      
      Create such a driver in order to remove these issues, and hopefully factor
      the implementations, reducing code size across platforms and consolidating
      the various implementations.
      Signed-off-by: NMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
      f2e0a532
  8. 17 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 03 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  10. 25 8月, 2015 3 次提交
  11. 29 7月, 2015 3 次提交
  12. 28 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • B
      clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate() prototype · 0817b62c
      Boris Brezillon 提交于
      Clock rates are stored in an unsigned long field, but ->determine_rate()
      (which returns a rounded rate from a requested one) returns a long
      value (errors are reported using negative error codes), which can lead
      to long overflow if the clock rate exceed 2Ghz.
      
      Change ->determine_rate() prototype to return 0 or an error code, and pass
      a pointer to a clk_rate_request structure containing the expected target
      rate and the rate constraints imposed by clk users.
      
      The clk_rate_request structure might be extended in the future to contain
      other kind of constraints like the rounding policy, the maximum clock
      inaccuracy or other things that are not yet supported by the CCF
      (power consumption constraints ?).
      Signed-off-by: NBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
      CC: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      CC: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      CC: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
      CC: "Emilio López" <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
      CC: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
      Acked-by: NTero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
      CC: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
      CC: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
      CC: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
      CC: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
      CC: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
      CC: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
      CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
      CC: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
      CC: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
      CC: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
      [sboyd@codeaurora.org: Fix parent dereference problem in
      __clk_determine_rate()]
      Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
      Tested-by: NRomain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NHeiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
      [sboyd@codeaurora.org: Folded in fix from Heiko for fixed-rate
      clocks without parents or a rate determining op]
      Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
      0817b62c
  13. 21 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  14. 07 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 21 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • B
      clk: add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES clock flag for Exynos cpu clock support · d8d91987
      Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 提交于
      This flag is needed to fix the issue with wrong dividers being setup
      by Common Clock Framework when using the new Exynos cpu clock support.
      
      The issue happens because clk_core_set_rate_nolock()  calls
      clk_calc_new_rates(clk, rate) before both pre/post clock notifiers have
      a chance to run.  In case of Exynos cpu clock support pre/post clock
      notifiers are registered for mout_apll clock which is a parent of armclk
      cpu clock and dividers are modified in both pre and post clock notifier.
      This results in wrong dividers values being later programmed by
      clk_change_rate(top).  To workaround the problem CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES
      flag is added and it is set for mout_apll clock later so the correct
      divider values are re-calculated after both pre and post clock notifiers
      had run.
      
      For example when using "performance" governor on Exynos4210 Origen board
      the cpufreq-dt driver requests to change the frequency from 1000MHz to
      1200MHz and after the change state of the relevant clocks is following:
      
      Without use of CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE flag:
      
       fout_apll rate: 1200000000
               fout_apll_div_2 rate: 600000000
                       mout_clkout_cpu rate: 600000000
                               div_clkout_cpu rate: 600000000
                                       clkout_cpu rate: 600000000
               mout_apll rate: 1200000000
                       armclk rate: 1200000000
                       mout_hpm rate: 1200000000
                               div_copy rate: 300000000
                                       div_hpm rate: 300000000
                       mout_core rate: 1200000000
                               div_core rate: 1200000000
                                       div_core2 rate: 1200000000
                                               arm_clk_div_2 rate: 600000000
                                               div_corem0 rate: 300000000
                                               div_corem1 rate: 150000000
                                               div_periph rate: 300000000
                               div_atb rate: 300000000
                                       div_pclk_dbg rate: 150000000
                       sclk_apll rate: 1200000000
                               sclk_apll_div_2 rate: 600000000
      
      With use of CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE flag:
      
       fout_apll rate: 1200000000
               fout_apll_div_2 rate: 600000000
                       mout_clkout_cpu rate: 600000000
                               div_clkout_cpu rate: 600000000
                                       clkout_cpu rate: 600000000
               mout_apll rate: 1200000000
                       armclk rate: 1200000000
                       mout_hpm rate: 1200000000
                               div_copy rate: 200000000
                                       div_hpm rate: 200000000
                       mout_core rate: 1200000000
                               div_core rate: 1200000000
                                       div_core2 rate: 1200000000
                                               arm_clk_div_2 rate: 600000000
                                               div_corem0 rate: 300000000
                                               div_corem1 rate: 150000000
                                               div_periph rate: 300000000
                               div_atb rate: 240000000
                                       div_pclk_dbg rate: 120000000
                       sclk_apll rate: 150000000
                               sclk_apll_div_2 rate: 75000000
      
      Without this change cpufreq-dt driver showed ~10 mA larger energy
      consumption when compared to cpufreq-exynos one when "performance"
      cpufreq governor was used on Exynos4210 SoC based Origen board.
      
      This issue was probably meant to be workarounded by use of
      CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE and CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY clock flags in
      the original Exynos cpu clock patchset (in "[PATCH v12 6/6] clk:
      samsung: remove unused clock aliases and update clock flags" patch)
      but usage of these flags is not sufficient to fix the issue observed.
      
      Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
      Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
      Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
      Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMichael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
      d8d91987
  16. 11 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 06 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  18. 13 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  19. 06 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  20. 11 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  21. 19 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  22. 03 2月, 2015 2 次提交
  23. 28 1月, 2015 2 次提交
  24. 18 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  25. 04 12月, 2014 4 次提交