- 04 5月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Florian Ragwitz 提交于
In older versions of the elantech hardware/firmware those bits always were unset, so it didn't actually matter, but newer versions seem to use those high bits for something else, screwing up the coordinates we report to the input layer for those devices. Signed-off-by: NFlorian Ragwitz <rafl@debian.org> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
-
由 Florian Ragwitz 提交于
Apparently hardware vendors now ship elantech touchpads with different version magic. This options allows for them to be tested easier with the current driver in order to add their magic to the whitelist later. Signed-off-by: NFlorian Ragwitz <rafl@debian.org> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
-
由 Florian Ragwitz 提交于
The check determining whether device should use 4- or 6-byte packets was trying to compare firmware with 2.48, but was failing on majors greater than 2. The new check ensures that versions like 4.1 are checked properly. Signed-off-by: NFlorian Ragwitz <rafl@debian.org> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
-
- 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
-
- 20 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Torokhov 提交于
Elantech touchpads work in absolute mode and do not generate relative events so they should not be advertising them. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
-
- 11 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Torokhov 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
-
- 19 4月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Arjan Opmeer 提交于
There exist laptops with Elantech touchpads where switching to absolute mode does not happen, although writing the configuration register succeeds without error. Reading back the register afterwards reveils that the absolute mode bit is not set as if masked out by the touchpad firmware. Always read back register 0x10, make sure that for hardware version 1 the absolute mode bit is actually set and fail otherwise. This prevents the case where the touchpad is claimed by the Elantech driver but is nonetheless not working. Signed-off-by: NArjan Opmeer <arjan@opmeer.net> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
-
由 Arjan Opmeer 提交于
It seems that Elantech touchpad firmware version 2.34 on the Hercules eCAFÉ suffers from a problem where bogus coordinates get reported at the beginning of a touch action. This causes the mouse cursor or the scrolled page to jump. Included patch provides a workaround that discards mouse packets that are likely to contain bogus coordinates. The workaround is activated when we detect touchpad with fimware version 2.34. Signed-off-by: NArjan Opmeer <arjan@opmeer.net> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
-
- 01 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arjan Opmeer 提交于
Some Logitech mice react to the magic knock like Elantech touchpad would. This leads to those mice being misdetected as Elantech touchpads. Add a version query to elantech_detect() to distinguish the two. [dtor@mail.ru: - lower severity of some messages - when we are not sure yet if device is Elantech or not not responding to knock is not an error. ] Signed-off-by: NArjan Opmeer <arjan@opmeer.net> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
-
- 17 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arjan Opmeer 提交于
This is version 5 of the driver. Relative mode support has been dropped (users wishing to use touchpad in relative mode can use standard PS/2 protocol emulation done in hardware). The driver supports both original version of Elantech protocol and the newer one used by touchpads installed in EeePC. Signed-off-by: NArjan Opmeer <arjan@opmeer.net> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
-