- 23 6月, 2015 22 次提交
-
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Now that everything above has been converted to use request structures, it is possible to update the lower level move_to_active() functions to be request based as well. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Now that all callers of i915_add_request() have a request pointer to hand, it is possible to update the add request function to take a request pointer rather than pulling it out of the OLR. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The plan is to pass requests around as the basic submission tracking structure rather than rings and contexts. This patch updates the i915_gem_object_sync() code path. v2: Much more complex patch to share a single request between the sync and the page flip. The _sync() function now supports lazy allocation of the request structure. That is, if one is passed in then that will be used. If one is not, then a request will be allocated and passed back out. Note that the _sync() code does not necessarily require a request. Thus one will only be created until certain situations. The reason the lazy allocation must be done within the _sync() code itself is because the decision to need one or not is not really something that code above can second guess (except in the case where one is definitely not required because no ring is passed in). The call chains above _sync() now support passing a request through which most callers passing in NULL and assuming that no request will be required (because they also pass in NULL for the ring and therefore can't be generating any ring code). The exeception is intel_crtc_page_flip() which now supports having a request returned from _sync(). If one is, then that request is shared by the page flip (if the page flip is of a type to need a request). If _sync() does not generate a request but the page flip does need one, then the page flip path will create its own request. v3: Updated comment description to be clearer about 'to_req' parameter (Tomas Elf review request). Rebased onto newer tree that significantly changed the synchronisation code. v4: Updated comments from review feedback (Tomas Elf) For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated the two render_state_init() functions to take a request pointer instead of a ring. This removes their reliance on the OLR. v2: Rebased to newer tree. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Now that everything above has been converted to use requests, it is possible to update init_context() to take a request pointer instead of a ring/context pair. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
In execlist mode, context initialisation is deferred until first use of the given context. This is because execlist mode has per ring context state and thus many more context storage objects than legacy mode and many are never actually used. Previously, the initialisation commands were written to the ring and tagged with some random request structure via the OLR. This seemed to be causing a null pointer deference bug under certain circumstances (BZ:88865). This patch adds explicit request creation and submission to the deferred initialisation code path. Thus removing any reliance on or randomness caused by the OLR. Note that it should be possible to move the deferred context creation until even later - when the context is actually switched to rather than when it is merely validated. This would allow the initialisation to be done within the request of the work that is wanting to use the context. Hence, the extra request that is created, used and retired just for the context init could be removed completely. However, this is left for a follow up patch. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Now that a single per ring loop is being done for all the different intialisation steps in i915_gem_init_hw(), it is possible to add proper request management as well. The last remaining issue is that the context enable call eventually ends up within *_render_state_init() and this does its own private _i915_add_request() call. This patch adds explicit request creation and submission to the top level loop and removes the add_request() from deep within the sub-functions. v2: Updated for removal of batch_obj from add_request call in previous patch. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The render state initialisation code does an explicit i915_add_request() call to commit the init commands. It was passing in the initialisation batch buffer to add_request() as the batch object parameter. However, the batch object entry in the request structure (which is all that parameter is used for) is meant for keeping track of user generated batch buffers for blame tagging during GPU hangs. This patch clears the batch object parameter so that kernel generated batch buffers are not tagged as being user generated. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
In order to explcitly track all GPU work (and completely remove the outstanding lazy request), it is necessary to add extra i915_add_request() calls to various places. Some of these do not need the implicit cache flush done as part of the standard batch buffer submission process. This patch adds a flag to _add_request() to specify whether the flush is required or not. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The plan is to pass requests around as the basic submission tracking structure rather than rings and contexts. This patch updates the execbuffer_move_to_active() code path. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The plan is to pass requests around as the basic submission tracking structure rather than rings and contexts. This patch updates the move_to_gpu() code paths. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated a couple of trace points to use the now cached request pointer rather than extracting it from the ring. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The alloc_request() function does not actually return the newly allocated request. Instead, it must be pulled from ring->outstanding_lazy_request. This patch fixes this so that code can create a request and start using it knowing exactly which request it actually owns. v2: Updated for new i915_gem_request_alloc() scheme. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Shrunk the parameter list of i915_gem_execbuffer_retire_commands() to a single structure as everything it requires is available in the execbuff_params object. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The do_execbuf() function takes quite a few parameters. The actual set of parameters is going to change with the conversion to passing requests around. Further, it is due to grow massively with the arrival of the GPU scheduler. This patch simplifies the prototype by passing a parameter structure instead. Changing the parameter set in the future is then simply a matter of adding/removing items to the structure. Note that the structure does not contain absolutely everything that is passed in. This is because the intention is to use this structure more extensively later in this patch series and more especially in the GPU scheduler that is coming soon. The latter requires hanging on to the structure as the final hardware submission can be delayed until long after the execbuf IOCTL has returned to user land. Thus it is unsafe to put anything in the structure that is local to the IOCTL call itself - such as the 'args' parameter. All entries must be copies of data or pointers to structures that are reference counted in some way and guaranteed to exist for the duration of the batch buffer's life. v2: Rebased to newer tree and updated for changes to the command parser. Specifically, a code shuffle has required saving the batch start address in the params structure. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
In execlist mode, the context object pointer is written in to the request structure (and reference counted) at the point of request creation. In legacy mode, this only happens inside i915_add_request(). This patch updates the legacy code path to match the execlist version. This allows all the intermediate code between request creation and request submission to get at the context object given only a request structure. Thus negating the need to pass context pointers here, there and everywhere. v2: Moved the context reference so it does not need to be undone if the get_seqno() fails. v3: Fixed execlist mode always hitting a warning about invalid last_contexts (which don't exist in execlist mode). v4: Updated for new i915_gem_request_alloc() scheme. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The i915_add_request() function is called to keep track of work that has been written to the ring buffer. It adds epilogue commands to track progress (seqno updates and such), moves the request structure onto the right list and other such house keeping tasks. However, the work itself has already been written to the ring and will get executed whether or not the add request call succeeds. So no matter what goes wrong, there isn't a whole lot of point in failing the call. At the moment, this is fine(ish). If the add request does bail early on and not do the housekeeping, the request will still float around in the ring->outstanding_lazy_request field and be picked up next time. It means multiple pieces of work will be tagged as the same request and driver can't actually wait for the first piece of work until something else has been submitted. But it all sort of hangs together. This patch series is all about removing the OLR and guaranteeing that each piece of work gets its own personal request. That means that there is no more 'hoovering up of forgotten requests'. If the request does not get tracked then it will be leaked. Thus the add request call _must_ not fail. The previous patch should have already ensured that it _will_ not fail by removing the potential for running out of ring space. This patch enforces the rule by actually removing the early exit paths and the return code. Note that if something does manage to fail and the epilogue commands don't get written to the ring, the driver will still hang together. The request will be added to the tracking lists. And as in the old case, any subsequent work will generate a new seqno which will suffice for marking the old one as complete. v2: Improved WARNings (Tomas Elf review request). For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
It is a bad idea for i915_add_request() to fail. The work will already have been send to the ring and will be processed, but there will not be any tracking or management of that work. The only way the add request call can fail is if it can't write its epilogue commands to the ring (cache flushing, seqno updates, interrupt signalling). The reasons for that are mostly down to running out of ring buffer space and the problems associated with trying to get some more. This patch prevents that situation from happening in the first place. When a request is created, it marks sufficient space as reserved for the epilogue commands. Thus guaranteeing that by the time the epilogue is written, there will be plenty of space for it. Note that a ring_begin() call is required to actually reserve the space (and do any potential waiting). However, that is not currently done at request creation time. This is because the ring_begin() code can allocate a request. Hence calling begin() from the request allocation code would lead to infinite recursion! Later patches in this series remove the need for begin() to do the allocate. At that point, it becomes safe for the allocate to call begin() and really reserve the space. Until then, there is a potential for insufficient space to be available at the point of calling i915_add_request(). However, that would only be in the case where the request was created and immediately submitted without ever calling ring_begin() and adding any work to that request. Which should never happen. And even if it does, and if that request happens to fall down the tiny window of opportunity for failing due to being out of ring space then does it really matter because the request wasn't doing anything in the first place? v2: Updated the 'reserved space too small' warning to include the offending sizes. Added a 'cancel' operation to clean up when a request is abandoned. Added re-initialisation of tracking state after a buffer wrap to keep the sanity checks accurate. v3: Incremented the reserved size to accommodate Ironlake (after finally managing to run on an ILK system). Also fixed missing wrap code in LRC mode. v4: Added extra comment and removed duplicate WARN (feedback from Tomas). For: VIZ-5115 CC: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Arun Siluvery 提交于
In Indirect context w/a batch buffer, +WaFlushCoherentL3CacheLinesAtContextSwitch:bdw v2: Add LRI commands to set/reset bit that invalidates coherent lines, update WA to include programming restrictions and exclude CHV as it is not required (Ville) v3: Avoid unnecessary read when it can be done by reading register once (Chris). Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael Barbalho <rafael.barbalho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NArun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Arun Siluvery 提交于
In Indirect and Per context w/a batch buffer, +WaDisableCtxRestoreArbitration Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael Barbalho <rafael.barbalho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NArun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Arun Siluvery 提交于
Some of the WA applied using WA batch buffers perform writes to scratch page. In the current flow WA are initialized before scratch obj is allocated. This patch reorders intel_init_pipe_control() to have a valid scratch obj before we initialize WA. v2: Check for valid scratch page before initializing WA as some of them perform writes to it. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NArun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Arun Siluvery 提交于
Some of the WA are to be applied during context save but before restore and some at the end of context save/restore but before executing the instructions in the ring, WA batch buffers are created for this purpose and these WA cannot be applied using normal means. Each context has two registers to load the offsets of these batch buffers. If they are non-zero, HW understands that it need to execute these batches. v1: In this version two separate ring_buffer objects were used to load WA instructions for indirect and per context batch buffers and they were part of every context. v2: Chris suggested to include additional page in context and use it to load these WA instead of creating separate objects. This will simplify lot of things as we need not explicity pin/unpin them. Thomas Daniel further pointed that GuC is planning to use a similar setup to share data between GuC and driver and WA batch buffers can probably share that page. However after discussions with Dave who is implementing GuC changes, he suggested to use an independent page for the reasons - GuC area might grow and these WA are initialized only once and are not changed afterwards so we can share them share across all contexts. The page is updated with WA during render ring init. This has an advantage of not adding more special cases to default_context. We don't know upfront the number of WA we will applying using these batch buffers. For this reason the size was fixed earlier but it is not a good idea. To fix this, the functions that load instructions are modified to report the no of commands inserted and the size is now calculated after the batch is updated. A macro is introduced to add commands to these batch buffers which also checks for overflow and returns error. We have a full page dedicated for these WA so that should be sufficient for good number of WA, anything more means we have major issues. The list for Gen8 is small, same for Gen9 also, maybe few more gets added going forward but not close to filling entire page. Chris suggested a two-pass approach but we agreed to go with single page setup as it is a one-off routine and simpler code wins. One additional option is offset field which is helpful if we would like to have multiple batches at different offsets within the page and select them based on some criteria. This is not a requirement at this point but could help in future (Dave). Chris provided some helpful macros and suggestions which further simplified the code, they will also help in reducing code duplication when WA for other Gen are added. Add detailed comments explaining restrictions. Use do {} while(0) for wa_ctx_emit() macro. (Many thanks to Chris, Dave and Thomas for their reviews and inputs) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael Barbalho <rafael.barbalho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NArun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 27 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michel Thierry 提交于
commit 53292cdb ("drm/i915: Workaround to avoid lite restore with HEAD==TAIL") added a check for req0 != null which is unnecessary. The only way req0 could be null is if the list was empty, and this is already addressed at the beginning of execlists_context_unqueue(). Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 21 5月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
This trims a little overhead from the common case of not needing to synchronize between rings. v2: execlists is special and likes to duplicate code. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Currently, we only track the last request globally across all engines. This prevents us from issuing concurrent read requests on e.g. the RCS and BCS engines (or more likely the render and media engines). Without semaphores, we incur costly stalls as we synchronise between rings - greatly impacting the current performance of Broadwell versus Haswell in certain workloads (like video decode). With the introduction of reference counted requests, it is much easier to track the last request per ring, as well as the last global write request so that we can optimise inter-engine read read requests (as well as better optimise certain CPU waits). v2: Fix inverted readonly condition for nonblocking waits. v3: Handle non-continguous engine array after waits v4: Rebase, tidy, rewrite ring list debugging v5: Use obj->active as a bitfield, it looks cool v6: Micro-optimise, mostly involving moving code around v7: Fix retire-requests-upto for execlists (and multiple rq->ringbuf) v8: Rebase v9: Refactor i915_gem_object_sync() to allow the compiler to better optimise it. Benchmark: igt/gem_read_read_speed hsw:gt3e (with semaphores): Before: Time to read-read 1024k: 275.794µs After: Time to read-read 1024k: 123.260µs hsw:gt3e (w/o semaphores): Before: Time to read-read 1024k: 230.433µs After: Time to read-read 1024k: 124.593µs bdw-u (w/o semaphores): Before After Time to read-read 1x1: 26.274µs 10.350µs Time to read-read 128x128: 40.097µs 21.366µs Time to read-read 256x256: 77.087µs 42.608µs Time to read-read 512x512: 281.999µs 181.155µs Time to read-read 1024x1024: 1196.141µs 1118.223µs Time to read-read 2048x2048: 5639.072µs 5225.837µs Time to read-read 4096x4096: 22401.662µs 21137.067µs Time to read-read 8192x8192: 89617.735µs 85637.681µs Testcase: igt/gem_concurrent_blit (read-read and friends) Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> [v8] [danvet: s/\<rq\>/req/g] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 20 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Antoine 提交于
If an batch ends while the IRQs are not turned on the notification can go missing and the GPU can hang. So generate a warning in this case. Signed-off-by: NPeter Antoine <peter.antoine@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 08 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
We switched from calling i915_gem_alloc_context_obj() to calling i915_gem_alloc_object() so the error handling needs to be updated to check for NULL instead of IS_ERR(). Fixes: 149c86e7 ('drm/i915: Allocate context objects from stolen') Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 24 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michel Thierry 提交于
WaIdleLiteRestore is an execlists-only workaround, and requires the driver to ensure that any context always has HEAD!=TAIL when attempting lite restore. Add two extra MI_NOOP instructions at the end of each request, but keep the requests tail pointing before the MI_NOOPs. We may not need to executed them, and this is why request->tail is sampled before adding these extra instructions. If we submit a context to the ELSP which has previously been submitted, move the tail pointer past the MI_NOOPs. This ensures HEAD!=TAIL. v2: Move overallocation to gen8_emit_request, and added note about sampling request->tail in commit message (Chris). v3: Remove redundant request->tail assignment in __i915_add_request, in lrc mode this is already set in execlists_context_queue. Do not add wa implementation details inside gem (Chris). v4: Apply the wa whenever the req has been resubmitted and update comment (Chris). Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NThomas Daniel <thomas.daniel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 14 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
On GEN9+ per specification a NULL PIPE_CONTROL needs to be emitted before any PIPE_CONTROL command with the VS_INVALIDATE flag set. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NNick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 10 4月, 2015 11 次提交
-
-
由 Michel Thierry 提交于
After commit d7b9ca2f ("drm/i915: Remove request->uniq") dev_priv is no longer needed. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
As we never expose context objects directly to userspace, we can forgo allocating a first-class GEM object for them and prefer to use the limited resource of reserved/stolen memory for them. Note this means that their initial contents are undefined. However, a downside of using stolen objects for execlists is that we cannot access the physical address directly (thanks MCH!) which prevents their use. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We already assign a unique identifier to every request: seqno. That someone felt like adding a second one without even mentioning why and tweaking ABI smells very fishy. Fixes regression from commit b3a38998 Author: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com> Date: Thu Feb 19 16:30:47 2015 +0000 drm/i915: Fix a use after free, and unbalanced refcounting v2: Rebase Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Daniel <thomas.daniel@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> [danvet: Fixup because different merge order.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
This eliminates six needless spin lock/unlock pairs when writing out ELSP. v2: Respin with my preferred colour. v3: Mostly back to the original colour Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> [v1] Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Already tagged this one and 0-day builder is failing me. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
After the removal of DRI1, all access to the rings are through requests and so we can always be sure that there is a request to wait upon to free up available space. The fallback code only existed so that we could quiesce the GPU following unmediated access by DRI1. v2: Rebase Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
When we submit a request to the GPU, we first take the rpm wakelock, and only release it once the GPU has been idle for a small period of time after all requests have been complete. This means that we are sure no new interrupt can arrive whilst we do not hold the rpm wakelock and so can drop the individual get/put around every single request inside execlists. Note: to close one potential issue we should mark the GPU as busy earlier in __i915_add_request. To elaborate: The issue is that we emit the irq signalling sequence before we grab the rpm reference, which means we could miss the resulting interrupt (since that's not set up when suspended). The only bad side effect is a missed interrupt, gt mmio writes automatically wake up the hw itself. But otoh we have an umbrella rpm reference for the entirety of execbuf, as long as that's there we're covered. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> [danvet: Explain a bit more about the add_request issue, which after some irc chatting with Chris turns out to not be an issue really.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We can use the simpler spinlock form to disable interrupts as we are always outside of an irq/softirq handler. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Michel Thierry 提交于
This finishes off the dynamic page tables allocations, in the legacy 3 level style that already exists. Most everything has already been setup to this point, the patch finishes off the enabling by setting the appropriate function pointers. In LRC mode, contexts need to know the PDPs when they are populated. With dynamic page table allocations, these PDPs may not exist yet. Check if PDPs have been allocated and use the scratch page if they do not exist yet. Before submission, update the PDPs in the logic ring context as PDPs have been allocated. v2: Update aliasing/true ppgtt allocate/teardown/clear functions for gen 6 & 7. v3: Rebase. v4: Remove BUG() from ppgtt_unbind_vma, but keep checking that either teardown_va_range or clear_range functions exist (Daniel). v5: Similar to gen6, in init, gen8_ppgtt_clear_range call is only needed for aliasing ppgtt. Zombie tracking was originally added for teardown function and is no longer required. v6: Update err_out case in gen8_alloc_va_range (missed from lastest rebase). v7: Rebase after s/page_tables/page_table/. v8: Updated scratch_pt check after scratch flag was removed in previous patch. v9: Note that lrc mode needs to be updated to support init state without any PDP. v10: Unmap correct page_table in gen8_alloc_va_range's error case, clean-up gen8_aliasing_ppgtt_init (remove duplicated map), and initialize PTs during page table allocation. v11: Squashed LRC enabling commit, otherwise LRC mode would be left broken until it was updated to handle the init case without any PDP. v12: Do not overallocate new_pts bitmap, make alloc_gen8_temp_bitmaps static and don't abuse of inline functions. (Mika) Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> (v2+) Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Michel Thierry 提交于
When we do dynamic page table allocations for gen8, we'll need to have more control over how and when we map page tables, similar to gen6. In particular, DMA mappings for page directories/tables occur at allocation time. This patch adds the functionality and calls it at init, which should have no functional change. The PDPEs are still a special case for now. We'll need a function for that in the future as well. v2: Handle renamed unmap_and_free_page functions. v3: Updated after teardown_va logic was removed. v4: Rebase after s/page_tables/page_table/. v5: No longer allocate all PDPs in GEN8+ systems with less than 4GB of memory, and update populate_lr_context to handle this new case (proper tracking will be added later in the patch series). v6: Assign lrc page directory pointer addresses using a macro. (Mika) Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> (v2+) Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
I woke up one morning and found 50k objects sitting in the batch pool and every search seemed to iterate the entire list... Painting the screen in oils would provide a more fluid display. One issue with the current design is that we only check for retirements on the current ring when preparing to submit a new batch. This means that we can have thousands of "active" batches on another ring that we have to walk over. The simplest way to avoid that is to split the pools per ring and then our LRU execution ordering will also ensure that the inactive buffers remain at the front. v2: execlists still requires duplicate code. v3: execlists requires more duplicate code Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-