1. 18 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 19 8月, 2013 2 次提交
    • D
      drm: rip out drm_core_has_MTRR checks · 28185647
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      The new arch_phys_wc_add/del functions do the right thing both with
      and without MTRR support in the kernel. So we can drop these
      additional checks.
      
      David Herrmann suggest to also kill the DRIVER_USE_MTRR flag since
      it's now unused, which spurred me to do a bit a better audit of the
      affected drivers. David helped a lot in that. Quoting our mail
      discussion:
      
      On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:41 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> wrote:
      > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
      >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> wrote:
      >>>> -#if __OS_HAS_MTRR
      >>>> -static inline int drm_core_has_MTRR(struct drm_device *dev)
      >>>> -{
      >>>> -       return drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_USE_MTRR);
      >>>> -}
      >>>> -#else
      >>>> -#define drm_core_has_MTRR(dev) (0)
      >>>> -#endif
      >>>> -
      >>>
      >>> That was the last user of DRIVER_USE_MTRR (apart from drivers setting
      >>> it in .driver_features). Any reason to keep it around?
      >>
      >> Yeah, I guess we could rip things out. Which will also force me to
      >> properly audit drivers for the eventual behaviour change this could
      >> entail (in case there's an x86 driver which did not ask for an mtrr,
      >> but iirc there isn't).
      >
      > david@david-mb ~/dev/kernel/linux $ for i in drivers/gpu/drm/* ; do if
      > test -d "$i" ; then if ! grep -q USE_MTRR -r $i ; then echo $i ; fi ;
      > fi ; done
      > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos
      > drivers/gpu/drm/gma500
      > drivers/gpu/drm/i2c
      > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau
      > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm
      > drivers/gpu/drm/qxl
      > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du
      > drivers/gpu/drm/shmobile
      > drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc
      > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm
      > drivers/gpu/drm/udl
      > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx
      > david@david-mb ~/dev/kernel/linux $
      >
      > So for x86 gma500,nouveau,qxl,udl,vmwgfx don't set DRIVER_USE_MTRR.
      > But I cannot tell whether they break if we call arch_phys_wc_add/del,
      > anyway. At least nouveau seemed to work here, but it doesn't use AGP
      > or drm_bufs, I guess.
      
      Cool, thanks a lot for stitching together the list of drivers to look
      at. So for real KMS drivers it's the drives responsibility to add an
      mtrr if it needs one. nouvea, radeon, mgag200, i915 and vmwgfx do that
      already. Somehow the savage driver also ends up doing that, I have no
      idea why.
      
      Note that gma500 as a pure KMS driver doesn't need MTRR setup since
      the platforms that it supports all support PAT. So no MTRRs needed to
      get wc iomappings.
      
      The mtrr support in the drm core is all for legacy mappings of garts,
      framebuffers and registers. All legacy drivers set the USE_MTRR flag,
      so we're good there.
      
      All in all I think we can really just ditch this
      
      /endquote
      
      v2: Also kill DRIVER_USE_MTRR as suggested by David Herrmann
      
      v3: Rebase on top of David Herrmann's agp setup/cleanup changes.
      
      Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      Acked-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      28185647
    • D
      drm: remove FASYNC support · b0e898ac
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      So I've stumbled over drm_fasync and wondered what it does. Digging
      that up is quite a story.
      
      First I've had to read up on what this does and ended up being rather
      bewildered why peopled loved signals so much back in the days that
      they've created SIGIO just for that ...
      
      Then I wondered how this ever works, and what that strange "No-op."
      comment right above it should mean. After all calling the core fasync
      helper is pretty obviously not a noop. After reading through the
      kernels FASYNC implementation I've noticed that signals are only sent
      out to the processes attached with FASYNC by calling kill_fasync.
      
      No merged drm driver has ever done that.
      
      After more digging I've found out that the only driver that ever used
      this is the so called GAMMA driver. I've frankly never heard of such a
      gpu brand ever before. Now FASYNC seems to not have been the only bad
      thing with that driver, since Dave Airlie removed it from the drm
      driver with prejudice:
      
      commit 1430163b4bbf7b00367ea1066c1c5fe85dbeefed
      Author: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
      Date:   Sun Aug 29 12:04:35 2004 +0000
      
          Drop GAMMA DRM from a great height ...
      
      Long story short, the drm fasync support seems to be doing absolutely
      nothing. And the only user of it was never merged into the upstream
      kernel. And we don't need any fops->fasync callback since the fcntl
      implementation in the kernel already implements the noop case
      correctly.
      
      So stop this particular cargo-cult and rip it all out.
      
      v2: Kill drm_fasync assignments in rcar (newly added) and imx drivers
      (somehow I've missed that one in staging). Also drop the reference in
      the drm DocBook. ARM compile-fail reported by Rob Clark.
      
      v3: Move the removal of dev->buf_asnyc assignment in drm_setup to this
      patch here.
      
      v4: Actually git add ... tsk.
      
      Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
      Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
      Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      b0e898ac
  3. 07 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 31 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 03 10月, 2012 2 次提交
  6. 06 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • K
      drm: use drm_compat_ioctl for 32-bit apps · 804d74ab
      Keith Packard 提交于
      Most of the DRM drivers appear to be missing the .compat_ioctl file
      operation entry necessary for 32-bit application compatibility.
      
      This patch  uses drm_compat_ioctl for all drivers which don't have
      their own, and which are using drm_ioctl for .unlocked_ioctl.
      
      This leaves drivers/gpu/drm/psb/psb_drv.c unchanged; it has a custom
      .unlocked_ioctl and will presumably need a custom .compat_ioctl as
      well.
      Signed-off-by: NKeith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
      804d74ab
  7. 20 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  8. 17 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 10 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  10. 20 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 11 11月, 2011 1 次提交
    • A
      drm: Make the per-driver file_operations struct const · e08e96de
      Arjan van de Ven 提交于
      From fdf1fdebaa00f81de18c227f32f8074c8b352d50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
      From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
      Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:06:07 -0700
      Subject: [PATCH] drm: Make the per-driver file_operations struct const
      
      The DRM layer keeps a copy of struct file_operations inside its
      big driver struct... which prevents it from being consistent and static.
      For consistency (and the general security objective of having such things
      static), it's desirable to get this fixed.
      
      This patch splits out the file_operations field to its own struct,
      which is then "static const", and just stick a pointer to this into
      the driver struct, making it more consistent with how the rest of the
      kernel does this.
      Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      e08e96de
  12. 01 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 14 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  14. 07 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  15. 16 9月, 2010 1 次提交
    • A
      drm: use noop_llseek · dc880abe
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      The drm device drivers currently allow seeking on the
      character device but never care about the actual
      file position.
      
      When we change the default llseek operation to be
      no_llseek, calling llseek on a drm device would
      return an error condition, which is an API change.
      
      Explicitly setting noop_llseek lets us keep the
      current API.
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
      Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
      dc880abe
  16. 30 8月, 2010 2 次提交
  17. 17 8月, 2010 1 次提交
    • D
      drm: block userspace under allocating buffer and having drivers overwrite it (v2) · 1b2f1489
      Dave Airlie 提交于
      With the current screwed but its ABI, ioctls for the drm, Linus pointed out that we could allow userspace to specify the allocation size, but we pass it to the driver which then uses it blindly to store a struct. Now if userspace specifies the allocation size as smaller than the driver needs, the driver can possibly overwrite memory.
      
      This patch restructures the driver ioctls so we store the structure size we are expecting, and make sure we allocate at least that size. The copy from/to userspace are still restricted to the size the user specifies, this allows ioctl structs to grow on both sides of the equation.
      
      Up until now we didn't really use the DRM_IOCTL defines in the kernel, so this cleans them up and adds them for nouveau.
      
      v2:
      fix nouveau pushbuf arg (thanks to Ben for pointing it out)
      Reported-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      1b2f1489
  18. 17 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  19. 01 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  20. 18 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  21. 18 12月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      drm: convert drm_ioctl to unlocked_ioctl · ed8b6704
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      drm_ioctl is called with the Big Kernel Lock held,
      which shows up very high in statistics on vfs_ioctl.
      
      Moving the lock into the drm_ioctl function itself
      makes sure we blame the right subsystem and it gets
      us one step closer to eliminating the locked version
      of fops->ioctl.
      
      Since drm_ioctl does not require the lock itself,
      we only need to hold it while calling the specific
      handler. The 32 bit conversion handlers do not
      interact with any other code, so they don't need
      the BKL here either and can just call drm_ioctl.
      
      As a bonus, this cleans up all the other users
      of drm_ioctl which now no longer have to find
      the inode or call lock_kernel.
      
      [airlied: squashed the non-driver bits
      of the second patch in here, this provides
      the flag for drivers to use to select unlocked
      ioctls - but doesn't modify any drivers].
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
      Cc: dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
      Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      ed8b6704
  22. 19 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  23. 13 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  24. 14 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • D
      drm: reorganise drm tree to be more future proof. · c0e09200
      Dave Airlie 提交于
      With the coming of kernel based modesetting and the memory manager stuff,
      the everything in one directory approach was getting very ugly and
      starting to be unmanageable.
      
      This restructures the drm along the lines of other kernel components.
      
      It creates a drivers/gpu/drm directory and moves the hw drivers into
      subdirectores. It moves the includes into an include/drm, and
      sets up the unifdef for the userspace headers we should be exporting.
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      c0e09200