- 30 8月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently we don't support xattrs with e_value_block set. We don't allow them to pass initial xattr check so there's no point for checking for this later. Since these tests were untested, bugs were creeping in and not all places which should have checked were checking e_value_block anyway. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently we don't support xattrs with values stored out of line. Check for that in ext4_xattr_check_names() to make sure we never work with such xattrs since not all the code counts with that resulting is possible weird corruption issues. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Conditions checking whether there is enough free space in an xattr block and when xattr is large enough to make enough space in the inode forgot to account for the fact that inode need not be completely filled up with xattrs. Thus we could move unnecessarily many xattrs out of inode or even falsely claim there is not enough space to expand the inode. We also forgot to update the amount of free space in xattr block when moving more xattrs and thus could decide to move too big xattr resulting in unexpected failure. Fix these problems by properly updating free space in the inode and xattr block as we move xattrs. To simplify the math, avoid shifting xattrs after removing each one xattr and instead just shift xattrs only once there is enough free space in the inode. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 12 8月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When we need to move xattrs into external xattr block, we call ext4_xattr_block_set() from ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea(). That may end up calling ext4_mark_inode_dirty() again which will recurse back into the inode expansion code leading to deadlocks. Protect from recursion using EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND inode flag and move its management into ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() since its manipulation is safe there (due to xattr_sem) from possible races with ext4_xattr_set_handle() which plays with it as well. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
We did not count with the padding of xattr value when computing desired shift of xattrs in the inode when expanding i_extra_isize. As a result we could create unaligned start of inline xattrs. Account for alignment properly. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x- Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 11 8月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When multiple xattrs need to be moved out of inode, we did not properly recompute total size of xattr headers in the inode and the new header position. Thus when moving the second and further xattr we asked ext4_xattr_shift_entries() to move too much and from the wrong place, resulting in possible xattr value corruption or general memory corruption. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
The code in ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() treated new_extra_isize argument sometimes as the desired target i_extra_isize and sometimes as the amount by which we need to grow current i_extra_isize. These happen to coincide when i_extra_isize is 0 which used to be the common case and so nobody noticed this until recently when we added i_projid to the inode and so i_extra_isize now needs to grow from 28 to 32 bytes. The result of these bugs was that we sometimes unnecessarily decided to move xattrs out of inode even if there was enough space and we often ended up corrupting in-inode xattrs because arguments to ext4_xattr_shift_entries() were just wrong. This could demonstrate itself as BUG_ON in ext4_xattr_shift_entries() triggering. Fix the problem by introducing new isize_diff variable and use it where appropriate. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x Reported-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daeho Jeong 提交于
We temporally change checksum fields in buffers of some types of metadata into '0' for verifying the checksum values. By doing this without locking the buffer, some metadata's checksums, which are being committed or written back to the storage, could be damaged. In our test, several metadata blocks were found with damaged metadata checksum value during recovery process. When we only verify the checksum value, we have to avoid modifying checksum fields directly. Signed-off-by: NDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NYoungjin Gil <youngjin.gil@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
-
- 23 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
We aren't checking to see if the in-inode extended attribute is corrupted before we try to expand the inode's extra isize fields. This can lead to potential crashes caused by the BUG_ON() check in ext4_xattr_shift_entries(). Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 2月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Gruenbacher 提交于
To reduce amount of damage caused by single bad block, we limit number of inodes sharing an xattr block to 1024. Thus there can be more xattr blocks with the same contents when there are lots of files with the same extended attributes. These xattr blocks naturally result in hash collisions and can form long hash chains and we unnecessarily check each such block only to find out we cannot use it because it is already shared by too many inodes. Add a reusable flag to cache entries which is cleared when a cache entry has reached its maximum refcount. Cache entries which are not marked reusable are skipped by mb_cache_entry_find_{first,next}. This significantly speeds up mbcache when there are many same xattr blocks. For example for xattr-bench with 5 values and each process handling 20000 files, the run for 64 processes is 25x faster with this patch. Even for 8 processes the speedup is almost 3x. We have also verified that for situations where there is only one xattr block of each kind, the patch doesn't have a measurable cost. [JK: Remove handling of setting the same value since it is not needed anymore, check for races in e_reusable setting, improve changelog, add measurements] Signed-off-by: NAndreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When someone tried to set xattr to the same value (i.e., not changing anything) we did all the work of removing original xattr, possibly breaking references to shared xattr block, inserting new xattr, and merging xattr blocks again. Since this is not so rare operation and it is relatively cheap for us to detect this case, check for this and shortcut xattr setting in that case. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Since old mbcache code is gone, let's rename new code to mbcache since number 2 is now meaningless. This is just a mechanical replacement. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
The conversion is generally straightforward. The only tricky part is that xattr block corresponding to found mbcache entry can get freed before we get buffer lock for that block. So we have to check whether the entry is still valid after getting buffer lock. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 07 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 14 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Gruenbacher 提交于
Change the list operation to only return whether or not an attribute should be listed. Copying the attribute names into the buffer is moved to the callers. Since the result only depends on the dentry and not on the attribute name, we do not pass the attribute name to list operations. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 14 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Gruenbacher 提交于
The xattr_handler operations are currently all passed a file system specific flags value which the operations can use to disambiguate between different handlers; some file systems use that to distinguish the xattr namespace, for example. In some oprations, it would be useful to also have access to the handler prefix. To allow that, pass a pointer to the handler to operations instead of the flags value alone. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 18 10月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Create separate predicate functions to test/set/clear feature flags, thereby replacing the wordy old macros. Furthermore, clean out the places where we open-coded feature tests. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Instead of overloading EIO for CRC errors and corrupt structures, return the same error codes that XFS returns for the same issues. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
that's the bulk of filesystem drivers dealing with inodes of their own Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 03 4月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yuan 提交于
In this if statement, the previous condition is useless, the later one has covered it. Signed-off-by: NWeiyuan <weiyuan.wei@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
-
由 Sheng Yong 提交于
Remove unused header files and header files which are included in ext4.h. Signed-off-by: NSheng Yong <shengyong1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Besides the fact that this replacement improves code readability it also protects from errors caused direct EXT4_S(sb)->s_es manipulation which may result attempt to use uninitialized csum machinery. #Testcase_BEGIN IMG=/dev/ram0 MNT=/mnt mkfs.ext4 $IMG mount $IMG $MNT #Enable feature directly on disk, on mounted fs tune2fs -O metadata_csum $IMG # Provoke metadata update, likey result in OOPS touch $MNT/test umount $MNT #Testcase_END # Replacement script @@ expression E; @@ - EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(E, EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM) + ext4_has_metadata_csum(E) https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82201Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 17 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
When loading extended attributes, check each entry's value offset to make sure it doesn't collide with the entries. Without this check it is easy to crash the kernel by mounting a malicious FS containing a file with an EA wherein e_value_offs = 0 and e_value_size > 0 and then deleting the EA, which corrupts the name list. (See the f_ea_value_crash test's FS image in e2fsprogs for an example.) Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 05 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED flag was originally implemented because it was too hard to make sure the mballoc and get_block flags could be reliably passed down through all of the codepaths that end up calling ext4_mb_new_blocks(). Since then, we have mb_flags passed down through most of the code paths, so getting rid of EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED isn't as tricky as it used to. This commit plumbs in the last of what is required, and then adds a WARN_ON check to make sure we haven't missed anything. If this passes a full regression test run, we can then drop EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED. Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 13 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 liang xie 提交于
Make them more consistently Signed-off-by: Nxieliang <xieliang@xiaomi.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 12 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhang Zhen 提交于
In ext4_xattr_set_handle() we have checked the xattr name's length. So we should also check it in ext4_xattr_get() to avoid unneeded lookup caused by invalid name. Signed-off-by: NZhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 07 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When heavily exercising xattr code the assertion that jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() shouldn't return error was triggered: WARNING: at /srv/autobuild-ceph/gitbuilder.git/build/fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1237 jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x1ba/0x260() CPU: 0 PID: 8877 Comm: ceph-osd Tainted: G W 3.10.0-ceph-00049-g68d04c9 #1 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R410/01V648, BIOS 1.6.3 02/07/2011 ffffffff81a1d3c8 ffff880214469928 ffffffff816311b0 ffff880214469968 ffffffff8103fae0 ffff880214469958 ffff880170a9dc30 ffff8802240fbe80 0000000000000000 ffff88020b366000 ffff8802256e7510 ffff880214469978 Call Trace: [<ffffffff816311b0>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [<ffffffff8103fae0>] warn_slowpath_common+0x70/0xa0 [<ffffffff8103fb2a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [<ffffffff81267c2a>] jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x1ba/0x260 [<ffffffff81245093>] __ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0xa3/0x140 [<ffffffff812561f3>] ext4_xattr_release_block+0x103/0x1f0 [<ffffffff81256680>] ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1e0/0x910 [<ffffffff8125795b>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x38b/0x4a0 [<ffffffff810a319d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffff81257b32>] ext4_xattr_set+0xc2/0x140 [<ffffffff81258547>] ext4_xattr_user_set+0x47/0x50 [<ffffffff811935ce>] generic_setxattr+0x6e/0x90 [<ffffffff81193ecb>] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x7b/0x1c0 [<ffffffff811940d4>] vfs_setxattr+0xc4/0xd0 [<ffffffff8119421e>] setxattr+0x13e/0x1e0 [<ffffffff811719c7>] ? __sb_start_write+0xe7/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8118f2e8>] ? mnt_want_write_file+0x28/0x60 [<ffffffff8118c65c>] ? fget_light+0x3c/0x130 [<ffffffff8118f2e8>] ? mnt_want_write_file+0x28/0x60 [<ffffffff8118f1f8>] ? __mnt_want_write+0x58/0x70 [<ffffffff811946be>] SyS_fsetxattr+0xbe/0x100 [<ffffffff816407c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b The reason for the warning is that buffer_head passed into jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() didn't have journal_head attached. This is caused by the following race of two ext4_xattr_release_block() calls: CPU1 CPU2 ext4_xattr_release_block() ext4_xattr_release_block() lock_buffer(bh); /* False */ if (BHDR(bh)->h_refcount == cpu_to_le32(1)) } else { le32_add_cpu(&BHDR(bh)->h_refcount, -1); unlock_buffer(bh); lock_buffer(bh); /* True */ if (BHDR(bh)->h_refcount == cpu_to_le32(1)) get_bh(bh); ext4_free_blocks() ... jbd2_journal_forget() jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() -> JH is gone error = ext4_handle_dirty_xattr_block(handle, inode, bh); -> triggers the warning We fix the problem by moving ext4_handle_dirty_xattr_block() under the buffer lock. Sadly this cannot be done in nojournal mode as that function can call sync_dirty_buffer() which would deadlock. Luckily in nojournal mode the race is harmless (we only dirty already freed buffer) and thus for nojournal mode we leave the dirtying outside of the buffer lock. Reported-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 19 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 T Makphaibulchoke 提交于
This patch adds new interfaces to create and destory cache, ext4_xattr_create_cache() and ext4_xattr_destroy_cache(), and remove the cache creation and destory calls from ex4_init_xattr() and ext4_exitxattr() in fs/ext4/xattr.c. fs/ext4/super.c has been changed so that when a filesystem is mounted a cache is allocated and attched to its ext4_sb_info structure. fs/mbcache.c has been changed so that only one slab allocator is allocated and used by all mbcache structures. Signed-off-by: NT. Makphaibulchoke <tmac@hp.com>
-
- 20 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The function ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() doesn't need the size of all of the extended attribute headers. So if we don't calculate it when it is unneeded, it we can skip some undeeded memory references, and as a bonus, we eliminate some kvetching by static code analysis tools. Addresses-Coverity-Id: #741291 Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 01 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 13 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
If we take the 2nd retry path in ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea, we potentionally return from the function without having freed these allocations. If we don't do the return, we over-write the previous allocation pointers, so we leak either way. Spotted with Coverity. [ Fixed by tytso to set is and bs to NULL after freeing these pointers, in case in the retry loop we later end up triggering an error causing a jump to cleanup, at which point we could have a double free bug. -- Ted ] Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@fedoraproject.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 10 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
None of these result in any bug, but they makes sparse complain. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 19 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently when new xattr block is created or released we we would call dquot_free_block() or dquot_alloc_block() respectively, among the else decrementing or incrementing the number of blocks assigned to the inode by one block. This however does not work for bigalloc file system because we always allocate/free the whole cluster so we have to count with that in dquot_free_block() and dquot_alloc_block() as well. Use the clusters-to-blocks conversion EXT4_C2B() when passing number of blocks to the dquot_alloc/free functions to fix the problem. The problem has been revealed by xfstests #117 (and possibly others). Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 10 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Operations which modify extended attributes may need extra journal credits if inline data is used, since there is a chance that some extended attributes may need to get pushed to an external attribute block. Changes to reflect this was made in xattr.c, but they were missed in fs/ext4/acl.c. To fix this, abstract the calculation of the number of credits needed for xattr operations to an inline function defined in ext4_jbd2.h, and use it in acl.c and xattr.c. Also move the function declarations used in inline.c from xattr.h (where they are non-obviously hidden, and caused problems since ext4_jbd2.h needs to use the function ext4_has_inline_data), and move them to ext4.h. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 09 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
So we can better understand what bits of ext4 are responsible for long-running jbd2 handles, use jbd2__journal_start() so we can pass context information for logging purposes. The recommended way for finding the longer-running handles is: T=/sys/kernel/debug/tracing EVENT=$T/events/jbd2/jbd2_handle_stats echo "interval > 5" > $EVENT/filter echo 1 > $EVENT/enable ./run-my-fs-benchmark cat $T/trace > /tmp/problem-handles This will list handles that were active for longer than 20ms. Having longer-running handles is bad, because a commit started at the wrong time could stall for those 20+ milliseconds, which could delay an fsync() or an O_SYNC operation. Here is an example line from the trace file describing a handle which lived on for 311 jiffies, or over 1.2 seconds: postmark-2917 [000] .... 196.435786: jbd2_handle_stats: dev 254,32 tid 570 type 2 line_no 2541 interval 311 sync 0 requested_blocks 1 dirtied_blocks 0 Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 1月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Because the function 'sb_getblk' seldomly fails to return NULL value,it will be better to use 'unlikely' to optimize it. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The only reason for sb_getblk() failing is if it can't allocate the buffer_head. So ENOMEM is more appropriate than EIO. In addition, make sure that the file system is marked as being inconsistent if sb_getblk() fails. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 11 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Not all architectures (in particular, sparc64) have empty_zero_page. So instead of copying from empty_zero_page, use memset to clear the inline data by signalling to ext4_xattr_set_entry() via a magic pointer value, EXT4_ZERO_ATTR_VALUE, which is defined by casting -1 to a pointer. This fixes a build failure on sparc64, and the memset() should be more efficient than using memcpy() anyway. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-